259
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Feeling at home in an experiential research group: reflections on the research process in collaborative pluralism

, , , , , & show all

References

  • Andreassen, R., and L. Myong. 2017. Race, gender, and researcher positionality analysed through memory work. Nordic Journal of Migration 7:97–104. doi:10.1515/njmr-2017-0011.
  • Berg, A. J. 2008. Silence and articulation—whiteness, racialization and feminist memory work. NORA—Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies 16:213–27. doi:10.1080/08038740802446492.
  • Bryman, A. 2007. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1):8–22. doi:10.1177/2345678906290531.
  • Cadman, K., L. Friend, S. Gannon, C. Ingleton, G. Koutroulis, C. McCormack, P. Mitchell, J. Onyx, K. O’Regan, S. Rocco, et al. 2001. Memory-workers doing memory-work on memory-work: Exploring unresolved power. In Memory-work: A critique (Working Paper Series, 20/01), ed. J. Small and J. Onyx. Sydney, Australia: School of Management, University of Technology. pp. 261–278.
  • Chamberlain, K., T. Cain, J. Sheridan, and A. Dupuis. 2011. Pluralism in qualitative research: From multiple methods to integrated methods. Qualitative Research in Psychology 8:151–69. doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.572730.
  • Clarke, N. J., M. E. Willis, J. S. Barnes, N. Caddick, J. Cromby, H. McDermott, and G. Wiltshire. 2015. Analytical pluralism in qualitative research: A meta-study. Qualitative Research in Psychology 12 (2):182–201.
  • Dempsey, M., S. Foley, N. Frost, R. Murphy, N. Willis, and S. Robinson. 2019. Am I lazy, a drama queen or depressed? A journey through a pluralistic approach to analysing accounts of depression posted to an Ireland-based website. Qualitative Research in Psychology 19 (2):473–93. doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1677833.
  • Doucet, A., and N. S. Mauthner. 2006. Feminist methodologies and epistemology. Handbook of 21st Century Sociology 2:36–43.
  • Finlay, L., and B. Gough. 2003. Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences. London: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Frost, N., and D. Bailey-Rodriguez. 2021. Doing qualitatively driven mixed methods and pluralistic qualitative research. In Enjoying research in counselling and psychotherapy, ed. S. Bager-Charleson and A. McBeath. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan/ Springer Nature. pp. 137–160.
  • Frost, N. A., V. Eatough, R. Shaw, K. L. Weille, E. Tzemou, and L. Baraitser. 2012. Pleasure, pain, and procrastination: Reflections on the experience of doing memory-work research. Qualitative Research in Psychology 9 (3):231–48. doi:10.1080/14780887.2010.500355.
  • Frost, N., S. M. Nolas, B. Brooks-Gordon, C. Esin, A. Holt, L. Mehdizadeh, and P. Shinebourne. 2010. Pluralism in qualitative research: The impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative Research 10 (4):441–60. doi:10.1177/1468794110366802.
  • Garrett, M. 2013. Tied to a tree: Culture and self-reflexivity. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43 (3):243–55.
  • Gillies, V., A. Harden, K. Johnson, P. Reavey, V. Strange, and C. Willig. 2004. Women’s collective constructions of embodied practices through memory work: Cartesian dualism in memories of sweating and pain. British Journal of Social Psychology 43:99–112. doi:10.1348/014466604322916006.
  • Gilligan, C. 2015. The listening guide method of psychological inquiry. Qualitative Psychology 2 (1):69–77. doi:10.1037/qup0000023.
  • Gilligan, C., R. Spencer, M. K. Weinberg, and T. Bertsch. 2003. On the listening guide: A voice-centered relational method. In Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design, ed. P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, and L. Yardley, 157–72. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Haggerty, K. D. 2003. Review essay: Ruminations on reflexivity. Current Sociology 51 (2):153–62.
  • Hamm, R. 2020. “De-romanticised and very different” models for distinguishing practical applications of collective memory-work. Other Education 9:53–90.
  • Haug, F. 1987. Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory. London, UK: Verso.
  • Haug, F. 1999. Female sexualization: A collective work of memory. In Interviews in Qualitative Research, ed. N. Verso.King, C. Horrocks, and J. Brooks, 2nd. vol. 25. London: Sage.
  • King, N., L. Finlay, P. Ashworth, J. A. Smith, D. Langdridge, and T. Butt. 2008. “Can’t really trust that, so what can I trust?”: A polyvocal, qualitative analysis of the psychology of mistrust. Qualitative Research in Psychology 5 (2):80–102.
  • Korsgaard, M. T., V. Larsen, and M. Wiberg. 2020. Thinking and researching inclusive education without a banister–visiting, listening and tact as a foundation for collective research on inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education 24:496–512. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1469680.
  • Lapadat, J. C. 2017. Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry 23 (8):589–603. doi:10.1177/1077800417704462.
  • Lazard, L., and J. McAvoy. 2020. Doing reflexivity in psychological research: What’s the point? What’s the practice? Qualitative Research in Psychology 17 (2):159–77. doi:10.1080/14780887.2017.1400144.
  • Madill, A., P. Flowers, N. Frost, and A. Locke. 2018. A meta-methodology to enhance pluralist qualitative research: One man’s use of socio-sexual media and midlife adjustment to HIV. Psychology & Health 33 (10):1209–28. doi:10.1080/08870446.2018.1475670.
  • Mauthner, N. S., and A. Doucet. 2003. Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology 37 (3):413–31.
  • Stephenson, N., and S. Kippax. 2017. Memory work. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, ed. C. Willig and W. Stainton Rogers, 141–156. London: Sage.
  • Willig, C. 2012. Qualitative interpretation and analysis in psychology. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.