An interactional analysis of Muslim women resisting discourses of othering through humour: an autoethnographic reflection of a critical micro-analytic approach

References

• Ali, N., and B. Whitham. 2021. Racial capitalism, Islamophobia, and austerity. International Political Sociology 15 (2):190–211. doi:10.1093/ips/olaa023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. 1988. Ethnomethodology: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology 14 (1):441–65. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.002301.
   Google Scholar
• Bhimji, F. 2009. Identities and agency in religious spheres: A study of British Muslim women’s experience. Gender, Place and Culture 16 (4):365–80. doi:10.1080/09663690903003850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilici, M. 2010. Muslim ethnic comedy: Inversions of Islamophobia. In Islamophobia/Islamophilia: Beyond the Politics of Enemy and Friend, ed.A. Shyrock, 195–208. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 1999a. Conversation analysis and the claims of naivety. Discourse & Society 10 (4):572–76. doi:10.1177/0957926599010004007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 1999b. Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society 10 (4):543–58. doi:10.1177/0957926599010004005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, R. 2018. The Internet Can’t Stop Cracking Jokes About Donald Trump’s Hair Blowing in the Wind. [online] Time. Available at: <https://time.com/5229937/donald-trump-wind-hair-photos/> [Accessed 28th November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Byng, M. D. 1998. Mediating discrimination: Resisting oppression among African-American Muslim women. Social Problems 45 (4):473–87. doi:10.2307/3097208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 1990. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, K. J. M. 2019. Natives: Race and class in the ruins of empire. London: Two roads.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. 1998. Race and criminalization: Black Americans and the punishment industry. In The house that race built, ed. W. Lubiano, 264–279. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• de Kok, B. C. 2008. The role of context in conversation analysis: Reviving an interest in ethno-methods. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (5):886–903. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranti, A. 1997. Ethnographic methods. Linguistic anthropology, 84–121. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• El-Khoury, L. J. 2012. ‘Being while black’: Resistance and the management of the self. Social Identities 18 (1):85–100. doi:10.1080/13504630.2012.629516.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L., and W. L. Moore. 2015. Impossible burdens: White institutions, emotional labor, and micro-resistance. Social Problems 62 (3):439–54. doi:10.1093/socpro/spv009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J., and J. E. Richardson. eds. 2018. The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. London:Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781315739342
   Google Scholar
• Haggins, B. 2007. Laughing mad: The black comic persona in post-soul America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 2001. Goffman, Garfinkel and conversation analysis. In Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader, ed. M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, 47–56. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, R. 1990. Ethnography and conversation analysis after Talking Culture. Research on Language & Social Interaction 24 (1–4):161–71. doi:10.1080/08351819009389336.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, H. 2016. Donald Trump’s ‘Tiny’ Hand Size Revealed as Online Graphic Invites You to Compare Palms with the Billionaire. [online] The Telegraph. Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/04/donald-trumps-tiny-hand-size-revealed—use-this-graphic-to-see/[Accessed 28th November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Howitt, D. 2016. Introduction to qualitative research methods in psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hylton, K. 2018. I’m not joking! The strategic use of humour in stories of racism. Ethnicities 18 (3):327–43. doi:10.1177/1468796817743998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, I. 2004. Hyper‐self‐reflexive development? Spivak on representing the Third world ‘other’. Third World Quarterly 25 (4):627–47. doi:10.1080/01436590410001678898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundnani, A. 2014. The Muslims are coming!: Islamophobia, extremism, and the domestic war on terror. London: Verso Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, J. N., Y. Cho, and C. R. Lochmiller. 2020. Learning to do qualitative data analysis: A starting point. Human Resource Development Review 19 (1):94–106. doi:10.1177/1534484320903890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor-Khan, S. 2022. Tangled in terror: Uprooting Islamophobia. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massoumi, N., T. Mills, and D. Miller, eds. 2017. What is Islamophobia?: Racism, social movements and the state. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meer, N. 2014. Islamophobia and postcolonialism: Continuity, Orientalism and Muslim consciousness. Patterns of Prejudice 48 (5):500–15. doi:10.1080/0031322X.2014.966960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qurashi, F. 2018. The Prevent strategy and the UK ‘war on terror’: Embedding infrastructures of surveillance in Muslim communities. Palgrave Communications 4 (1):1–13. doi:10.1057/s41599-017-0061-9.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, A. 2017. The UK counter-terrorism matrix: Structural racism and the case of Mahdi Hashi. In What is Islamophobia? Racism, social movements and the state, ed. <. Massoumi, <. Mills, and <. Miller, 74–96. Pluto Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1rfsndp.10
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, A. 2019. A virtue of disobedience. London: Unbound Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, A. 2002. Introduction ln Garfinkel, H., 2002. Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s Amorphism. Editor. Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group: Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Rossing, J. P. 2015. Emancipatory racial humor as critical public pedagogy: Subverting hegemonic racism. Communication, Culture & Critique 9 (4):614–32. doi:10.1111/cccr.12126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runneymede Trust. 1997. Islamophobia: A challenge for us all. London: Runnymede Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Runnymede Trust. 2017. Islamophobia: Still a challenge for us all. London: Runnymede Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Sabir, R. 2022. The suspect: Counterterrorism, Islam, and the security state. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed, T. 2016. Islamophobia and securitization: Religion, ethnicity and the female voice. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32680-1.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 1997. Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society 8 (2):165–87. doi:10.1177/0957926597008002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrikant, N. 2022. Membership categorization analysis of racism in an online discussion among neighbors. Language in Society 51 (2):237–58. doi:10.1017/S0047404520000846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. 2007. Comparative studies in conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 36 (1):229–44. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094313.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. 2011. Conversation analysis: An introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Song, M. 2012. Part of the British mainstream? British Muslim students and Islamic student associations. Journal of Youth Studies 15 (2):143–60. doi:10.1080/13676261.2011.630995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, M. J. 2008. Humor as a serious strategy of nonviolent resistance to oppression. Peace & Change 33 (2):167–90. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0130.2008.00488.x.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton-Rogers, W., and C. Willig. 2017a. Review and ProspectIn <. <. Willig and <. <. Stainton-Rogers. ed.vol. 2017. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, London: Sage 590–606. 10.4135/9781526405555.n34.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton-Rogers, W., and C. Willig. 2017b. IntroductionIn <. I. I. A. I. <. Willig and <. I. I. A. I. <. Stainton-Rogers. ed.vol. 2017. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, London: Sage. 10.4135/9781526405555.n1.
   Google Scholar
• Sue, D. W., C. M. Capodilupo, G. C. Torino, J. M. Bucceri, A. Holder, K. L. Nadal, and M. Esquilin. 2007. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist 62 (4):271. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. 2007. Doing conversation analysis. Sage Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9781849208895.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. 1984. Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pb.v.3.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. 1999. Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis. Discourse and Society 10 (4):459–60. doi:10.1177/0957926599010004001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. 2001. Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In Methods of critical discourse analysis, 95–120. London: Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9780857028020.n5.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. 2014. Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107775404.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, P., 2019. How Does Trump Maintain His Orange Glow?. [ online] Rollingstone. Available at: <https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-tan-789157/> [Accessed 28th November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Weatherall, A. 2016. Interpretative repertoires, conversation analysis and being critical. In Discursive psychology, ed. C. Tileaga and E. StokoE, 15–28. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315863054-2
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, S. 2010. The ‘other’ laughs back: Humour and resistance in anti-racist comedy. Sociology 44 (1):31–48. doi:10.1177/0038038509351624.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. 2012. Affect and emotion. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. 2014. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. In The Discursive turn in social psychology, ed. N. Bozatsis and T. Dragonas, 95–119. Chagrin Falls, Ohio: Taos Institute Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., H. Stiven, and J. Potter. 1987. Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities. British Journal of Social Psychology 26 (1):59–71. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00761.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. 2016. Discursive psychology: Theory, method and applications. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781473983335.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins‐Yel, K. G., F. A. Williamson, C. Priddie, D. Cross Francis, S. Gallimore, and J. L. Davis‐Randolph. 2022. A site of radical possibilities: Examining how a multigenerational counterspace promoted STEM persistence among undergraduate women of color. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 60 (2):1–36. doi:10.1002/tea.21798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younis, T., and S. Jadhav. 2019. Keeping our mouths shut: The fear and racialized self-censorship of British healthcare professionals in PREVENT training. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 43 (3):404–24. doi:10.1007/s11013-019-09629-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar