Bringing identities to the table: Exploring conversational practices of vegetarians and vegans at flashpoints in interaction with meat-eaters

References

• Atkinson, J. M., and J. Heritage. 1984. Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2002. Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education 31 (2):101–19. doi:10.1080/0305724022014322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilmes, J. 1988. The Concept of Preference in Conversation Analysis. Language in Society 17 (2):161–81. doi:10.1017/S0047404500012744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolderdijk, J. W., and G. Cornelissen. 2022. “How do you know someone’s vegan?” They won’t always tell you. an empirical test of the do-gooder’s dilemma. Appetite 168 (January):105719. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105719.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brouwer, C., J.-W. Bolderdijk, G. Cornelissen, and T. Kurz. 2022. Communication strategies for moral rebels: How to talk about change in order to inspire self-efficacy in others. WIREs Climate Change 13 (5):e781. doi:10.1002/wcc.781.
   Google Scholar
• Buttny, R., and E. Kinefuchi. 2020. Vegans’ problem stories: negotiating vegan identity in dealing with omnivores. Discourse & Society 31 (6):565–83. doi:10.1177/0957926520939689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrin, T., and A. Papadopoulos. 2017. Understanding the attitudes and perceptions of vegetarian and plant-based diets to shape future health promotion programs. Appetite 109 (February):40–47. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.018.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cramer, H., C. S. Kessler, T. Sundberg, M. J. Leach, D. Schumann, J. Adams, and R. Lauche. 2017. Characteristics of Americans choosing vegetarian and vegan diets for health reasons. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 49 (7):561–567.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2017.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docherty, D., and C. Jasper. 2023. The cheese paradox: How do vegetarians justify consuming non-meat animal products? Appetite 188 (September):106976. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2023.106976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards, D., and J. Potter. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Graça, J., M.M. Calheiros, and A. Oliveira. 2014. Moral disengagement in harmful but cherished food practices? An exploration into the case of meat. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (5):749–65. doi:10.1007/s10806-014-9488-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenebaum, J. 2012. Veganism, Identity and the quest for authenticity. Food, Culture & Society 15 (1):129–44. doi:10.2752/175174412X13190510222101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and G. Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1):15–38. doi:10.1177/019027250506800103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, M., and M. S. Wilson. 2019. A dual-process motivational model of attitudes towards vegetarians and vegans. European Journal of Social Psychology 49 (1):169–78. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiński, M., K. Skonieczna-Żydecka, J. Krzysztof Nowak, and E. Stachowska. 2020. Global and local diet popularity rankings, their secular trends, and seasonal variation in google trends data. Nutrition 79–80 (November):110759. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2020.110759.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitzinger, C., and H. Frith. 1999. Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse & Society 10 (3):293–316. doi:10.1177/0957926599010003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz, T., A. M. B. Prosser, A. Rabinovich, and S. O’Neill. 2020. Could vegans and lycra cyclists be bad for the planet? Theorizing the role of moralized minority practice identities in processes of societal–level change. Journal of Social Issues 76 (1):86–100. doi:10.1111/josi.12366.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, A. 2013. ‘Beyond hippies and rabbit food: The social effects of vegetarianism and veganism’. Accessed July 30, 2023. https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/honors_program_theses/7/.
   Google Scholar
• MacInnis, C. C., and G. Hodson. 2017. It ain’t easy eating greens: evidence of bias toward vegetarians and vegans from both source and target. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 20 (6):721–44. doi:10.1177/1368430215618253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minson, J. A., and B. Monin. 2012. Do-gooder derogation: Disparaging morally motivated minorities to defuse anticipated reproach. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3 (2):200–07. doi:10.1177/1948550611415695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezlek, J. B., and C. A. Forestell. 2020. Vegetarianism as a social identity. Current Opinion in Food Science, Sensory Science & Consumer Perception • Food Physics and Material Science 33 (June):45–51. doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2019.12.005.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiler, T. M., and B. Egloff. 2018. Personality and attitudinal correlates of meat consumption: Results of two representative German samples. Appetite 121 (February):294–301. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.098.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piazza, J., M. B. Ruby, S. Loughnan, M. Luong, J. Kulik, H. M. Watkins, and M. Seigerman. 2015. Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite 91 (August):114–28. doi:10.1016/J.APPET.2015.04.011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1984, January. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped. Communication Faculty Scholarship. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cas_communication_scholar/3
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. 1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. 2002. Two Kinds of Natural. Discourse Studies 4 (4):539–42. doi:10.1177/14614456020040040901.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., and A. Hepburn. 2005. Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2 (4):281–307. doi:10.1191/1478088705qp045oa.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, A. M. B., L. N. M. Heung, L. Blackwood, S. O’Neill, J. Bolderdijk, and T. Kurz. 2024. “Talk amongst yourselves”: designing and evaluating a novel remotely-moderated focus group methodology for exploring group talk. Qualitative Research in Psychology 21 (1):1–43. doi:10.1080/14780887.2023.2257614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendle-Short, J. 2015. Dispreferred responses when texting: delaying that “no” response. Discourse & Communication 9 (6):643–61. doi:10.1177/1750481315600309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H. 2014. Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eaters. Appetite 79:32–41. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneijder, P., and H. Te Molder 2009. Normalizing ideological food choice and eating practices. Identity work in online discussions on veganism. Appetite 52 (3):621–30. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneijder, P., and H. F. Te Molder. 2005. Moral logic and logical morality: Attributions of responsibility and blame in online discourse on veganism. Discourse & Society 16 (5):675–96. doi:10.1177/0957926505054941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, K. 2023. Debating animal agriculture in contemporary India: Ethics, Politics, Ecologies. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 6 (2):776–800. doi:10.1177/25148486211045477.
   Google Scholar
• Vandermoere, F., R. Geerts, C. De Backer, S. Erreygers, and E. Van Doorslaer. 2019. Meat consumption and vegaphobia: An exploration of the characteristics of meat eaters, vegaphobes, and their social environment. Sustainability 11 (14):3936. doi:10.3390/su11143936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verplanken, B., and D. Roy. 2016. Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 45 (March):127–34. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.008.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. 2016. Discursive psychology: Theory, method and applications London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. S., A. Weatherall, and C. Butler. 2004. A Rhetorical Approach to Discussions about Health and Vegetarianism. Journal of Health Psychology 9 (4):567–81. doi:10.1177/1359105304044040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YouGov. 2023. World food day: What are Australia’s major dietary preferences – And most favourite cuisines? | YouGov. Accessed March 2, 2024. https://au.yougov.com/consumer/articles/47583-world-food-day-australia-major-dietary-preferences-most-favourite-cuisines-2023.
   Google Scholar
• YouGov. 2024. ‘Dietary choices of brits (e.g. vegeterian, flexitarian, meat-eater etc)?’ Accessed March 2, 2024. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/society/trackers/dietery-choices-of-brits-eg-vegeterian-flexitarian-meat-eater-etc.
   Google Scholar