Tracking narrative change in post-intervention focus groups for teachers: an exploratory study

References

• Alves, D., P. Fernández-Navarro, J. Baptista, E. Ribeiro, I. Sousa, and M. M. Gonçalves. 2014. Innovative moments in grief therapy: The meaning reconstruction approach and the processes of self-narrative transformation. Psychotherapy Research 24 (1):25–41. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.814927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansay, S. J., D. F. Perkins, and C. J. Nelson. 2004. Interpreting outcomes: Using focus groups in evaluation research. Family Relations 53 (3):310–16. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.0007.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayrton, R. 2019. The micro-dynamics of power and performance in focus groups: An example from discussions on national identity with the South Sudanese diaspora in the UK. Qualitative Research 19 (3):323–39. doi:10.1177/1468794118757102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista, J., J. R. Silva, C. Magalhaes, H. Ferreira, P. Fernandez-Navarro, and M. M. Goncalves. 2020. Studying change in narrative terms: The innovative moments method. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 20 (3):442–48. doi:10.1002/capr.12297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, P., M. M. Gonçalves, M. E. Duarte, J. R. Silva, and D. Alves. 2016. Life design counseling outcome and process: A case study with an adolescent. Journal of Vocational Behavior 93:58–66. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, J. 2016. The pitfalls and promise of focus groups as a data collection method. Sociological Methods & Research 45 (2):231–59. doi:10.1177/0049124115570065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva, R., P. Fernández-Navarro, M. M. Gonçalves, C. Rosa, and J. Silva. 2019. Tracking narrative change in the context of extremism and terrorism: Adapting the innovative moments coding system. Aggression & Violent Behavior 47:204–14. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2019.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, G., A. S. Cutolo, R. Passeggia, S. Formentin, and M. M. Gonçalves. 2022. Tracking change in group interventions: A further adaptation of the innovative moments coding system for groups. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome 25 (3):354–64. doi:10.4081/ripppo.2022.648.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, G., A. S. Cutolo, R. Passeggia, and M. F. Freda. 2024. The development and adaptation of the innovative moments coding system for groups (IMCS-G). Journal of Constructivist Psychology 37 (1):21–32. doi:10.1080/10720537.2023.2248527.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, G., A. S. Cutolo, R. Passeggia, J. T. Oliveira, and M. M. Gonçalves. 2024. Reliability of the innovative moments coding system for groups and the association between markers of change and outcomes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research & Practice. 28 (2):82–100. doi:10.1037/gdn0000212.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, G., A. P. Ribeiro, D. Alves, M. M. Gonçalves, and M. F. Freda. 2017. Meaning coconstruction in group counseling: The development of innovative moments. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 30 (4):404–26. doi:10.1080/10720537.2016.1238789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Navarro, P., A. P. Ribeiro, K. K. Soylemez, and M. M. Gonçalves. 2020. Innovative moments as developmental levels: A case study on meaning development and integration in the treatment of depression. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 33 (2):207–23. doi:10.1080/10720537.2019.1592037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Navarro, P., C. Rosa, I. Sousa, V. Moutinho, A. Antunes, and C. Magalhães, A. P. Ribeiro, M. M. Gonçalves. 2018. Reconceptualization innovative moments as a predictor of symptomatology improvement in treatment for depression. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 25 (6):765–73. doi:10.1002/cpp.2306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Martinez, J., D. Maestre-Castillo, M. A. Payan-Bravo, and P. Fernandez-Navarro. 2021. Innovative moments in group therapy: Analyzing voices of group change. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 34 (2):195–206. doi:10.1080/10720537.2020.1717143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. 2009. Introducing compassion-focused therapy. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 15 (3):199–208. doi:10.1192/apt.bp.107.005264.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P., M. Matos, W. Wood, and F. Maratos. 2020. The compassionate mind and the conflicts between competing and caring: Implications for educating young minds. In Education for survival: The pedagogy of compassion, ed. M. I. Coles and B. Gent, 44–76. London: Trentham Books, UCL IOE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M. M., I. Mendes, G. Cruz, A. P. Ribeiro, I. Sousa, L. Angus, and L. S. Greenberg. 2012. Innovative moments and change in client-centered therapy. Psychotherapy Research 22 (4):389–401. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.662605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M. M., A. P. Ribeiro, I. Mendes, D. Alves, J. Silva, C. Rosa, and C. Braga, J. Batista, P. Fernández-Navarro, J. T. Oliveira. 2017. Three narrative-based coding systems: Innovative moments, ambivalence and ambivalence resolution. Psychotherapy Research 27 (3):270–82. doi:10.1080/10503307.2016.1247216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M. M., A. P. Ribeiro, I. Mendes, M. Matos, and A. Santos. 2011. Tracking novelties in psychotherapy process research: The innovative moments coding system. Psychotherapy Research 21 (5):497–509. doi:10.1080/10503307.2011.560207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M. M., A. P. Ribeiro, C. Rosa, J. Silva, C. Braga, C. Magalhães, and J. T. Oliveira. 2018. Innovation and ambivalence: A narrative-dialogical perspective on therapeutic change. In Handbook of dialogical self theory and psychotherapy: Bridging psychotherapeutic and cultural traditions, ed. A. Konopka, H. J. M. Hermans, and M. M. Gonçalves, 120–134. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M. M., A. P. Ribeiro, J. R. Silva, I. Mendes, and I. Sousa. 2016. Narrative innovations predict symptom improvement: Studying innovative moments in narrative therapy of depression. Psychotherapy Research 26 (4):425–35. doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1035355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger, M. S., S. Moyers, K. McAnally, and L. E. McKinley. 2020. Known knowns and known unknowns on behavior change interventions and mechanisms of action. Health Psychology Review 14 (1):199–212. doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1719184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. E., and S. Knox. 2021. Essentials of consensual qualitative research. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. E., and M. J. Lambert. 2004. Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes. In Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change, ed. M. J. Lambert, 5th ed. 84–135. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jemal, A., and S. Caliste. 2022. Work-in-progress: Focus groups evaluate and inform revisions of a socio-behavioral health intervention. Evaluation and Program Planning 93:102079. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas-Dick, K., and E. O’Shaughnessy. 2020. Interventions that promote resilience among teachers: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology 8 (2):131–46. doi:10.1080/21683603.2020.1734125.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. 2009. Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change. Psychotherapy Research 19 (4–5):418–28. doi:10.1080/10503300802448899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, P. S., and M. B. Parshall. 2000. Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research 10 (3):293–308. doi:10.1177/104973200129118453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipp, M. 2017. ANVIL: The video annotation research tool (version 6.0) [computer software]. http://anvil-software.org.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, M. J. 2023. Measuring changes with traditional and retrospective pre-posttest self-report surveys for a brief intervention program. Evaluation and Program Planning 99:102323. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle, B. D. 2017. Compassion in schools. In The oxford handbook of compassion science, ed. E. M. Seppälä, E. Simon-Thomas, S. L. Brown, M. C. Worline, C. D. Cameron, and J. R. Doty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maratos, F. A., J. Montague, H. Ashra, M. Welford, W. Wood, C. Barnes, D. Sheffield, and P. Gilbert. 2019. Evaluation of a compassionate mind training intervention with school teachers and support staff. Mindfulness 10 (11):2245–58. doi:10.1007/s12671-019-01185-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maratos, F., M. Matos, I. Albuquerque, W. Wood, L. Palmeira, M. Cunha, M. P. Lima, and P. Gilbert. 2020. Exploring the international utility of progressing compassionate mind training in school settings: A comparison of implementation effectiveness of the same curricula in the UK and Portugal. The Psychology of Education Review 44 (2):73–82. doi:10.53841/bpsper.2020.44.2.73.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, O. T. 2011. A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research. Evaluation and Program Planning 34 (1):21–28. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, M., I. Albuquerque, A. Galhardo, M. Cunha, M. P. Lima, L. Palmeira, N. Petrocchi, K. McEwan, F. Maratos, P. Gilbert, et al. 2022. Nurturing compassion in schools: A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a compassionate mind training program for teachers. PLOS ONE 17 (3):e0263480. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, M., L. Palmeira, I. Albuquerque, M. Cunha, M. P. Lima, A. Galhardo, F. Maratos, and P. Gilbert. 2022. Building compassionate schools: Pilot study of a compassionate mind training intervention to promote teachers’ well-being. Mindfulness 13 (1):145–61. doi:10.1007/s12671-021-01778-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, M., A. Santos, M. Gonçalves, and C. Martins. 2009. Innovative moments and change in narrative therapy. Psychotherapy Research 19 (1):68–80. doi:10.1080/10503300802430657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVittie, C., S. Craig, and M. Temple. 2020. A conversation analysis of communicative changes in a time-limited psychotherapy group for mothers with post-natal depression. Psychotherapy Research 30 (8):1048–60. doi:10.1080/10503307.2019.1694721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meira, L., J. Salgado, I. Sousa, A. P. Ribeiro, and M. M. Gonçalves. 2018. Psychological change in everyday life: An exploratory study. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 31 (3):257–72. doi:10.1080/10720537.2017.1304300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, I., A. Ribeiro, L. Angus, L. Greenberg, I. Sousa, and M. Gonçalves. 2010. Narrative change in emotion-focused therapy: How is change constructed through the lens of the innovative moments coding system? Psychotherapy Research 20 (6):692–701. doi:10.1080/10503307.2010.514960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., and K. Hoffman. 2018. A system for coding the interaction in focus groups and dyadic interviews. The Qualitative Report 23 (3):519–31. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neimeyer, R. A. 2000. Narrative disruptions in the construction of the self. In Constructions of disorder: Meaning-making frameworks for psychotherapy, ed. R. A. Neimeyer and J. D. Raskin, 207–42. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10368-009.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós, A., D. Faria, and F. Almeida. 2017. Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies 3 (9):369–87. doi:10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1017.
   Google Scholar
• Quinio, A. E., and T. C. Lam. 2021. Methods and biases in measuring change with self-reports. In Basic elements of survey research in education: Addressing the problems your advisor never told you about, ed. U. Luhanga and A. G. Harbaugh, 193–217. Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Seppälä, E. M., S. Simon-Thomas, S. L. Brown, M. C. Worline, C. D. Cameron, and J. R. Doty. 2017. The oxford handbook of compassion science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, J. 2000. Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3 (2):103–19. doi:10.1080/136455700405172.
   Google Scholar
• van Loon, A. W., H. E. Creemers, W. Y. Beumer, A. Okorn, S. Vogelaar, N. Saab, and J. J. Asscher, P. M. Westenberg, J. J. Asscher. 2020. Can schools reduce adolescent psychological stress? A multilevel meta-analysis of the effectiveness of school-based intervention programs. Journal of Youth & Adolescence 49 (6):1127–45. doi:10.1007/s10964-020-01201-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welford, M., and K. Langmead. 2015. Compassion-based initiatives in educational settings. Educational & Child Psychology 32 (1):71–80. doi:10.53841/bpsecp.2015.32.1.71.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. 2006. Analysing interaction in focus groups. In Talk and interaction in social research methods, ed. P. Drew, G. Raymond, and D. Weinberg, 50–62. Sage Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9781849209991.n4.
   Google Scholar