Translation and religion: Issues of materiality

References

• Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auslander, Leora. 2005. “Beyond Words.” The American Historical Review 110 (4): 1015–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belle, Marie-Alice, and Brenda M. Hosington. 2019. “Translation as ‘Transformission’ in Early Modern England and France.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 46 (2): 201–204.
   Google Scholar
• Belting, Hans. 2016. “Iconic Presence. Images in Religious Traditions.” Material Religion 12 (2): 235–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Arthur Asa. 2009. What Objects Mean: An Introduction to Material Culture. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blatt, Heather. 2018. Participatory Reading in Late-Medieval England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumczynski, Piotr, and John Gillespie, eds. 2016. Translating Values: Evaluative Concepts in Translation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burkette, Allison. 2016. “Response by Burkette to ‘Translation and the Materialities Of Communication’.” Translation Studies 9 (3): 318–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldiron, Anne E. B. 2015. Printers without Borders: Translation and Textuality in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coldiron, Anne E. B. 2016. “Response by Coldiron to ‘Translation and the Materialities Of Communication’.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 96–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldiron, Anne E. B. 2018. “The Translator’s Visibility in Early Printed Portray-Images and the Ambiguous Example of Margaret More Roper.” In Thresholds of Translation. Paratexts, Print, and Cultural Exchange in Early Modern Britain (1473–1660), edited by Marie-Alice Belle, and Brenda M. Hosington, 51–74. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coldiron, Anne E. B. 2019. “Translation and Transformission; or, Early Modernity in Motion.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 46 (2): 205–216.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, Alice. 2019. “Intersections between Translation And Book History: Reflections and New Directions.” Comparative Critical Studies 16 (2–3): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, Alice, Niall Ó Ciosáin, and Anne O’Connor. 2019. “Translation Meets Book History: Intersections. Special Issue.” Comparative Critical Studies 16: 2–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, Michael. 2003. Translation and Globalization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, Michael. 2013. Translation in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeJonge, Michael P., and Christiane Tietz. 2015. Translating Religion: What is Lost and Gained? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, Manuel. 2019. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1980. Mille Plateaux. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial statement. 2005. “Introduction.” Material Religion 1 (1): 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Engelke, Matthew. 2011. “Material Religion.” In The Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies, edited by Robert A. Orsi, 209–229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, Chris, and Oliver J. T. Harris. 2015. “Enduring Relations: Exploring a Paradox of New Materialism.” Journal of Material Culture 20 (2): 127–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Meredith J. 2012. “Reformations: The Painted Interiors of Augustine and Jerome.” In Augustine Beyond the Book: Intermediality, Transmediality and Reception, edited by Karla Pollmann, and Meredith J. Gill, 59–94. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Hazard, Sonia. 2013. “The Material Turn in the Study of Religion.” Religion and Society 4 (1): 58–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hazard, Sonia. 2018. “Thing.” Early American Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 16 (4): 792–800.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann, Mary. 1995. Catholic Devotion in Victorian England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, Dan, and Mary C Beaudry. 2010. “Introduction: Material Culture Studies: A Reactionary View.” In The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, edited by Dan Hicks, and Mary C. Beaudry, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, Ian. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Houtman, Dick, and Birgit Meyer. 2012. Things: Religion and the Question of Materiality. New York: Fordham University.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, Hephzibah. 2011. Religious Transactions in Colonial South India: Language, Translation, and the Making of Protestant Identity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, Hephzibah. 2019. “Translation and Religion: Crafting Regimes of Identity.” Religion 49 (3): 323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry, Wyn Kelley, Katie Clinton, Jenna McWilliams, and Ricardo Pitts-Wiley. 2013. Reading in a Participatory Culture: Remixing Moby-Dick in the English Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1996. “On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications.” Soziale Welt 47 (4): 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littau, Karin. 2011. “First Steps towards a Media History of Translation.” Translation Studies 4 (3): 261–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littau, Karin. 2016. “Translation and the Materialities of Communication.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 82–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littau, Karin. 2019. “Afterword: Translation and the Histories and Geographies of the Book.” Comparative Critical Studies 16 (2-3): 365–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Lynne. 2005. Translation and Religion: Holy Untranslatable? Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mandair, Arvind-Pal S. 2019. “Im/materialities: Translation Technologies & the (Dis)enchantment of Diasporic Life-Worlds.” Religion 49 (3): 413–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews-Jones, Lucinda, and Timothy Willem Jones. 2015. “Introduction: Materiality and Religious History.” In Material Religion in Modern Britain, edited by Timothy Willem Jones, and Lucina Matthews-Jones, 1–14, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McDannell, Colleen. 1995. Material Christianity: Religion and Popular Culture in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meiss, Millard. 1970. The Great Age of Fresco: Discoveries, Recoveries and Survivals. London: Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Birgit, David Morgan, Crispin Paine, and S. Brent Plate. 2010. “The Origin and Mission of Material Religion.” Religion 40 (3): 207–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Daniel. 1987. Material Culture and Mass Consumption, Social Archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Christine. 2010. “Translation and Materiality: The Paradox of Visible Translation.” Translating Media 30 (1): 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, David. 2008. “The Materiality of Cultural Construction.” Material Religion 4 (2): 228–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, David. 2010. Religion and Material Culture: The Matter of Belief. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, David. 2011. “Thing.” Material Religion 7 (1): 140–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, David. 2016. “Materializing the Study of Religion.” Religion 46 (4): 640–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, David. 2017. “Materiality.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Study of Religion, edited by Michael Stausberg, and Steven Engler, 271–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, David. 2018. Images at Work: The Material Culture of Enchantment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nida, Eugene A., and Charles R. Taber. 1969. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Nugteren, Albertina. 2019. “Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Religion, Ritual, and Ritualistic Objects’.” Religions 10 (163): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Paloposki, Outi. 2019. “Tauchnitz for Translators. The Circulation of English-language Literature in Finland.” Comparative Critical Studies 16 (2–3): 161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prown, Jules David. 1982. “Mind in Matter: An Introduction to Material Culture Theory and Method.” Winterthur Portfolio 17 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Douglas. 1992. “The Ascetic Foundations of Western Translatology: Jerome and Augustine.” Translation and Literature 1: 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Saramifar, Younes. 2018. “Objects, Object-ness, and Shadows of Meanings: Carving Prayer Beads and Exploring Their Materiality alongside a Khaksari Sufi Murshid.” Material Religion 14 (3): 368–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Sherry. 2019. Translation Sites: A Field Guide. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleford, Richard. 1994. “Intellect and Intuition in Botticelli’s Saint Augustine.” The Art Bulletin 76 (1): 69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taves, Ann. 1986. The Household of Faith: Roman Catholic Devotions in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, Dora. 1998. The Scholar in His Study: Ownership and Experience in Renaissance Italy. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar