Introduction: (re-)conceptualizing translation in translation studies

References

• Baker, Mona. 2006. Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bassnett, Susan, and Peter Bush. 2006. The Translator as Writer. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Bassnett, Susan, and David Johnston. 2019. “The Outward Turn in Translation Studies.” The Translator 25 (3): 181–188. doi:10.1080/13556509.2019.1701228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassnett, Susan, and André Lefevere. 1990. Translation, History and Culture. London: Printer Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Blumczynski, Piotr. 2023. Experiencing Translationality: Material and Metaphorical Journeys. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boria, Monica, Carreres Ángeles, Noriega-Sánchez María, and Tomalin Marcus. 2019. Translation and Multimodality: Beyond Words. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Catford, John C. 1965. A Linguistic Theory of Translation. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Martha. 2011. “Reconceptualizing Translation – Some Chinese Endeavours1.” Meta 56 (1): 1–19. doi:10.7202/1003507ar.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, Michael. 2010. “The Translation Crowd.” Revista Tradumàtica. Traducció i Tecnologies Dela Informació i la Comunicació 8: 1–7. doi:10.5565/rev/tradumatica.100.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, Michael. 2013. Translation in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deely, John. 2009. Purely Objective Reality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz Cintas, Jorge, and Serenella Massidda. 2019. “Technological Advances in Audiovisual Translation.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Technology, edited by Minako O’Hagan, 255–270. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gambier, Yves, and Luc van Doorslaer. 2016. Border Crossing: Translation Studies and Other Disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, Theo. 1999. Translation in System: Descriptive and System-Oriented Approaches Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado Albir, Amparo, and Fabio Alves. 2009. “Translation as a Cognitive Activity.” In The Routledge Companion to Translation Studies, edited by Jeremy Munday, 210–234. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1959. “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” In On Translation, edited by Reuben Brower, 232–239. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel A. 2017. Crowdsourcing and Online Collaborative Translations: Expanding the Limits of Translation Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ketola, Anne. 2016. “Towards a Multimodally Oriented Theory of Translation: A Cognitive Framework for the Translation of Illustrated Technical Texts.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 67–81. doi:10.1080/14781700.2015.1086670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevere, André. 1992. Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Wenyan. 2020. Translation as Actor-Networking: Actors, Agencies, and Networks in the Making of Arthur Waley’s English Translation of the Chinese Classic Journey to the West. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marais, Kobus. 2019. A (Bio)Semiotic Theory of Translation: The Emergence of Social-Cultural Reality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marais, Kobus, ed. 2022. Translation beyond Translation Studies. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Martín, Ricardo. 2016a. “Reembedding Translation Process Research. An Introduction.” In  Reembedding Translation Process Research, edited by Ricardo Muñoz Martín, 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Newmark, Peter. 1988. A Textbook of Translation. London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Orengo, Alberto. 2005. “Localising News: Translation and the ‘Global-National’ Dichotomy.” Language and Intercultural Communication 5 (2): 168–187. doi:10.1080/14708470508668892.
   Google Scholar
• Pym, Anthony. 2019. “Quality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Technology, edited by Minako O’Hagan, 437–452. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Snell-Hornby, Mary. 2006. The Turns of Translation Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, George. 1992. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies – and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tymoczko, Maria. 2007. Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Tyulenev, Sergey. 2012. Applying Luhmann to Translation Studies: Translation in Society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Doorslaer, Luc. 2020. “Translation Studies: What’s in a Name?” Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies 7 (2): 139–150. doi:10.1080/23306343.2020.1824761.
   Google Scholar
• Venuti, Lawrence. 1995. The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vorderobermeier, Gisella M.2014. Remapping Habitus in Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Way, Andy. 2018. “Quality Expectations of Machine Translation.” In Translation Quality Assessment: From Principles to Practice, edited by Joss Moorkens, Sheila Castilho, Federico Gaspari, and Stephen Doherty, 159–178. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Michaela, and Alexandra Fukari. 2007. Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Zwischenberger, Cornelia. 2019. “From Inward to Outward: The Need for Translation Studies to Become Outward-Going.” The Translator 25 (3): 256–268. doi:10.1080/13556509.2019.1654060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar