320
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Rights and Responsibilities of Working-Age Sick and Disabled Benefit Claimants in Austerity Europe

REFERENCES

  • ACDET. 2001. In the Mainstream: Recommendations on Removing Barriers to Disabled People's Inclusion in Mainstream Labour Market Interventions. London: DWP.
  • Andersen, I.2011. “Kommuner Sparer Ved at Opgive Svage Ledige.” Ugebrevet A4, December 14. Accessed September 9, 2013. http://www.ugebreveta4.dk/da/2011/201150/Onsdag/kommuner_sparer_ved_at_opgive_svage_ledige.aspx.
  • Beatty, C., and S.Fothergill. 2011. Incapacity Benefit Reform: The Local, Regional and National Impact. Sheffield: CRESR.
  • Bengtsson, S.2000. “Truly European Type of Disability Struggle: Disability Policy in Denmark and the EU in the 1990s.” European Journal of Social Security2: 363.
  • Bredgaard, T., and F.Larsen. 2008. “Quasi-Markets in Employment Policy: Do They Deliver on Promises?” Social Policy and Society7 (3): 341–352.
  • Bredgaard, T., F. Larsen, P. K. Madsen, and S. Rasmussen. 2009. “Flexicurity and Atypical Employment in Denmark.” CARMA, Centre for Labour Market Research, Aalborg University.
  • Clasen, J., D.Clegg, and J.Kvist. 2012. European labour Market Policies in (the) Crisis. ETUI Working Paper No. 2012.12Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
  • Clegg, D.2010. “Labour Market Policy in the Crisis: The UK in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Poverty and Social Justice18 (1): 5–17.
  • Considine, M.2001. Enterprising States: The Public Management of Welfare-to-Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Danske Handicaporganisationer. 2012. “Gode intentioner—men store fleksjobforringelser.” Accessed February 3, 2014. http://www.handicap.dk/politik/tema-om-fortidspension-og-fleksjob/dhs-holdninger/gode-intentioner-men-store-fleksjobforringelser.
  • Etherington, D., and J.Ingold. 2012. “Welfare to Work and the Inclusive Labour Market: A Comparative Study of Activation Policies for Disability and Long-Term Sickness Benefit Claimants in the UK and Denmark.” Journal of European Social Policy22 (1): 30–44.
  • European Foundation Centre. 2012. “Assessing the Impact of European Governments' Austerity Plans on the Rights of People with Disabilities.” Accessed September 8, 2013. http://www.enil.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Austerity-European-Report_FINAL.pdf.
  • Evans, M.2001. “Welfare to Work and the Organisation of Opportunity—Lessons from Abroad.” CASE Report 15—ESRC Research Centre for the analysis of social exclusion. Accessed April 21, 2013. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/28306/1/CASEreport15.pdf.
  • Freud, D.2007. Reducing Dependency, Increasing Opportunity: Options for the Future of Welfare to Work. London: DWP.
  • Greve, B.2009. “The Labour Market Situation of Disabled People in European Countries and Implementation of Employment Policies: A Summary of Evidence from Country Reports and Research Studies.”, Report prepared for the Academic Network of European Disability experts (ANED), April.
  • Grover, C., and L.Piggott. 2005. “Disabled People, the Reserve Army of Labour and Welfare Reform.” Disability and Society20 (7): 705–717.
  • Heap, D., with H. Bennett, and D. Edmistson. 2012. “Mainstreaming and Specialisation: Tensions at the Heart of the New Welfare-to-Work Settlement for Sick and Disabled Benefit Claimants.” Paper presented to panel on The unequal outcomes of the Freud Report in action. Joint East Asian Social Policy Research Network (EASP) and United Kingdom Social Policy Association (SPA) Annual Conference 2012, ‘Social Policy in an Unequal World’, July 16–18, in University of York, UK.
  • Herløv. 2012. “Mette Frederiksens Reform: Økonomisk pisk og tvivlsom hjælp.” Modkraft.dk. Accessed March 2, 2014. http://modkraft.dk/artikel/mette-frederiksens-reform-%C3%B8konomisk-pisk-og-tvivlsom-hj%C3%A6lp.
  • Høgelund, J.2003. In Search of Effective Disability Policy: Comparing the Developments and Outcomes of Dutch and Danish Disability Policies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • House of Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee. 2011. Oral Evidence on the Work Programme: Providers and Contracting Arrangements. January 12London: The Stationery Office.
  • House of Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee. 2013. Can the Work Programme Work for all User Groups? First Report of Session 2013–14. London: The Stationery Office.
  • Hyde, M.2000. “From Welfare to Work? Social Policy for Disabled People of Working Age in the United Kingdom in the 1990s.” Disability & Society15 (2): 327–341.
  • Jewell, C. J.2007. Agents of the Welfare State: How Caseworkers Respond to Need in the United States, and Sweden. New York: Macmillan.
  • Jobindsats.dk. 2012. “Revalidering.” http://www.jobindsats.dk/sw171.asp.
  • Jorgensen, H.2009. “From a Beautiful Swan to an Ugly Duckling: The Renewal of Danish Activation Policy Since 2003.” European Journal of Social Security11: 337–368.
  • Lane, P., R.Foster, L.Gardiner, L.Lanceley, and A.Purvis. 2013. Work Programme Evaluation: Procurement, Supply Chains and Implementation of the Commissioning Model. London: Department for Work and Pensions.
  • Lindsay, C., W.McQuaid, and M.Dutton. 2007. “New Approaches to Employability in the UK: Combining ‘Human Capital Development’ and ‘Work First’ Strategies.” Journal of Social Policy36 (4): 539–560.
  • Mabbett, D.2003. “Why have Disability Categories in Social Security?” Benefits11 (3): 163–168.
  • Macnicol, J.2013. “A History of Work-Disability.” In Disability Benefits, Welfare Reform and Employment Policy: Work and Welfare in Europe, edited by C.Lindsay, and D.Houston, 33–53. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Murphy, M.2010. “What Future Lies Ahead for the Irish Welfare State?” Irish Journal of Public Policy (Online)2 (1). Accessed February 3, 2011. http://publish.ucc.ie/ijpp/2010/01/murphy/02/en.
  • National Audit Office (NAO). 2010. Support to Incapacity Benefits Claimants Through Pathways to Work. London: HMSO.
  • Newton, B., N.Meager, C.Bertram, A.Corden, A.George, M.Lalani, H.Metcalf, H.Rolfe, R.Sainsbury, and K.Weston. 2012. Work Programme Evaluation: Findings from the First Phase of Qualitative Research on Programme Delivery. London: Department for Work and Pensions.
  • Nunn, A., S.Jassi, T.Bickerstaffe, and L.Wymer. 2010. Early Effects of the Economic Downturn on the Welfare to Work System in Deprived Areas. London: HMSO.
  • O'Connell, P.2009. “What Works? Applying Lessons from the 1990s.” Economic and Social Research Institute Policy Conference 2009: The Labour Market in Recession, April 30, in Dublin.
  • OECD. 2010. “Sickness, Disability and Work: Lessons from across the OECD.” November, 1–20.
  • Patrick, R.2012. “Work as the Primary ‘Duty’ of the Responsible Citizen: A Critique of this Work-Centric Approach.” People, Place & Policy Online6 (1). Accessed March 2, 2014. http://extra.shu.ac.uk/ppp-online/issue_1_300312/article_2.html.
  • Pierson, P.1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics48: 143–179.
  • Politiken. 2012. “Enhedslisten: Nu sparker regeringen til de svage igen.” June 30. Accessed February 1, 2013. http://politiken.dk/politik/ECE1675093/enhedslisten-nu-sparker-regeringen-til-de-svage-igen/.
  • Priestley, M., and A.Roulstone. 2009. Targeting and Mainstreaming Disability in the 2008–2010 National Reform Programmes for Growth and Jobs. Academic Network of European Disability Experts, University of Leeds.
  • Shutes, I.2011. “Welfare-to-Work and the Responsiveness of Employment Providers to the Needs of Refugees.” Journal of Social Policy40 (4): 1–18.
  • Sissons, P.2009. “Welfare Reform and Recession: Past Labour Market Responses to Job Losses and the Potential Impact Responses to Job Losses and the Potential Impact of Employment Support Allowance Employment Support Allowance.” People, Place and Policy Online3 (3): 171–182.
  • Stone, D. A.1984. The Disabled State. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Ugebrevet A4. 2013. “222 udsatte unge får hjælp—5728 venter.” Accessed February 1, 2014. http://www.ugebreveta4.dk/da/2013/201338/Tirsdag/Ressourceforlob.aspx.
  • Weston, K.2012. “Debating Conditionality for Disability Benefits Recipients and Welfare Reform: Research Evidence from Pathways to Work.” Local Economy27 (5–6): 514–528.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.