Backsliding in judicial reforms: domestic political costs as limits to EU’s political conditionality in Turkey

References

• Aydın-Düzgit, S., and Y. Gürsoy. 2015. “The Rule of Law and Judicial Reforms in Turkey between 2002 and 2013.” In Siyasetin Bilimi: İlter Turan’a Armağan, edited by B. Erozan and N. İncioğlu, 327–341, Pınar Uyan-Semerci, Istanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Aydın-Düzgit, S., and A. Kaliber. 2016. “Encounters with Europe in an Era of Domestic and International Turmoil: Is Turkey a De-Europeanising Candidate Country?” South European Society and Politics 21 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/13608746.2016.1155282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., and T. Risse. 2012. “From Europeanization to Diffusion: Introduction.” West European Politics 35 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.631310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman, R. 2013. “The Policy Role of the EU in Judicial Politics and the Limits of Conditionality: The Case of Hungary.” Polish Political Science Review 1 (1): 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Coman, R. 2014. “Quo Vadis Judicial Reforms? the Quest for Judicial Independence in Central and Eastern Europe.” Europe-Asia Studies 66 (6): 892–924. doi:10.1080/09668136.2014.905385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (2008) “Turkey 2008 Progress Report.” SEC(2008) 2699.
   Google Scholar
• Council (2001). “Council decision of 8 March 2001 on the principles, priorities, intermediate objectives and conditions contained in the Accession Partnership with the Republic of Turkey.” Council Document No. 2001/235/EC.
   Google Scholar
• Esen, B., and S. Gümüşçü. 2017. “Building a Competitive Authoritarian Regime: State-Business Relations in the AKP’s Turkey.” Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies 20 (4): 349–372. doi:10.1080/19448953.2018.1385924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011). “Multi-annual Indicative Planning Document (MIPD) 2011–2013 for Turkey.” C(2011) 4490 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013). “Turkey 2013 Progress Report.” SWD(2013) 417 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014). “Indicative Strategy Paper for Turkey (2014–2020),” Accessed http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2014/20140919-csp-turkey.pdf, 23 April 2015
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016) “Turkey 2016 Report”, https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2016/20161109_report_turkey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018) “Turkey 2018 Report.” SWD (2018) 153 Final.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, K., and C. Radaelli. 2003. The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. 2002. “European Union Conditionality and the Acquis Communautaire.” International Political Science Review 23 (3): 249–268. doi:10.1177/0192512102023003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. 2006. The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoriadis, I. 2009. Trials of Europeanization: Turkish Political Culture and the EU. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gürsoy, Y. 2011. “The Impact of EU-Driven Reforms on the Political Autonomy of Turkish Military.” South East European Society and Politics 16: 293–308. doi:10.1080/13608746.2011.577950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürsoy, Y. 2012. “The Changing Role of the Military in Turkish Politics: Democratization through Coup Plots.” Democratization 19: 735–760. doi:10.1080/13510347.2011.623352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazama, Y. 2011. “Hegemonic Preservation or Horizontal Accountability: Constitutional Review in Turkey.” International Political Science Review 33: 421–440. doi:10.1177/0192512111414132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyman, F. 2013. Turkey’s Transformation and Democratic Consolidation. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kubicek, P. 2011. “Political Conditionality and EU’s Cultivation of Democracy in Turkey.” Democratization 18: 910–931. doi:10.1080/13510347.2011.584732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelski, M. 2012. “EU-driven Judicial Reforms in Romania: A Success Story?” East European Politics 28 (1): 23–42. doi:10.1080/13523279.2011.636806.
   Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, M. 2005. “Turkey’s Political Reforms: The Impact of the European Union.” Southeast European Politics and Societies 10: 16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, M. 2008. “Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: The Impact of the EU’s Internal Dynamics.” International Studies Perspectives 9: 208–226. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2008.00327.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, M. 2016. “The Pandora’s Box: Democratization and Rule of Law in Turkey.” Asia-Europe Journal 14 (1): 61–77. doi:10.1007/s10308-015-0435-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, M., and F. Keyman. 2012. “The Era of Dominant Party Politics.” Journal of Democracy 23: 85–99. doi:10.1353/jod.2012.0000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neppi Modana, G. (2012) “External and Internal Aspects of the Independence of the Judiciary.” Accessed http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL%282012%29049-e, 23 April 2015
   Google Scholar
• Noutcheva, G. 2006. Bulgaria and Romania’s Accession to the EU: Postponement, Safeguards and the Rule of Law In C. F. E. P. Studies (Ed.). Brussels: Brussels Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. 2007. “Conservative Globalists versus Defensive Nationalists: Political Parties and Paradoxes of Europeanization in Turkey.” Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 9: 247–261. doi:10.1080/14613190701689902.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. 2007. “Democratization Reforms in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 8: 179–196. doi:10.1080/14683840701312195.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. 2014. “AKP at the Crossroads: Erdoğan’s Majoritarian Drift.” South European Society and Politics 19: 155–167. doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.920571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. 2015. “Turkey’s Judiciary and the Drift toward Competitive Authoritarianism.” International Spectator 50 (2): 42–55. doi:10.1080/03932729.2015.1020651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pridham, G. 2007. “The Effects of the European Union’s Democratic Conditionality: The Case of Romania during Accession.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 23 (2): 233–258. doi:10.1080/13523270701317505.
   Google Scholar
• Saatçioğlu, B. 2009. “How Closely Does the European Union’s Membership Conditionality Reflect the Copenhagen Criteria? Insights from Turkey.” Turkish Studies 10: 559–576. doi:10.1080/14683840903384802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancar, M. 2007. Yargιda Algι Ve Zihniyet Kalιplarι [Perceptions and Predispositions in the Judiciary]. Istanbul: TESEV.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2009. “Entrapped Again: The Way to EU Membership Negotiations with Turkey.” International Politics 46: 413–431. doi:10.1057/ip.2009.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., S. Engert, and H. Knobel. 2003. “Costs, Commitment and Compliance: Latvia, Slovakia, Turkey.” Journal of Common Market Studies 4: 495–518. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00432.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. 2004. “Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 661–679. doi:10.1080/1350176042000248089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. 2005. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. 2012. “Is Europeanisation through Conditionality Sustainable? Lock-In of Institutional Change after EU Accession.” West European Politics 35 (1): 20–38. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.631311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shambayati, H., and E. Kirdis. 2009. “In Pursuit of ‘Contemporary Civilization’: Judicial Empowerment in Turkey.” Political Research Quarterly 62: 767–780. doi:10.1177/1065912909346741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezcür, G. 2009. “Judicial Activism in Perilous Times: The Turkish Case.” Law and Society Review 43: 305–336. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00374.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uğur, M. 2010. “Open-Ended Membership Prospect and Commitment Credibility.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48: 967–991. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02082.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. A. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. A. 2014. “EU Leverage and National Interests in the Balkans: The Puzzles of Enlargement Ten Years On.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 122–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar