Armenia’s and Georgia’s contrasted positioning vis-à-vis the EU: between vocal centrality and strategic marginality

References

• Adler, E. 2002. “Constructivism in International Relations.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. Simmons, 95–118. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Babayan, N. 2011. “Armenia: Why the European Neighbourhood Policy Has Failed.” FRIDE Policy Brief 68.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, W. 1990. Personal Identity, National Identity and International Relations, 9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Studies in International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, B., and U. Jasper. 2017. “Revisiting ‘Identity’ in International Relations: From Identity as Substance to Identifications in Action.” European Journal of International Relations 23 (2): 391–415. doi:10.1177/1354066116644035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coene, F. 2016. Euro-Atlantic Discourse in Georgia: The Making of Georgian Foreign and Domestic Policy after the Rose Revolution. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D. 1993. “The Comparative Method.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, edited by A. Finifter, 105–119. Washington: American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 1999. 1999 Ordinary Session. Official Report of Debates. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2018. “EU Relations with Georgia.” accessed 20 June 2018. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eastern-partnership/georgia/
   Google Scholar
• Delcour, L. 2011. « Perceptions de l‘Union européenne et réception de ses politiques dans l‘ex-URSS: Les exemples russe, ukrainien, géorgien.» Anatoli 2: 211–230.
   Google Scholar
• Delcour, L. 2017. The EU and Russia in Their Contested Neighbourhood: Multiple Influences, Policy Transfer and Domestic Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delcour, L., and K. Wolczuk. 2015. “The EU’s Unexpected “Ideal Neighbour”? the Perplexing Case of Armenia’s Europeanisation.” Journal of European Integration 37 (4): 491–507. doi:10.1080/07036337.2015.1004631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delcour, L., and K. Wolczuk. 2018. “Well-Meaning but Ineffective? Perceptions of the EU’s Role as a Security Actor in the South Caucasus.” European Foreign Affairs Review 23: 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Di Puppo, L. 2009. “The Externalization of JHA Policies in Georgia: Partner or Hotbed of Threats?.” Journal ofEuropean Integration 31 (1): pp. 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Etzold, T., and H. Haukkala. 2011. “Is There a Nordic Russia Policy? Swedish, Finnish and Danish Relations with Russia in the Context of the European Union.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 19 (2): pp.249–260. doi:10.1080/14782804.2011.580913.
   Google Scholar
• EU-Georgia Association Agreement. 2014. “Association agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and Their Member States, of the One Part, and Georgia, of the Other Part.” Official Journal of the European Union L261/4: 30. August.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. “Wider Europe – Neighbourhood’: A New Framework for Relations with Our Eastern and Southern Neighbours.” COM(2003) 104 final. Brussels, 11 March.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2004. European Neighbourhood Policy. Strategy Paper. COM(2004) 373 final. Brussels, 12 May.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission/High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. 2015. Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Brussels. 26 November.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2006. “Mikheil Saakashvili: ‘Georgia is an ancient European nation.” accessed 3 July 2018. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+IM-PRESS+20061113IPR12538+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=SL
   Google Scholar
• Ghazaryan, N., and L. Delcour. 2017. “From EU Integration Process to the Eurasian Economic Union: The Case of Armenia.” In Post-Soviet Constitutions and Challenges of Regional Integration: Adapting to European and Eurasian Integration Projects, edited by P. Van Elsuwege and R. Petrov. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeandesboz, J. 2007. « Définir le voisin. La genèse de la Politique européenne de voisinage.» Cultures et conflits 66: 11–29. doi:10.4000/conflits.2441.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. 2016. “Foreword.” In Values and Identity as Sources of Foreign Policy in Armenia and Georgia, edited by K. Kakachia and A. Markarov, 10–11. Tbilisi: Universal.
   Google Scholar
• Kakachia, K., and S. Minesashvili. 2015. “Identity Politics: Exploring Georgian Foreign Policy Behaviour.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, N. (2012). “Georgia: National Security Concept versus National Security,” Chatham House Russia and Eurasia Programme Paper. REP. Jan.
   Google Scholar
• Makarychev, A. S. 2008. “Rebranding Russia: Norms, Politics and Power.” In Who Is a Normative Foreign Policy Actor? the European Union and Its Global Partners, edited by N. Tocci, 156–210. Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Markarov, A., N. Galstyan, and G. Hayrapetyan. 2016. “The Main Dimensions and Issues of Armenia’s Foreign Policy.” In Values and Identity as Sources of Foreign Policy in Armenia and Georgia, edited by K. Kakachia and A. Markarov, 107–144. Tbilisi: Universal.
   Google Scholar
• Minesashvili, S. 2016. « Narrating Identity: Belongingness and Alterity in Georgia’s Foreign Policy » In Values and Identity as Sources of Foreign Policy in Armenia and Georgia, edited by K. Kakachia and A. Markarov, 11–33. Tbilisi: Universal.
   Google Scholar
• Naskidashvili, M., and L. Kakhishvili. 2016. “National Identity of Georgian Political Elite and Population and Its Impact on Foreign Policy Choices.” In Values and Identity as Sources of Foreign Policy in Armenia and Georgia, edited by K. Kakachia and A. Markarov, 34–61. Tbilisi: Universal.
   Google Scholar
• National Security Concept of Georgia. 2005. Accessed 22 April 2019. http://www.parliament.ge/files/292_880_927746_concept_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oskanian, K. 2016. “The Balance Strikes Back: Power, Perceptions, and Ideology in Georgian Foreign Policy, 1992–2014.” Foreign Policy Analysis, 12 (4): 628–652.
   Google Scholar
• Oskanian, V. 2004. Armenia’s Evolving Relations With United States, Europe. Washington: Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Oyahon, I., S. Serrano, and A. Regamey. 2014. “Introduction. The Post-Soviet Caucasus and Central Asia: Another South?.” In Development in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Migration, Democratisation and Inequality in the Post-Soviet Era, edited by S. Hohmann, C. Mouradian, S. Serrano, and J. Thorez, 1–16. London, New-York: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Papazian, T. 2006. “From Ter-petrossian to Kocharian: Explaining Continuity in Armenian Foreign Policy, 1991-2003.” Demokratizatsiya 14 (2): 235–251. doi:10.3200/DEMO.14.2.235-251.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, N. 2002. “Differentiating, Collaborating, Outdoing: Nordic Identity and Marginality in the Contemporary World.” Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 9 (3): 355–381. doi:10.1080/10702890213973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, N., ed. 2008. The Geopolitics of Europe’s Identity: Centers, Boundaries, and Margins. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sargsyan, S. (2013). Statement by Serzh Sargsyan, President of the Republic of Armenia at the Third Eastern Partnership Summit, Vilnius. 29 November. accessed 22 June 2016. http://www.president.am/en/statements-and-messages/item/2013/11/29/president-serzh-sargsyan-at-the-third-eastern-partnership-summit-speech/
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, S. 2007. Géorgie: Sortie D'empire. Paris: éditions du CNRS.
   Google Scholar
• Stefes, C. H. 2006. Understanding Post-Soviet Transitions. Corruption, Collusion and Clientelism. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ter-Matevosyan, V., A. Drnoian, N. Mkrtchyan, and T. Yepremyan. 2017. “Armenia in the Eurasian Economic Union: Reasons for Joining and Its Consequences.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 58 (3): 340–360. doi:10.1080/15387216.2017.1360193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzyan, A. 2016. “The Evolution of Armenia’s Foreign Policy Identity: The Conception of Identity Driven Paths. Friends and Foes in Armenian Foreign Policy Discourse.” In Values and Identity as Sources of Foreign Policy in Armenia and Georgia, edited by K. Kakachia and A. Markarov, 145–183. Tbilisi: Universal.
   Google Scholar
• Terzyan, A. 2017. “The EU Vs. Russia in the Foreign Policy Discourse of Armenia: The Fragility of Normative Power or the Power of Russian Coercion?.” Eastern Journal of European Studies 8 (2): pp. 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. 2007. “Can the EU Promote Democracy and Human Rights through the ENP? the Case for Refocusing on the Rule of Law.” In The European Neighbourhood Policy: A New Framework for Modernisation? EUI Working Papers, edited by M. Cremona and G. Meloni, LAW 2007/21. Fiesole: European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Treaty on the European Union. 2012. Official Journal of the European Union, C326/13, 26 October.
   Google Scholar
• Tulmets, E. 2008. “A ‘Soft Power’ with Civilian Means: Can the EU Bridge Its Capability-Expectations Gap in the ENP?.” In Pioneer Europe? Testing European Foreign Policy in Its Neighbourhood, edited by L. Delcour and E. Tulmets, pp.133–160. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar