After competitive authoritarianism hybrid regime legacies and the quality of democracy in Croatia

References

• Bejaković, P. 2002. “Corruption in Croatia – Institutional Settings and Practical Experiences.” Politička Misao 39 (5): 128–155.
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1353/jod.2016.0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, M., and E. Karakoc. 2007. “Civil Society and the Legacies of Dictatorship.” World Politics 59 (4): 539–567. doi:10.1353/wp.2008.0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bićanić, I. 1993. “Privatization in Croatia.” East European Politics and Societies 7 (3): 422–439. doi:10.1177/0888325493007003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M., and S. Elischer, eds. 2016. Democratization and Competitive Authoritarianism in Africa. Berlin: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldo, A., and N. Di Sotto. 2011. “Tra Vecchio E Nuovo Regime. Il Peso Delle Eredità Nella Costruzione Della Democrazia.” In Germania. Le Eredità Del Nazismo Nella Bundesrepublik, edited by G. Pietro Di Cortona and O. Lanza, 79–108. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldo, A. 2014. Dall’imposizione Al Successo. La Democratizzazione Tedesca in Prospettiva Comparata. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldo, A. 2018a. “A Crise Da Democracia: Uma Revisão Seletiva Do Debate Académico Atual.” Relações Internacionais 59: 9–27. doi:10.23906/ri16459199.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldo, A. 2018b. “Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 18 (4): 467–487. doi:10.1080/14683857.2018.1550948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldo, A., and A. Pinna. 2017. “Western Balkan Countries in Transition. EU Democracy Promotion in Croatia.” Iconocrazia, no. 12. http://www.iconocrazia.it/western-balkan-countries-in-transition-eu-democracy-promotion-in-croatia/
   Google Scholar
• Citizens Organized to Monitor Elections (GONG). 2005. Final Report on the Election of President of the Republic of Croatia. Zagreb: GONG. 2 and 16 January 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Committee to Protect Journalists. 2000. “Attacks on the Press 1999: Croatia.” https://cpj.org/2000/03/attacks-on-the-press-1999-croatia.php
   Google Scholar
• Costa Pinto, A., and L. Morlino. 2011. Dealing with the Legacy of Authoritarianism. The Politics of the past in Southern European Democracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Čular, G. 2000. “Political Development in Croatia 1990-2000: Fast Transition Postponed Consolidation.” Croatian Political Science Review 37 (5): 30–46.
   Google Scholar
• Di Cortona Pietro, G. 2011. “Tra Vecchio E Nuovo Regime. Il Peso Delle Eredità Nella Costruzione Della Democrazia.” In Il Passato Che Non Passa: Il Ruolo Delle Eredità Nelle Democratizzazioni, edited by G. Pietro Di Cortona and O. Lanza, 11–39. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Dolenec, D. 2013. Democratic Institutions and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Europe. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2003. Croatia. Stabilization and Association Report. Brussels: European Commission. http://www.emins.org/sr/aktivnosti/konferencije/solun/pdf/zvanicna/sap-cro.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2004. Communication from the Commission. Opinion on Croatia’s Application for Membership on the European Union. Brussels: European Commission. https://www.fer.unizg.hr/_download/repository/cr_croat.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2005. Croatia. Progress Report. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/archives/pdf/key_documents/2005/package/sec_1424_final_progress_report_hr_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2006. Croatia. Progress Report. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2006/nov/hr_sec_1385_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2007. Croatia. Progress Report. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2007/nov/croatia_progress_reports_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2008. Croatia. Progress Report. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/press_corner/key-documents/reports_nov_2008/croatia_progress_report_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2009. Croatia. Progress Report. Brussels: European Commission. http://www.pfri.uniri.hr/~axel/documents/hr_rapport_2009_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2012. Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Croatia. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/hr_analytical_2012_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Esen, B., and S. Gumuscu. 2016. “Rising Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly 37 (9): 1581–1606. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. 2005. Transition Report 2005. Business in Transition. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2002. Croatia. Stabilization and Association Report. Brussels: European Commission. http://www.esiweb.org/pdf/croatia_croatia_sap_report_2002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. 2006. Political Change in Post-Communist Slovakia and Croatia: from Nationalist to Europeanist. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom of the Press (FOP). 2002. Croatia. New York: Freedom House.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom of the Press (FOP). 2003. Croatia. New York: Freedom House.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom of the Press (FOP). 2004. Croatia. New York: Freedom House.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom of the Press (FOP). 2005. Croatia. New York: Freedom House.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom of the Press (FOP). 2008. Croatia. New York: Freedom House.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom of the Press (FOP). 2009. Croatia. New York: Freedom House.
   Google Scholar
• GONG. 2007. Final Report on the Election of Representatives to the Croatian Parliament. Zagreb: GONG. 25 November 2007.
   Google Scholar
• GONG. 2010. Final Report on the Presidential Elections 2009-2010. Zagreb: GONG.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, A. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: the Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herz, J., eds. 1982. From Dictatorship to Democracy. Coping with the Legacies of Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism. Westport-London: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hite, K., and L. Morlino. 2004. “Problematizing the Links between Authoritarian Legacies and «good» Democracy.” In Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe, edited by K. Hite and P. Cesarini, 25–84. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. 1991. The Third Wave. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jowitt, K. 1992. “The Leninist Legacy.” In New World Disorder. The Leninist Extinction, edited by K. Jowitt, 284–305. Cambridge: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karl, T., and P. Schmitter. 1991. “Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe.” International Social Science Journal 128 (2): 267–282.
   Google Scholar
• Kasapović, M. 2008. “Semi-presidentialism in Croatia.” In Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by R. Elgie and S. Moestrup, 51–64. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, I. 1998. “Croatian Politics: Authoritarianism or Democracy?” Contemporary Politics 4 (3): 247–258. doi:10.1080/13569779808449966.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchheimer, O. 1965. “Confining Conditions and Revolutionary Breakthroughs.” American Political Science Review 59 (4): 964–974. doi:10.2307/1953216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lani, R., and F. Cupi. 2002. “The Difficult Road to the Independent Media: Is the Post-Communist Transition Over?” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 2 (1): 75–89. doi:10.1080/14683850208454673.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., ed. 1998. Modern Europe after Fascism. 1943-1980s. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and J. Loxton. 2013. “Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in the Andes.” Democratization 20 (1): 107–136. doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.738864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J., and A. Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore-London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loxton, J., and S. Mainwaring, Eds. 2018. Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malenica, Z. 2005. “Corruption in the Judiciary and the State Administration in the Republic of Croatia.” In Between Authoritarianism and Democracy. Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia, edited by D. Vujadinović, 455–469. Vol. II. Belgrade: CEDET.
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. 2010. “Authoritarian Legacies, Politics of the past and the Quality of Democracy in Southern Europe: Open Conclusions.” South European Society and Politics 15 (3): 507–529. doi:10.1080/13608746.2010.513609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nations in Transit (NIT). 1998-2017. Croatia. New York: Freedom House.
   Google Scholar
• Nizich, I., Ž. Markić, and J. Laber. 1995. Civil and Political Rights in Croatia. Helsinki: Human Rights Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Coordinator of US Assistance to Europe and Eurasia (EUR/ACE). 2001. SEED Act Implementation Report. Supporting for East European Democracy. Fiscal Year 2000. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). 1997. “Statement: Presidential Election in the Republic of Croatia.” Warsaw: OSCE. http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/croatia/15773?download=true
   Google Scholar
• OSCE. 2003. Republic of Croatia. Parliamentary Elections 23 November 2003. OSCE/ODIHR Expert Team Report. Warsaw: OSCE. http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/croatia/42559?download=true
   Google Scholar
• OSCE. 2008. Republic of Croatia. Parliamentary Elections, 25 November 2007. OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Report. Warsaw: OSCE. http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/croatia/31736?download=true
   Google Scholar
• OSCE. 2010. Republic of Croatia. Presidential Elections, 27 December 2009 and 10 January 2010. OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE. http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/67596?download=true
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Liñán, A., and S. Mainwaring. 2013. “Regime Legacies and Levels of Democracy: Evidence from Latin America.” Comparative Politics 45 (4): 379–397. doi:10.5129/001041513X13815259182785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruško, Z. 2007. “Media and Civic Values.” In Democratic Transition in Croatia. Value Transformation, Education and Media, edited by S. Ramet and D. Matić, 224–244. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267. doi:10.2307/2586011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P., and T. Skocpol. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science.” In Political Science. State of Discipline, edited by I. Katznelson and H. Milner, 693–721. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Pop-Eleches, G. 2007. “Historical Legacies and Post-Communist Regime Change.” The Journal of Politics 69 (4): 908–926. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00598.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pridham, G. 2000. “Confining Conditions and Breaking with the Past: Historical Legacies and Political Learning in Transitions to Democracy.” Democratization 7 (2): 36–64. doi:10.1080/13510340008403659.
   Google Scholar
• Pusić, V. 1998. “Croatia at the Crossroads.” Journal of Democracy 9 (1): 111–124. doi:10.1353/jod.1998.0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimundo, F. 2015. “Strategic Silence as a Third Way: Political Parties and Transitional Justice.” Democratization 22 (6): 1054–1073. doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.901965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramet, S. 2010. “Politics in Croatia since 1990.” In Central and Southeast European Politics since 1989, edited by S. Ramet, 258–285. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramet, S. 2011. “Croatia and Serbia since 1991: an Assessment of Their Similarities and Differences.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 (2): 263–290. doi:10.1080/13523279.2011.564098.
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. 2006. Global Corruption Report 2006. Country Report Croatia. Berlin: Transparency International.
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. 2014. “EU Leverage and National Interests in the Balkans: the Puzzles of Enlargement Ten Years On.” JCMS 52 (1): 122–138.
   Google Scholar
• Wittenberg, J. 2006. Crucibles of Political Loyalty: Church Institutions and Electoral Continuity in Hungary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar