A tale of two fears: negotiating trust and neighborly relations in urbanizing Turkey

References

• Bardakçi, M. 2015. “The Alevi Opening of the AKP Government in Turkey: Walking a Tightrope between Democracy and Identity.” Turkish Studies 16 (3): 349–370. doi:10.1080/14683849.2015.1050959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelik, A. B., R. Bilali, and Y. Iqbal. 2017. “Patterns of ‘Othering’ in Turkey: A Study of Ethnic, Ideological, and Sectarian Polarisation.” South European Society and Politics 22 (2): 217–238. doi:10.1080/13608746.2016.1250382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnskov, C. 2007. “Determinants of Generalized Trust: A Cross-country Comparison.” Public Choice 130: 1–21. doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9069-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M., L. Giard, and P. Mayol. 1988. The Practice of Everyday Life, Vol. 2: Living and Cooking. Translated by Timothy J. Tomasik. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delhey, J., and K. Newton. 2005. “Predicting Cross-national Levels of Social Trust: Global Attern or Nordic Exceptionalism?” European Sociological Review 21 (4): 311–327. doi:10.1093/esr/jci022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez Medrano, J. 2013. “Interpersonal Trust.” ASEP/JDS. Accessed 8 April 2013. http://www.jdsurvey.net/jds/jdsurveyMaps.jsp?Idioma=I&SeccionTexto=0404&NOID=104
   Google Scholar
• Erder, S. 1996. İstanbul’a Bir Kent Kondu: Ümraniye [A City Happened Upon Istanbul: Ümraniye]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayıncılık A. Ş.
   Google Scholar
• Erder, S. 1999. “Where Do You Hail From?: Localism and Networks in Istanbul.” In Istanbul: Between the Global and the Local, Translated and edited by Ç. Keyder, 161–171. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, A. 2015. Mamak: Tarih ve Kültür Atlası [Mamak: A History and Cultural Atlas], 2 vols. Ankara: Mamak Belediyesi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Ergun, A., and A. Erdemir. 2010. “Negotiating Insider and Outsider Identities in the Field: “Insider” in a Foreign Land; “Outsider” in One’s Own Land.” Field Methods 22 (1): 16–38. doi:10.1177/1525822X09349919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, T. 1996. “Women and the Housing Environment: The Experiences of Turkish Migrant Women in Squatter (Gecekondu) and Apartment Housing.” Environment and Behavior 28 (6): 764–798. doi:10.1177/001391659602800603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, T. 1997. “Squatter (Gecekondu) Housing versus Apartment Housing: Turkish Rural-to-urban Migrant Residents’ Perspectives.” Habitat International 21 (1): 91–106. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(96)00048-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, T. 2011. “Understanding The Experiences Of The Politics Of Urbanization In Two Gecekondu (Squatter) Neighborhoods Under Two Urban Regimes: Ethnography In The Urban Periphery Of Ankara, Turkey.” Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development 40: 67–108.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, T., and B. Hatiboğlu. 2018. “Gendering Residential Space: From Squatter and Slum Housing to the Apartment Estates in Turkish Renewal Projects.” City & Community 17 (3): 808–834. doi:10.1111/cico.12325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. 2014. “Relational Trust: Outline of a Bourdieusian Theory of Interpersonal Trust.” Journal of Trust Research 4 (2): 167–192. doi:10.1080/21515581.2014.966829.
   Google Scholar
• Grimpe, B. 2019. “Attending to the Importance of Context: Trust as a Process in Global Microfinance.” Journal of Trust Research 9 (1): 87–109. doi:10.1080/21515581.2019.1566073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. 2006. Trust. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. 2012. “Political Culture.” In The Routledge Handbook of Modern Turkey, edited by M. Heper and S. Sayarı, 171–181. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karakayali, N. 2004. “Reading Bourdieu with Adorno: The Limits of Critical Theory and Reflexive Sociology.” Sociology 38 (2): 351–368. doi:10.1177/0038038504040869.
   Google Scholar
• Kayaoğlu, A. 2017. “Determinants of Trust in Turkey.” European Societies 19 (4): 492–516. doi:10.1080/14616696.2016.1228992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodyakov, D. 2007. “Trust as A Process: A Three-dimensional Approach.” Sociology 41 (1): 115–132. doi:10.1177/0038038507072285.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, T., and Ö. Ünsal. 2010. “‘Urban Transformation’ as State-led Property Transfer: An Analysis of Two Cases of Urban Renewal in Istanbul.” Urban Studies 47 (7): 1479–1499. doi:10.1177/0042098009353629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 2000. “Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives.” In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, edited by D. Gambetta, 94–107. Oxford: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• McEvily, B. 2011. “Reorganizing the Boundaries of Trust: From Discrete Alternatives to Hybrid Forms.” Organization Science 22 (5): 1266–1276. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. S., and T. Mitamura. 2003. “Are Surveys on Trust Trustworthy?” Social Psychology Quarterly 66 (1): 62–70. doi:10.2307/3090141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, A. 2007. “Gender and Mahalle (Neighborhood) Space in Istanbul.” Gender, Place & Culture 14 (3): 335–354. doi:10.1080/09663690701324995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. 2013. “Process Views of Trusting and Crises.” In Handbook of Advances in Trust Research, edited by R. Bachmann and A. Zaheer, 285–305. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nannestad, P. 2008. “What Have We Learned About Generalized Trust, If Anything?” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 413–436. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öktem, K. 2008. “Being Muslim at the Margins: Alevis and the AKP.” Middle East Report 246: 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Poyraz, B. 2005. “The Turkish State and Alevis: Changing Parameters of an Uneasy Relationship.” Middle Eastern Studies 41 (4): 503–516. doi:10.1080/00263200500119233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poyraz, U. 2011. Looking at the Urban Transformation Project from the Gecekondu Dwellers’ Perspective: The Case of Mamak. Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, B. 2017. “The House Unbound: Refiguring Gender and Domestic Boundaries in Urbanizing Southeast Turkey.” City & Society 29 (1): 14–34. doi:10.1111/ciso.12110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankland, D. 2012. “Islam.” In The Routledge Handbook of Modern Turkey, edited by M. Heper and S. Sayarı, 108–115. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Six, F., B. Nooteboom, and A. Hoogendoorn. 2010. “Actions that Build Interpersonal Trust: A Relational Signalling Perspective.” Review of Social Economy 68 (3): 285–315. doi:10.1080/00346760902756487.
   Google Scholar
• Wasti, S. A., H. H. Tan, and S. E. Erdil. 2011. “Antecedents of Trust across Foci: A Comparative Study of Turkey and China.” Management and Organization Review 7 (2): 279–302. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00186.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Values Survey. 2014. “World Values Survey Wave - Time Series: A165. - Most People Can Be Trusted.” Accessed 20 April 2016. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp
   Google Scholar