South caucasus and a ‘New Great Game’: the communication of competition in securitised international relations

References

• Abbasov, N., and D. Siroky. 2018. “Joining the Club: Explaining Alliance Preferences in the South Caucasus.” Caucasus Survey 6 (3): 252–267. doi:10.1080/23761199.2018.1507599.
   Google Scholar
• Abushov, K. 2009. “Policing the near Abroad: Russian Foreign Policy in the South Caucasus.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 63 (2): 187–212. doi:10.1080/10357710902895129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, M., and B. Buzan. 2011. “Securitisation, Sectors and Functional Differentiation.” Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 413–425. doi:10.1177/0967010611418710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. W. 2000. “NATO Expansion and Implications for Southern Tier Stability.” In Crossroads and Conflict: Security and Foreign Policy in the Caucasus and Central Asia, edited by G. K. Bertsch, C. Craft, S. A. Jones, and M. Beck, 129–139. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Antonopoulos, P., R. Velez, and D. Cottle. 2017. “NATO’s Push into the Caucasus: Geopolitical Flashpoints and Limits for Expansion.” Defence and Security Analysis 33 (4): 366–379. doi:10.1080/14751798.2017.1379119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baele, S. J., and C. P. Thomson. 2017. “An Experimental Agenda for Securitisation Theory.” International Studies Review 19: 646–666. doi:10.1093/isr/vix014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. 2012. “The ‘Great Game’: The History of an Evocative Phase.” Asian Affairs 43 (1): 61–80. doi:10.1080/03068374.2012.646404.
   Google Scholar
• Boréus, K., and G. Bergström. 2017. Analysing Text and Discourse: Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Waever, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A Framework for Analysis. Boulder (CO): Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Celikpala, M. 2010. “Escalating Rivalries and Diverging Interests: Prospects for Stability and Security in the Black Sea Region.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 10 (3): 287–302. doi:10.1080/14683857.2010.503640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, A. 2012. Great Games, Local Rules: The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, S. E., R. N. McDermott, W. O’Malley, V. Socor, and S. F. Starr. 2004. Regional Security in the South Caucasus: The Role of NATO. Washington DC: Central Asia Caucasus Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbertson, I. 1994/1995. “The New “Great Game.” World Policy Journal 11 (4, Winter): 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. 2003. “The New Great Game and the New Great Gamers: Disciples of Kipling and MacKinder.” Central Asian Survey 22 (1): 83–102. doi:10.1080/0263493032000108644.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. 2016. “Extraordinary or Ordinary Emergency Measures: What, and Who, Defines the ‘Success’ of Securitisation?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (2): 677–694. doi:10.1080/09557571.2015.1077651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromkin, D. 1979. “The Great Game in Asia.” Foreign Affairs 58: 936–951. doi:10.2307/20040512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German, T. 2012. Regional Cooperation in the South Caucasus: Good Neighbours or Distant Relatives? Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, E. 1980. “Great Britain’s Great Game: An Introduction.” The International History Review 2 (2): 160–171. doi:10.1080/07075332.1980.9640210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur, P., and F. Labarre. 2011. “NATO’s Engagement in the South Caucasus: Looking for Energy Security or Expanding Norms and Values?” In Reassessing Security in the South Caucasus: Regional Conflicts and Transformation, edited by A. Jafalian, 157–176. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kazantsev, A. 2008. “Russian Policy in Central Asia and the Caspian Sea Region.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (6, August): 1073–1088. doi:10.1080/09668130802180983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer, M. 2010. “European Partnership and the South Caucasus: Framework Condition for a Grand Bargain in 2025?” Future Scenarios for the South Caucasus by Caucasus Analytical Digest No. 19, August 13. 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kurecic, P. 2010. “The New Great Game: Rivalry of Geostrategies and Geoeconomics in Central Asia.” Hrvatski Geografski Glasnik 72 (1): 21–48. doi:10.21861/HGG.2010.72.01.02.
   Google Scholar
• Lieven, A. 1999/2000. “The (Not So) Great Game.” The National Interest 58, Winter: 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., and A. Jaffe. 1998. “The Myth of the Caspian ‘Great Game’: The Real Geopolitics of Energy.” Survival 40 (44): 112–129. doi:10.1080/713660015.
   Google Scholar
• Markedonov, S. 2017. “Russian Policy toward the South Caucasus: Security, Unity, and Diversity.” In The New Geopolitics of the South Caucasus: Prospects for Regional Cooperation and Conflict Resolution, edited by S. T. Hunter, 127–153. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mastanduno, M. 1997. “Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War.” International Security 21 (4): 49–88. doi:10.1162/isec.21.4.49. Spring.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molchanov, M. A. 2015. Eurasian Regionalisms and Russian Foreign Policy. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. 1973. “Myth and Reality in the Great Game.” Asian Affairs 4 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1080/03068377308729652.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, S. 2004. “Great Game or Grubby Game? The Struggle for Control of the Caspian.” Geopolitics 9 (1): 138–160. doi:10.1080/14650040412331307862.
   Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A., and A. Libman, eds. 2015. Autocratic and Democratic External Influences in Post-Soviet Eurasia. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Peña-Ramos, J. 2017. “The Impact of Russian Intervention in Post-Soviet Secessionist Conflict in the South Caucasus on Russian Geo-energy Interests.” International Journal of Conflict and Violence 11 (3): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Priego, A. 2008. “NATO Cooperation Towards the South Caucasus.” Caucasian Review of International Affairs 2: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. 2008. “The Great Power ‘Great Game’ between India and China: ‘The Logic of Geography.’.” Geopolitics 13 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1080/14650040701783243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simao, L., and M. R. Freire. 2008. “The EU’s Neighbourhood Policy and the South Caucasus: Unfolding New Patterns of Cooperation.” Caucasian Review of International Affairs 2(4). Autumn.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, G. 2019. “Digital Communication Disrupting Hegemonic Power in Global Politics: New Media Shape New World Order.” Russia in Global Affairs 17 (2): 132–154. doi:10.31278/1810-6374-2019-17-2-108-130.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, G., and M. Glaser. 2019. “New Cold War and the Crisis of the Liberal Global Order.” Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law 12 (3): 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Stritzel, H. 2007. “Towards a Theory of Securitisation: Copenhagen and Beyond.” European Journal of International Relations 13 (3): 357–383. doi:10.1177/1354066107080128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman, G. 2010. Branding Democracy: US Regime Change in Post-Soviet Eastern Europe. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Toal, G. 2017. Near Abroad: Putin, the West and the Contest over Ukraine and the Caucasus. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trenin, D. 2009. “Russia’s Spheres of Interest, Not Influence.” The Washington Quarterly 32 (4): 3–22. doi:10.1080/01636600903231089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenin, D. 2009a. “Russia in the Caucasus: Reversing the Tide.” The Brown Journal of World Affairs 15 (2, Spring/Summer): 143–155.
   Google Scholar
• Valiyev, A. 2018. “U.S. Disengagement from the South Caucasus: The Throne Is Never Vacant.” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 545, October.
   Google Scholar
• van der Pijl, K. 2009. “Global and Local Rivalries in NATO’s Push Towards the Caucasus.” Spectrum: Journal of Global Politics 1 (1): 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gils, E. 2018. “Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy Strategies and the European Union: Successful Resistance and Pursued Influence.” Europe-Asia Studies 70 (5): 738–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waever, O. 2011. “Politics, Security Theory.” Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 465–480. doi:10.1177/0967010611418718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. C. 2003. “Words, Images, Enemies: Securitisation and International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 47: 511–531. doi:10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar