References
- Adler-Nissen, R. 2011. “Opting Out of an Ever Closer Union: The Integration Doxa and the Management of Sovereignty.” West European Politics 34 (5): 1092–1113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.591102.
- Agnew, J. 2019. “Taking Back Control? The Myth of Territorial Sovereignty and the Brexit Fiasco.” Territory, Politics, Governance 8 (2): 259–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1687327.
- Albert, M., and B. Buzan. 2013. “International Relations Theory and the “Social Whole”: Encounters and Gaps between IR and Sociology.” International Political Sociology 7 (2): 117–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12013.
- Andersen, S., and N. Sitter. 2006. “Differentiated Integration: What is It and How Much Can the EU Accommodate?” Journal of European Integration 28 (4): 313–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330600853919.
- Behr, H. 2007. “The European Union in the Legacies of Imperial Rule? EU Accession Politics Viewed from a Historical Comparative Perspective.” European Journal of International Relations 13 (2): 239–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107076956.
- Bell, E. 2020. “Post-Brexit Nationalism: Challenging the British Political Tradition?” Journal of Contemporary European Studies: 1–17. Early Access. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1750351.
- Bickerton, C. 2019a. “The Limits of Differentiation: Capitalist Diversity and Labor Mobility as Drivers of Brexit.” Comparative European Politics 17 (2): 231–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00160-x.
- Bickerton, C. 2019b. “‘Parliamentary’, ‘Popular’ and ‘Pooled’: Conflicts of Sovereignty in the United Kingdom’s Exit from the European Union.” Journal of European Integration 41 (7): 887–902. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1670172.
- Bonde, J. 2002. “The Convention about the FutureS of Europe.” European Convention Website. CONV 277/02. Accessed 18 July 2013. http://european-convention.eu.int/pdf/reg/en/02/cv00/cv00277.en02.pdf
- Bull, H. 1995. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Buzan, B. 2001. “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR.” Review of International Studies 27 (3): 471–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210501004715.
- Caporaso, J. 2000. “Changes in the Westphalian Order: Territory, Public Authority, and Sovereignty.” International Studies Review 2 (2): 1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00203.
- Del Sarto, R. 2016. “Normative Empire Europe: The European Union, Its Borderlands and the Arab Spring.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (2): 215–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12282.
- Diez, T., I. Manners, and R. Whitman. 2011. “The Changing Nature of International Institutions in Europe: The Challenge of the European Union.” Journal of European Integration 33 (2): 117–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2011.543522.
- Diez, T., and R. Whitman. 2002. “Analyzing European Integration: Reflecting on the English School Scenarios for an Encounter.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (1): 43–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00343.
- Dupuy, C. and Pollard, J. 2014. “A Dethroned King? The Limits of State Infrastructural Power in France„. Public Administration 92 (2): 359–374 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.2014.92.issue-2
- Eleftheriadis, P. 2007. “The Idea of a European Constitution.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (1): 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gql022.
- Fortin-Rittberger, F. 2014. “Exploring the Relationship between Infrastructural and Coercive State Capacity.” Democratization 21 (7): 1244–1264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.960207.
- Foster, R. 2013. “Tabula Imperi Europae: A Cartographic Approach to the Current Debate on the European Union as Empire.” Geopolitics 18 (2): 371–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.716466.
- Frendo, M. 2003. “For a European Constitution Which Recognizes Secularism.” European Convention Website. CONV 557/03. Accessed 18 July 2013. http://european-convention.eu.int/pdf/reg/en/03/cv00/cv00577.en03.pdf
- Gravier, M. 2009. “The Next European Empire?” European Societies 11 (5): 627–647. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690902785687.
- Haas, E. 1967. “The Uniting of Europe and the Uniting of Latin America.” Journal of Common Market Studies 5 (4): 315–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1967.tb01153.x.
- Halliday, F. 2005. “He Hasn’t Finished Yet: Achievements and Challenges in the Work of Michael Mann.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 (2): 509–516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298060340020401.
- Hobson, J. 2005a. “Mann, the State and War.” In An Anatomy of Power: The Social Theory of Michael Mann, edited by J. A. Hall and R. Schroeder, 150–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hobson, J. 2005b. “Eurocentrism and Neorealism in the ‘Fall of Mann’: Will the Real Mann Please Stand Up?” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 (2): 517–527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298060340020501.
- Holzinger, K., and F. Schimmelfennig. 2012. “Differentiated Integration in the European Union: Many Concepts, Sparse Theory, Few Data.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (3): 292–305.
- Hooghe, L., and G. Gary Marks. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409.
- Kuhn, T. 2019. “Grand Theories of European Integration Revisited: Does Identity Politics Shape the Course of European Integration?” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (8): 1213–1230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1622588.
- Lavanex, S. 2011. “Concentric Circles of Flexible ‘European’ Integration: A Typology of EU External Governance Relations.” Comparative European Politics 9 (4/5): 372–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2011.7.
- Lawson, G. 2006. “A Conversation with Michael Mann.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 (2): 477–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298060340020201.
- Leruth, B., S. Gänzle, and J. Trondal. 2019. “Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (5): 1013–1030. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12869.
- Lord, C. 2015. “Utopia or Dystopia? Towards a Normative Analysis of Differentiated Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 783–798. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020839.
- Lungo, M. 2003. “European Integration: Between Micro-Regionalism and Globalism.” Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (3): 475–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00431.
- Mann, M. 1984. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results.” http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/mann/Doc1.pdf
- Mann, M. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Volume I: A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mann, M. 1993. “Nation-States in Europe and Other Continents: Diversifying, Developing, Not Dying.” Daedalus 122 (3): 115–140.
- Mann, M. 1997. “Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-state?” Review of International Political Economy 4 (3): 472–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/096922997347715.
- Mann, M. 2005. “Explaining International Relations, Empires and European Miracles: A Response.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 (2): 541–550. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298060340020701.
- Mann, M. 2008. “Infrastructural Power Revisited„. Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (3): 355–365
- Marks, G. 2011. “Europe and Its Empires: From Rome to the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (1): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02218.x.
- McNamara, K. 2018. “Authority under Construction: The European Union in Comparative Political Perspective.” Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (7): 1510–1525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12784.
- Neumann, I. 1998. “European Identity, EU Expansion, and the Integration/Exclusion Nexus.” Alternatives 23 (3): 397–416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549802300305.
- Parker, N. 2010. “Empire as a Geopolitical Figure.” Geopolitics 15 (1): 109–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040903420412.
- Schimmelfennig, F. 2019. “Differentiated Integration and European Union Politics.” Oxford Research Encyclopedias. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1142.
- Schimmelfennig, F., D. Leuffen, and B. Rittberger. 2015. “The European Union as a System of Differentiated Integration: Interdependence, Politicization and Differentiation.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 764–782. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020835.
- Schimmelfennig, F., and T. Winzen. 2019. “Grand Theories, Differentiated Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (8): 1172–1192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1576761.
- Shore, C. 2006. “‘Government without Statehood’? Anthropological Perspectives on Governance and Sovereignty in the European Union.” European Law Journal 12 (6): 709–724. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00343.x.
- Slater, D. 2008. “Can Leviathan Be Democratic? Competitive Elections, Robust Mass Politics, and State Infrastructural Power.” Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (3–4): 252–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-008-9026-8.
- Soifer, H. 2008. “State Infrastructural Power: Approaches to Conceptualization and Measurement.” Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (3–4): 231–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-008-9028-6.
- Stanbridge, K. A. 1997. “England, France and Their North American Colonies: An Analysis of Absolutist State Power in Europe and in the New World.” Journal of Historical Sociology 10 (1): 27–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6443.00029.
- Stivachtis, Y. A. 2013. “The English School and the Concept of ‘Empire’: Theoretical and Practical/political Implications.” Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought 3 (1): 129–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2013.809241.
- Stivachtis, Y. A., and M. Webber. 2011. “Regional International Society in a Post-Enlargement Europe.” Journal of European Integration 33 (2): 101–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2011.543519.
- Wæver, O. 1996. “Europe’s Three Empires: A Watsonian Interpretation of Post-Wall European Security.” In International Society after the Cold War: Anarchy and Order Reconsidered, edited by R. Fawn and J. Larkins, 220–260. London: Macmillan Press.
- Watson, A. 1968. The Nature and Problems of the Third World. Claremont: Claremont Colleges.
- Watson, A. 1992. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. London: Routledge.
- Watson, A. 1997. The Limits of Independence: Relations between States in the Modern World. London: Routledge.
- Watson, A. 2007. Hegemony and History. London: Routledge.
- Webber, D. 2014. “How Likely Is It that the European Union Will Disintegrate? A Critical Analysis of Competing Theoretical Perspectives.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (2): 341–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066112461286.
- Wight, M. 1977. Systems of States, edited by H. Bull. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
- Wilson, P., and T. Oliver. 2019. “The International Consequences of Brexit: An English School Analysis.” Journal of European Integration 41 (8): 1009–1025. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1665656.
- Ziblatt, D. 2004. “Rethinking the Origins of Federalism: Puzzle, Theory and Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Europe.” World Politics 57 (1): 70–98.
- Zielonka, J. 2008. “Europe as a Global Actor: Empire by Example?” International Affairs 84 (3): 471–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00718.x.
- Zielonka, J. 2012. “Empires and the Modern International System.” Geopolitics 17 (3): 502–525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.595440.