Moral policy entrepreneurship: the role of NGOs in the EU’s external human rights policy towards China

References

• Ackrill, R., A. Kay, and N. Zahariadis. 2013. “Ambiguity, Multiple Streams, and EU Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (6): 871–887. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.781824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balme, R. 2008. The European Union, China and Human Rights. In Laïdi, Zaki (ed.). EU Foreign Policy in a Globalized World: Normative Power and Social Preferences, 143–173. Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Barigazzi, J. 2020. “European Union Diplomats Face the Enemy within - POLITICO.” May 13, https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/13/european-union-diplomats-face-the-enemy-within–257633. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Glencoe: Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Bossuyt, F. 2021. “The Influence of Interest Groups on the EU’s Foreign Policy: Assessing and Explaining the Influence of Human Rights NGOs on the EU’s Human Rights Promotion in the Post-Soviet Space.” Contemporary Politics 0 (0): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021
   Google Scholar
• Busby, J. W. 2007. “Bono Made Jesse Helms Cry: Jubilee 2000, Debt Relief, and Moral Action in International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (2): 247–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, P., and S. James. 2014. “Policy Windows, Ambiguity and Commission Entrepreneurship: Explaining the Relaunch of the European Union’s Economic Reform Agenda.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, O., and M. Patrick. 2019. “Une Liaison Transnationale: Exploring the Role of NGOs in EU Foreign Policy-Making on the ICC.” Comparative European Politics 17 (5): 696–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2012. “EU Strategic Framework on Human Rights and Democracy.” http://www.consilium.europa.eu/Newsroom. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2020. “Council Conclusions on EU Priorities in UN Human Rights Fora in 2020.” Brussels. http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5982-2020-INIT/en/pdf. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2021. “Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/478 of 22 March 2021 Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 Concerning Restrictive Measures against Serious Human Rights Violations and Abuses”. Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2021:099I:FULL&from=EN. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. E., and J. True. 2017. “Norm Entrepreneurship in Foreign Policy: William Hague and the Prevention of Sexual Violence in Conflict.” Foreign Policy Analysis 13: 701–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellmuth, Lisa Maria, and Jonas Tallberg. 2017. “Advocacy Strategies in Global Governance: Inside versus Outside Lobbying.” Political Studies 65 (3): 705–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716684356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derderian, K. 2019. “Opinion: Europe’s Real Test in China: Human Rights – European Institutions Office Amnesty International.” Amnesty International. March 22, https://www.amnesty.eu/news/opinion-europes-real-test-in-china-human-rights/. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• EEAS. 2018. “EU Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2017.”
   Google Scholar
• EEAS. 2019a. “The European Union and China Held Their 37th Human Rights Dialogue - European External Action Service,” April 2, https://eeas.europa.eu/topics/external-investment-plan/60545/european-union-and-china-held-their-37th-human-rights-dialogue_bg. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• EEAS. 2019b. “EU-NGO Human Rights Forum: Speech by the HR/VP Josep Borrell.” November 4. https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/71508/eu-ngo-human-rights-forum-speech-hrvp-josep-borrell_th. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, A., and L. Pech. 2017. “Respect for Human Rights as a General Objective of the EU’s External Action.” In Research Handboek on EU Law and Human Rights, edited by D.-S. Sionaid and N. Hatzis, 243–266. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Elgstrom, O. 2000. “Norm Negotiations. The Construction of New Norms regarding Gender and Development in Eu Foreign Aid Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 7 (3): 457–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. “European Governance: A White Paper.”
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2020a. “Protection and Promotion of Human Rights - Consilium.” https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/human-rights/. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2020b. “Respect for Minorities, Beliefs and Religions - Hearing DROI.” February 17. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/respect-for-minorities-beliefs-and-relig/product-details/20200211CHE07063. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2020c. “Forced Labour and the Situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region.” December 17, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0375_EN.html. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• FIDH. 2019. “China: Tibetans and Uyghurs to Hold Demonstration during EU-China Summit.” April 4, https://www.fidh.org/en/international-advocacy/european-union/china-tibetans-and-uyghurs-to-hold-demonstration-during-eu-china. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, G. 2019. “The EU-China Partnership: Balancing between Divergence and Convergence.” Asia Europe Journal 17: 281–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GLOBUS. 2018. “What Role for CSOs in EU Foreign Policy?” Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, A. 2017. “Policy Entrepreneurs and Policy Formulation.” In Handbook of Policy Formulation, edited by M. Howlett and I. Mukherjee, 265–282, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, B. 2019. “European Companies Get Rich in China’s ‘Open Air Prison’ | Human Rights without Frontiers.” Human Rights Without Frontiers. August 22. https://hrwf.eu/european-companies-get-rich-in-chinas-open-air-prison/. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, C. 2010. “Non-Governmental Organisations and the European Union’s Promotion of Human Rights in China: NGO Influence or NO Influence?” EU Diplomacy Papers 4: 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• HRIC. 2017. “Joint NGO Letter to European Leaders Prior to EU-China Summit: Prioritize Human Rights.” Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• HRW. 2019a. “China’s Algorithms of Repression - Reverse Engineering a Xinjiang Policy Mass Surveillance App.” http://www.hrw.org. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• HRW. 2019b. “NGOs Urge the EU to Press China on Human Rights - Joint Letter to the EU and EU Member States | Human Rights Watch.” March 13. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/03/13/ngos-urge-eu-press-china-human-rights. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• HRW. 2019c. “Make China’s Rights Crisis a Summit Priority | Human Rights Watch.” April 4, https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/04/04/eu-make-chinas-rights-crisis-summit-priority. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• HRW. 2020. “Europe Needs to Stop China’s Assault on the Global Rights System.” https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/02/11/europe-needs-stop-chinas-assault-global-rights-system. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Junk, W. M. 2016. “Two Logics of NGO Advocacy: Understanding inside and outside Lobbying on EU Environmental Policies.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (2): 236–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W. M., and A. Rasmussen. 2019. “Framing by the Flock: Collective Issue Definition and Advocacy Success.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (4): 483–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. D. 2018. “The Limits of Western Human Rights Discourse.” In Human Rights in Thick and Thin Societies - Universality without Uniformity, edited by S. D. Kaplan, 103–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, A. 2014. “The EU’s China Problem: A Battle over Norms.” International Politics 51: 214–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Kjersti, L. 2019. “From Moral Entrepreneurs to Moral Advocates.” In Advocates of Humanity: Human Rights NGOs in International Criminal Justice, edited by K. Lohne, 89–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leibold, J. 2020. “Surveillance in China’s Xinjiang Region: Ethnic Sorting, Coercion, and Inducement.” Journal of Contemporary China 29 (121): 46–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leicht, L., and S. Richardson. 2017. “Letter to the EU High Representative Ahead of Her Visit to China | Human Rights Watch.” Human Rights Watch. April 14, https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/04/14/letter-eu-high-representative-ahead-her-visit-china. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, J. E. 2001. “On the Possibilities and Limitations of NGO Participation in International Law and Its Processes: Remarks.” American Society of International Law Proceedings, 95: 295–299.
   Google Scholar
• Maizland, L. 2019. “China’s Repression of Uighurs in Xinjiang | Council on Foreign Relations.” Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-repression-uighurs-xinjiang#chapter-title–0–1. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, R. 2017. “Foreign Policy by Proxy: Democracy and Human Rights Promotion through an Engagement with Civil Society.” In Partnerships in International Policy-Making, edited by R. Marchetti, 275–292, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• McEntire, K., M. L. Jo, and M. Krain. 2015. “Human Rights Organizations as Agents of Change: An Experimental Examination of Framing and Micromobilization.” American Political Science Review 109 (3): 407–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and S. Nicholson-Crotty. 2012. “From Perception to Public Policy: Translating Social Constructions into Policy Designs.” In Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy, edited by A. L. Schneider and H. M. Ingram, 223–242, Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. 2019. “So You Want to Be a Policy Entrepreneur?” Policy Design and Practice 2 (4): 307–323.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., and M. Thomas. 2018. “Policy Entrepreneurs and Collaborative Action: Pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing 10 (2): 153–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the EU. 2019. “Statement by the Mission of China to the EU on Human Rights Day.” December 10, http://www.chinamission.be/eng/gdxw/t1723339.htm. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, L., and L. Tello. 2015. “Labor Rights, Material Interests, and Moral Entrepreneurship.” Human Rights Quarterly 37 (1): 53–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelmann, E. A. 1990. “Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society.” International Organization 44 (4): 479–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, N., and M. Rhinard. 2019. “The ‘Political’ Roles of the European Commission.” Journal of European Integration 41 (2): 203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z. 2012. Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations: Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships. Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations: Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, D. L., E. A. Frongillo, S. Gervais, L. Hoey, P. Menon, T. Ngo, R. J. Stoltzfus, S. Ahmed, and T. Ahmed. 2012. “Nutrition Agenda Setting, Policy Formulation and Implementation: Lessons from the Mainstreaming Nutrition Initiative.” Health Policy and Planning 27 (February): 19–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierobon, C. 2017. “Civil Society in the EU Development and Human Rights Agenda: The Case of DG DEVCO-EIDHR.” In Partnerships in International Policy-Making, 195–213. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, R. A. 1999. The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pozen, D. E. 2008. “We Are All Entrepreneurs Now.” Wake Forest Law Review 43: 283–340. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/wflr43&id=289&div=11&collection=journals
   Google Scholar
• Prososki, P. 2019. “Call to Action: Time to Increase Pressure to Save Uyghurs.” April 8, https://bitterwinter.org/time-to-increase-pressure-to-save-uyghurs/. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C., and P. J. King. 1991. “Policy Entrepreneurs: Their Activity Structure and Function in the Policy Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1 (2): 147–175.
   Google Scholar
• Rozbicka, P., and F. Spohr. 2016. “Interest Groups in Multiple Streams: Specifying Their Involvement in the Framework.” Policy Sciences 49 (1): 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rühlig, T. N., B. Jerdén, F.-P. Van Der Putten, J. Seaman, M. Otero-Iglesias, and A. Ekman. 2018. “Political Values in Europe-China Relations - A Report by the European Think-Tank Network on China (ETNC).”
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shapovalova, N. 2019. “Lobbying and Interest Group Influence in EU Foreign Policy.” In Lobbying in the European Union: Strategies, Dynamics and Trends, edited by D. Dialer and M. Richter, 425–434. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Sherrington, P. 2000. “Shaping the Policy Agenda: Think Tank Activity in the European Union.” Global Society 14 (2): 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeckl, K. 2016. “The Russian Rthodox Church as Moral Norm Entrepreneur.” Religion, State & Society 44 (2): 132–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2000. “Non-Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes.” Governance 13 (1): 45–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STP. 2019a. “EU Must Demand Human Rights for Uyghurs and Kazakhs (Press Release).” Society for Threatened Peoples. August 4, https://www.gfbv.de/en/news/eu-china-gipfel-in-bruessel-9-40-9660/. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• STP. 2019b. “Detention Centers in China - Human Rights Organizations Calls for Sanctions against Those Who are Responsible (Press Release).” November 26, https://www.gfbv.de/en/pm/internierungslager-in-china0-9863/. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• STP. 2019c. “Sakharov Prize for Ilham Tohti (Press Release).” December 17, https://www.gfbv.de/en/pm/sacharow-preis-fuer-ilham-tohti0-9901/. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• STP. 2020. “New Secret Documents on Crimes in Xinjiang.” February 18, https://www.gfbv.de/en/news/neue-geheimdokumente-zu-verbrechen-in-xinjiang0-9935/. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J, Lisa M. Dellmuth, Hans Agné, and Andreas Duit. 2018. “NGO Influence in International Organizations: Information, Access and Exchange.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 213–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341500037X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja, P. 2010. “China-Europe Relations: The Limits of Strategic Partnership.” International Politics 47: 371–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, M., and E. M. Uçarer. 2014. “Access and Agenda-Setting in the European Union: Advocacy NGOs in Comparative Perspective.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 3 (1): 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Uçarer, E. M. 2014. “Tempering the EU? NGO Advocacy in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 27 (1): 127–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNPO. 2017a. “Persecution of Tibetans and Uyghurs: EP Conference Sheds Light on Chinese Counter-Terrorism Policy.” February 9, https://unpo.org/article/19835. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• UNPO. 2017b. “Launch of ‘Friends of Uyghur’ Friendship Group in the European Parliament Brings Together MEPs, NGOs and Public to Celebrate Uyghur Community Culture.” October 20. https://unpo.org/article/20403. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• UNPO. 2018. “2,000 March for Freedom of the Uyghurs in Large-Scale Demonstration Organised by UNPO and WUC.” April 27. https://unpo.org/article/20774. Accessed 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoonacker, S., and K. Pomorska. 2013. “The European External Action Service and Agenda-Setting in European Foreign Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (9): 1316–1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanacopulos, H. 2015. “The Current State of INGOs.” In International NGO Engagement, Advocacy, Activism, edited by H. Yanacopulos, 1–20, Palgrave Macmillan: UK.
   Google Scholar