How to approach state capture in post-communist Europe. A new research agenda

References

• Abrahams, F. 2015. Modern Albania, from Dictatorship to Democracy in Europe. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., A. Blais, S. Bowler, T. Donovan, and O. Listhaug. 2005. Losers’ Consent – Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., L. Pritchett, and M. Woolcock. 2017. Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ateljevic, J., and J. Budak. 2010. “Corruption and Public Procurement: Example from Croatia.” Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies 12 (4): 375–397. doi:10.1080/19448953.2010.531202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, W. 2021a. “The Yugoslav Successor States: From Self-Management Socialism to Political Capitalism.” In Comparative Economic Studies in Europe. A Thirty Year Review, edited by W. Andreff, 279–296. Cham, Palgrave: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, W. 2021b. The Performance of Politically Connected Firms in South East Europe: state capture or business capture? LEQS Paper No. 171/2020. London: London School of Economics. Accessed July 29 2022 . https://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/Assets/Documents/LEQS-Discussion-Papers/LEQSPaper171.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., and S. Becker. 2020. “Democratic Backsliding, Populism, and Public Administration.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3 (1): 19–31. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvz026.
   Google Scholar
• Bhorat, H., M. Buthelezi, I. Chipkin, S. Duma, L. Mondi, C. Peter, M. Qobo, M. Swilling, and H. Friedenstein. 2017. Betrayal of the Promise: How South Africa Is Being Stolen. Stellenbosch: Centre for Complex Systems in Transition.
   Google Scholar
• Bliznakovski, J. 2019. “Party Soldier” (Acessed 7 October 2021. https://www.in-formality.com/wiki/index.php?title=Party_soldiers_(Western_Balkans)
   Google Scholar
• Broms, R., C. Dahlström, and M. Fazekas. 2019. “M. Political Competition and Public Procurement Outcomes.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (9): 1259–1292. doi:10.1177/0010414019830723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, R., and K. Amerhauser. 2022. Illicit Financial Flows in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia. Key Drivers and Current Trends. Geneva: Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime.
   Google Scholar
• Charron, N., C. Dahlström, M. Fazekas, and V. Lapuente. 2017. “Careers, Connections, and Corruption Risks: Investigating the Impact of Bureaucratic Meritocracy on Public Procurement Processes.” The Journal of Politics 79 (1): 89–104. doi:10.1086/687209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipkin, I., and M. Swilling. 2018. Shadow State: The Politics of State Capture. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chipkin, I., and J. Vidojević. 2021. Making Sense of State Capture in South Africa. Submission to the State Capture Commission. Gauteng: Government and Public Policy Think-tank. (Manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Cvetičanin, P. 2022. Captured States And/Or Captured Societies in the Western Balkans. Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetičanin, P., M. Popovikj, and M. Jovanović. 2019. “Informality in the Western Balkans: A Culture, a Contextual Rational Choice, or Both?” Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 19 (2): 1–20. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1692427.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetičanin, P., I. Tomić-Koludrović, M. Petrić, Ž. Zdravković, and A. Leguina. 2021. “From Occupational to Existential Class: How to Analyze Class Structure in Hybrid Societies (The Case of Serbia).” British Journal of Sociology 72 (4): 946–973. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dávid-Barrett, L. 2021. State Capture and Inequality. New York: Center on International Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Dávid-Barrett, E., and M. Fazekas. 2020. “Grand Corruption and Government Change: An Analysis of Partisan Favoritism in Public Procurement.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 26 (4): 411–430. doi:10.1007/s10610-019-09416-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Democratization Policy Council and EUROTHINK. 2021. Sell Out, Tune Out, Get Out, or Freak Out? Understanding Corruption, State Capture, Radicalization, Pacification, Resilience, and Emigration in Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia. Sarajevo and Skopje: Democratization Policy Council and Center for European Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Drishti, E., B. Kopliku, and D. Imami. 2022. “Active Political Engagement, Political Patronage, and Local Labour Markets – The Example of Shkoder.” International Journal of Manpower Accepted for publishing on 5 February 2022. doi:10.1108/IJM-06-2021-0362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EBRD, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2020). Transition Report 2020. State Strikes Back. Brussels, EBRD.
   Google Scholar
• Economist, The. 2022a. Democracy in India. Festive but Frying. London:Economist. 12 February 2022 9.
   Google Scholar
• Economist, The. 2022b. Our crony-capitalism Index. The Makers and the Takers. London:Economist. 12 March 2022 63.
   Google Scholar
• Elbasani, A. 2017. “Judiciary as a Mechanism of State Capture: External Actors, Party Patronage and Informality.” State Capture in the Balkans. Heinrich Boell foundation. https://ba.boell.org/sites/default/files/perspectives_-_09-2017_-_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elbasani, A., and S. Š. Šabić. 2018. “Rule of Law, Corruption and Democratic Accountability in the Course of EU Enlargement.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (9): 1317–1335. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1315162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. “Key Findings of the 2021 Report on Montenegro” Accessed on 20 October 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_5279
   Google Scholar
• Fazekas, F., and G. Kocsis. 2017. “Uncovering High-Level Corruption: Cross-National Objective Corruption Risk Indicators Using Public Procurement Data.” British Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000461.
   Google Scholar
• Fazekas, M., and I. J. Tóth. 2016. “From Corruption to State Capture: A New Analytical Framework with Empirical Applications from Hungary.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 320–334. doi:10.1177/1065912916639137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazekas, M., I. J. Tóth, and L. P. King. 2016. “An Objective Corruption Risk Index Using Public Procurement Data.” European Journal On Criminal Policy Research 22 (3): 369–397. doi:10.1007/s10610-016-9308-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feruleva, N. V., and M. A. Shtefan. 2017. “Detecting Financial Statements Fraud: The Evidence from Russia.” Journal of Corporate Finance Research/корпоративные Финансы 12 (2): 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Freund, C. 2016. Rich People. Poor Countries. The Rise of Emerging Market Tycoons and Their Mega Firms. Washington DC: Peterson Institute of International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., and A. Przeworski. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (11): 1279–1301. 2007 doi:10.1177/0010414007305817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Initiative. 2019. Hotspots of Organized Crime in the Western Balkans. Local Vulnerabilities in a Regional Context. Geneva: Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymała-Busse, A. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, T., and K. Deegan-Krause. 2020. The New Party Challenge: Changing Cycles of Party Birth and Death in Central Europe and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Havrylyshyn, O. 2006. Divergent Paths in Post-Communist Transformation: Capitalism for All or Capitalism for the Few? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Havrylyshyn, O., X. Meng, and M. Tupy. 2016. “25 Years of Reforms in Ex-Communist Countries: Fast and Extensive Reforms Led to Higher Growth and More Political Freedom.” In Policy Analysis No 795. Washington: CATO Institute. Accessed July29 2022. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/25-years-reforms-ex-communist-countries-fast-extensive-reforms-led-higher-growth
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, J. S. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Post-communist Transitions.” World Politics 50 (2): 203–234. doi:10.1017/S0043887100008091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, J., J. Geraint, D. Kaufmann, and M. Schankerman (2000). “Measuring Governance, Corruption, and State Capture: How Firms and Bureaucrats Shape the Business Environment in Transition Economies.” Policy Paper no. 2312. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, J. S., G. Jones, and D. Kaufmann. 2003. “Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture and Influence in Transition Economies.” Journal of Comparative Economics 31 (4): 751–773. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2003.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, J., and D. Kaufmann. 2001. “Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economies.” Finance & Development 38 (3): 31-31.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, A. 2014. “The Political Economy of State Capture in Central Europe.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 88–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, A. 2016. “Corporate State Capture in Open Societies. The Emergence of Corporate Brokerage Party Systems.” East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 30 (3): 594–620. doi:10.1177/0888325416628957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanović, M. 2021. “Pronašli Smo 59 Savetnika U Grockoj, Za Čije Plate Izdavajamo 59 Miliona Dinara [We Found Out 59 Advisors in Grocka. We Pay Them 56 Million Dinars.] Žig Info” 23 August 2021. http://ziginfo.rs/2804/15319-pronasli-smo-59-savetnika-u-grockoj-ua-cije-plate-izdvajamo-preko-56-miliona.html?fbclid=IwAR3cx8Y_LLXDbT9HQEntb-2ForetQsTqvbOaaRU_ZnK5P_1i33hiBlp0iVU ( Accessed: Oct 26, 20121)
   Google Scholar
• Kacarska, S. 2017. Freeing the Captured State in Macedonia: What Role for EU Accession. Analytical Brief. New York: Freedom House.
   Google Scholar
• Kinyakin, A. 2013. “The Oligarchs in Contemporary Russia: From State “Capture” to Subjection to State “Predation”. Revue internationale de politique comparée 20 (3): 115–131. doi:10.3917/ripc.203.0115.
   Google Scholar
• Klíma, M. 2019. Informal Politics in Post-Communist Europe Political Parties, Clientelism and State Capture. Milton Park, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., and M. Spirova. 2011. “Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.” West European Politics 34 (5): 897–921. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.591072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., and M. Spirova. 2012. “Measuring Party Patronage Through Structured Expert Interviews.” In Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies, edited by P. Kopecký, P. Mair, and M. Spirova, 17–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press and ECPR.
   Google Scholar
• Kornai, J., E. Maskin, and G. Roland. 2003. “Understanding the Soft Budget Constraint.” Journal of Economic Literature 41 (4): 1095–1136. doi:10.1257/jel.41.4.1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotarski, K., and Z. Petak. 2021. “When EU Political Convergence Fails in New Member States: Corporate and Party State Capture in Croatia and the Czech Republic.” Europe-Asia Studies 73 (4): 740–765. doi:10.1080/09668136.2020.1864297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozarzewski, P., and M. Bałtowski. 2016. “Change in Economic Policy Paradigm: Privatization and State Capture in Poland.” CASE Research Paper No 3 (127): dx. 21 July 2016. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2814116.
   Google Scholar
• Larraburu, C. R. R., F. Panizza, and G. B. Peters. 2019. “Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments.” Public Administration 97 (1): 147–161. doi:10.1111/padm.12560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magleshov, V. 2020. “Rampage in Parliament Remains Open Wound in North Macedonia” BalkanInsight, 27 April 2020. https://balkaninsight.com/2020/04/27/rampage-in-parliament-remains-open-wound-in-north-macedonia/ Accessed 3 May 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Magyar, B. 2016. Post-Communist Mafia State-The Case of Hungary. Budapest: CEU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magyar, B., and B. Madlovics. 2020. The Anatomy of Post-Communist Regimes: A Conceptual Framework. Budapest-New York: CEU Press.
   Google Scholar
• MANS. (2021). “State Capture. Montenegro National Report.” Podgorica: NGO MANS.
   Google Scholar
• Marković, S. 2021. “Kako Je SNS Od Podstanara Došao Do Milionskih Nekretnina. [How Did the SNS from a Tenant Become the Owner of Expensive Real Estate.] CINS” Accessed 21 October 2021. https://www.cins.rs/kako-je-sns-od-podstanara-dosao-do-milionskih-nekretnina/
   Google Scholar
• Martini, C. 2014. State Capture: An Overview. Berlin: Transparency International.
   Google Scholar
• Matić, R. 2017. “Društvo i korupcija: Politički uticaj u profesionalnim strukturama javnih institucija kao čimbenik korupcijskog rizika.” [Society and Corruption: Political Influence in Professional Structures of Public Institutions as a Risk Factor for Corruption.] Društvena Istraživanja 26 (2): 187–205. doi:10.5559/di.26.2.03.
   Google Scholar
• Mavrogordatos, G. T. 1997. “From Traditional Clientelism to Machine Politics: The Impact of PASOK Populism in Greece.” South European Society & Politics 2 (3): 1–26. doi:10.1080/13608749708539516.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, W. (2019). “Past, Present and Future of Democracy.” Policy Review. Independent Expert Report written for European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H., and F. Toth. 2020. “Governing Illiberal Democracies: Democratic Backsliding and the Political Appointment of Top Officials in Hungary.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy XIII (2): 93–113. doi:10.2478/nispa-2020-0016.
   Google Scholar
• Mihályi, P., and I. Szelényi. 2019. “The Place of Rent-Seeking and Corruption in Varieties of Capitalism Models.” In Market Liberalism and Economic Patriotism in the Capitalist World-System, edited by T. Gerőcs and M. Szanyi, 67–97. Cham, Palgrave: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mihályi, P., and I. Szelényi. 2020. Varieties of Post-communist Capitalism. A Comparative Analysis of Russia, Eastern Europe and China. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Mitevski, M. 2019. Captured State. Understanding the Macedonian Case. Skopje: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (editor and main author), Loncaric, M., Vaz Mundo, B., et al. (2011). “Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lessons Learned.” NORAD, Report 4/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A., and R. Dadašov. 2016. “Measuring Control of Corruption by a New Index of Public Integrity.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 22 (3): 415–438. doi:10.1007/s10610-016-9324-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, C. 2004. “Runaway State Building: How Political Parties Shape States in Post-communist Eastern Europe.” World Politics 56 (4): 520–523. doi:10.1353/wp.2005.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, C. 2006. Runaway State Building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. Government at a Glance. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Orenstein, M. 2019. The Lands in Between. Russia Vs. the West and the New Politics of Hybrid War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., and S. I. Wilkinson, Eds. 2007. Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlović, D. 2020a. “How Political Parties in Hybrid Regimes Help the Incumbent Maintain a Democratic Façade.” East European Politics and Societies. doi:10.1177/0888325420941101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlović, D. 2020b. “The Political Economy behind the Gradual Demise of Democratic Institutions in Serbia.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20 (1): 19–39. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1672929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlović, D. 2022. The Moneywasting Machine. Five Months inside Serbia’s Ministry of Economy. Budapest: CEU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pei, M. 2016. China’s Crony Capitalism. The Dynamics of Regime Decay. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pešić, V. 2007. “State Capture and Widespread Corruption in Serbia” CEPS Working Document No. 262, Accessed 28 October 2021. https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/1478.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Petrović, P. 2021. “State Capture and Security Intelligence Agencies in Serbia.” Journal of Regional Security 16 (2): 151–182. doi:10.5937/jrs0-29333.
   Google Scholar
• Petrović, P., D. Brčerević, and M. Gligorić. 2019. “Why Is Serbia An Economic Growth Underachiever?” Ekonomika preduzeca 67 (1–2): 17–33. doi:10.5937/EkoPre1808017P.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. 2020. Capital and Ideology. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prelec, T. 2020. “The Vicious Circle of Corrosive Capital, Authoritarian Tendencies and State Capture in the Western Balkans.” Journal of Regional Security 15 (2): 167–198. doi:10.5937/jrs15-25716.
   Google Scholar
• Resimić, M. 2021. “Network Ties and the Politics of Renationalization: Embeddedness, Political–Business Relations, and Renationalization in Post-Milosevic Serbia.” Comparative Political Studies 54 (1): 1. doi:10.1177/0010414020926223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resimić, M. 2022. Capture Me if You Can: The Road to the Political Colonisation of Business in Post-Milošević Serbia. Europe-Asia Studies. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09668136.2021.2008878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, C., D. Benedek, B. Cegar, P. Dohlman, M. Hassine, B. Jajko, P. Kopyrski, et al. (2019). “Reassessing the Role of State-Owned Enterprises in Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe.” No. 19/11. Washington DC: IMF, European Department
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. 2014. Putin and the Oligarch: The Khodorkovsky-Yukos Affair. London: IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Sanfey, P., and J. Milatović. 2018. The Western Balkans in Transition: Diagnosing the Constraints on the Path to a Sustainable Market Economy. Brussels: EBRD.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. 2015. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. 2017. “The Changing Nature of Political Party Membership.” Politics. Oxford Research Encyclopaedias. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.226.
   Google Scholar
• Sickinger, H. 2013. Politisches Geld. Partieienfinanzierung und oeffentliche Kontrolle in Oesterreich. Wien: Czermin Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Šimić-Banović, R. 2019. “Uhljeb – A post-socialist Homo Croaticus: A Personification of the Economy of Favours in Croatia?” Post-Communist Economies 31 (3): 279–300. doi:10.1080/14631377.2018.1537708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slinko, I., E. Yakovlev, and E. Zhuravskaya. 2004. “Effects of State Capture: Evidence from Russian Regions.” In Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition, edited by J. Kornai and S. RoseRoseAckerman, 119–132. New York and Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Spirova, M., and R. Sharenkova-Toshkova. 2021. “Juggling Friends and Foes: Prime Minister Borissov’s Surprise Survival in Bulgaria.” East European Politics 37 (3): 432–447. doi:10.1080/21599165.2021.1883589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamenković, I. 2019. NIN. Lokalni šerifi odranije poznati policiji [Local thugs previously known to the police]. no. 3554: 10–13. Belgrade, Ringier, Axel Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stojanović-Gajić, S., and D. Pavlović. 2021. “State Capture, Hybrid Regimes, and Security Sector Reform.” Journal of Regional Security 16 (2): 89–126. doi:10.5937/jrs0-34622.
   Google Scholar
• Szarzec, K., B. Totleben, and D. Piątek. 2020. “How Do Politicians Capture a State? Evidence from State-Owned Enterprises.” East European Politics and Societies. doi:10.1177/0888325420953485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelényi, I., and P. Mihályi. 2020. “China, Eastern Europe and Russia Compared.” Acta Oeconomica 70 (S): 85–93. doi:10.1556/032.2020.00027.
   Google Scholar
• Tomic, S., and B. Radeljic. 2022. “University Autonomy under Democratic Backsliding: A Case Study of a Plagiarism Investigation against Serbian Minister of Finance.” Higher Education 2014–2019. doi:10.1007/s10734-021-00811-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzelac, S. 2003. “Corruption in Transition Countries: “How to Capture a State” - the Example of Montenegro.” Seer: Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe 6 (1/2): 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Volkov, V. 2002. Violent Entrepreneurs: The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vujačić, I., and J. Petrović-Vujačić. 2020. “Incomplete Transition – Is There a “Mid-Transition Trap?” Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business. Special Conference Issue 23 s1: 57–71. doi:10.2478/zireb-2020-0023.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2002. Transition. The First Ten Years. Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Yakovlev, A. 2006. “The Evolution of Business: State Interaction in Russia: From State Capture to Business Capture?” Europe-Asia Studies 58 (7): 1033–1056. doi:10.1080/09668130600926256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakovlev, E., and E. Zhuravskaya. 2009. “State Capture: From Yeltsin to Putin.” In Corruption, Development and Institutional Design, edited by J. Kornai, L. Mátyás, and G. Roland, 24–36. London: Palgrave, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, C. B., and A. Cerne. 2020. “Turning around State-Owned Enterprises in Croatia.” Law In Transition Journal. 2020.75.
   Google Scholar