Heroisation and victimisation: populism, commemorative narratives and National Days in Hungary and Poland

References

• Andruszkiewicz, A. 2015. Przemówienie Na Marszu Niepodległości 2015 [Speech at the 2015 Independence March] accessed11 December 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bOjLnMwGNU
   Google Scholar
• Bąkiewicz, R. 2019. “‘Przemówienie na Marszu Niepodległości 2019’”, accessed 20 December 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa4rmJ_ccsY
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis. Practical Strategies. Lodon: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beckwith, K. 2015. “Narratives of Defeat: Explaining the Effects of Loss in Social Movements.” The Journal of Politics 77 (1): 2–13. doi:10.1086/678531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benazzo, S. 2017. “Not All the past Needs to Be Used: Features of Fidesz’s Politics of Memory.” Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics 11 (2): 198–221. doi:10.1515/jnmlp-2017-0009.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, M., and J. Kubik. 2014. “‘A Theory of the Politics of Memory’.” In In Twenty Years after Communism. The Politics of Memory and Commemoration, edited by M. Bernhard and J. Kubik, 7–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, H.-G. 2019. “”Facets of Nativism: A Heuristic Exploration”.” Patterns of Prejudice 53 (2): 111–135. doi:10.1080/0031322X.2019.1572276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bíró-Nagy, A. 2022. ”Orbán’s Political Jackpot: Migration and the Hungarian Electorate.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (2): 405–424. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischoping, K., and A. Gazso. 2016. Analyzing Talk in the Social Sciences: Narrative, Conversation & Discourse Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bozóki, A. 2016 “Nationalism and Hegemony: Symbolic Politics and Colonization of Culture in Hungary.”In Twenty-Four Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State edited by,Magyar , B. and Vásárhelyi, J. Budapest - New York: Central European University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bull A Cento and Hansen H Lauge. (2016). On agonistic memory. Memory Studies, 9(4), 390–404. 10.1177/1750698015615935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, N. , and 1986 ”The Ideal Victim” In From Crime Policy to Victim Policy edited by,E. A. Fattah, 17–30. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-08305-3_2
   Google Scholar
• Cranmer, M. 2011. “Populist Communication and Publicity: An Empirical Study of Contextual Differences in Switzerland Populist Communication and Publicity.” Swiss Political Science Review 17 (3): 286–307. doi:10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C., F. Esser, T. Aalberg, C. Reinemann, and J. Stanyer. 2018. “Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 23 (4): 423–438. doi:10.1177/1940161218790035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorosz, T. 2016. “Każdego dnia musimy walczyć o Wielka Polskę” [Every day we must fight for the Greatness of Poland]” Accessed 15 October 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWsIJh7yIn0
   Google Scholar
• Dorosz, T. 2017. “Nie Ma Miejsca W Polskiej Przestrzeni Publicznej Dla Zdrajców Ojczyzny” [There Is No Place in the Public Sphere for the Traitors of the Fatherland]” Accessed 15 October 2020. https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1585069128195149
   Google Scholar
• Drinóczi, T., and A. Bień-Kacała. 2019. “Illiberal Constitutionalism: The Case of Hungary and Poland.” German Law Journal 20 (8): 1140–1166. doi:10.1017/glj.2019.83.
   Google Scholar
• Duda, A. 2018. “Jestem Przekonany, Że Pod biało-czerwonym Sztandarem Jest Miejsce Dla Każdego Z Nas” [I Am Convinced that under the red-and-white Banner There Is Room for Each and Every One of Us]”. accessed 20 December 2020. https://www.prezydent.pl/aktualnosci/wypowiedzi-prezydenta-rp/wystapienia/art,571,jestem-przekonany-ze-pod-bialo-czerwonym-sztandarem-jest-miejsce-dla-kazdego-z-nas.html
   Google Scholar
• Dzierżawski, M. 2014. “Przemówienia po Marszu Niepodległości [Speeches after the Independence March]” Accessed 20 October 2020. https://www.deepl.com/translator#pl/en/Przemówienia%20po%20Marszu%20Niepodległości%202014
   Google Scholar
• Eyerman, R. 2004. “The past in the Present: Culture and the Transmission of Memory.” Acta Sociologica 47 (2): 159–169. doi:10.1177/0001699304043853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feischmidt, M. 2020. “Memory-Politics and Neonationalism: Trianon as Mythomoteur.” Nationalities Papers 48 (1): 130–143. doi:10.1017/nps.2018.72..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freistein, K., and F. Gadinger. 2020. “‘Populist Stories of Honest Men and Proud Mothers: A Visual Narrative Analysis.”.” Review of International Studies 46 (2): 217–236. doi:10.1017/S0260210519000421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghilani, D., O. Luminet, H.-P. Erb, C. Flassbeck, V. Rosoux, I. Tames, and O. Klein. 2017. “Looking Forward to the Past: An Interdisciplinary Discussion on the Use of Historical Analogies and Their Effects.” Memory Studies 10 (3): 274–285. doi:10.1177/1750698017701609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golec de Zavala, A., K. Dyduch‐Hazar, and D. Lantos. 2019. “Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image.” Political Psychology 40 (1): 37–74. doi:10.1111/pops.12569.
   Google Scholar
• Golec de Zavala, A., and O. Keenan. 2021. “Collective Narcissism as a Framework for Understanding Populism.” Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology 5 (2): 56–64. doi:10.1002/jts5.69.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A., and C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. “The Ideational Approach to Populism.” Latin American Research Review 52 (4): 513–528. doi:10.25222/larr.85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homolar, A., and G. Löfflmann. 2021. “Populism and the Affective Politics of Humiliation Narratives.” Global Studies Quarterly 1 (1). doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksab002.
   Google Scholar
• Hyttinen, A., and L. Näre. 2017. “”Symbolic and Ritual Enactments of Nationalism – A Visual Study of Jobbik’s Gatherings during Hungarian National Day Commemorations.”.” Visual Studies 32 (3): 236–250. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2017.1358104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczyński, J. 2014. “Przemówienie Jarosława Kaczyńskiego w Narodowe Święto Niepodległości 2015 [Jarosław Kaczyński’s speech on National Independence Day 2015]” accessed 10 October 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjIURr0VnYc
   Google Scholar
• Kaczyński, J. 2015. “Przemówienie Jarosława Kaczyńskiego w Narodowe Święto Niepodległości 2015 [Jarosław Kaczyński’s speech on National Independence Day 2015]” accessed 10 October 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjIURr0VnY
   Google Scholar
• Kaczyński, J. 2016. “Przemówienie Jarosława Kaczyńskiego w Krakowie w dniu Święta Niepodległości [Jarosław Kaczyński’s speech in Kraków on Independence Day]” Accessed 20 October 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knbjL4_8msE&t=43s
   Google Scholar
• Kaczyński, J. 2017. “Wystąpienie Prezesa PiS W Krakowie Z Okazji Narodowego Święta Niepodległości [Address by the President of the Law and Justice Party in Cracow on the Occasion of National Independence Day]” Accessed 20 October 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIZvNDIP4HQ
   Google Scholar
• Kaczyński, J. 2019. “Przemówienie Jarosława Kaczyńskiego 10 listopada 2019 [Jaroslaw Kaczyński’s speech - 10 November 2019]” Accessed 10 October 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCxwkXxKKII
   Google Scholar
• Kaczyński, J. 2008. “Na Prawo Od Nas Tylko Ściana [Just a Wall to the Right of Us].” Rzeczpospolita 20 November. Accessed 15 December 2020. https://www.rp.pl/wydarzenia/art15931211-na-prawo-od-nas-tylko-sciana
   Google Scholar
• Khoury, N. 2018. “Plotting Stories after War: Toward a Methodology for Negotiating Identity.” European Journal of International Relations 24 (2): 367–390. doi:10.1177/1354066117711743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korycki, K. 2017. “Memory, Party Politics, and Post-Transition Space: The Case of Poland.” East European Politics and Societies 31 (3): 518–544. doi:10.1177/0888325417700263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotwas, M., and J. Kubik. 2019. “Symbolic Thickening of Public Culture and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism in Poland.” East European Politics and Societies 33 (2): 435–471. doi:10.1177/0888325419826691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács, B. 2014. “Trianon Nem Csak a Múlt, Hanem a Jelen Nehézsége Is’ [Trianon Is Not Only Our Past, but a Burden of Today as Well]” Accessed 20 October 2020. https://nemzeti.net/kovacs-bela trianon trianonnemcsakaamultmulthanemaajelenjelennehezsegeis2125145.html2125145.html
   Google Scholar
• Kövér, L. 2016. ”A legmostohább trianoni sors a kárpátaljai magyarságnak jutott” [The Hungarians in Carpathia had the worst fate.] Accessed on 10 October 2020 https://ma7.sk/kozelet/kover-laszlo-a-legmostohabb-trianoni-sors-a-karpataljai-magyarsagnak-jutott
   Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski, P. T. 2018. Odzyskiwanie niepodległości w polskiej pamięci zbiorowej [Restoration of independence in the Polish collective memory]. Warszawa: Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. “Populism: What’s in a Name?” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by F. Panizza, 32–49. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T. 2017. “Narrativity and Intertextuality in the Making of a Shared European Memory.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 25 (1): 57–72. doi:10.1080/14782804.2016.1159544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lázár, J. 2017. “‘Miniszterelnökséget vezető miniszter beszéde – Szarvas [The speech of the Minister of Prime Minister’s Office in Szarvas]’”. Accessed 8 October 2020. https://www.lazarjanos.hu/
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, C. 2018. “Reversing the Myth? Dystopian Narratives of the EU in UKIP and Front National Discourse.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 26 (1): 117–132. doi:10.1080/14782804.2017.1304900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mládková L. 2013. “Leadership and Storytelling.“ Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 75: 83–90. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.010
   Google Scholar
• Mock, S. 2012. Symbols of Defeat in the Construction of National Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139004022.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism. Performance, Political Style and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noor, M., J. R. Vollhardt, S. Mari, A. Nadler, A. McNeill, S. Pehrson, and C. Stevenson. 2017. “The Rhetorical Complexity of Competitive and Common Victimhood in Conversational Discourse: The Rhetorical Complexity of Victimhood.” European Journal of Social Psychology 47 (2): 167–179. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbán, V. 2019. “‘A minszterelnök beszéde a nemzeti összetartozás napján [The speech of the Prime Minister]’”. Accessed 20 November 2020. http://www.miniszterelnok.hu/orban-viktor-beszede-a-nemzeti-osszetartozas-napjan/
   Google Scholar
• Papadakis, Y. 2003. “’Nation, Narrative and Commemoration: Political Ritual in Divided Cyprus.’.” History and Anthropology 14 (3): 253–270. doi:10.1080/0275720032000136642.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., P. Ching, B. Chen, B. Gardner, and A. Motes. 2011. “The Sociology of Storytelling.” Annual Review of Sociology 37 (1): 109–130. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., and B. G. Gardiner. 2015. “Narrative and Social Movements.” In The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, edited by D. Della Porta and M. Diani, 534–548. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Rosoux, V. 2017. “Reconciliation Narrative: Scope and Limits of the Pax Europeana.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 25 (3): 325–339. doi:10.1080/14782804.2017.1351929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sata, R., and I. P. Karolewski. 2020. “Caesarean Politics in Hungary and Poland.” East European Politics 36 (2): 206–225. doi:10.1080/21599165.2019.1703694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. 1982. “The Social Context of Commemoration: A Study in Collective Memory.” Social Forces 61 (2): 374–402. doi:10.2307/2578232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semjén, Z. 2014. “‘A Magyar Nemzet Büszke Lehet Arra, Hogy Túlélte Trianont [The Hungarian Nation Should Feel Pride after Surviving Trianon]’” Accessed 15 November 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R31aRRsMXDw
   Google Scholar
• Semjén, Z. 2015. “‘Egyetlen nemzetrészt sem adunk fel’ [We shall not give up any of our fellow Hungarians]’”. Accessed 15 November 2020. https://hirado.hu/2015/06/04/semjen-egyetlen-nemzetreszt-sem-adunk-fel/
   Google Scholar
• Semjén, Z. 2018. “‘Túléltük, Itt Vagyunk! [We Survived, We are Still Here]’”. Accessed 15 November 2020. https://www.semjenzsolt.hu/2018/06/tuleltuk-itt-vagyunk/
   Google Scholar
• Shenhav, S. R. 2005. “Thin and Thick Narrative Analysis: On the Question of Defining and Analyzing Political Narratives.” Narrative Inquiry 15 (1): 75–99. doi:10.1075/ni.15.1.05she.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeekes, A., T. Wildschut, and C. Sedikides. 2021. “Longing for the “Good Old Days” of Our Country: National Nostalgia as a New master-frame of Populist Radical Right Parties.” Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology 5 (2): 90–102. doi:10.1002/jts5.78.
   Google Scholar
• Szávay, I. 2018. “‘A Külhoni Magyar Közösségek Autonómiáját Nekünk Kell Kiharcolni’ [It Is Our Task to Fight for the Autonomy of the Hungarian Communities]’”. Accessed 15 October 2020. https://alfahir.hu/2018/06/04/trianon_bekediktatum_budapest_szavay_istvan_baucsek_rajmund_sneider_tamas_onrendelkezes
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 2003. “Political Identities in Changing Polities.” Social Research 70 (2): 605–620. doi:10.1353/sor.2003.0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toroczkai, L. 2017. “‘Mi vagyunk Európa utolsó ellenállói! [We are the last resistants in Europe]’”. Accessed 15 November 2020. https://alfahir.hu/2017/06/04/hvim_trianon_toroczkai_laszlo_incze_bela_zagyva_gyorgy_gyula
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. 2008. Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varga M and Buzogány A. 2021. “The Foreign Policy of Populists in Power: Contesting Liberalism in Poland and Hungary.“ Geopolitics 26 (5): 1442–1463. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1734564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeersch, P. 2019. “Victimhood as Victory: The Role of Memory Politics in the Process of De-Europeanisation in East-Central Europe.” Global Discourse 9 (1): 113–130. doi:10.1332/204378918X15453934506003.
   Google Scholar
• Vona, G. 2016. “‘Trianon Egy Próbatétel’ [Trianon Is a Major Test for Hungarians]’”. Accessed 15 November 2020. https://hirado.hu/2016/06/04/vona-gabor-trianon-egy-probatetel/
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V., and H. L. I. I. I. Roediger. 2008. “Conceptual Foundations and Theoretical Approaches.’ Memory.” ‘Collective Memory 16 (3): 318–326. doi:10.1080/09658210701801434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigren, J. 1994. “Narrative Completion in the Treatment of Trauma.” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 31 (3): 415–423. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.31.3.415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicki, R. 2018. “‘Przemówienie podczas Marszu Niepodległości 2018 [Speech during the Independence March 2018]’” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTNXn_n8pqo&t=18s Accessed 7 November 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zagyva, G. 2015. “‘Közeleg Az Idő, Hogy Romániát Is Fel Lehet Darabolni’ [The Time Is Coming that It Will Be Possible to Chop up Romania]’” Accessed 1 November 2020. https://alfahir.hu/kozeleg_az_ido_hogy_romaniat_is_fel_lehet_darabolni
   Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, E. 2012. Time Maps: Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zubrzycki, G. 2013. “Polish Mythology and the Traps of Messianic Martyrology.” In National Myths: Constructed Pasts, Contested Presents, edited by G. Bouchard, 110–132. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar