Divided Towns, Integration and Cross-border Cooperation. The Cases of Cieszyn/Český Těšín and Słubice/Frankfurt (Oder)

References

• Asher, A. D. 2005. “A Paradise on the Oder? Ethnicity, Europeanization, and the EU Referendum in a Polish-German Border City.” City & Society 17 (1): 127–152. doi:10.1525/city.2005.17.1.127.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., and E. Grande. 2007. Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binicewicz, A. 2017. Contemporary Identity and Memory in the Borderlands of Poland and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar.
   Google Scholar
• Błahut, G. 2010. “Wielokulturowość Cieszyna jako miasta pogranicza.” In [The Multiculturalism of Cieszyn as a Borderland Town] In Dziedzictwo kulturowe jako klucz do tożsamości pogranicza polsko-czeskiego [Cultural Heritage as a Key to the Identity of the Polish-Czech Borderland], edited by H. Rusek, A. Pieńczak, and J. Szczyrbowski, 53–66. Cieszyn: Wydział Etnologii i Nauk o Edukacji Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Cieszynie.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, H. 2017. “Comparison of the Role of EU Funds for Czech-Polish Cross-Border Cooperation of Schools.” Edukacja Międzykulturowa 1 (6): 145–162. doi:10.15804/em.2017.01.08.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, H., and E. Drápela. 2017. “Cross-Border Cooperation as a Reconciliation Tool: Example from the East Czech-Polish Borders.” Regional & Federal Studies 27 (3): 305–319. doi:10.1080/13597566.2017.1350650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañer, M., J. Jańczak, and J. Martín-Uceda. 2018. “Economic Development, (A)symmetries and Local Geopolitics: A New Approach to Studying Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe.” Eurasia Border Review 9 (1): 67–90.
   Google Scholar
• Dębicki, M., and M. Tamáska. 2014. “Laboratories of Integration. Divided Twin Towns at River Borders in the Visegrad Countries and Germany.” Socio.hu 4(2): 1–20 doi:10.18030/socio.hu.2014en.1.
   Google Scholar
• Dębicki, M., and R. Zenderowski. 2021. Dlaczego Cieszyn (nie) jest stolicą Europy Środkowej? Idiosynkratyczne mniemania o charakterze miasta [Why is Cieszyn (not) the capital of Central Europe? Idiosyncratic assumptions about the town’s character]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., F. Durand, and V. Feltgen. 2015. “Opportunities of Cross-border Cooperation between Small and Medium Cities in Europe.” Report as part of the Spatial Development Observatory, Department of Spatial Planning and Development – Ministry of Sustainable Development and Infrastructure, Luxembourg. European Commission. Accessed August 8 2020. www.espaces-transfrontaliers.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Themes/Agglomerations/Opportunities-of-cross-border-cooperation-between-small-and-medium-cities-in-Europe.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. 2008. “Comparative analysis: case-oriented versus variable-oriented research.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, edited by D. Della Porta and M. Keating, 198–229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolińska, K., J. Makaro, and N. Niedźwiecka-Iwańczak. 2018. Cud pogranicza? Zgorzelczanie, gubinianie i słubiczanie o życiu w miastach podzielonych [The Miracle of the Borderland? The Residents of Zgorzelec, Gubin and Słubice on Life in Divided Towns]. Kraków: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Dolińska, K., and N. Niedźwiecka-Iwańczak. 2017. “German Neighbours from Across the River - Insiders? Strangers? Others?.” Sociální studia/Social Studies 14 (1): 95–116. doi:10.5817/SOC2017-1-95.
   Google Scholar
• Dołzbłasz, S. 2015. “Symmetry or Asymmetry? Cross-border Openness of Service Providers in Polish-Czech and Polish-German Border Towns.” Moravian Geographical Reports 23 (1): 2–12. doi:10.1515/mgr-2015-0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dołzbłasz, S., and A. Raczyk. 2011. ““Projekty współpracy transgranicznej na zewnętrznych i wewnętrznych granicach Unii Europejskiej – przykład Polski” [Trans-Border Cooperation Projects on the External and Internal EU Borders – A Polish Case Study].” Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 3 (45): 59–80.
   Google Scholar
• Garrard, J., and E. Mikhailova, edited by. 2019. Twin Cities: Urban Communities, Borders and Relations Over Time. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gierczak, D. 2017. “Town Pairs, Divided Border Towns and Places of Integration: The Case of Görlitz/Zgorzelec.” Sociální studia / Social Studies 14 (1): 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hardi, T., and A. Uszkai. 2017. “Theoretical Models of Cross-Border Integration.” Sociální studia / Social Studies 14 (1): 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin-Hunt, A. 2019 “Frankfurt (Oder): The Small City Thinking Big.” fDi Intelligence, 17 October. Accessed 25 April 2020. https://www.fdiintelligence.com/article/75914.
   Google Scholar
• Jajeśniak-Quast, D., and K. Stokłosa. 2000. Geteilte Städte an der Oder und Neisse: Frankfurt (Oder) - Słubice, Guben - Gubin und Görlitz - Zgorzelec 1945-1995 [Divided Towns on the Oder and Neisse Rivers: Frankfurt (Oder) – Słubice, Guben – Gubin and Görlitz – Zgorzelec 1945–1995]. Berlin: Arno Spitz.
   Google Scholar
• Jańczak, J. 2013. Border Twin Towns in Europe. Cross-Border Cooperation at a Local Level. Berlin: Collegium Polonicum & Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Jańczak, J. 2017. “Theorizing Town Twinning—Towards a Global Perspective.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 32 (4): 423–428. doi:10.1080/08865655.2016.1267589.
   Google Scholar
• Jańczak, J. 2018. “Cross-Border Urbanism on the German-Polish Border. Between Spatial De-Boundarization and Social (Re-)Frontierization.” In European Borderlands. Living with Barriers and Bridges, edited by E. Boesen and G. Schnuer, 47–63. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joenniemi, P., and J. Jańczak. 2017. “Theorizing Town Twinning—Towards a Global Perspective.” Journal of Borderland Studies 32 (4): 423–428. doi:10.1080/08865655.2016.1267583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joenniemi, P., and A. Sergunin. 2011a. “When Two Aspire to Become One: City-Twinning in Northern Europe.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 26 (2): 231–242. doi:10.1080/08865655.2011.641323.
   Google Scholar
• Joenniemi, P., and A. Sergunin. 2011b. “Another Face of Integration: City Twinning in Europe.” Research Journal of International Studies 22: 120–131.
   Google Scholar
• Kajta, J., and E. Opiłowska. 2022. “Community Response to Rebordering Politics: The Case of Two Twin Towns in Central Europe.” Nationalities Papers 1–17. doi:10.1017/nps.2022.15
   Google Scholar
• Krehl, A., and S. Weck. 2020. “Doing Comparative Case Study Research in Urban and Regional Studies: What Can be Learnt from Practice?.” European Planning Studies 28 (9): 1858–1876. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1699909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kučerová, L. 2010. “Cesky Tesin – a Reunited Town.” Annual of Language & Politics and Politics of Identity IV: 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kulczyńska, K.2011.Słubfurt – idea euromiasta na pograniczu polsko-niemieckim.” [Słubfurt - the Idea of a Eurocity in the Polish-German Borderland].Studia Miejskie 4: 161–169.10.25167/sm.2317
   Google Scholar
• Kulczyńska, K., and R. Matykowski. 2011. “Images of the Urban Spaces of Cieszyn.” Bulletin of Geography Socio–economic Series 15: 83–93. doi:10.2478/v10089-011-0006-9.
   Google Scholar
• Kurowska-Pysz, J., M. Razima, and Ł. Wróblewski. 2019. “Strategia Współpracy Transgranicznej Cieszyna i Czeskiego Cieszyna w Kontekście Rozwoju Euroregionu Śląsk Cieszyński” [Strategy of Cross-Border Cooperation of Cieszyn and Český Těšín in the Context of Development of the Czech Silesia Euroregion]. Cieszyn and Czeski Cieszyn: KREATUS. Accessed 20 April 2020. www.cieszyn.pl/files/Strategia%20pl%20i%20cz.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, J. 2012. “Border Paradox: Striking a Balance between Access and Control in Asymmetrical Border Settings.” Eurasia Border Review 3 (1): 51–79.
   Google Scholar
• Makaro, J. 2019. “On the Domination of the Integration Perspective in Academic Reflections on Polish-German Divided cities—Selected Aspects.” Polish Sociological Review 1: 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Máliková, L., M. Klobučník, V. Bačík, and P. Spišiak. 2015. “Socio-Economic Changes in the Borderlands of the Visegrad Group (V4) Countries.” Moravian Geographical Reports 23 (2): 26–37. doi:10.1515/mgr-2015-0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markuszewska, I., M. Tanskanen, and J. Vila Subirós. 2016. “Boundaries from Borders: Cross-Border Relationships in the Context of the Mental Perception of a Borderline – Experiences from Spanish-French and Polish-German Border Twin Towns.” Quaestiones Geographicae 35 (1): 105–119. doi:10.1515/quageo-2016-0010.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Uceda, J., and J. Jańczak. 2018. “A View of German-Polish Cross-Border Cooperation: An Experience from the 2007–2013 INTERREG Programme.” Pogranicze Polish Borderlands Studies 6 (3): 229–251. doi:10.25167/ppbs369.
   Google Scholar
• Michelová, R. 2006. “Institucionální přeshraniční spolupráce očima obyvatel příhraničních regionů RČ” [Institutional Cross-Border Cooperation in the Opinions of the Borderland Region Citizens in the Czech Republic]. In Člověk v pohraničí. Výzkum přeshraničních vlivů působících na obyvatele pohrančí ČR.” [A Man in the Borderland. Studies on Cross-Border Influences on Borderland Citizens in the Czech Republic], edited by F. Zich, 89–105. Ústí nad Labem: UJEP.
   Google Scholar
• O’dowd, L., and T. Wilson. 2002. “Frontiers of Sovereignty in the New Europe.” In Borders of Europe, edited by N. Alkan, 7–30. Bonn: Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Opiłowska, E. 2014. “The Europeanization of the German-Polish Borderlands.” In European Border Regions in Comparison. Overcoming Nationalistic Aspects or Re-Nationalization?, edited by K. Stokłosa and G. Besier, 275–285. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Opiłowska, E. 2017. “Creating Transborderness in the Public Space of the Divided Cities. The Case of Frankfurt (Oder) and Słubice.” In Advances in European Borderlands Studies, edited by E. Opiłowska, Z. Kurcz, and J. Roose, 317–344. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Opiłowska, E. 2021. “The Determinants of the Cross-Border Cooperation in the Polish–German Borderland.” In Poland and Germany in the European Union. The Multidimensional Dynamics of Bilateral Relations, edited by E. Opiłowska and M. Sus, 208–226. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. 2003. “Cross-Border Regions in Europe: Significance and Drivers of Regional Cross-Border Co-operation.” European Urban and Regional Studies 10 (2): 153–171. doi:10.1177/0969776403010002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokkola, E. K. 2019. “Border Cities.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, edited by A. M. Orum, 1–5. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. 2003. “The Europeanization of Public Policy.” In The Politics of Europeanization, edited by K. Featherstone and C. M. Radaelli, 27–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rusek, H. 2009. “Kapitał otwartej granicy. Socjologiczny portret Cieszyna i Czeskiego Cieszyna po Schengen” [The Capital of an Open Border. A Sociological Portrait of Cieszyn and Český Těšín after Schengen]. In Kapitały społeczne i kulturowe miast środkowoeuropejskich i wschodnioeuropejskich pograniczy.” In [Social and Cultural Capitals of Central and Eastern European Borderland Cities], edited by U. Abłażewicz-Górnicka, K. Krzysztofek, R. Oryszczyn, and A. Sadowski, 265–280. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, H., D. Jajeśniak-Quast, and K. Stokłosa. 2002. “Twin Towns on the Border as Laboratories of European Integration”. FIT Diskussionspapiere (04) European University Viadrina. Accessed 20 June 2020. de/de/forschung/institut/institut_fit/publikationen/discussion_papers/2002/04-02-Schultz.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. 2015. “Bordering, Border Politics and Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe.” In Neighbourhood Policy and the Construction of the European External Borders, GeoJournal Library 115 edited by F. Celata and R. Coletti, 27–44. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C., and F. Lara-Valencia. 2013. “Borders and Cities: Perspectives from North America and Europe.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 28 (2): 181–190. doi:10.1080/08865655.2013.854662.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, M. 2017. “Transnational Urban Heritage? Constructing Shared Places in Polish–German Border Towns.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 21 (3–4): 271–292. doi:10.1080/13604813.2017.1325202.
   Google Scholar
• Székely, A. 2007. “Multicultural Challenges in the Cross-Border Twin City of Komárom/Komárno (SK/HU).” In European Multiculturalism as a Challenge – Policies, Successes and Failures, edited by W. Janicki, 209–220. Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University.
   Google Scholar
• Vink, M., and P. Graziano, eds. 2008. “Challenges of a New Research Agenda.” In Europeanization New Research Agendas, 3–20. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, E. 1974. The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zenderowski, R. 2002. “Stosunki między mieszkańcami miast podzielonych granicą państwową na przykładzie Cieszyna i Czeskiego Cieszyna (Český Těšín). Studium socjologiczne” [Relations Between the Inhabitants of the Towns Divided by the State Border Based on the Example of Cieszyn and Český Těšín. A Sociological Study].” Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 3 (8): 49–78.
   Google Scholar
• Zenderowski, R. 2021. ““’Nikdo nic neví’, czyli krótka historia czeskocieszyńskiego słupa granicznego” [‘Nobody knows anything’ or a short history of the Český Těšín border post].” Wschodnioznawstwo 15: 113–137. doi:10.4467/20827695WSC.21.006.14713.
   Google Scholar
• Zenderowski, R., and M. Krycki. 2014. “Public diplomacy w miastach podzielonych granicą państwową. Przykład Cieszyna i Czeskiego Cieszyna (Český Těšín)” [Public Diplomacy in the Towns Divided by the State Border. The Example of Cieszyn and Český Těšín].” Pogranicze Polish Borderlands Studies 2: 206–227. doi:10.25167/ppbs566.
   Google Scholar