Who accepts electoral clientelism? The role of personality traits in Romania

References

• Afshan, A., I. Askari, and L. S. S. Manickam. 2015. “Shyness, Self-Construal, Extraversion–Introversion, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Among College Students.” SAGE Open 5 (2): 215824401558755. doi:10.1177/2158244015587559.
   Google Scholar
• Alalehto, T. 2003. “Economic Crime: Does Personality Matter?” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 47 (3): 335–355. doi:10.1177/0306624X03047003007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barasch, A., E. E. Levine, and M. E. Schweitzer. 2016. “Bliss is Ignorance: How the Magnitude of Expressed Happiness Influences Perceived naiveté and Interpersonal Exploitation.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 137: 184–206. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bøggild, T., R. Campbell, N. Mk, P. Hh, and V. H. Ja. 2021. “Which Personality Fits Personalized Representation?” Party Politics 27 (2): 269–281. doi:10.1177/1354068819855703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollich, K. L., P. L. Hill, P. D. Harms, and J. J. Jackson. 2016. “When Friends’ and Society’s Expectations Collide: A Longitudinal Study of Moral Decision-Making and Personality Across College.” PLoS ONE 11 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canare, T. A., R. U. Mendoza, and M. A. Lopez. 2018. “An Empirical Analysis of Vote Buying Among the Poor: Evidence from Elections in the Philippines.” South East Asia Research 26 (1): 58–84. doi:10.1177/0967828X17753420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, K. 2020. How Openness Affects Your Behavior, Very well mind.
   Google Scholar
• Cinar, K. 2016. “A Comparative Analysis of Clientelism in Greece, Spain, and Turkey: The Rural–Urban Divide.” Contemporary Politics 22 (1): 77–94. doi:10.1080/13569775.2015.1112952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. M., and R. P. Bagozzi. 1999. “Testing the Equivalence of the Socialization Factor Structure for Criminals and Noncriminals.” Journal of Personality Assessment 72 (1): 68–73. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7201_4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corstange, D. 2018. “Clientelism in Competitive and Uncompetitive Elections.” Comparative political studies 51 (1): 76–104. doi:10.1177/0010414017695332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., and R. R. McCrae. 1992. “Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory.” Psychological Assessment 4 (1): 5–13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., and R. R. McCrae. 2013. “The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Its Relevance to Personality Disorders.” The Science of Mental Health: Volume 7: Personality and Personality Disorder 6 (March 1991): 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Costantini, G., D. Saraulli, and M. Perugini. 2020. “Uncovering the Motivational Core of Traits: The Case of Conscientiousness.” European Journal of Personality 34 (6): 1073–1094. doi:10.1002/per.2237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W. 2009. “Swing Voters, Core Voters, and Distributive Politics.” In Political Representation, edited by I. Shapiro, et al., 342–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. 2017. “Political Participation, Personality, and the Conditional Effect of Campaign Mobilization.” Electoral studies 45: 100–109. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digi 24. 2020. Incidente alegeri locale 2020.
   Google Scholar
• DiLima, R. K. 2020. Risky Behavior: The Roles of Depression, Openness to Experience, and Coping.
   Google Scholar
• Dinesen, P. T., A. S. Nørgaard, and R. Klemmensen. 2014. “The Civic Personality: Personality and Democratic Citizenship.” Political studies 62 (S1): 134–152. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12094.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., G. A. Huber, D. Doherty, C. M. Dowling, C. Raso, and S. E. Ha. 2011. “Personality Traits and Participation in Political Processes.” The Journal of Politics 73 (3): 692–706. doi:10.1017/S0022381611000399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2013. “Going for a Safe Vote: Electoral Bribes in Post-Communist Romania.” Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 21 (2–3): 143–164. doi:10.1080/0965156X.2013.836859.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., and M. Chiru. 2012. “Taking the Short Route: Political Parties, Funding Regulations, and State Resources in Romania.” East European Politics & Societies 27 (1): 108–128. doi:10.1177/0888325412465003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., I. Saikkonen, and P. Bankov. 2022. “Dissatisfied, Uninformed or Both? Democratic Satisfaction, Political Knowledge and the Acceptance of Clientelism in a New Democracy.” Democratization 29 (2): 211–231. doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1947250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., and P. Tap. 2022. “Buying Loyalty: Volatile Voters and Electoral Clientelism.” Politics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., and P. Tap. 2022. “Buying Loyalty: Volatile Voters and Electoral ClientelismBuying Loyalty: Volatile Voters and Electoral Clientelism.” Sfera Politicii 26 (3–4): 70–82. Politics, no. online only. Marian, Claudiu
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., and C. Volintiru. 2017. “A New Model of Clientelism: Political Parties, Public Resources, and Private Contributors.” European Political Science Review 9 (1): 115–137. doi:10.1017/S1755773915000326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., P. J. Rentfrow, and W. B. J. Swann. 2003. “A Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains.” Journal of Research in Personality 37 (6): 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M. R., and T. Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, S. E., and R. R. Lau. 2015. “Personality Traits and Correct Voting.” American Politics Research 43 (6): 975–998. doi:10.1177/1532673X14568551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtfreter, K., M. D. Reisig, and T. C. Pratt. 2008. “Low self‐control, Routine Activities, and Fraud Victimization.” Criminology 46 (1): 189–220. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00101.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. J., D. Wood, T. Bogg, W. Ke, H. Pd, and R. Bw. 2010. “What Do Conscientious People Do? Development and Validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC).” Journal of Research in Personality 44 (4): 501–511. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koter, D. 2013. “Urban and Rural Voting Patterns in Senegal: The Spatial Aspects of Incumbency, C. 1978-2012.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 51 (4): 653–679. doi:10.1017/S0022278X13000621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasch, C. 1991. The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. revis ed. London: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lauriola, M., and J. Weller. 2018. “Personality and Risk: Beyond Daredevils-Risk Taking from a Temperament Perspective.” Psychological Perspectives on Risk and Risk Analysis: Theory, Models, and Applications. 3–36. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_1#citeas
   Google Scholar
• Mares, I., and L. E. Young. 2019. Conditionality and Coercion: Electoral Clientelism in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marian, C. 2018. “The Social Democrat Party and the Use of Political Marketing in the 2016 Elections in Romania.” Sfera Politicii 26 (3–4): 70–82.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, K. O., and W. Fleeson. 2012. “What is Extraversion For? Integrating Trait and Motivational Perspectives and Identifying the Purpose of Extraversion.” Psychological Science 23 (12): 1498–1505. doi:10.1177/0956797612444904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirea, C. 2020. “Posibil caz de mita electorala la Sornicesti.” Olt-Alert. https://olt-alert.ro/2020/09/23/posibil-caz-de-mita-electorala-la-scornicesti-o-femeie-primeste-bani-de-la-liberali-fotovideo/
   Google Scholar
• Mizuno, B., and E. Lorena. 2012. “Does Everyone Have a Price? The Demand Side of Clientelism and Vote-Buying in an Emerging Democracy.” PhD Dissertation, Duke University.
   Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J., H. Mv, D. Canache, S. Ma, and A. Mr. 2010. “Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior.” The American Political Science Review 104 (1): 85–110. doi:10.1017/S0003055409990359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichter, S. 2008. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” The American Political Science Review 102 (1): 19–31. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichter, S. 2010. Politics and Poverty: Electoral Clientelism in Latin America. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. PhD Dissertation of UC Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicer, M., E. Wegner, L. J. Benstead, and E. Lust. 2021. “Poor People’s Beliefs and the Dynamics of Clientelism.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 33 (3): 300–332. online first. doi:10.1177/09516298211003661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permanent Electoral Authority. 2016. Ghidul finanţării campaniei electorale la alegerile locale din anul 2016. Available at: https://lege5.ro/Gratuit/geydmmbshezq/ghidul-finantarii-campaniei-electorale-la-alegerile-locale-din-anul-2016-din-18042016.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S., edited by. 2001. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, R. A., and M. Pluess. 2015. “Heritability Estimates of the Big Five Personality Traits Based on Common Genetic Variants.” Translational Psychiatry 5(7): pp.e604–4. Nature Publishing Group, 10.1038/tp.2015.96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanian Government. 2012. Emergency Decree 67/2012. Available at: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/142652.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, S. D. 2002. “The Influence of Romanian Campaign Finance Laws on Party System Development and Corruption.” Party Politics 8 (2): 175–192. doi:10.1177/1354068802008002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotaru, V. 2020. ‘Mită electorală dată de PSD Iași, în campania pentru alegerile locale 2020’, BZI.ro, 1 September. Available at: https://www.bzi.ro/mita-electorala-data-de-psd-iasi-in-campania-pentru-alegerile-locale-2020-imagini-socante-cu-zeci-de-oameni-momiti-cu-mici-bautura-si-manele-in-plina-perioada-de-crestere-a-cazurilor-de-covid-19-4015915.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, R., and G. C. Fekken. 2014. “Agreeableness at the Core of the Dark Triad of Personality.” Individual Differences Research 12 (4–A): 131–141.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, S. C. 2009. “Political Clientelism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by C. Boix and S. C. Stokes, 604–627. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terpstra, D. E., E. J. Rozell, and R. K. Robinson. 1993. “The Influence of Personality and Demographic Variables on Ethical Decisions Related to Insider Trading.” The Journal of Psychology 127 (4): 375–389. doi:10.1080/00223980.1993.9915573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, M. 2020. Candidatul PSD la o primărie din județul Arad și-a pus soția, mama, soacra și fina pe lista de consilieri: “Și la celelalte partide e la fel” Citeşte întreaga ştire: Candidatul PSD la o primărie din județul Arad și-a pus soția, mama, soacra și fina pe lis, Libertatea.
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan-Johnston, T. I., M. Ke, F. Lr, E. LE, and L. Wasylkiw. 2021. “Extraversion as a Moderator of the Efficacy of Self-Esteem Maintenance Strategies.” Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 47 (1): 131–145. doi:10.1177/0146167220921713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinschenk, A. C., and C. T. Dawes. 2018. “Genes, Personality Traits, and the Sense of Civic Duty.” American Politics Research 46 (1): 47–76. doi:10.1177/1532673X17710760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. I. 2006 ‘Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability’, ( 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, K., and H. Kitschelt. 2020. “Analytical Perspectives on Varieties of Clientelism.” Democratization 27 (1): 20–43. doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1641798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar