Choosing among the chosen? Electoral lists and party primaries in Europe

References

• Astudillo, J., and K. Detterbeck. 2020. “Why, Sometimes, Primaries? Intraparty Democratization as a Default Selection Mechanism in German and Spanish Mainstream Parties.” Party Politics 26 (5): 594–604. doi:10.1177/1354068818795195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astudillo, J., and I. Lago. 2021. “Primaries Through the Looking Glass: The Electoral Effects of Opening the Selection of Top Candidates.” British Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 1550–1564. doi:10.1017/s0007123419000632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atmor, N., R. Y. Hazan, and G. Rahat. 2011. “Candidate Selection.” In Personal Representation: The Neglected Dimension of Electoral Systems, edited by J. Colomer, 19–34. Essex: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakvis, H., and S. B. Wolinetz. 2005. “Canada: Executive dominance and presidentialization”. In The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, edited by T. Poguntke and P. Webb, 199–220.10.1093/0199252017.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Bermúdez, S., and G. Cordero. 2017. “Who is Recruiting Our Crew? Contextual Determinants of MPS’ Selection.” Acta Politica 52: 265–285. doi:10.1057/s41269-016-0007-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boatright, R. G. 2018. Routledge Handbook of Primary Elections. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315544182.
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn, K. 2018. “Party Primaries as a Strategic Choice: The Costs and Benefits of Democratic Candidate Selection.” In Routledge Handbook of Primary Elections, edited by R. G. Boatright, 354–368. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315544182.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M. 2007. “Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 92–107. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00239.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., and M. S. Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–439. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCS. 2016. Comparative Candidates Survey Module I - 2005-2012. [Dataset - Cumulative File]. Distributed by FORS, Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• CCS. 2020. Comparative Candidates Survey Wave II - 2013-2019. [Dataset - Cumulative File]. Distributed by FORS, Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Cogels, M. 2020. Representation Amidst Candidates: The Balance of Electoral Lists. A Longitudinal Analysis of the Belgian Political Parties. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Coller, X., G. Cordero, and A. M. Jaime-Castillo, edited by. 2018. The Selection of Politicians in Times of Crisis. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315179575.
   Google Scholar
• Colomer, J., edited by. 2011. Personal Representation: The Neglected Dimension of Electoral Systems. Essex: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cordero, G., and X. Coller. 2015. “Cohesion and Candidate Selection in Parliamentary Groups.” Parliamentary Affairs 68 (3): 357–379. doi:10.1093/pa/gsu008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero, G., and X. Coller. 2018. Democratizing Candidate Selection: New Methods, Old Receipts?. London: Palgrave MacMillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76550-1.
   Google Scholar
• Cordero, G., A. M. Jaime-Castillo, and X. Coller. 2016. “Candidate Selection in a Multilevel State: The Case of Spain.” The American Behavioral Scientist 60 (7): 773–780. doi:10.1177/0002764216632818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. 1999. “Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 145–161. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W. P., and A. Blais. 2012. “Who Selects the Party Leader?” Party Politics 18 (2): 127–150. doi:10.1177/1354068810382935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W. P., and S. Katz. 2013. The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy. London: Oxford. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661879.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, W. P., and S. Pruysers. 2019. “Sore Losers? The Costs of Intra-Party Democracy.” Party Politics 25 (4): 483–494. doi:10.1177/1354068817728216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, B. S., and N. Sahuguet. 2018. Electoral Incentives: The Interaction Between Candidate Selection and Electoral Rules. [ Unpublished manuscript]. Rotterdam: Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Czudnowski, M. 1975. “Political recruitment.” In Handbook of Political Science, edited by F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby, 155–242. Vol. 2. MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Debus, M., and R. M. Navarrete. 2020. “Do Regional Party Primaries Affect the Ideological Cohesion of Political Parties in Multilevel Systems? Evidence from Spain.” Party Politics 26 (6): 770–782. doi:10.1177/1354068818812200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Winter, L. 1988. “Belgium: Democracy or Oligarchy?” In Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics, edited by M. Gallagher and M. Marsh, 20–46. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, H., and P. Manow. 2021. Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development version.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, L. 1967. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. 1980. “Candidate Selection in Ireland: The Impact of Localism and the Electoral System.” British Journal of Political Science 10 (4): 489–503. doi:10.1017/S0007123400002350.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., and M. Marsh. 1988. Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gauja, A., and W. Cross. 2015. “The Influence of Party Candidate Selection Methods on Candidate Diversity.” Representation 51 (3): 287–298. doi:10.1080/00344893.2015.1108359.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., and P. Spáč. 2015. “Democratising Candidate Selection in Romania and Slovakia.” In Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective, edited by S. Sandri, A. Seddone, and F. Venturino, 145–160. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315599595.
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. Y., and G. Rahat. 2006. “The Influence of Candidate Selection Methods on Legislatures and Legislators: Theoretical Propositions, Methodological Suggestions and Empirical Evidence.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 12 (3–4): 366–385. doi:10.1080/13572330600875647.
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. Y., and G. Rahat. 2010. Democracy Within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572540.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. Y., and G. Voerman. 2006. “Electoral Systems and Candidate Selection.” Acta Politica 41: 146–162. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermens, F. A. 1972. Democracy or Anarchy?. New York: Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. 2004. “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament.” World Politics 56 (2): 194–223. doi:10.1353/wp.2004.0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkin, J. 2001. “Bringing the Members Back In? Democratizing Candidate Selection in Britain and Spain.” Party Politics 7 (3): 343–361. doi:10.1177/1354068801007003005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., M. Moerbeek, and R. Van de Schoot. 2017. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315650982.
   Google Scholar
• Ignazi, P. 2020. “The Four Knights of Intra-Party Democracy: A Rescue for Party Delegitimation.” Party Politics 26 (1): 9–20. doi:10.1177/1354068818754599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenny, M. 2018. “Intra-Party Democracy and Internet: The Case of NEOS in Austria.” In Democratizing Candidate Selection: New Methods, Old Receipts?, edited by G. Cordero and X. Coller, 77–98. London: Palgrave. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76550-1.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. P. 2009. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Evidence from the Latin American Vanguard.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (1): 56–81. doi:10.1177/0010414008324993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. 2001. “The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy.” Party Politics 7 (3): 277–296. doi:10.1177/1354068801007003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelbel, C. 2020. “‘I Bend, Indeed, but Never break’: Formal Rules and Informal Processes of Candidate Selection for European Elections.” Party Politics 26 (1): 43–55. doi:10.1177/1354068818754602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig, O., and S. Pruysers. 2018. “The Challenges of Inclusive Intra-Party Selection Methods.” In Democratizing Candidate Selection: New Methods, Old Receipts?, edited by G. Cordero and X. Coller, 25–48. London: Palgrave. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76550-1.
   Google Scholar
• Krouwel, A. 1999. “The Selection of Parliamentary Candidates in Western Europe: The Paradox of Democracy.” In Paper Presented at the ECPR Workshop. (Mannheim): The Consequences of Candidate Selection.
   Google Scholar
• Lanzone, E., and S. Rombi. 2018. “Selecting Candidates Online in Europe: A Comparison Among the Cases of M5S, Podemos, and the European Green Party.” In Democratizing Candidate Selection, edited by G. Cordero and X. Coller, 99–122. Palgrave. London: New Methods. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76550-1.
   Google Scholar
• Lundell, K. 2004. “Determinants of Candidate Selection – the Degree of Centralization in Comparative Perspective.” Party Politics 10 (1): 25–47. doi:10.1177/1354068804039119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundell, K. 2005. Contextual Determinants of Electoral System Choice. A Macro-Comparative Study (1945–2003). Turku: Åbo Akademi University Printing House.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. 2006. “Political Parties and Democracy: What Sort of Future?” Central European Political Science Review 4 (13): 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, R. T. 1964. British Political Parties: The Distribution of Power Within the Conservative and Labour Parties. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Michels, R. 1911. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Dover. doi:10.4324/9781315126685.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 1997. Passages to Power. Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., and J. Lovenduski. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511598609.
   Google Scholar
• Passarelli, G. 2020. Preferential Voting Systems: Influence on Intra-Party Competition and Voting Behaviour. London: Palgrave. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25286-1.
   Google Scholar
• Pennings, P., and R. Y. Hazan. 2001. “Democratizing Candidate Selection – Causes and Consequences.” Party Politics 7 (3): 267–275. doi:10.1177/1354068801007003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Nievas, S., J. Rama, and C. Fernández-Esquer. 2018. “New Wine in Old Bottles? The Selection of Electoral Candidates in General Elections in Podemos.” In Democratizing Candidate Selection: New Methods, Old Receipts?, edited by G. Cordero and X. Coller, 123–146. London: Palgrave. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76550-1.
   Google Scholar
• Pilet, J. B., and W. P. Cross, edited by. 2014. The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315856025.
   Google Scholar
• Podemos 2015. Estatutos del partido político PODEMOS. Available online: https://participa.podemos.info/pdf/estatutos_de_podemos.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T., and P. Webb, edited by. 2005. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199252017.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Rahat, G., and R. Y. Hazan. 2001. “Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework.” Party Politics 7 (3): 297–322. doi:10.1177/1354068801007003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramiro, L. 2016. “The Effects of Party Primaries on Electoral Performance. The Spanish Socialist Primaries in Local Elections.” Party Politics 22 (1): 125–136. doi:10.1177/1354068813514884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehmert, J. 2020. “Behavioral Consequences of Open Candidate Recruitment.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 46 (2): 427–458. doi:10.1111/lsq.12283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiser, M. 2018. “Contagion Effects by the AfD?: Candidate Selection in Germany.” In The Selection of Politicians in Times of Crisis, edited by X. Coller, G. Cordero, and A. M. Jaime-Castillo, 81–97. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315179575.
   Google Scholar
• Renwick, A., and J. B. Pilet. 2016. Faces on the Ballot: The Personalization of Electoral Systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Teruel, J., and A. Barrio. 2016. “Going National: Ciudadanos from Catalonia to Spain.” South European Society & Politics 21 (4): 587–607. doi:10.1080/13608746.2015.1119646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandri, G., and A. Seddone, edited by. 2021. New Paths for Selecting Political Elites: Investigating the Impact of Inclusive Candidate and Party Leader Selection Methods. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003022893.
   Google Scholar
• Sandri, G. S. A., and F. Venturino, edited by. 2015. Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315599595.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. 2014. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661862.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. 2021. “Intra-Party Democracy and Party Unity: Varied Rules, Varied Consequences.” Representation 57 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1080/00344893.2020.1785537.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S., and P. Webb. 2015. “Investigating Party Organization: Structures, Resources, and Representative Strategies.” In Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power, edited by P. D. S Scarrow and P. Thomas, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198758631.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, G., and N. Giger. 2017. “Who Leads the Party? On Membership Size, Selectorates and Party Oligarchy.” Political Studies 65 (1): 162–181. doi:10.1177/0032321716667957.
   Google Scholar
• Shomer, S. 2014. “What Affects Candidate Selection Processes? A Cross-National Examination.” Party Politics 20 (4): 533–546. doi:10.1177/1354068811436060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeleene, A., J. Dodeigne, and L. De Winter. 2016. “What Do Selectorates Seek? A Comparative Analysis of Belgian Federal and Regional Candidate Selection Processes in 2014.” The American Behavioral Scientist 60 (7): 889–908. doi:10.1177/0002764216632825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., T. Burst, W. Krause, P. Lehmann, T. Matthieß, N. Merz, S. Regel, B. Weßels, and L. Zehnter. 2020. The Manifesto Data Collection, Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Available online: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. 2012. “Parties and Their Leaders. Does It Matter How They Match? The German General Elections 2009 in Comparison.” Electoral Studies 31 (1): 72–82. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waylen, G. 2014. “Informal Institutions, Institutional Change, and Gender Equality.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 212–223. doi:10.1177/1065912913510360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. 2006. “Electoral Systems Design and Power-Sharing Regimes.” In Powersharing: New Challenges for Divided Societies, edited by I. O’Flynn and D. Russel, 59–74. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt18dzsm7.
   Google Scholar