Show me how to live: transactional advocacy organizations, managerial populism, and the EU

References

• Baldassarri, D., and M. Diani. 2007. “The Integrative Power of Civic Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (3): 735–780. https://doi.org/10.1086/521839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, J., M. Hanegraaf, and P. Statsch. 2021. “Explaining the Patterns of Contacts Between Interest Groups and Political Parties: Revising the Standard Model for Populist Times.” Party Politics 27 (3): 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819856608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., and B. Kerremans. 2012. “Domestic Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Multilevel Venue Shopping in Four EU Member States.” Governance 25 (2): 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01551.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bill, S. 2022. “Counter-Elite Populism and Civil Society in Poland: PiS’s Strategies of Elite Replacement.” East European Politics and Societies 36 (1): 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420950800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bill, S., and B. Stanley. 2020. “Whose Poland is It to Be? PiS and the Struggle Between Monism and Pluralism.” East European Politics 36 (3): 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1787161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N. 2021. “Civil Society, Crisis Exposure and Resistance Strategies.” In Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism, edited by A. Sajó, R. Uitz, and S. Holmes, 939–956. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buben, R., and K. Kouba. 2023. “How Czech Democracy Defies the Illiberal Trend.” Current History 122 (842): 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2023.122.842.108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A., S. Kerényi, and G. Olt. 2022. “Back to the Grassroots? The Shrinking Space of Environmental Activism in Illiberal Hungary.” Environmental Politics 31 (7): 1267–1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2113607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabanet, D. 2002. “Les marches européennes contre le chomage, la précarité et les exclusions.” In L’action collective en Europe, edited by R. Balme, D. Chabanet, and V. Wright, 461–494. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Cianetti, L., and S. Hanley. 2021. “The End of the Backsliding Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 32 (1): 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Císař, O., and J. Navrátil. 2015. “Promoting Competition or Cooperation? The Impact of EU Funding on Czech Advocacy Organizations.” Democratization 22 (3): 536–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.869742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Císař, O., and V. Štětka. 2017. “Czech Republic. The Rise of Populism from the Fringes to the Mainstream.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe, edited by T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, and C. H. de Vreese, 285–298. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., and M. Caiani. 2009. Social Movements and Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., and S. Tarrow. 2005. “Transnational Processes and Social Activism: An Introduction.” In Transnational Protest and Global Activism, edited by D. Della Porta and S. Tarrow, 1–17. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Engler, S. 2020. “Centrist Anti-Establishment Parties and Their Protest Voters: More Than a Superficial Romance?” European Political Science Review 12 (3): 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, S., B. Pytlas, and K. Deegan-Krause. 2019. “Assessing the Diversity of Anti-Establishment and Populist Politics in Central and Eastern Europe.” West European Politics 42 (6): 1310–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1596696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerő, M., A. Fejős, S. Kerényi, and D. Szikra. 2023. “From Exclusion to Co-Optation: Political Opportunity Structures and Civil Society Responses in De-Democratising Hungary.” Politics & Governance 11 (1): 16–27. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.5883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A. 2021. “European Union, Populism and Religious Minorities: Complex Entanglements.” European Politics and Society 22 (4): 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1801184.
   Google Scholar
• Greskovits, B. 2020. “Rebuilding the Hungarian Right Through Conquering Civil Society: The Civic Circles Movement.” East European Politics 36 (2): 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1718657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasti, P., and L. Bustikova. 2023. “Varieties of Illiberal Backlash in Central Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 70 (2): 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2022.2156889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halmai, G. 2011. “(Dis-)possessed by the Spectre of Socialism: Nationalist Mobilization in ‘Transitional’ Hungary.” In Headlines of Nation, Subtexts of Class: Working Class Populism and the Return of the Repressed in Neoliberal Europe, edited by D. Kalb and G. Halmai, 113–141. Oxford: Berghahn Books .
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, S., and M. A. Vachudová. 2018. “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic.” East European Politics 34 (3): 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlík, V. 2019. “Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 66 (6): 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1580590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. 2003. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kamiński, P., and R. Riedel. 2021. “When Illiberalism Looms-Mortality Anxiety and the Perceived Existential Threat Among Polish and Slovenian Interest Groups.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 10 (4): 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-021-00135-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labanino, R. P., and M. Dobbins. 2023. “Multilevel Venue Shopping Amid Democratic Backsliding in New European Union Member States.” Politics & Governance 11 (1): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.5882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, S. 2012. NGOs, Civil Society, and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., and D. McAdam. 1996. “Social Movements and the Changing Structure of Political Opportunity in the European Union.” West European Politics 19 (2): 249–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389608425133.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., J. McCarthy, and M. Zald. 1996. “Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes – Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, and M. Zald, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., and S. Tarrow. 2019. “The Political Context of Social Movements.” In The Willey-Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by D. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, and H. J. McCammon, 19–42. Hoboken: Willey-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., C. Moder, M. Neumayr, and P. Vandor. 2020. “Civil Society and Its Institutional Context in CEE.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 31 (4): 811–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00106-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monforte, P. 2014. Europeanizing Contention. The Protest Against ‘Fortress Europe’ in France and Germany. Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, L. 2015. Social Movement Campaigns on EU Policy. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Petrova, T., and S. Tarrow. 2007. “Transactional and Participatory Activism in the Emerging European Polity: The Puzzle of East-Central Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006291189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poloni-Staudinger, L. 2008. “The Domestic Opportunity Structure and Supranational Activity: An Explanation of Environmental Group Activity at the European Union Level.” European Union Politics 9 (4): 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116508095150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pospieszna, P., and A. Vetulani-Cęgiel. 2021. “Polish Interest Groups Facing Democratic Backsliding.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 10 (2): 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-021-00119-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzza, C., and R. Sanchez Salgado. 2021. “The Populist Turn in EU Politics and the Intermediary Role of Civil Society Organizations.” European Politics and Society 22 (4): 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1801180.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, B. 2008. “The Thin Ideology of Populism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 13 (1): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289.
   Google Scholar
• Taguieff, P.-A. 1995. “Political Science Confronts Populism: From a Conceptual Mirage to a Real Problem.” Telos 1995:9–43. https://doi.org/10.3817/0395103009. 103
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 2011. Power in Movement. Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vachudová, M. A. 2020. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics 36 (3): 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1787163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamponi, L. 2020. “Challenging Precarity, Austerity and Delocalisation: Italian Labour Struggles from Euro-Criticism to Euro-Disenchantment.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 7 (3): 347–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2020.1804962.
   Google Scholar