Service quality management and ecosystem theory

References

• Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. doi: 10.1002/smj.821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basole, R.C., & Karla, J. (2012). Value transformation in the mobile service ecosystem: A study of app store emergence and growth. Service Science, 4(1), 24–41. doi: 10.1287/serv.1120.0004
   Google Scholar
• van der Borgh, M., Cloodt, M., & Romme, A.G.L. (2012). Value creation by knowledge-based ecosystems: Evidence from a field study. R&D Management, 42(2), 150–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M.K., & Cronin, J.J. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 34–49. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.65.3.34.18334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, A., & Scoglio, F. (2012). Reframing the past: A new approach in service quality assessment. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(11–12), 1329–1343. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.733259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard, J.J., Kristensen, K., & Kanji, G.K. (1994). The quality journey – a journey without an end. London: Carfax.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard, J.J., Kristensen, K., & Kanji, G.K. (1998). Fundamentals of total quality management. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. (2000). From ancient philosophies to TQM and modern management theories. PhD thesis, Linköping University Press, Linköping.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. (2011). The quality movement – where are you going. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(5), 493–516. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.578481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., Chen, C.K., Jang, J.Y., & Dahlgaard, J.J. (2013). Diagnosing and prognosticating the quality movement – a review on the 25 years quality literature (1987–2011). Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.756749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W.E. (1982). Quality, productivity, and competitive position. Cambridge, MA: Center for Advanced Engineering Study, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Center for Advanced Engineering Study, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W.E. (1990, August 20–26). A system of profound knowledge. Actionline.
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W.E. (1993). The new economics for industry, government & education. Cambridge, MA: Center for Advanced Engineering Study, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Edison, T. (2012). Original innovation: Innovation management of Chinese enterprise’s transition. Beijing: Intercontinental Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004a). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004b). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation and sustainability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, U. (1999). Organizational strategy on different landscapes: A new science approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12(3), 257–278. doi: 10.1023/A:1022499601393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J.F. (1993). The evolution of Wal-wart: Savvy expansion and leadership. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 82–83.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J.F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J.F. (2005). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. Antitrust Bulletin, 51(1), 31–75.
   Google Scholar
• Peltoniemi, M., & Vuori, E. (2004). Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. In M. Seppä (Ed.), Proceedings of the eBRF conference: Frontiers of e-business research 2004 (pp. 267–281). Tampere: Tampere University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Rietkerk, M., Dekker, S.C., de Ruiter, P.C., & van de Koppel, J. (2004). Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science, 305(5692), 1926–1929. doi: 10.1126/science.1101867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochet, J.C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: A progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 35(3), 645–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable), enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. doi: 10.1002/smj.640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trist, E. (1976). A concept of organizational ecology. Australian Journal of Management, 2(2), 161–175. doi: 10.1177/031289627700200205
   Google Scholar
• Trist, E. (1983). Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human Relations, 36(3), 269–284.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, J. (2013). The nonperforming loan ratio of Wenzhou City's banks rose to 4.01%. Retrieved from http://economy.caijing.com.cn/2013-05-06/112744895.html
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M. (2012, November 1). The listed companies’ 3rd Quarter 2012 reports−banking contributes more than half net profit. The Beijing News, B01.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S.N. (2012). Banks become ‘super cash-generating machine’ because of highly profit. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/dfpd/jingji/2012-01/13/content_14437020.htm
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y.Y. (2012). More than 60% enterprises cut back or suspend production in Wenzhou – bring disaster to the finance. Retrieved from http://finance.jrj.com.cn/2012/08/25070714257724.shtml
   Google Scholar