Public administrators' engagement in services co-creation: factors that foster and hinder organisational learning about citizens

References

• Alford, J. (2002). Why do public sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory. Administration & Society, 34(1), 32–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, H. (2013). Co-creation and innovation in public services. The Service Industries Journal, 33(7–8), 671–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, C., Lai, F., Chen, Y., & Hutchinson, J. (2008). Conceptualising the perceived service quality of public utility services: A multi-level, multi-dimensional model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 19(10), 1055–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, D. (2004). Dialogue and its role in the development of relationship specific knowledge. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(2), 114–123.
   Google Scholar
• Beverland, M., & Lindgreen, A. (2010). What makes a good case study? A positivist review of qualitative case research published in industrial marketing management, 1971–2006. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 56–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G.A., & Walker, R.M. (2010). Strategic management and public service performance: The way ahead. Public Administration Review, 70(Supplement s1), s.185–s.192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradwell, P., & Marr, S. (2008). Making the most of collaboration: An international survey of public service co-design. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Brudney, J.F., & England, R.E. (1982). Urban policy making and subjective service evaluations: Are they compatible? Public Administration Review, 42(2), 127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassia, F., & Magno, F. (2009). Public services co-production: Exploring the role of citizen orientation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1(3), 334–343.
   Google Scholar
• Cassia, F., & Magno, F. (2011). Differences between public administrators’ and elected officials’ perspectives on the role of the citizen in service quality improvement processes. The TQM Journal, 23(5), 550–559.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2011). Explaining the failure of an online citizen engagement initiative: The role of internal institutional variables. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8(1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.C., Chiu, C.M., & Chen, C.A. (2010). The effect of TQM practices on employee satisfaction and loyalty in government. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(12), 1299–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, P., & Deakin, M. (2011). Co-design in smart cities. Smart Cities Guide. Retrieved from http://www.smartcities.info/files/Co-Design%20in%20Smart%20Cities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard, J.J., Pettersen, J., & Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. (2011). Quality and lean health care: A system for assessing and improving the health of healthcare organisations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(6), 673–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalehite, G.E. (2008). Determinants of performance measurement: An investigation into the decision to conduct citizen surveys. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 891–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Pietro, L., Mugion, R.G., & Renzi, M.F. (2013). An integrated approach between lean and customer feedback tools: An empirical study in the public sector. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(7–8), 899–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. (2004). Searching for a role for citizens in the budget process. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(1), 32–49.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebauer, H., Johnson, M., & Enquist, B. (2010). Value co-creation as a determinant of success in public transport services: A study of the Swiss Federal Railway operator (SBB). Managing Service Quality, 20(6), 511–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates? European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314.
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson, E., Lusch, R.F., & Vargo, S.L. (2010). Transitioning from service management to service-dominant logic: Observations and recommendations. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Isett, K.R. (2007). Citizen involvement and performance management in special-purpose governments. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 238–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan, P.T., Lu, H.P., & Chou, T.C. (2012). Measuring the perception discrepancy of the service quality between provider and customers in the internet protocol television industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(7–8), 981–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensson, P., Matthing, J., & Johansson, N. (2008). Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19(4), 474–491.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, K., & Canwell, A. (2010). Leadership at all levels: Leading public sector organization in an age of austerity. European Management Journal, 28(4), 297–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C. (2008). Realising the potential of co-production: Negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy and Society, 7(2), 221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, A.A., Galvão, T., & Cunha, J.F.e. (2014). Urban public transport service co-creation: Leveraging passenger's knowledge to enhance travel experience. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111, 577–585.
   Google Scholar
• Parrado, S., Van Ryzin, G.G., Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2013). Correlates of co-production: Evidence from a five-nation survey of citizens. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 85–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, A.F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S.V. (1999). The academic as service provider: Is the customer ‘always right’? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21(2), 193–202.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore, P., Bound, K., & Lownsbrough, H. (2006). Community participation: Who benefits? York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Stipak, B. (1980). Local governments’ use of citizen surveys. Public Administration Review, 40(5), 521–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiss, J.E. (1992). Adapting total quality management (TQM) to government. Public Administration Review, 52(4), 356–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G.G., & Immerwahr, S. (2007). Importance-performance analysis of citizen satisfaction surveys. Public Administration, 85(1), 215–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G.G., Immerwahr, S., & Altman, S. (2008). Measuring street cleanliness: A comparison of New York city's scorecard and results from a citizen survey. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 295–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Pandey, S.K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes? Public Administration Review, 71(6), 880–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar