What drives leapfrogging? empirical assessment of consumer determinants of leapfrogging

References

• Antioco, M., & Kleijnen, M. (2010). Consumer adoption of technological innovations: Effects of psychological and functional barriers in a lack of content versus a presence of content situation. European Journal of Marketing, 44(11/12), 1700–1724. doi: 10.1108/03090561011079846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts Joep, W. C., Frambach, R. T., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2011). Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior. Journal of Business Research, 28(2), 134–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badawy, M. A. (2009). Technology management simply defined: A tweet plus two characters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26(4), 219–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayus, B. L. (1988). Accelerating the durable replacement cycle with marketing mix variables. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(3), 216–226. doi: 10.1016/0737-6782(88)90024-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayus, B. L., & Gupta, S. (1992). An empirical analysis of consumer durable replacement intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9(3), 257–267. doi: 10.1016/0167-8116(92)90021-C
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. R., & Bucklin, R. E. (1999). The role of internal reference points in the category purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(2), 128–143. doi: 10.1086/209555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., Li, L., Shi, Y., & Lu, Y. (2012). Conceptualizing leapfrogging with spatially coupled innovation systems: The case of onsite wastewater treatment in China. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79(1), 155–171. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, J. (2001). Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(5), 705–726. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00090-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezis, E. S., Krugman, P. R., & Tsiddon, D. (1993). Leapfrogging in international competition: The theory of cycles in national technological leadership. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1211–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanda, U., & Bardhan, A. K. (2008). Modeling innovation and imitation sales of products with multiple technological generations. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 18(2), 173–190. doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2007.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D. Z. (2003). Analysis of the leading factors in technological leapfrogging. Journal of HIT, 8, 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D. Z., & Li-Hua, R. (2012). Modes of technological leapfrogging: Five case studies from China. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(1), 93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, P., & Staunton, N. (1994). Innovation in technology and organization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cripps, J. D. (1993). The process of sequential durable replacement decisions. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cripps, J. D., & Meyer, R. J. (1994). Heuristics and biases in timing the replacement of durable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 304–318. doi: 10.1086/209399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, P. J., Hardie, B. G. S., & Putsis, W. P. (2001). Marketing-mix variables and the diffusion of successive generations of a technological innovation. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(4), 501–514. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.38.4.501.18907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druehl, C. T., Schmidt, G. M., & Souza, G. C. (2009). The optimal pace of product updates. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(2), 621–633. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.09.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdem, T., Keane, M. P., Öncü, S. T., & Strebel, J. (2005). Learning about computers: An analysis of information search and technology choice. Quantitative Marketing Economics, 3(3), 207–247. doi: 10.1007/s11129-005-0269-7
   Google Scholar
• Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T. S. (1985). A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 849–867. doi: 10.1086/209021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, B. R. (2009). A dynamic model of consumer replacement cycles in the PC processor industry. Marketing Science, 28(5), 846–867. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1080.0448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, E. A., & Lehmann, D. R. (1995). A typology of reasons for substantial delay in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 186–199. doi: 10.1086/209444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 98–107. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00295-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holak, S. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (1990). Determinants of innovative durables adoption, an empirical study with implications for early product screening. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(1), 50–69. doi: 10.1016/0737-6782(88)90032-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, J. (2009). Leapfrogging in mobile telephony: A measure for comparing country performance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76(7), 991–998. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N., Srivastava, R. K., & Han, J. K. (2001). Consumer decision-making in a multi-generational choice set context. Journal of Business Research, 53(3), 123–136. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00113-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornish, L. J. (2001). Pricing for a durable-goods monopolist under rapid sequential innovation. Management Science, 47(11), 1552–1561. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1552.10247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labay, D. G., & Kinnear, T. C. (1981). Exploring the consumer decision process in the adoption of solar energy systems. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 271–278. doi: 10.1086/208865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Lim, C. S. (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries source. Research Policy, 30(3), 459–483. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00088-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A., & Purohit, D. (1989). Durable goods and product obsolescence. Marketing Science, 8(1), 35–56. doi: 10.1287/mksc.8.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L. H., & Lu, I. Y. (2006). Product quality as a determinant of product innovation: An empirical analysis of the global automotive industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17(2), 141–147. doi: 10.1080/14783360500450434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, T. J., Pamela, E., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 18(1), 3–9. doi: 10.1177/0146167292181001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mody, A., & Sherman, R. (1990). Leapfrogging in switching systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 37(1), 77–83. doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(90)90060-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montini, T., & Slobin, K. (1991). Tensions between good science and good practice: Lagging behind and leapfrogging ahead along the cancer care continuum. Research in the Sociology of Health Care, 9, 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Moorthy, S. K., & Png, I. P. L. (1992). Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Marketing Science, 38(3), 345–359.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. O., Morgan, R. M., & Moore, W. L. (2001). Quality and time-to-market trade-offs when there are multiple product generations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3(2), 89–104. doi: 10.1287/msom.3.2.89.9991
   Google Scholar
• Ofek, E., & Sarvary, M. (2003). R&D, marketing, and the success of next-generation products. Marketing Science, 22(3), 355–370. doi: 10.1287/mksc.22.3.355.17742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan, V., Rajiv, S., & Srinivasan, K. (1997). New products, upgrades, and new releases: A rationale for sequential product introduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(4), 456–472. doi: 10.2307/3151964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PASW, Inc. (2009). PASW missing value analysis™ 18.0. Chicago, IL: IBM.
   Google Scholar
• Punj, G. N., & Staelin, R. (1983). A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(4), 366–380. doi: 10.1086/208931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purohit, D. (1992). Exploring the relationship between the markets for new and used durable goods: The case of automobiles. Marketing Science, 11(2), 154–167. doi: 10.1287/mksc.11.2.154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purohit, D. (1995). Playing the role of buyer and seller: The mental accounting of trade-ins. Marketing Letters, 6(2), 101–110. doi: 10.1007/BF00994926
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A. (2003). Technological leapfrogging: Lessons from the US video game console industry. California Management Review, 45(3), 6–32. doi: 10.2307/41166174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G. (2000). Critical technology management issues of new product development in high-tech companies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(1), 57–77. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(99)00012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif, M. N. (1989). Technological leapfrogging. Implications for developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 36(1–2), 201–208. doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(89)90024-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, I., & Chintagunta, P. K. (2003). A micromodel of new product adoption with heterogeneous and forward-looking consumers: Application to the digital camera category. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 1(4), 371–407. doi: 10.1023/B:QMEC.0000004843.41279.f3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speece, M. W., & MacLachlan, D. L. (1995). Application of a multi-generation diffusion model to milk container technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 49(3), 281–295. doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(95)00006-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1992). The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 434–448. doi: 10.1086/209313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. B., & Charlotte, H. M. (1999). The link between attractiveness of ‘extrabrand’ attributes and the adoption of innovations. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 306–319. doi: 10.1177/0092070399273002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, P. W., & Meenaghan, A. (1980). Diffusion of innovation and opinion leadership. European Journal of Marketing, 14(1), 3–33. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000004893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, D. B., & Calder, B. G. (1993). Leapfrogging: A portable technique for implementing efficient futures. Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery, 28, 208–217.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Wenyu, D., & Zhou, N. (2008). Consumption attitudes and adoption of new consumer products: A contingency approach. European Journal of Marketing, 42(1/2), 238–254. doi: 10.1108/03090560810840998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, A. M. (1987). The effects of technological expectations on the industrial purchase decision, theory and evidence (Report Nr. 87–157). Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, A. M., & John, G. (1989). Leapfrogging behavior and the purchase of industrial innovations (Report Nr. 89–110). Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development, quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quantity. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar