The epistemological basis for quality management

References

• Anderson, J., Dooley, K., & Misterek, R. (1991). The role of profound knowledge in the continual improvement of quality. Human Systems Management, 10, 243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., Rungtusanatham, M., & Schroeder, R. (1994). A theory of QM underlying the Deming management method. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 472–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avenier, M. J. (2010). Shaping a constructivist view of organizational design science. Organization Studies, 31(9&10), 1229–1255. doi: 10.1177/0170840610374395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avenier, M. J. (2011). Les paradigmes épistémologiques constructivistes: Post-modernisme ou pragmatism. Management & Avenir, 43, 372–391. doi: 10.3917/mav.043.0372
   Google Scholar
• Avenier, M. J., & Parmentier Cajaiba, A. (2012). The dialogical model: Developing academic knowledge for and from practice. European Management Review, 9, 199–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-4762.2012.01038.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barouch, G. (2011a). Total quality management as a theory of change. Total Quality Management and Excellence, 39(2), 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Barouch, G. (2011b). Change management and homeostasy. Gérer et Comprendre, 106(December), 27–36. doi: 10.3917/geco.106.0027
   Google Scholar
• Barouch, G., & Kleinhans, S. (2015). Learning from quality management criticisms. International Journal of Quality and Service Science, 7, 201–216. doi: 10.1108/IJQSS-02-2015-0026
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (read in French).
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity (advances in systems theory, complexity, and the human sciences). New York, NY: Hampton Press (read in French).
   Google Scholar
• Benner, M., & Tushman, M. (2003). Exploitation, exploration and quality management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenship, B., & Petersen, P. (1999). Edwards Deming’s mentor and others who made significant impact on his view during the 1920s and the 1930s. Journal of Management History, 5, 454–467. doi: 10.1108/13552529910290511
   Google Scholar
• Cavaleri, S. A. (2008). Are learning organizations pragmatic? The Learning Organization, 15, 474–485. doi: 10.1108/09696470810907383
   Google Scholar
• Conti, T. (2010). Systems thinking in quality management. The QM Journal, 22, 352–368.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, N. (1994). Deming and the vindication of knowledge in the philosophy of C. I. Lewis. Quality Management Journal, 1, 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard, J. (2015). Quality trilogy. The SAGE encyclopedia of quality and the service economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard-Park, S. M. (2011). The quality movement: Where are you going? Total Quality Management, 22, 493–516. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.578481
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard-Park, S. M. (2015). Total quality management. The SAGE encyclopedia of quality and the service economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, B. G., Wu, P. Y., Zairi, M., Williams, A. R. T., & Van Der Wiele, T. (2001). Total quality management and theory: An exploratory study of contribution. Total Quality Management, 12, 439–449. doi: 10.1080/09544120123930
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. W., & Bowen, D. (1994). Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through research development. Academy of Management Review, 19, 392–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1993). The new economics for industry, government, education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
   Google Scholar
• Detert, J., Schroeder, R., & Mauriel, J. (2000). A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 850–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, K., Johnson, T., & Bush, D. (1995). TQM, chaos, and complexity. Human Systems Management, 14, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dotchin, J. A., & Oakland, J. S. (1992). Theories and concepts in total quality management. Total Quality Management, 3, 133–145. doi: 10.1080/09544129200000015
   Google Scholar
• Emison, G. A. (2004). Pragmatism, adaptation, and total quality management: Philosophy and science in the service of managing continuous improvement. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(2), 56–61. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:2(56)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. (1984). What does product quality really mean. Sloan Management Review, 26, 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. A. (1988). Managing quality: The strategic and competitive edge. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H., & Landry, S. (1998). Schools of thought in and against total quality. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10, 183–203.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. (2009). Toward a pragmatic discourse of constructivism: Reflections on lessons from practice. Educational Studies, 45, 39–58. doi: 10.1080/00131940802546894
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (1995). Total quality management: Empirical conceptual and practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 309–342. doi: 10.2307/2393640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassard, J. (1991). Multiple paradigms and organizational analysis: A case study. Organization Studies, 12(2), 275–299. doi: 10.1177/017084069101200206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassard, J., & Kelemen, M. (2002). Production and consumption in organizational knowledge: The case of the paradigms debate. Organization, 9, 331–355. doi: 10.1177/1350508402009002911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helzer, T. A. (1994). Envisioning total quality management through systems thinking. Systems Research, 11, 177–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hillmer, S., & Karney, D. (1997). Towards understanding the foundations of Deming’s management theory. Journal of Quality Management, 6, 371–400. doi: 10.1016/S1084-8568(01)00045-1
   Google Scholar
• Hillmer, S., & Karney, D. (2001). In support of the assumptions at the foundation of Deming’s theory of management. Journal of Quality Management, 2, 171–189. doi: 10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90002-X
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9001. (2015). Quality management systems: Fundamentals and vocabulary. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9004. (2009). Managing for the sustained success of an organization: A quality management approach. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (read in French).
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, M. (2003). Managing quality. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lemak, D., Mero, N., & Reed, R. (2002). When quality works: A premature post mortem on TQM. Journal of Business and Management, 4, 391–410.
   Google Scholar
• Lovitt, M. R. (1997). The new pragmatism: Going beyond Shewhart and Deming. Quality Progress, 10, 99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Manjunath, U. (2008). Core issues in defining healthcare quality. The ICFAI University Journal of Services Marketing, VI, 72–78.
   Google Scholar
• Manz, C., & Stewart, G. (1997). Attaining flexible stability by integrating total quality management and socio-technical systems theory. Organizational Science, 8, 59–70. doi: 10.1287/orsc.8.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauléon, C., & Bergman, B. (2009). Exploring the epistemological origins of Shewhart’s and Deming’s theory of quality: Influences from C. I. Lewis’s conceptualist pragmatism. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2, 160–171. doi: 10.1108/17566690910971436
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Luzón, M. D., & Peris, F. J. (1998). Strategic approaches, organizational design and quality management: Integration in a fit and contingency model. International Journal of Quality Science, 3, 328–347. doi: 10.1108/13598539810243667
   Google Scholar
• Mulej, M., & Rebernik, M. (1994). There is hardly a (total) quality without systems thinking. Systems Research, 11, 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Nørreklit, H., Nørreklit, L., & Mitchell, F. (2010). Towards a paradigmatic foundation for accounting practice. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23, 733–758. doi: 10.1108/09513571011065844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, L., Parayitam, S., & Olson, B. (2007). Edwards Deming, Mary P. Follett and Frederick Taylor: Reconciliation of differences in organizational and strategic leadership. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 6, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Prida, B., & Grijalvo, M. (2008). The socio-technical approach to work organization: An essential element in quality management systems. Total Quality Management, 19, 343–352. doi: 10.1080/14783360701594568
   Google Scholar
• Priebe, S. (2000). Ensuring and improving quality in community mental health care. International Review of Psychiatry, 12, 226–232. doi: 10.1080/irp.12.3.226.232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman, T., & Grieves, J. (1999). Managing strategic change through QM: Learning from failure. New Technology, Work and Employment, 14(1), 45–61. doi: 10.1111/1468-005X.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1995). L’espoir au lieu du savoir: Introduction au pragmatisme. Paris: Albin Michel.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. (2013). Six sigma: Just more of the same? Performance Improvement, 52, 25–30. doi: 10.1002/pfi.21326
   Google Scholar
• Rungtusanatham, M., Forza, C., Filippini, R., & Anderson, J. C. (1998). A replication study of a theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method: Insights from an Italian context. Journal of Operations Management, 17(1), 77–95. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00032-1
   Google Scholar
• Rungtusanatham, M., Ogden, J. A., & Wu, B. (2003). Advancing theory development in total quality management: A ‘Deming management method perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23, 918–936. doi: 10.1108/01443570310486356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, C., & Challenger, R. (2012). Revisiting paradigms in management research: A rhetorical analysis of the paradigm wars. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 225–244. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliwa, M., & Wilcox, M. (2008). Philosophical thought and the origins of quality management: Uncovering conceptual underpinnings of W. A. Shewhart's ideas on quality. Culture & Organization, 14, 97–106. doi: 10.1080/14759550701864934
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2002). Quality management revisited: A reflective review and agenda for future research. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 91–109. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00088-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, B. (1994). Models of organization and total quality management: A comparison and a critical evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 9, 446–471.
   Google Scholar
• Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). The history and status of General System Theory. Academy of Management Journal, 15, 407–426. doi: 10.2307/255139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (2001). The radical constructivist view of science. Foundations of Science: Special Issue on Impact of Radical Constructivism on Science, 6(1–3), 31–43. doi: 10.1023/A:1011345023932
   Google Scholar
• Wang T.-W. (2004). From General System Theory to total quality management. The Journal of American Academy of Business, March, 394–400.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P. (Ed.). (1984). The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know?. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, G. R., & Gioia, D. A. (1994). Paradigms lost: Incommensurability vs. structurationist inquiry. Organization Studies, 15(4), 565–589. doi: 10.1177/017084069401500404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, N. (1950). Cybernetics. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 3, 2–4. doi: 10.2307/3822945
   Google Scholar
• Wruck, K. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1994). Science, specific knowledge, and total quality management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18, 247–287. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zbracki, P. M. L. (1998). The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 602–636. doi: 10.2307/2393677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar