Systematic failure mode and effect analysis using a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making approach

References

• Abdullah, L., & Zulkifli, N. (2015). Integration of fuzzy AHP and interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL: An application to human resource management. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(9), 4397–4409. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attri, R., Grover, S., & Dev, N. (2014). A graph theoretic approach to evaluate the intensity of barriers in the implementation of total productive maintenance (TPM). International Journal of Production Research, 52(10), 3032–3051. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.860250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu, A. (2014). A review and analysis of ‘graph theoretical-matrix permanent’ approach to decision making with example applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 42(4), 573–605. doi: 10.1007/s10462-012-9354-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995). Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 50(2), 203–213. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, J. S., & Ongkowijoyo, C. S. (2014). Risk-based group decision making regarding renewable energy schemes using a stochastic graphical matrix model. Automation in Construction, 37, 98–109. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, Y. C., Sun, C. C., & Yen, H. Y. (2012). Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Applied Soft Computing, 12(1), 64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.08.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragincic, J., Korac, N., & Blagojevic, B. (2015). Group multi-criteria decision making (GMCDM) approach for selecting the most suitable table grape variety intended for organic viticulture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 111, 194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2014.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetanat, A., & Khorasaninejad, E. (2015). A novel hybrid MCDM approach for offshore wind farm site selection: A case study of Iran. Ocean & Coastal Management, 109, 17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouladgar, M. M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Yakhchali, S. H., & Ghasempourabadi, M. H. (2012). Project portfolio selection using fuzzy AHP and VIKOR techniques. Transformations in Business and Economics, 11(25), 213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility (DEMATEL Report No. 1). Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Gargama, H., & Chaturvedi, S. K. (2011). Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 60(1), 102–110. doi: 10.1109/TR.2010.2103672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, D., Mohammed, E. S., & Rozakis, S. (2015). Multi-criteria decision making on the energy supply configuration of autonomous desalination units. Renewable Energy, 75, 459–467. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, T., Ho, W., Lee Ka Man, C., & Xu, X. (2012). A fuzzy AHP based integer linear programming model for the multi-criteria transshipment problem. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(1), 159–179. doi: 10.1108/09574091211226975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul. Energy, 35(6), 2517–2527. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., Singh, R., & Kumar, R. (2017). An integrated framework of interpretive structural modeling and graph theory matrix approach to fix the agility index of an automobile manufacturing organization. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 8(supp1.), 342–352. doi: 10.1007/s13198-015-0350-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanjewar, P. B., Rao, R. V., & Kale, A. V. (2015). Assessment of alternative fuels for transportation using a hybrid graph theory and analytic hierarchy process method. Fuel, 154, 9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnemann, A. R., Hendrix, E. M. T., Apaiah, R., & van Boekel, T. A. J. S. (2015). Food chain design using multi criteria decision making, an approach to complex design issues. NJAS -Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 72–73, 13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.njas.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, J. J. H., Tamošaitienė, J., Zavadskas, E. K., & Tzeng, G. H. (2015). New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 114–134. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1010747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C. (2016). FMEA using uncertainty theories and MCDM methods. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Lin, Q. L. (2013). Fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning and belief rule-based methodology. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 62(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1109/TR.2013.2241251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 828–838. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Liu, N., & Mao, L. X. (2012). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 12926–12934. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., Li, P., You, J. X., & Chen, Y. Z. (2015). A novel approach for FMEA: Combination of interval 2-tuple linguistic variables and grey relational analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31(5), 761–772. doi: 10.1002/qre.1633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Chen, S., & Chen, Y. Z. (2016). An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty. IIE Transactions, 48(11), 1027–1042. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2016.1172742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Ding, X. F., & Su, Q. (2015). Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with a hybrid multiple criteria decision making method. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 32(7), 763–782. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-10-2013-0169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Lin, Q. L., & Li, H. (2015). Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 28(7), 701–714. doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2014.900865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Li, P., & Su, Q. (2016). Failure mode and effect analysis under uncertainty: An integrated multiple criteria decision making approach. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 65(3), 1380–1392. doi: 10.1109/TR.2016.2570567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Lu, C., & Chen, Y. Z. (2015). Evaluating health-care waste treatment technologies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 932–942. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Shan, M. M., & Shao, L. N. (2015). Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid TOPSIS approach. Soft Computing, 19(4), 1085–1098. doi: 10.1007/s00500-014-1321-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., You, J. X., & You, X. Y. (2014). Evaluating the risk of healthcare failure modes using interval 2-tuple hybrid weighted distance measure. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 78, 249–258. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S. H., & Lee, G. G. (2015). Applying failure mode and effects analysis for successful knowledge management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(1), 62–75. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.733263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medineckiene, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Björk, F., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 15(1), 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, S. K., & Kant, R. (2014). A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL and FMCDM to predict success of knowledge management adoption in supply chain. Applied Soft Computing, 18, 126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajesh, R., Ravi, V., & Venkata Rao, R. (2015). Selection of risk mitigation strategy in electronic supply chains using grey theory and digraph-matrix approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 53(1), 238–257. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.948579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, R. V., & Parnichkun, M. (2009). Flexible manufacturing system selection using a combinatorial mathematics-based decision-making method. International Journal of Production Research, 47(24), 6981–6998. doi: 10.1080/00207540802389227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratha, D., & Agrawal, V. P. (2015). A digraph permanent approach to evaluation and analysis of integrated watershed management system. Journal of Hydrology, 525, 188–196. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburg, CA: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sabharwal, S., & Garg, S. (2013). Determining cost effectiveness index of remanufacturing: A graph theoretic approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 521–532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari, H., Faraji, Z., & Majidian, S. (2016). Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(2), 475–486. doi: 10.1007/s10845-014-0880-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyed-Hosseini, S. M., Safaei, N., & Asgharpour, M. J. (2006). Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(8), 872–881. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafiee, M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Saleh, H. (2014). Supply chain performance evaluation with data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(21–22), 5092–5112. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, R. K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2005). Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(9), 986–1004. doi: 10.1108/02656710510625248
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Lozano, J. M., Serna, J., & Dolón-Payán, A. (2015). Evaluating military training aircrafts through the combination of multi-criteria decision making processes with fuzzy logic. A case study in the Spanish Air Force Academy. Aerospace Science and Technology, 42, 58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2014.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z., & Zhu, B. (2014). A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30(4), 473–486. doi: 10.1002/qre.1500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution (2nd ed). New York, NY: ASQC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tadić, S., Zečević, S., & Krstić, M. (2014). A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(18), 8112–8128. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, K., Jong, C., & Lim, C. (2015). A clustering-based failure mode and effect analysis model and its application to the edible bird nest industry. Neural Computing and Applications, 26(3), 551–560. doi: 10.1007/s00521-014-1647-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabi, S. A., Rezaei Soufi, H., & Sahebjamnia, N. (2014). A new framework for business impact analysis in business continuity management (with a case study). Safety Science, 68, 309–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, C. W., Tzeng, G. H., & Wen, U. P. (2015). A hybrid MCDM approach for improving the performance of green suppliers in the TFT-LCD industry. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6436–6454. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.935829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vimal, K. E. K., Vinodh, S., & Raja, A. (2015). Modelling, assessment and deployment of strategies for ensuring sustainable shielded metal arc welding process – a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93, 364–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinodh, S., Aravindraj, S., Narayanan, R. S., & Yogeshwaran, N. (2012). Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for rotary switches: A case study. The TQM Journal, 24(5), 461–475. doi: 10.1108/17542731211261601
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1195–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, K., Tang, L. C., Xie, M., Ho, S. L., & Zhu, M. L. (2002). Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 75(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00101-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Bonsall, S., & Wang, J. (2008). Fuzzy rule-based Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 57(3), 517–528. doi: 10.1109/TR.2008.928208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning – I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249. doi: 10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., You, J. X., & Liu, H. C. (2016). Failure mode and effect analysis using MULTIMOORA method with continuous weighted entropy under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Soft Computing, 31(3), 343. doi: 10.1007/s00500-016-2118-x
   Google Scholar