Exploring the role of core and infrastructure quality management practices in ambidexterity

References

• Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracies: enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61–89. doi: 10.2307/2393986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Álvarez Santos, J., Miguel-Dávila, J.-Á., & Nieto Antolín, M. (2016). The innovation strategies for managing a specific paradox: Exploration/exploitation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 869, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation–exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20, 696–717. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony, J., Leung, K., Knowles, G., & Gosh, S. (2002). Critical success factors of TQM implementation in Hong Kong industries. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19, 551–566. doi: 10.1108/02656710210427520
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, S. H. (1997). Socio-technical systems theory: An intervention strategy for organizational development. Management Decision, 35, 452–463. doi: 10.1108/00251749710173823
   Google Scholar
• Asif, M., & De Vries, H. (2015). Creating ambidexterity through quality management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26, 1226–1241. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2014.926609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462. doi: 10.1348/096317999166789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19–31. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17, 112–121.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, C. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 741–758. doi: 10.5465/amj.2006.22083030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–256. doi: 10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Kaesser, M. (2013). Ambidextrous governance in supply chains: The impact on innovation and cost performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49, 59–80. doi: 10.1111/jscm.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boumgarden, P., Nickerson, J., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 587–610. doi: 10.1002/smj.1972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claver, E., Tari, J. J., & Molina, J. F. (2003). Critical factors and results of quality management: An empirical study. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 14, 91–118. doi: 10.1080/14783360309709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtright, J. A., Fairhurst, G. T., & Rogers, L. E. (1989). Interaction patterns in organic and mechanistic systems. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 773–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derbyshire, J. (2014). The impact of ambidexterity on enterprise performance: Evidence from 15 countries and 14 sectors. Technovation, 34, 574–581. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32, 1422–1433. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dover, P. A., & Dierk, U. (2010). The ambidextrous organization: Integrating managers, entrepreneurs and leaders. Journal of Business Strategy, 31, 49–58. doi: 10.1108/02756661011076318
   Google Scholar
• Droge, C., Jayaram, J., & Vickery, S. K. (2004). The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 557–573. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Killman, L. Pondy, & R. Sleven (Eds.), The management of organization (pp. 167–188). New York, NY: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi, M., & Sadeghi, M. (2013). Quality management and performance: An annotated review. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 5625–5643. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.793426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotopoulos, C. B., & Psomas, E. L. (2009a). The use of quality management tools and techniques in ISO 9001: 2000 certified companies: The Greek case. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58, 564–580. doi: 10.1108/17410400910977091
   Google Scholar
• Fotopoulos, C. B., & Psomas, E. L. (2009b). The impact of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ TQM elements on quality management results. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26, 150–163. doi: 10.1108/02656710910928798
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, D., & Michel, E. J. (2013). Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. The Journal of Psychology, 147, 435–453. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2012.710663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., Smith, K., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706. doi: 10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, D., Duffy, V., & Shih, H. (2001). Total quality management: An empirical test for mediation effect. International Journal of Production Research, 39, 529–548. doi: 10.1080/00207540010005709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, K. (Ed.). (1985). What is total quality control? The Japanese way. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J., Tempelaar, M. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 797–811. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynak, H. (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 405–435. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.-Y., Kumar, V., & Kumar, U. (2012). Relationship between quality management practices and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 30, 295–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAWRENCE & LORSCH. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-Y., & Huang, Y.-C. (2012). Knowledge stock, ambidextrous learning, and firm performance: Evidence from technologically intensive industries. Management Decision, 50, 1096–1116. doi: 10.1108/00251741211238355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, C. C., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Attaining flexible stability by integrating total quality management and socio-technical systems theory. Organization Science, 8, 59–70. doi: 10.1287/orsc.8.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Luzon, M. D., Gil-Marques, M., & Arteaga, F. (2014). Driving organisational ambidexterity through process management. The key role of cultural change. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25, 1026–1038. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2013.776768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motwani, J. (2001). Critical factors and performance measures of TQM. The TQM Magazine, 13, 292–300. doi: 10.1108/13683040010362300
   Google Scholar
• Nair, A. (2006). Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance – Implications for quality management theory development. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 948–975. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82, 74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasmore, W. A. (1988). Designing effective organizations: The sociotechnical systems perspective. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Peretti, F., & Negro, G. (2006). Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team design. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 759–777. doi: 10.5465/amj.2006.22083032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, S. (2004). The future of TQM is past. Can TQM be resurrected? Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15, 411–422. doi: 10.1080/1478336042000183550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375–409. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseefeld, Y., Warszawski, A., & Laufer, A. (1992). Using quality circles to raise productivity and quality of work life. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118, 17–33. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:1(17)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaheldin, S. I. (2009). Critical success factors for TQM implementation and their impact on performance of SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58, 215–237. doi: 10.1108/17410400910938832
   Google Scholar
• Seetharaman, A., Sreenivasan, J., & Boon, L. P. (2006). Critical success factors of total quality management. Quality and Quantity, 40, 675–695. doi: 10.1007/s11135-005-1097-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheremata, W. A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25, 389–408. doi: 10.5465/amr.2000.3312925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sila, I., & Ebrahimpour, M. (2003). Examination and comparison of the critical factors of total quality management (TQM) across countries. International Journal of Production Research, 41, 235–268. doi: 10.1080/0020754021000022212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 597–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 864–894. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tague, N. R. (2005). The quality toolbox. Milwakee: ASQ Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarí, J. J., & Sabater, V. (2004). Quality tools and techniques: Are they necessary for quality management? International Journal of Production Economics, 92, 267–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, N., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2013). Unpacking the theory on ambidexterity: An illustrative case on the managerial architectures, mechanisms and dynamics. Management Learning, 44, 179–196. doi: 10.1177/1350507612444074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 317–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8–29. doi: 10.2307/41165852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29, 222–240. doi: 10.5465/amr.2004.12736080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, A. C., Cheng, T., & Lai, K. H. (2005). An empirical model for managing quality in the electronics industry. Production and Operations Management, 14, 189–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00018.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, T., Patterson, P. G., & de Ruyter, K. (2013). Achieving service-sales ambidexterity. Journal of Service Research, 16, 52–66. doi: 10.1177/1094670512453878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zairi, M., & Youssef, M. (1995). A review of key publications on benchmarking part I. Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, 2, 65–72. doi: 10.1108/14635779510081652
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Linderman, K., & Schroeder, R. G. (2012). The moderating role of contextual factors on quality management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 30, 12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2011.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zu, X. (2009). Infrastructure and core quality management practices: How do they affect quality? International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 26, 129–149. doi: 10.1108/02656710910928789
   Google Scholar