Integrating QFD for product-service systems with the Kano model and fuzzy AHP

References

• Abdolshah, M., & Moradi, M. (2013). Fuzzy quality function deployment: An analytical literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2013, 1–11. Article ID 682532:11.
   Google Scholar
• Akao, Y. (1990). Quality function deployment: Integrating customer requirements into product design. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alam, I., & Perry, C. (2002). A customer-oriented new service development process. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 515–534.
   Google Scholar
• Arai, T., & Shimomura, Y. (2005). Service CAD system – evaluation and quantification. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 54(1), 463–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadabadi, M. R. (2014). A hybrid QFD-based approach in addressing supplier selection problem in product improvement process. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5(4), 543–560.
   Google Scholar
• Aurich, J. C., Mannweiler, C., & Schweitzer, E. (2010). How to design and offer services successfully. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2, 136–143.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, S. G., Govindan, K., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2013). Ecosilient index to assess the greenness and resilience of the upstream automotive supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, T. S., Lightfoot, H. W., Benedettini, O., & Kay, J. M. (2009). The servitization of manufacturing: A review of literature and reflection on future challenges. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(5), 547–567.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, T. S., Ziaee Bigdeli, A., Bustinza, O. F., Shi, G., Baldwin, J. S., & Ridgway, K. (2017). Servitization: Revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(2), 256–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Bereketli, I., & Genevois, M. E. (2013). An integrated QFDE approach for identifying improvement strategies in sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 188–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, M. A., & Lundberg, S. (2013). Tender evaluation and supplier selection methods in public procurement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoni, M., Rondini, A., & Pezzotta, G. (2017). A systematic review of value metrics for PSS design. Procedia CIRP, 64, 289–294.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, C. C. (1994). Delphi technique supplies the classic result? The Australian Library Journal, 43(3), 158–164.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., & Ruan, D. (2004). Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 19(5), 443–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevalli, J. A., & Miguel, P. A. C. (2008). Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD—types of research, difficulties and benefits. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 737–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevalli, J. A., Miguel, P. A. C., & Calarge, F. A. (2010). Axiomatic design application for minimizing the difficulties of QFD usage. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K., & Wu, M. L. (2002). Quality function deployment: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 463–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, B. W., & Chiu, W. H. (2007). Two-dimensional quality function deployment: An application for deciding quality strategy using fuzzy logic. Total Quality Management, 18(4), 451–470.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, I. J., Kim, Y. J., & Kwak, C. (2016). Application of SERVQUAL and fuzzy quality function deployment to service improvement in service centres of electronics companies. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 27(3-4), 368–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. A. (2016). A multi-phased QFD based optimization approach to sustainable service design. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M. (2005). An integrated approach for the development and management of environmentally conscious products. Proceedings of environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing, Eco design (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M., Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., & Tronci, M. (2018). Product service-systems implementation: A customized framework to enhance sustainability and customer satisfaction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 387–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M., Costantino, F., Tronci, M., & Bisillo, S. (2013). Ecological profile of industrial products over the environmental compliance. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 6(2), 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M., De Minicis, M., & Tronci, M. (2012). Product’s life cycle modelling for eco-designing product-service systems. DS 70: Proceedings of DESIGN 2012, the 12th International design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M., De Minicis, M., & Tronci, M. (2014). Design management for sustainability: An integrated approach for the development of sustainable products. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 34, 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargnoli, M., & Sakao, T. (2017). Uncovering differences and similarities among Quality Function Deployment based methods in Design for X-benchmarking in different domains. Quality Engineering, 29(4), 690–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finster, M., Eagan, P., & Hussey, D. (2001). Linking industrial ecology with business strategy: Creating value for green product design. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(3), 107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2015). Prioritisation of engineering characteristics in QFD in the case of customer requirements orderings. International Journal of Production Research, 53(13), 3975–3988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. (2015). Prioritization of QFD customer requirements based on the law of comparative judgments. Quality Engineering, 27(4), 437–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebauer, H., & Kowalkowski, C. (2012). Customer-focused and service-focused orientation in organizational structures. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 27(7), 527–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelderman, C. J., Ghijsen, P. W. T., & Brugman, M. J. (2006). Public procurement and EU tendering directives–explaining non-compliance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(7), 702–714.
   Google Scholar
• Geng, X., Chu, X., Xue, D., & Zhang, Z. (2010). An integrated approach for rating engineering characteristics’ final importance in product-service system development. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 59(4), 585–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentles, S. J., Charles, C., Ploeg, J., & McKibbon, K. A. (2015). Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The Qualitative Report, 20(11), 1772–1789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghesquière, P., Maes, B., & Vandenberghe, R. (2004). The usefulness of qualitative case studies in research on special needs education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51(2), 171–184.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-López, R., Serrano-Bedia, A., & López-Fernández, M. (2016). Motivations for implementing TQM through the EFQM model in Spain: An empirical investigation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(11-12), 1224–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. H., Davies, P., & Ng, I. C. L. (2017). Two strands of servitization: A thematic analysis of traditional and customer co-created servitization and future research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 40–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber, N., & Fargnoli, M. (2017a). Designing product-service systems: A review towards a unified approach. Proceedings of the International conference on industrial engineering and operations management – IEOM 2017, Rabat, Morocco, April 11–13, 817–837. ISBN: 978-0-9855497-6-3. ISSN: 2169-8767
   Google Scholar
• Haber, N., & Fargnoli, M. (2017b). Design for product-service systems: A procedure to enhance functional integration of product-service offerings. International Journal of Product Development, 22(2), 135–164.
   Google Scholar
• Hakanen, T., Helander, N., & Valkokari, K. (2016). Servitization in global business-to-business distribution: The central activities of manufacturers. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2012). Troubling theory in case study research. Higher Education Research &Development, 31(3), 393–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara, T., Arai, T., & Shimomura, Y. (2009). A CAD system for service innovation: Integrated representation of function, service activity, and product behaviour. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(4), 367–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulos, V., & Stergiou, H. (2011). Public procurement law and health care: From theory to practice. Health Care and EU Law, 413–451.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S. S., & Hsu, W. K. (2016). An assessment of service quality for international distribution centers in Taiwan – A QFD approach with Fuzzy AHP. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(4), 509–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, M., & Oh, H. (1998). Quality function deployment: An extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 17(4), 375–390.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao, J., & Chen, C. H. (2006). Customer requirement management in product development: A review of research issues. Concurrent Engineering, 14(3), 173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., & Büyüközkan, G. (2006). A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(2), 390–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamvysi, K., Gotzamani, K., Andronikidis, A., & Georgiou, A. C. (2014). Capturing and prioritizing students’ requirements for course design by embedding Fuzzy-AHP and linear programming in QFD. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(3), 1083–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, G. (2008). Implementation of fuzzy quality function deployment in an automobile component to improve the quality characteristics. Quality Engineering, 20(3), 321–333.
   Google Scholar
• Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsjui, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu, 14(2), 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Kayyar, M., Ameri, F., & Summers, J. D. (2012). A case study of the development of a design enabler tool to support frame analysis for Wright Metal Products, a US SME. International Journal of Computer Aided Engineering and Technology, 4(4), 321–339.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Yoon, B. (2012). Developing a process of concept generation for new product-service systems: A QFD and TRIZ-based approach. Service Business, 6, 323–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ki Moon, S., Simpson, T. W., Shu, J., & Kumara, S. R. T. (2009). Service representation for capturing and reusing design knowledge in product and service families using object-oriented concepts and an ontology. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(4), 413–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., & Reinartz, W. (2012). Customer relationship management issues in the business-to-business context. In Customer relationship management. Berlin: Springer-Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Kwong, C. K., & Bai, H. (2003). Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a Fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Transactions, 35(7), 619–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Dain, M. A., Blanco, E., & Summers, J. D. (2013). Assessing design research quality: Investigating verification and validation criteria. In: DS 75-2: Proceedings of the 19th International conference on engineering design (ICED13), design for harmonies, Vol. 2: Design theory and research methodology, Seoul, Korea, 19-22.08.2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. K. M., Ru, C. T. Y., Yeung, C. L., Choy, K. L., & Ip, W. H. (2015). Analyze the healthcare service requirement using fuzzy QFD. Computers in Industry, 74, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C., Sheu, L. C., & Tsou, Y. G. (2008). Quality function deployment implementation based on Fuzzy Kano model: An application in PLM system. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 55(1), 48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., He, T., Wang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2016). A QFD-based evaluation method for business models of product service systems. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 16. doi: 10.1155/2016/8532607
   Google Scholar
• Lingg, M., Merida-Herrera, E., Wyss, K., & Durán-Arenas, L. (2017). Attitudes of orthopedic specialists toward effects of medical device purchasing. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 33(1), 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T. (2009). The extension of fuzzy QFD: From product planning to part deployment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 11131–11144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T., & Tsai, Y. L. (2012). A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry. Safety Science, 50, 1067–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T., & Wang, C. (2010). An advanced quality function deployment model using fuzzy analytic network process. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34, 3333–3351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, S. M., Shen, H. P., & Shen, J. C. (2016). An integrated approach to project management using the Kano model and QFD: An empirical case study. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2016.1151780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, H. J., Wang, L. Y., Zhao, S. X., & Jiang, Z. B. (2016). An approach to rule extraction for product service system configuration that considers customer perception. International Journal of Production Research, 54(18), 5337–5360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madzík, P. (2016). Increasing accuracy of the Kano model – a case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2016.1194197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marceau, J., & Basri, E. (2001). Translation of innovation systems into industrial policy: The healthcare sector in Australia. Industry and Innovation, 8(3), 291–308.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, V., Bastl, M., Kingston, J., & Evans, S. (2010). Challenges in transforming manufacturing organisations into product-service providers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(4), 449–469.
   Google Scholar
• Materla, T., Cudney, E. A., & Antony, J. (2017). The application of Kano model in the healthcare industry: A systematic literature review. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1328980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matschewsky, J., Kambanou, M. L., & Sakao, T. (2017). Designing and providing integrated product-service systems – challenges, opportunities and solutions resulting from prescriptive approaches in two industrial companies. International Journal of Production Research. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1332792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. H. (1998). How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation, 18(1), 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittermeyer, S. A., Njuguna, J. A., & Alcock, J. R. (2011). Product-service systems in health care: Case study of a drug-device combination. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52(9-12), 1209–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moultrie, J., Sutcliffe, L., & Maier, A. (2015). Exploratory study of the state of environmentally conscious design in the medical device industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 363–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 160–172.
   Google Scholar
• Onar, SÇ, Büyüközkan, G., Öztayşi, B., & Kahraman, C. (2016). A new hesitant fuzzy QFD approach: An application to computer workstation selection. Applied Soft Computing, 46, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakizehkar, H., Sadrabadi, M. M., Mehrjardi, R. Z., & Eshaghieh, A. E. (2016). The application of integration of Kano’s model, AHP technique and QFD matrix in prioritizing the bank’s subtractions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, J. N., & Nguyen, H. T. N. (2015). Achieving customer satisfaction through product–service systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Mancini, M., & Costantino, F. (2016). Change management in the ATM system: Integrating information in the preliminary system safety assessment. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 9, 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Pawar, K. S., Beltagui, A., & Riedel, J. C. (2009). The PSO triangle: Designing product, service and organisation to create value. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(5), 468–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzotta, G., Pirola, F., Pinto, R., Akasaka, F., & Shimomura, Y. (2015). A service engineering framework to design and assess an integrated product-service. Mechatronics, 31, 169–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzotta, G., Pirola, F., Rondini, A., Pinto, R., & Ouertani, M. Z. (2016). Towards a methodology to engineer industrial product-service system – evidence from power and automation industry. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 15, 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piercy, N., & Rich, N. (2009). Lean transformation in the pure service environment: The case of the call service centre. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(1), 54–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raddats, C. (2011). Aligning industrial services with strategies and sources of market differentiation. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 26(5), 332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raharjo, H., Xie, M., & Brombacher, A. C. (2011). A systematic methodology to deal with the dynamics of customer needs in Quality Function Deployment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3653–3662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapaccini, M., Saccani, N., Pezzotta, G., Burger, T., & Ganz, W. (2013). Service development in product-service systems: A maturity model. The Service Industries Journal, 33(3-4), 300–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. S. (2015). The state of case study approach in mergers and acquisitions literature: A bibliometric analysis. Future Business Journal, 1(1), 13–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, W. J. (1963). The service revolution. Journal of Marketing, 27(July), 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Reim, W., Parida, V., & Ortqvist, D. (2014). Product service systems business models and tactics – a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990). Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2004). Fundamentals of the analytic network process—dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(2), 129–157.
   Google Scholar
• Sabbagh, O., Rahman, M. N. A., Ismail, W. R., & Hussain, W. M. H. W. (2016). Methodology implications in automotive product–service systems: A systematic literature review. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2016.1150169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakao, T. (2007). A QFD-centered design methodology for environmentally conscious product design. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4143–4162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakao, T., Birkhofer, H., Panshef, V., & Dörsam, E. (2009). An effective and efficient method to design services: Empirical study for services by an investment-machine manufacturer. International Journal of Internet Manufacturing and Services, 2(1), 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Sakao, T., Napolitano, N., Tronci, M., Sundin, E., & Lindahl, M. (2008). How are product-service combined offers provided in Germany and Italy? – analysis with company sizes and countries. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 17(3), 367–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakao, T., & Shimomura, Y. (2007). Service engineering: A novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(6), 590–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakao, T., Song, W., & Matschewsky, J. (2017). Creating service modules for customizing product/service systems by extending DSM. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 66(1), 21–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A., & Prasher, A. (2017). Measuring healthcare service quality from patients’ perspective: Using FAHP application. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1302794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivasamy, K., Arumugam, C., Devadasan, S. R., Murugesh, R., & Thilak, V. M. M. (2016). Advanced models of quality function deployment: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 50(3), 1399–1414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W. (2017). Requirement management for product-service systems: Status review and future trends. Computers in Industry, 85, 11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W., Ming, X., Han, Y., & Wu, Z. (2013). A rough set approach for evaluating vague customer requirement of industrial product-service system. International Journal of Production Research, 51(22), 6681–6701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W., & Sakao, T. (2016). Service conflict identification and resolution for design of product–service offerings. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 98, 91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa-Zomer, T. T., & Cauchick Miguel, P. A. (2017a). Exploring business model innovation for sustainability: An investigation of two product-service systems. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1317588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa-Zomer, T. T., & Cauchick Miguel, P. A. (2017b). A QFD-based approach to support sustainable product-service systems conceptual design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88(1–4), 701–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. R., Matzen, D., McAloone, T., & Evans, S. (2010). Strategies for designing and developing services for manufacturing firms. CIRP – Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 3(2), 90–97.
   Google Scholar
• Temponi, C., Yen, J., & Tiao, W. A. (1999). House of quality: A fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 117(2), 340–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tontini, G. (2007). Integrating the Kano model and QFD for designing new products. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 18(6), 599–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 246–260.
   Google Scholar
• Tukker, A. (2015). Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy–a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 76–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulaga, W., & Loveland, J. M. (2014). Transitioning from product to service-led growth in manufacturing firms: Emergent challenges in selecting and managing the industrial sales force. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(1), 113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulaga, W., & Reinartz, W. J. (2011). Hybrid offerings: How manufacturing firms combine goods and services successfully. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velamuri, V. K., Bansemir, B., Neyer, A. K., & Möslein, K. M. (2013). Product service systems as a driver for business model innovation: Lessons learned from the manufacturing industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1), 1340004-1-25.
   Google Scholar
• Vezzoli, C., & Ceschin, F. (2015). New design challenges to widely implement ‘sustainable product–service systems’. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinayak, K., & Kodali, R. (2013). Benchmarking the quality function deployment models. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(6), 825–854.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 195–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. H., & Chen, J. N. (2012). Using quality function deployment for collaborative product design and optimal selection of module mix. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 63, 1030–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, M., Goh, T. N., & Tan, K. C. (2003). Advanced QFD applications. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, K., Rapaccini, M., & Visintin, F. (2017). PSS in healthcare: An under-explored field. Procedia CIRP, 64, 241–246.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, M. H., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. R. (2014). Stakeholder engagement in early stage product-service system development for healthcare informatics. Engineering Management Journal, 26(3), 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare Mehrjerdi, Y. (2010). Quality function deployment and its extensions. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 27(6), 616–640.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Tong, S., Eres, H., Wang, K., & Kossmann, M. (2015). Towards avoiding the hidden traps in QFD during requirements establishment. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 24(4), 316–336.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, G., Zhu, N., Tian, Z., Chen, Y., & Sun, B. (2012). Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments. Safety Science, 50, 228–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar