Risk analysis in certification process in the field of energy construction: case in Latvia

References

• A Structured Approach to Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and the Requirements of ISO 31000. (2016). The public risk management association. Retrieved from https://www.theirm.org/media/886062/ISO3100_doc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Adar, E., İnce, M., Karatop, B., & Bilgili, M. (2017). The risk analysis by failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and fuzzy-FMEA of supercritical water gasification system used in the sewage sludge treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5, 1261–1268. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barends, D., Oldenhof, M., Vredenbregt, M., & Nauta, M. (2012). Risk analysis of analytical validations by probabilistic modification of FMEA. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 64-65, 82–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berner, C., & Flage, R. (2017). Creating risk management strategies based on uncertain assumptions and aspects from assumption-based planning. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 167, 10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besterfield, D. H. (2012). Total quality management: Revised edition for anna university (p. 453). Delhi: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995). Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 50, 203–213. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braglia, M. (2000). MAFMA: Multi-attribute failure mode analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17, 1017–1033. doi: 10.1108/02656710010353885
   Google Scholar
• Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., & Montanari, R. (2003). Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 19, 425–443. doi: 10.1002/qre.528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, C., & Soileau, J. (2017). Does enterprise risk management enhance operating performance? Advances in Accounting, 37, 122–139. doi: 10.1016/j.adiac.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis. Decision Support Systems, 48, 246–256. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2009.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingues, M., Baptista, A., & Tato, D. (2017). Engineering complex systems applied to risk management in the mining industry. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 30, 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Doucette, C. (2015). Internal and external factors that affect an organization. Houston Chronicle, 15, 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, H., Li, G., Sun, H., & Cheng, T. (2017). An information processing perspective on supply chain risk management: Antecedents, mechanism, and consequences. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flostrand, A. (2017). Finding the future: Crowdsourcing versus the Delphi technique. Business Horizons, 60, 229–236. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geum, Y. (2011). A systematic approach for diagnosing service failure: Service-specific FMEA and grey relational analysis approach. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54, 3126–3142. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.07.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzegorzewski, P. (2006). The coefficient of concordance for vague data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51, 314–322. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2006.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson, F., & Keeney, S. (2011). Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1695–1704. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. C., Lin, W. C., & Lin, J. D. (2008). Development of a fall-risk checklist using the Delphi technique. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17, 2275–2283. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02337.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue, H., & Yamada, S. (2010). Failure mode and effects analysis in pharmaceutical research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2, 369–382. doi: 10.1108/17566691011090080
   Google Scholar
• ISO 31000:2009 – Risk Management Dictionary, Plain English. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.praxiom.com/iso-31000-terms.htm
   Google Scholar
• Karpics, I. (2011). Terapijas kompleksu izmaksu salīdzinājuma ieguve, pielietojot ekspertu novērtējuma metodes. Datorzinātne: Datoru kontroles tehnoloģijas, 48, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, G., & Sen, K. (2012). A model for assessing consumer perceptions of quality. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 4, 175–188. doi: 10.1108/17566691211232909
   Google Scholar
• Lathrop, J., & Ezell, B. (2017). A systems approach to risk analysis validation for risk management. Safety Science, 30, 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Liepiņa, R., Mazais, J., & Lapiņa, I. (2012). Risk management in public utility service: Assessment of water consumption recording risks. Proceedings of the 16th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI 2012), Orlando, Florida, Vol. 2, pp. 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H., & Turoff, M. (2011). Delphi: A brief look backward and forward. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1712–1719. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Wang, L., You, X., & Wu, S. (2017). Failure mode and effect analysis with extended grey relational analysis method in cloud setting. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1337506
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., You, J., Fan, X.-J., & Lin, Q. (2014). Failure mode and effects analysis using D numbers and grey relational projection method. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 4670–4679. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.01.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofmark, A., & Martensson, G. (2017). Validation of the tool assessment of clinical education (AssCE): A study using Delphi method and clinical experts. Nurse Education Today, 50, 82–86. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal, S., & Maiti, J. (2014). Risk analysis using FMEA: Fuzzy similarity value and possibility theory based approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 3527–3537. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, G., & Levesque, T. (1998). The effectiveness of recovery strategies after-service failure: An experiment in the hospitality industry. Hospitality Leisure Marketing, 5, 27–49. doi: 10.1300/J150v05n02_03
   Google Scholar
• McLean, R. S., Antony, J., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2017). Failure of continuous improvement initiatives in manufacturing environments: A systematic review of the evidence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28, 219–237. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2015.1063414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeese, M. (2015). What went wrong? What can go right? A prospectus on human factors practice. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5217–5226.
   Google Scholar
• Mežinska, I., Lapiņa, I., & Mazais, J. (2015). Integrated management systems towards sustainable and socially responsible organisation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26, 469–481. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2013.835899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. J., Lam-McCullough, J., Herold-Mcllroy, J., & Tarshis, J. (2007). Simulation performance checklist generation using the Delphi technique. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien D'anesthésie, 54, 992–997. doi: 10.1007/BF03016633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003). Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 79, 69–85. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00179-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangra, S. (2015). Human reliability assessment under uncertainty – Towards a formal method. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3230–3237. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.874
   Google Scholar
• Rebula de Oliveira, U., Marins, F., Rocha, H., & Salomon, V. (2017). The ISO 31000 standard in supply chain risk management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 616–633. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, J. (2014). A method for analyzing services failure factors based on multiple perspectives. Procedia CIPR, 16, 234–239.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey, S. B., & Sharples, A. Y. (2001). An approach to consensus building using the Delphi technique: Developing a learning resource in mental health. Nurse Education Today, 21, 398–408. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2001.0573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, B. (2013). Assessing the risks of service failures based on ripple effects: A Bayesian network approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 141, 493–504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutrisno, A., Gunawan, I., & Tangkuman, S. (2015). Modified failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) model for accessing the risk of maintenance waste. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.010
   Google Scholar
• Yik, F. W. H., Lai, J. H. K., Lee, W. L., Chan, K. T., & Chau, C. K. (2012). A Delphi study on building services engineers’ core competence and statutory role in Hong Kong. Journal of Facilities Management, 10(1), 26–44. doi: 10.1108/14725961211200388
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Jin, F., & Liu, P. (2013). A grey relational projection method for multi-attribute decision making based on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 3467–3477. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimecs, A. (2009). Risku vadības nozīme mazo un vidējo uzņēmumu darbībā. Uzņēmējdarbība un Vadīšana, 19, 138–148.
   Google Scholar