Six Sigma literature: a bibliometric analysis

References

• Andersson, R., Eriksson, H., & Torstensson, H. (2006). Similarities and differences between TQM, six sigma and lean. The TQM Magazine, 18(3), 282–296. doi: 10.1108/09544780610660004
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J. (2006). Six sigma for service processes. Business Process Management Journal, 12(2), 234–248. doi: 10.1108/14637150610657558
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J., Palsuk, P., Gupta, S., Mishra, D., & Barach, P. (2018). Six Sigma in healthcare: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 35(5), 1075–1092. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-02-2017-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony, J., Snee, R., & Hoerl, R. (2017). Lean Six Sigma: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(7), 1073–1093. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-03-2016-0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnheiter, E. D., & Maleyeff, J. (2005). The integration of lean management and Six Sigma. The TQM Magazine, 17(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1108/09544780510573020
   Google Scholar
• Brady, J. E., & Allen, T. T. (2006). Six Sigma literature: A review and agenda for future research. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22, 335–367. doi: 10.1002/qre.769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun, A. (2011). Critical success factors of Six Sigma implementations in Italian companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, A., & Chuan Tan, K. (2007). The current state of six sigma application in services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 17(2), 194–208. doi: 10.1108/09604520710735191
   Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics (2018). Web Of Science Database.
   Google Scholar
• Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. doi: 10.1002/asi.21525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard, J. J., & Dahlgaard-Park, S. M. (2006). Lean production, six sigma quality, TQM and company culture. The TQM Magazine, 18(3), 263–281. doi: 10.1108/09544780610659998
   Google Scholar
• Dellifraine, J. L., Wang, Z., McCaughey, D., Langabeer, J. R., & Erwin, C. O. (2013). The use of six sigma in health care management: Are we using it to its full potential? Quality Management in Healthcare, 22(3), 210–223. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31829a838e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsevier. (2018). Scopus Database.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1994). Scientography: Mapping the tracks of Science. Current Contents: Social & Behavioural Sciences, 7(45), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• General Electric. (2013). What is six Sigma: the Roadmap to Customer Impact, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez Aleu, F., & Van Aken, E. M. (2017). Continuous improvement projects: An authorship bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 30(5), 467–476. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2016-0105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismyrlis, V., & Moschidis, O. (2013). Six Sigma’s critical success factors and toolbox. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 4(2), 108–117. doi: 10.1108/20401461311319310
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., Frazier, G. V., & Heiser, D. (2007). China-related POM research: A literature review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 662–684. doi: 10.1108/01443570710756947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karout, R., & Awasthi, A. (2017). Improving software quality using Six Sigma DMAIC-based approach: A case study. Business Process Management Journal, 23(4), 842–856. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-02-2017-0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keathley-Herring, H., Van Aken, E., Gonzalez-Aleu, F., Deschamps, F., Letens, G., & Orlandini, P. C. (2016). Assessing the maturity of a research area: Bibliometric review and proposed framework. Scientometrics, 109(2), 927–951. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering Version 2.3. EBSE Technical Report. UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Shivarama, J., & Choukimath, P. (2015). Popular Scientometric Analysis, Mapping and Visualisation Softwares : An Overview. 10th International CABLIBER 2015, 157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, Y. H., & Anbari, F. T. (2006). Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach. Technovation, 26(5–6), 708–715. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., Zaheer, S., & Choo, A. S. (2003). Six Sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 193–203. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00087-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, M. K., & Grover, V. (1998). An assessment of survey research in POM : from constructs to theory. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 407–425. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00021-7
   Google Scholar
• Merigó, J. M., Cancino, C. A., Coronado, F., & Urbano, D. (2016). Academic research in innovation: A country analysis. Scientometrics, 108(2), 559–593. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgey, 8(5), 336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negi, P. S., Mandaliya, A., Mahida, A., Patel, A., & Patyal, V. S. (2017). Six Sigma in construction industry: A review. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 22(4), 451–465. doi: 10.1504/IJPQM.2017.087863
   Google Scholar
• Nonthaleerak, P., & Hendry, L. C. (2006). Six Sigma: Literature review and key future research areas. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 2(2), 105–161. doi: 10.1504/IJSSCA.2006.010111
   Google Scholar
• Padhy, R. (2017). Six Sigma project selections: A critical review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8(2), 244–258. IJLSS-06-2016-0025. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-06-2016-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, R., Behl, A., & Aital, P. (2017). Six Sigma: An overview and further research directions. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 22(2), 141. doi: 10.1504/IJPQM.2017.086343
   Google Scholar
• Prabhushankar, G. V., Devadasan, S. R., Shalij, P. R., & Thirunavukkarasu, V. (2008). The origin, history and definition of Six Sigma: A literature review. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 4(2), 133–150. doi: 10.1504/IJSSCA.2008.020279
   Google Scholar
• Raisinghani, M. S., Ette, H., Pierce, R., Cannon, G., & Daripaly, P. (2005). Six Sigma: Concepts, tools, and applications. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4), 491–505. doi: 10.1108/02635570510592389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reosekar, R. S., & Pohekar, S. D. (2014). Six sigma methodology: A structured review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 5(4), 392–422. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-12-2013-0059
   Google Scholar
• Shanmugaraja, M., Nataraj, M., & Gunasekaran, N. (2012). Literature snapshot on Six Sigma project selection for future research. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 11(3), 335–357. doi: 10.1504/IJSOM.2012.045662
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, S. Q., Ullah, F., Thaheem, M. J., & Gabriel, H. F. (2016). Six Sigma in construction: A review of critical success factors. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(2), 171–186. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-11-2015-0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjahjono, B., Ball, P., Vitanov, V. I., Scorzafave, C., Nogueira, J., Calleja, J., … Yadav, A. (2010). Six Sigma: A literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(3), 216–233. doi: 10.1108/20401461011075017
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uluskan, M. (2016). A comprehensive insight into the Six Sigma DMAIC toolbox. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(4), 406–429. doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-10-2015-0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). VOSviewer Manual. Retrieved from http://www.vosviewer.com/download/f-y2z2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie Und Praxis, 1(12), 20–29. doi: 10.14512/tatup.12.1.20
   Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar