International networking in dynamic internationalization capability: the moderating role of absorptive capacity

References

• Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, U., Holm, D. B., & Johanson, M. (2007). Moving or doing? Knowledge flow, problem solving, and change in industrial networks. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierly, P. E., III, Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. (2009). The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 481–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broersma, R., Van Gils, A., & De Grip, A. (2016). Ambidexterity in SMEs: Role of absorptive capacity and CEO’s strategic engagement. Academy of Management proceedings, Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Brucks, M., Zeithaml, V. A., & Naylor, G. (2000). Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(3), 359–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadogan, J. W., Cui, C. C., & Kwok Yeung Li, E. (2003). Export market-oriented behavior and export performance: The moderating roles of competitive intensity and technological turbulence. International Marketing Review, 20(5), 493–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadogan, J. W., Kuivalainen, O., & Sundqvist, S. (2009). Export market-oriented behavior and export performance: Quadratic and moderating effects under differing degrees of market dynamism and internationalization. Journal of International Marketing, 17(4), 71–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadogan, J. W., & Lee, N. (2013). Improper use of endogenous formative variables. Journal of Business Research, 66(2), 233–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camisón, C., & Forés, B. (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 707–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J. C., Haggard, K. S., Hmieleski, K. M., & Zahra, S. A. (2010). A study of the moderating effects of firm age at internationalization on firm survival and short-term growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavusgil, S. T., & Knight, G. (2015). The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K. H., & Gotcher, D. F. (2007). Safeguarding investments and creation of transaction value in asymmetric international subcontracting relationships: The role of relationship learning and relational capital. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 477–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H. F. L. (2012). Export market orientation, managerial ties, and performance. International Marketing Review, 29(4), 403–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, E. M., & Wilson, H. N. (2003). The role of dynamic capabilities in e-business transformation. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 282–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneels, E. (2007). The process of technological competence leveraging. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 511–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanaraj, C., Lyles, M. A., Steensma, H. K., & Tihanyi, L. (2004). Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: The role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 428–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capability: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elg, U. (2008). Inter-firm market orientation and the influence of network and relational factors. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(1), 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribo, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethiraj, S. K., Kale, P., Krishnan, M. S., & Singh, J. V. (2005). Where do capabilities come from and how do the matter? A study in the software service industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. (2001). A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 597–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., Dialdin, D., & Wang, L. (2002). Organizational networks. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 281–304). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hau, L. N., & Evangelista, F. (2007). Acquiring tacit and explicit marketing knowledge from foreign partners in IJVs. Journal of Business Research, 60(11), 1130–1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration and exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidextrous hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., & Fox, B. C. (2015). Managerial social networks and ambidexterity of SMEs: The moderating role of a proactive commitment to innovation. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), s201–s221.
   Google Scholar
• Helfat, C., & Peteraf, M. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfert, G., Ritter, T., & Walter, A. (2002). Redefining market orientation from a relationship perspective: Theoretical considerations and empirical results. European Journal of Marketing, 36(9/10), 1119–1139.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, L. C., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: The mediating role of dynamic capability. British Journal of Management, 23(2), 179–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javalgi, R. G., Hall, K. D., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2014). Corporate entrepreneurship, customer-oriented selling, absorptive capacity, and international sales performance in the international B2B setting: Conceptual framework and research propositions. International Business Review, 23(6), 1193–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., & Li, Y. (2009). An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance: The case of alliances. Research Policy, 38, 358–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm—A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market Commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junni, P. M., Sarala, R., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(8), 1183–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., Hult, G. T. M., & Slater, S. F. (2007). Toward greater understanding of market orientation and the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 961–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, G. A., & Liesch, P. W. (2016). Internationalization: From incremental to born global. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koryak, O., Lockett, A., Hayton, J., Nicolaou, N., & Mole, K. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 47(2), 413–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Kelley, D., Lee, J., & Lee, S. (2012). SME survival: The impact of internationalization, technology resources, and alliances. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling-yee, L. (2004). An examination of the foreign market knowledge of exporting firms based in the People’s Republic of China: Its determinants and effect on export intensity. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 561–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. H., Horng, J. S., Chou, S. F., Huang, Y. C., & Chang, A. Y. (2018). How to create competitive advantage: The moderate role of organizational learning as a link between shared value, dynamic capability, differential strategy, and social capital. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 23(8), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, D., Ferraris, A., Papa, A., & Vrontis, D. (in press). The role of external embeddedness and knowledge management as antecedents of ambidexterity and performances in Italian SMEs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macpherson, A., Jones, O., & Zhang, M. (2004). Evolution or revolution? Dynamic capabilities in a knowledge-dependent firm. R&D Management, 34(2), 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. (2005). Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 1033–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrega, M., & Pfajfar, G. (2015). Business relationship process management as company dynamic capability improving relationship portfolio. Industrial Marketing Management, 46, 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Castillo, F. J., Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Munuera-Aleman, J. L. (2011). Product competence exploitation and exploration strategies: The impact on new product performance through quality and innovativeness. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(7), 1172–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monferrer, D., Blesa, A., & Ripollés, M. (2015). Born globals trough knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and network market orientation. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 18(1), 18–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, N. A., Vorhies, D. W., & Mason, C. H. (2009). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 909–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J. Y., Gao, G. Y., & Kotabe, M. (2011). Market orientation and performance of export ventures: The process through marketing capabilities and competitive advantages. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 252–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi-Tavani, S., Sharifi, H., & Najafi-Tavani, Z. (2016). Market orientation, marketing capability, and new product performance: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5059–5064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo, L. V., & O'Cass, A. (2012). Performance implications of market orientation, marketing resources, and marketing capabilities. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1–2), 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, B. B. (2005). The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1194–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, A. C., & Tushman, L. M. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özturan, P., Özsomer, A., & Pieters, R. (2014). The role of market orientation in advertising spending during economic collapse: The case of Turkey in 2001. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(2), 139–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrigot, R., Basset, G., Briand, D., & Cliguet, G. (2013). Uniformity in franchising: A case study of a French franchise network with several franchisees having their own website. Journal of Marketing Channels, 20(1-2), 99–119.
   Google Scholar
• Piao, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). How exploitation impedes and impels exploration: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1431–1447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho, J. C., & Prange, C. (2016). The effect of social networks and dynamic internationalization capabilities on international performance. Journal of World Business, 51, 391–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prange, C., & Verdier, S. (2011). Dynamic capabilities, internationalization processes and performance. Journal of World Business, 46(1), 126–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafailidis, A., Trivellas, P., & Polychroniou, P. (2017). The mediating role of quality on the relationship between cultural ambidexterity and innovation performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9-10), 1134–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi, D., & Guisinger, S. (2002). Liability of foreignness to competitive advantage: How multinational enterprises cope with the international business environment. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 223–240.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, R., & Sethi, A. (2009). Can quality-oriented firms develop innovative new products? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 206–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(July), 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyropoulou, S., Katsikeas, C. S., Skarmeas, D., & Morgan, N. A. (2018). Strategic goal accomplishment in export ventures: The role of capabilities, knowledge, and environment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 109–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan Mort, G., & Weerawardena, J. (2006). Networking capability and international entrepreneurship: How networks function in Australian born global firms. International Marketing Review, 23(5), 549–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2008). Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, M. T., Huang, Y. C., & Ma, R. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of global responsiveness: An empirical examination of MNCs in the global sourcing context. International Business Review, 18(6), 617–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). The ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahlne, J. E., & Jonsson, A. (2017). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability in the globalization of the multinational business enterprise (MBE): Case studies of AB Volvo and IKEA. International Business Review, 26(1), 57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S., Liesch, P. W., & Knight, G. (2007). Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business, 42(3), 294–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Ucbasaran, D. (2001). The internationalization of new and small firms: A resource-based view. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 333–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, 9(2), 141–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, W., & Chen, R. R. (2013). Dynamic capability and IJV performance: The effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(2), 601–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar