367
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A pattern-based decision framework in the era of Industry 4.0

, &

References

  • Alzbutas, R. (2016). Approaches of risk measures minimization and application to inspection. In 13th International conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management (pp. 1–14). Seoul: IAPSAM.
  • Appel, F., & Balmann, A. (in press). Human behaviour versus optimising agents and the resilience of farms–insights from agent-based participatory experiments with FarmAgriPoliS. Ecological Complexity.
  • Biglan, A., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2015). Acting in light of the future: How do future-oriented cultural practices evolve and how can we accelerate their evolution? Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(3), 184–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.06.002
  • Brown-Liburd, H., Issa, H., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Behavioral implications of big data's impact on audit judgment and decision making and future research directions. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 451–468. doi: 10.2308/acch-51023
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Nusbaum, N. C. (2003). Component processes underlying choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(6), 3016–3017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0730744100
  • Channon, J. (1982). Visions of the future: Forseum 1990. OE Communique, 2, 14–22.
  • Dahlgaard, J. J. (1981). Some important decision problems in auditors’ application of statistical models (Post Graduate Doctor Thesis). the Arhus School of Business, Denmark (ISSN 0106-9490).
  • Driver, M. J., & Mock, T. J. (1975). Human information processing, decision style theory, and accounting information systems. The Accounting Review, 50(3), 490–508.
  • Fishburn, P. C. (1988). Expected utility: An anniversary and a new era. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(3), 267–283. doi: 10.1007/BF00056138
  • Gartner Research. (2014). Gartner IT glossary. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/?s=big+data
  • Geisler, M., & Allwood, C. M. (2018). Relating decision-making styles to social orientation and time approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(3), 415–429. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2066
  • Gino, F., & Pisano, G. (2008). Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 676–691. doi: 10.1287/msom.1070.0205
  • Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B. E., Henninger, F., & Fiedler, S. (2016). The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(4), 486–508. doi: 10.1037/a0040103
  • Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., & Pham, M. T. (2011). When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment? A review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 107–141. doi: 10.1177/1088868310367640
  • Han, X., Xue, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Information providing in a task-centric military in-vehicle adaptive human–computer interface based on operator decision-making characteristic. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9(6), 1–11.
  • Harren, V. A. (1979). Research with the assessment of career decision making. Character Potential: A Record of Research, 9, 63–69.
  • Hogarth, R. M., & Makridakis, S. (1981). Forecasting and planning: An evaluation. Management Science, 27(2), 115–138. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.27.2.115
  • Howard, R. A. (1966). Decision analysis: Applied decision theory. Menlo Park: Stanford Research Institute.
  • Howard, R. A. (1988). Decision analysis: Practice and promise. Management Science, 34(6), 679–695. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.34.6.679
  • Huang, A. H., Chen, K., Yen, D. C., & Tran, T. P. (2015). A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.010
  • Huber, O., Beutter, C., Montoya, J., & Huber, O. W. (2001). Risk-defusing behaviour: Towards an understanding of risky decision making. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13(3), 409–426. doi: 10.1080/09541440125915
  • Hunt, R. G., Krzystofiak, F. J., Meindl, J. R., & Yousry, A. M. (1989). Cognitive style and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44(3), 436–453. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90018-6
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. doi: 10.2307/1914185
  • Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. doi: 10.1080/026999300402763
  • Leuner, H. (1977). Guided affective imagery: An account of its development. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1(1), 73–91.
  • Loveridge, D. J. (1979). Decisions, judgment and style. Long Range Planning, 12(1), 22–27. doi: 10.1016/0024-6301(79)90026-8
  • Martin, J. M., Gonzalez, C., Juvina, I., & Lebiere, C. (2014). A description–experience gap in social interactions: Information about interdependence and its effects on cooperation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(4), 349–362.
  • Park, S. H., Shin, W. S., Park, Y. H., & Lee, Y. (2017). Building a new culture for quality management in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9), 934–945. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1310703
  • Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2015). Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 29(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.967183
  • Rabin, M., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). Anomalies: Risk aversion. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 219–232. doi: 10.1257/jep.15.1.219
  • Rhodes, J. W. (1981). Relationships between vividness of mental imagery and creative thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 15(2), 90–98. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1981.tb00281.x
  • Schneider, M., & Deml, B. (2017). Analysis of a multimodal human-robot-interface in terms of mental workload. In Advances in ergonomic design of systems, products and processes (pp. 247–260). Berlin: Springer.
  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1982). The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations. Journal of Economic Literature, 20(2), 529–563.
  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5), 818–831. doi: 10.1177/0013164495055005017
  • Shin, W. S., Dahlgaard, J. J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., & Kim, M. G. (2018). A quality scorecard (QSC) for the era of Industry 4.0. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(5), 1–18.
  • Simon, H. A. (1960). The Ford distinguished lectures: Vol. 3. The new science of management decision. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
  • Soares Iwamoto, H., Vidal Vieira, J. G., Ubeda, C. L., & Laiate Liesack, M. L. (2017). Analysis of the decision-makers’ profile when making decisions in logistics. Latin American Business Review, 18(3–4), 189–210. doi: 10.1080/10978526.2017.1354704
  • Spetzler, C., & Neal, L. (2015). An organization-wide approach to good decision making. Harvard Business Review.
  • Spetzler, C., Winter, H., & Meyer, J. (2016). Decision quality: Value creation from better business decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Steiner, G. A., Kunin, H., & Kunin, E. (1983). Formal strategic planning in the United States today. Long Range Planning, 16(3), 12–17. doi: 10.1016/0024-6301(83)90026-2
  • Sundh, J., & Juslin, P. (2018). Compound risk judgment in tasks with both idiosyncratic and systematic risk: The “robust beauty” of additive probability integration. Cognition, 171, 25–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.023
  • Tetlock, P. E., Bernzweig, J., & Gallant, J. L. (1985). Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5), 1227–1239. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.5.1227
  • Thorstad, R., & Wolff, P. (2018). A big data analysis of the relationship between future thinking and decision-making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(8), E1740–E1748. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706589115
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683
  • Vangsness, L., & Young, M. E. (2017). The role of difficulty in dynamic risk mitigation decisions. Journal of Dynamic Decision Making, 3(1), 1–12.
  • Wheatley, W. J., Amin, R. V., Armstrong, T. R., & Vander Linde, C. T. (1991). The effect of leadership and cognitive processing styles upon peer performance evaluation: Implication for the utilization of simulations in business pedagogy. In Developments in business simulation and experiential learning: Proceedings of the annual ABSEL conference (Vol. 18, pp. 116–120). Nashville: ABSEL.
  • Wheatley, W. J., Anthony, W. P., & Maddox, E. N. (1988). The relationship of locus of control and vividness of imagination measures to simulation performance. In Developments in business simulation and experiential learning: Proceedings of the annual ABSEL conference (Vol. 15, pp. 134–137). San Diego: ABSEL.
  • Wheatley, W. J., Anthony, W. P., & Maddox, E. N. (1991). Selecting and training strategic planners with imagination and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(1), 52–60. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1991.tb01353.x
  • White, D. J., & Bowen, K. C. (1975). The role and effectiveness of theories of decision in practice. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
  • Zuboff, S. (2002). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.