Moral compliance as facilitator for ethical reflection in management: catalysts and situations

References

• Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2001). International ‘standards’ and international governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), 345–370. doi: 10.1080/13501760110056013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. (1968). The economics of moral hazard: Further comment. The American Economic Review, 58(3), 537–539.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1981). Altruism in the family and selfishness in the market place. Economica, 48(189), 1–15. doi: 10.2307/2552939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beim, D. O., & Calomiris, C. (2001). Emerging financial markets. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., & Jacobsson, B. (Eds.). (2000). A world of standards (pp. 138–150). Oxford/New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, E. (1790). Reflections on the revolution in France and on the proceedings in certain societies in London relative to that event. Conor Cruise O’Brien (Ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J., Liu, Y., Qian, Y., & Yu, M. (2015). Information asymmetry and corporate governance. Quarterly Journal of Finance, 5(3), 1550014. doi: 10.1142/S2010139215500147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelius, J. R., & Kavanaugh, K. (1988). Workers’ compensation and the level of occupational injuries. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 55(2), 315–323. doi: 10.2307/253332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1996). Risk types and inter-firm alliance structures. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 827–843. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C. E. (2014). The principle of good faith: Toward substantive stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(2), 283–295. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1697-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembe, A. E., & Boden, L. I. (2000). Moral hazard: A question of morality? New solutions. A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 10(3), 257–279.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, P. A. (1967). Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparison of utility: Comment. The Journal of Political Economy, 75(5), 765–766. doi: 10.1086/259353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). When ethics travel: The promise and peril of global business ethics. California Management Review, 41(4), 45–63. doi: 10.2307/41166009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducat, T. (1865). The practice of fire underwriting ( Published by T. Jones junior). New York: Wall Street.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi: 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrell, O. C., LeClair, D. T., & Ferrell, L. (1998). The federal sentencing guidelines for organizations: A framework for ethical compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 353–363. doi: 10.1023/A:1005786809479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, J., & Damschroder, L. (2007). Qualitative content analysis. In Empirical methods for bioethics: A primer (pp. 39–62). London: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1994). A test for moral hazard in the labor market: Contractual arrangements, effort, and health. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2), 213–227. doi: 10.2307/2109876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. doi: 10.2307/41165018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Routledge (first 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Hagerty, J., Hackbush, J., Gaughan, D., & Jacobson, S. (2008, March 25). E-governance, risk management, and compliance spending report, 2008–2009: Inside the $32B GRC market. Boston: AMR Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hardjono, T. W., & van Marrewijk, M. (2001). The social dimensions of business excellence. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 8(3), 223–233. doi: 10.1016/S1066-7938(01)00125-7
   Google Scholar
• Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Boiral, O. (2013). ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a research agenda on management system standards. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 47–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Casadesus, M., & Marimon, F. (2011). The impact of ISO 9001 standard and the EFQM model: The view of the assessors. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(2), 197–218. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2010.532330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Marimon, F., & Casadesús, M. (2012). An empirical study of the relationships within the categories of the EFQM model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(5–6), 523–540. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.669541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptein, M. (2017). The battle for business ethics: A struggle theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 343–361. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2780-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Hart, Schaffner and Marx.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (2009). El Retorno de la Economía de la Depresión y la crisis actual. Crítica: Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Lafuente, S. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.worldcomplianceassociation.com/1462/articulo-compliance-un-modelo-a-seguir.html
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Castilla, J. I. (2002). Possible ethical implications in the deployment of the EFQM Excellence Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1–2), 125–134. doi: 10.1023/A:1016344304416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, M. (2017). The morals of moral hazard: A contracts approach. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(1), 47–62. doi: 10.1111/beer.12121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247–259. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3, 344–347.
   Google Scholar
• Pauly, M. V. (1968). The economics of moral hazard: Comment. The American Economic Review, 58(3), 531–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 5–16. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250130903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502. doi: 10.5840/beq200313434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retolaza, J. L., San-Jose, L., & Ruiz-Roqueñi, M. (2014). Ontological stakeholder view: An innovative proposition. Global Business Review, 15(1), 25–36. doi: 10.1177/0972150913515590
   Google Scholar
• Retolaza, J. L., San-Jose, L., Urionabarrenetxea, S., & García-Merino, D. (2016). Linking the moral hazard and leverage in companies. Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics, 7, 143–166.
   Google Scholar
• Rowell, D., & Connelly, L. B. (2012). A history of the term “moral hazard”. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79(4), 1051–1075. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, J. (2012). Conducting research interviews. Management Research Review, 35(3/4), 260–271. doi: 10.1108/01409171211210154
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research a practical handbook (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tuttle, B., Harrell, A., & Harrison, P. (1997). Moral hazard, ethical considerations, and the decision to implement an information system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(4), 7–27. doi: 10.1080/07421222.1997.11518140
   Google Scholar
• Weber, J., & Getz, K. (2004). Buy bribes or bye-bye bribes: The future status of bribery in international commerce. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(4), 695–711. doi: 10.5840/beq200414441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar