Customer satisfaction – dilemma of comparing multiple scale scores

References

• Beuningen, J. V., Houwen, K. D. V., & Moonen, L. (2014). Measuring well-being: An analysis of different response scales. Statistics Netherlands. http://www.websm.org/uploadi/editor/1392703596Beuningen_Houwen_Moonen_2014_Measuringwellbeing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braunsberger, K., & Gates, R. (2009). Developing inventories for satisfaction and Likert scales in a service environment. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(4), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040910965557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. G. (1943). The comparison of different scales of measurement for experimental result. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731414
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, P. S., & Esteves, S. P. (2007). The choice between a five-point and a ten-point scale in the framework of customer satisfaction measurement. International Journal of Market Research, 49(3), 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530704900305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman, A. M., Norris, C. E., & Preston, C. C. (1997). Comparing rating scales of different length: Equivalence of scores from 5 point and 7 point scales. Psychological Reports, 80(2), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.80.2.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, E. P. (1980). The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: A review. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJonge, T., Veenhoven, R., Moonen, L., Kalmijn, W., Beuningen, J. V., & Arends, L. (2016). Conversion of verbal response scales: Robustness across demographic categories. Social Indicators Research, 126, 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0897-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittrich, R., Francis, B., Hatzinger, R., & Katzenbeisser, W. (2007). A paired comparison approach for the analysis of sets of Likert-scale responses. Statistical Modelling, 7(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X0600700102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallencreutz, J., & Parmler, J. (2019). Important drivers for customer satisfaction – from product focus to image and service quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(5-6), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2019.1594756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson, D., & Arnetz, B. B. (2005). Validation and findings comparing VAS vs. Likert scales for psychosocial measurements. International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 8, 178–192. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ794094.pdf
   Google Scholar
• He, Z., Yang, X., Wang, W., & Zhang, M. (2017). Measuring service quality in telematics service: Development and validation of multidimensional TeleServQ scale. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9-10), 1166–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1310709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heida, M., Neukamm, S., & Varga, M. (2021). Stochastic two-scale convergence and Young measures. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.12447.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Homes, D. S., & Mergen, A. E. (2014). Converting survey results from four-point to five-point scale: A case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(1-2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.799330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon, C. M., Aizpurua, E., & van der Valk, S. (2021). Agree or disagree: Does it matter which comes first? An examination of scale direction effects in a multi-device online survey. Field Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X211012259
   Google Scholar
• Leung, S. (2011). A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4, 5, 6, and 11-point Likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.580697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. (2012). Regression models for nominal and ordinal outcomes. https://jslsoc.sitehost.iu.edu/files_research/cdanor/Long%20-%20Nominal%20Ordinal%20Regression%20Models%20-%202012-05-29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McLauchlan, J., Browne, M., Russell, A. M. T., & Rockloff, M. (2020). Evaluating the reliability and validity of the short Gambling HARM screen: Are binary scales worse than Likert scales at capturing gambling harm? Journal of Gambling Issues, 44, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2020.44.6
   Google Scholar
• Minitab. (2013). Curve fitting with linear and nonlinear regression. https://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics-2/curve-fitting-with-linear-and-nonlinear-regression
   Google Scholar
• Minitab. (2019). Minitab: Rank function (Version 19) [Computer software]. https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/19/help-and-how-to/calculations-data-generation-and-matrices/calculator/calculator-functions/column-calculator-functions/rank-function/
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, J. T., Weston, R., & Voyles, E. C. (2015). Stuck in the middle: The use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires. The Journal of General Psychology, 142(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2014.994590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, J., & Neumann, Y. (1981). Comparison of six lengths of rating scales: Student’s attitudes towards instruction. Psychological Reports, 48(2), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1981.48.2.399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E., Jang, Y., Kim, J., Jeong, N. J., Bae, K., & del Pobil, A. P. (2019). Determinants of customer satisfaction with airline services: An analysis of customer feedback big data. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, P. L., McDaniel, H. S., & Crumpton-Young, L. L. (2002). Do research participants give interval or ordinal answers in response to Likert scales. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.19.6352&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pors, N. (2001). The appropriate statistical test, scales and satisfaction in customer surveys. Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances. https://doi.org/10.1108/bl.2001.17014aab.013
   Google Scholar
• Preston, C., & Colman, A. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, J. L., & Barry, H. M. (1971). An analysis of variance for categorical data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(335), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1971.10482297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soti, A., Shankar, R., & Kaushal, O. P. (2010). Modeling the enablers of six sigma using interpreting structural modelling. Journal of Modelling in Management, 5(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465661011060989
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., & Leung, S. (2017). Can Likert scales be treated as interval scales? A simulation study. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S. (2007). An empirical investigation on the economic consequences of customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(5), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360701240493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., He, X., Qin, F., Fu, W., & He, Z. (2019). Service quality measurement for omni-channel retail: Scale development and validation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(sup1), S210–S226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2019.1665846
   Google Scholar