Quality 4.0 social and strategic readiness factors: sufficient and Necessary Condition Analysis

References

• Acocella, I. (2023). Using biograms to promote life course research. An example of theoretical case configuration relating to paths of social exclusion. Quality & Quantity, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01777-7
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J., McDermot, O., & Sony, M. (2022). Quality 4.0 conceptualisation and theoretical understanding: A global exploratory qualitative study. The TQM Journal, 34(5), 1169–1188. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2021-0215
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J., McDermott, O., Sony, M., Toner, A., Bhat, S., Cudney, E. A., & Doulatabadi, M. (2023a). Benefits, challenges, critical success factors and motivations of Quality 4.0 – A qualitative global study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(7), 827–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2113737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony, J., Sony, M., McDermott, O., Jayaraman, R., & Flynn, D. (2023b). An exploration of organizational readiness factors for Quality 4.0: An intercontinental study and future research directions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(2), 582–606. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-10-2021-0357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokrantz, J., & Dul, J. (2023). Building and testing necessity theories in supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 59(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, A., Levialdi Ghiron, N., & Tiburzi, L. (2021). ‘Evolutions’ and ‘revolutions’ in manufacturers’ implementation of industry 4.0: A literature review, a multiple case study, and a conceptual framework. Production Planning & Control, 32(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1719715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Addison-Wesley Ed, Series on Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarini, A. (2020). Industry 4.0, quality management and TQM world. A systematic literature review and a proposed agenda for further research. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2020-0082
   Google Scholar
• Chiarini, A., Belvedere, V., & Grando, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 strategies and technological developments. An exploratory research from Italian manufacturing companies. Production Planning & Control, 31(16), 1385-1398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1710304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarini, A., & Kumar, M. (2022). What is Quality 4.0? An exploratory sequential mixed methods study of Italian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 60(16), 4890–4910. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1942285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168801200410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean Jr, J. W., & Bowen, D. E. (1994). Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. The Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 392–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/258933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dul, J. (2016). Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA): Logic and methodology of -necessary but not sufficient causality. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 10–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115584005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dul, J. (2021). Advances in Necessary Condition Analysis. https://bookdown.org/ncabook/advanced_nca2/
   Google Scholar
• Dul, J., Hauff, S., & Bouncken, R. B. (2023). Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA): Review of research topics and guidelines for good practice. Review of Managerial Science, 17(2), 683–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00628-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dul, J., van der Laan, E., & Kuik, R. (2020). A statistical significance test for Necessary Condition Analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 23(2), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118795272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, L. (2022). The EFQM 2020 model. A theoretical and critical review. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(9–10), 1011–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1915121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haffar, M., Al-Karaghouli, W., Irani, Z., Djebarni, R., & Gbadamosi, G. (2019). The influence of individual readiness for change dimensions on quality management implementation in Algerian manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Economics, 207, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair Jr., J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Castillo Apraiz, J., Cepeda Carrión, G. A., & Roldán, J. L. (2021). Advanced manual of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). OmniaScience.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalpande, S. D., & Toke, L. K. (2023). Reliability analysis and hypothesis testing of critical success factors of total productive maintenance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(1), 238–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2021-0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. R., Ganesh, L. S., & Rajendran, C. (2022). Quality 4.0 – a review of and framework for quality management in the digital era. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(6), 1385–1411. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2021-0150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küpper, D., Knizek, C., Ryeson, D., & Noecker, J. (2019). Quality 4.0 takes more than technology. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/quality-4.0-takes-more-than-technology.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Linder, C., Moulick, A. G., & Lechner, C. (2023). Necessary conditions and theory-method compatibility in quantitative entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(5), 1971–1994. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221102103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maranga, D. P., & Taifa, I. W. R. (2023). Quality 4.0 conceptualisation: An emerging quality management concept for manufacturing industries. The TQM Journal, 35(2), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2021-0328
   Google Scholar
• Markatos, N. G., & Mousavi, A. (2023). Manufacturing quality assessment in the industry 4.0 era: A review. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(13–14), 1655–1681. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2023.2194524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakland, J. (2011). Leadership and policy deployment: The backbone of TQM. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(5), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.579407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2023). Analytic induction for social research. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, N. F., & Hauff, S. (2022). Necessary conditions in international business research–Advancing the field with a new perspective on causality and data analysis. Journal of World Business, 57(5), 101310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, N. F., Hauff, S., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2022). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling and complementary methods in international management research. Management International Review, 62(4), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00475-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, N.F., Schubring, S., Hauff, S., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2020). When predictors of outcomes are necessary: Guidelines for the combined use of PLS-SEM and NCA. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2243–2267. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2019-0638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, N. F., Sinkovics, R. R., Ringle, C. M., & Schlägel, C. (2016). A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 376–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2014-0148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, R., Roldán, J. L., Real, J. C., & Felipe, C. M. (2023). Opening the black box of big data sustainable value creation: The mediating role of supply chain management capabilities and circular economy practices. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 53(7/8), 762–788. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2022-0098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. -M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com
   Google Scholar
• Sader, S., Husti, I., & Daróczi, M. (2019). Industry 4.0 as a key enabler toward successful implementation of Total Quality Management practices. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 27(2), 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Sader, S., Husti, I., & Daroczi, M. (2022). A review of quality 4.0: Definitions, features, technologies, applications and challenges. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(9/10), 1164–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1944082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Franco, M.J., Calvo-Mora, A., & Periáñez Cristobal, R. (2023). Clustering abstracts from the literature on Quality Management (1980–2020). Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(7–8), 959–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2139674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sony, J., Antony, J., Douglas, J. A., & Mc Dermott, O. (2021). Motivations, barriers and readiness factors for Quality 4.0 implementation: An exploratory study. The TQM Journal, 33(6), 1502–1515. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2020-0272
   Google Scholar
• Sony, M., & Aithal, P. S. (2020). Practical lessons for engineers to adapt towards Industry 4.0. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education, 4(2), 86–97.
   Google Scholar
• Sony, M., Antony, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2020). Essential ingredients for the implementation of Quality 4.0. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0275
   Google Scholar
• Sony, M., & Naik, S. (2020). Critical factors for the successful implementation of Industry 4.0: A review and future research direction. Production Planning & Control, 31(10), 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1691278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sureshchandar, G. S. (2022). Quality 4.0 – understanding the criticality of the dimensions using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(6), 1336–1367. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2021-0159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thekkoote, R. (2022). Enabler toward successful implementation of Quality 4.0 in digital transformation era: A comprehensive review and future research agenda. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(6), 1368–1384. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-07-2021-0206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toke, L.K., & Kalpande, S.D. (2023). An assessment of key performance indicators and its relationship for implementation of total productive maintenance in manufacturing sector. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 17(4), 1741-1753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01252-5
   Google Scholar
• Van der Valk, W., Sumo, R., Dul, J., & Schroeder, R. G. (2016). When are contracts and trust necessary for innovation in buyer-supplier relationships? A Necessary Condition Analysis. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(4), 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zatzick, C. D., Moliterno, T. P., & Fang, T. (2012). Strategic (MIS)FIT: The implementation of TQM in manufacturing organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1321–1330. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonnenshain, A., & Kenett, R. S. (2020). Quality 4.0—the challenging future of quality engineering. Quality Engineering, 32(4), 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2019.1706744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulfiqar, M., Antony, J., Swarnakar, V., Sony, M., Jayaraman, R., & McDermott, O. (2023). A readiness assessment of Quality 4.0 in packaging companies: an empirical investigation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(11), 1334–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2023.2170223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar