Metrics and trends: a bibliometric approach to software reliability growth models

References

• Barraza, N. R. (2015). A parametric empirical bayes model to predict software reliability growth. Procedia Computer Science, 62, 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.416
   Google Scholar
• Cai, K.-Y., Cai, L., Wang, W.-D., Yu, Z.-Y., & Zhang, D. (2001). On the neural network approach in software reliability modeling. Journal of Systems and Software, 58(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00027-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., Shukla, A., & Pham, H. (2019). Modeling and analysis of software fault detectability and removability with time variant fault exposure ratio, fault removal efficiency, and change point. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 233(2), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X18772930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarini, A., Belvedere, V., & Grando, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 strategies and technological developments. an exploratory research from Italian manufacturing companies. Production Planning & Control, 31(16), 1385–1398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1710304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, K.-C., Huang, Y.-S., & Lee, T.-Z. (2008). A study of software reliability growth from the perspective of learning effects. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(10), 1410–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciasullo, M. V., Marc Lim, W., Manesh, M. F., & Palumbo, R. (2022). The patient as a prosumer of healthcare: Insights from a bibliometric-interpretive review. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 36(9), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-11-2021-0401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokhale, S. S., & Trivedi, K. S. (2006). Analytical models for architecture-based software reliability prediction: A unification framework. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 55(4), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2006.884587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanagal, D. D., & Bhalerao, N. N. (2021). Software reliability growth models. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Q. P., Xie, M., Ng, S. H., & Levitin, G. (2007). Robust recurrent neural network modeling for software fault detection and correction prediction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 92(3), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-Y. (2005a). Cost-reliability-optimal release policy for software reliability models incorporating improvements in testing efficiency. Journal of Systems and Software, 77(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2004.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-Y. (2005b). Performance analysis of software reliability growth models with testing-effort and change-point. Journal of Systems and Software, 76(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2004.04.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-Y., & Kuo, S.-Y. (2002). Analysis of incorporating logistic testing-effort function into software reliability modeling. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 51(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2002.801847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-Y., Kuo, S.-Y., & Lyu, M. R. (2007). An assessment of testing-effort dependent software reliability growth models. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 56(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2007.895301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C-Y., & Lin, C-T. (2006). Software reliability analysis by considering fault dependency and debugging time lag. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 55(3), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2006.879607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-Y., & Lyu, M. R. (2011). Estimation and analysis of some generalized multiple change-point software reliability models. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 60(2), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2011.2134350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-Y., Lyu, M. R., & Kuo, S.-Y. (2003). A unified scheme of some nonhomogenous poisson process models for software reliability estimation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(3), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2003.1183936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, W., Zhang, C., Liu, D., Liu, K., Sun, Z., Wang, J., Qiu, Z., & Lv, W. (2022). SRGM decision model considering cost-reliability. International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics (IJDCF), 14(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDCF
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, P. K., Kumar, A., Yadav, K., & Khatri, S. (2007). Software reliability growth modelling for errors of different severity using change point. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 14(04), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218539307002672
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, P. K., Pham, H., Aggarwal, A. G., & Kaur, G. (2012). Two dimensional multi-release software reliability modeling and optimal release planning. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 61(3), 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2012.2207531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, P. K., Pham, H., Anand, S., & Yadav, K. (2011). A unified approach for developing software reliability growth models in the presence of imperfect debugging and error generation. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 60(1), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2010.2103590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, S., Breier, M., Marc Lim, W., Dabić, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Piñeiro-Chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios-Marqués, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & J. J. Ferreira (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2577–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, S.-Y., Huang, C.-Y., & Lyu, M. R. (2001). Framework for modeling software reliability, using various testing-efforts and fault-detection rates. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 50(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1109/24.974129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan, I., & Ramasamy, S. (2015). An artificial neural-network approach to software reliability growth modeling. Procedia Computer Science, 57, 695–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.450
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Pham, H. (2017). NHPP software reliability model considering the uncertainty of operating environments with imperfect debugging and testing coverage. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 51, 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, W. M., Vincenza Ciasullo, M., Escobar, O., & Kumar, S. (2024). Healthcare entrepreneurship: Current trends and future directions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2023-0197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevan, K., & Joshi, S. (2022). Omnichannel retailing: A bibliometric and network visualization analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(4), 1113–1136. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2020-0622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaiya, Y. K., Li, M. N., Bieman, J. M., & Karcich, R. (2002). Software reliability growth with test coverage. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 51(4), 420–426. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2002.804489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, L., & MacDonell, S. G. (2011). Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes: A survey of research. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 43(4), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978802.1978803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G., t PRISMA Group* (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of web of science and scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samal, U., & Kumar, A. (2023a). A software reliability model incorporating fault removal efficiency and it's release policy. Computational Statistics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-023-01430-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samal, U., & Kumar, A. (2023b). Enhancing software reliability forecasting through a hybrid ARIMA-ANN model. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08486-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samal, U., & Kumar, A. (2023c). Redefining software reliability modeling: Embracing fault-dependency, imperfect removal, and maximum fault considerations. Quality Engineering, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2023.2241067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samal, U., & Kumar, A. (2024a). A neural network approach for software reliability prediction. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218539324500098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samal, U., & Kumar, A. (2024b). Empowering software reliability: Leveraging efficient fault detection and removal efficiency. Quality Engineering, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2024.2358889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samal, U., & Kumar, A. (2024c). Fault removal efficiency: A key driver in software reliability growth modeling. In Reliability engineering for industrial processes: An analytics perspective (pp. 95–106). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55048-5_7
   Google Scholar
• Samal, U., Kushwaha, S., & Kumar, A. (2023). A testing-effort based srgm incorporating imperfect debugging and change point. Reliability: Theory & Applications, 18(1 (72)), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.24412/1932-2321-2023-172-86-93
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, K., Garg, R., Nagpal, C. K., & Garg, R. K. (2010). Selection of optimal software reliability growth models using a distance based approach. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 59(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2010.2048657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, A. Kumar., & Sharma, R. (2022). Developing a hybrid software reliability growth model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(5), 1209–1225. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2021-0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shyur, H.-J. (2003). A stochastic software reliability model with imperfect-debugging and change-point. Journal of Systems and Software, 66(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(02)00071-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Y.-S., & Huang, C.-Y. (2007). Neural-network-based approaches for software reliability estimation using dynamic weighted combinational models. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 606–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & Van Den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, V., Anand, S., Kapur, P. K., & Aggarwal, A. G. (2022). Unified framework to assess software reliability and determine optimal release time in presence of fault reduction factor, error generation and fault removal efficiency. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 13(5), 2429–2441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-022-01653-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, M., Hu, Q. P., Wu, Y. P., & Ng, S. H. (2007). A study of the modeling and analysis of software fault-detection and fault-correction processes. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 23(4), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Teng, X., & Pham, H. (2003). Considering fault removal efficiency in software reliability assessment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 33(1), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2003.812597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Liu, H.-W., Cui, G., & Yang, X.-Z. (2006). Software reliability growth model with change-point and environmental function. Journal of Systems and Software, 79(11), 1578–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.02.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, J. (2009). Predicting software reliability with neural network ensembles. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2116–2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.12.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, F.-Z. (2003). A change-point perspective on the software failure process. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 13(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/stvr.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar