Critical questions and answers about cathodic protection

References

• Davy H. OVI. On the corrosion of copper sheeting by sea water, and on methods of preventing this effect; and on their application to ships of war and other ships. Philos Trans Royal Soc London. 1824 Jan 1;114:151–158.
   Google Scholar
• Davy H. XII. Additional experiments and observations on the application of electrical combinations to the preservation of the copper sheathing of ships, and to other purposes. Philos Trans Royal Soci London. 1824 Jan 1;114:242–246.
   Google Scholar
• Davy H. XV. Further researches on the preservation of metals by electrochemical means. Philos Trans Royal Soci London. 1825 Jan 1;115:328–346.
   Google Scholar
• Ackland BG. Cathodic protection – it never sleeps. Proceedings of the Australasian corrosion assosciation conference, CAP-12; 2012 Nov 11–14; Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Ackland BG. Cathodic protection—it never sleeps. Corros Mater. 2012;37(6):50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ackland BG. Cathodic protection of the human genome. Proceedings of the Australasian corrosion Association Conference, CAP-02, paper 62; 2002 Nov 10–13; Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Ackland BG. Cathodic protection of the human genome. Corros Mater. 2003;28(4):S1–S4.
   Google Scholar
• Heller A. Spiers memorial lecture. On the hypothesis of cathodic protection of genes. Faraday Discuss. 2000;116:1–13. doi: 10.1039/b006196o
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handbook of cathodic corrosion protection (1997) von Baeckmann, W., Schwenk, W.Prinz, W. ed., Gulf.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan JH. Cathodic protection. 2nd ed. Houston (TX): National Association of Corrosion Engineers; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• NACE. Cathodic protection criteria – a literature survey. Houston (TX): National Association of Corrosion Engineers; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Büchler M, Ackland B, Angst U. The historic evolution of cathodic protection criteria. CEOCOR international Congress 2016 Ljubljana; 2016; Brussels, Belgium CEOCOR, c/o SYNERGRID.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia AS 2832.1. 2015. Cathodic protection of metals part 1: pipes and cables.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia AS 2832.2. 2003. Cathodic protection of metals part 2: compact buried structures.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia AS 2832.3. 2005. Cathodic protection of metals part 3: fixed immersed structures.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia AS 2832.4. 2006. Cathodic protection of metals part 4: internal surfaces.
   Google Scholar
• EN 12954 International Organisation for Standardisation. 2005. Cathodic protection of buried or immersed metallic structures – general principles and application for pipelines.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 15589-1 International Organisation for Standardisation. (2015). Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries – cathodic protection of pipeline systems – part 1: on-land pipelines.
   Google Scholar
• NACE International SP0169. 2007. Control of external corrosion on underground or submerged metallic piping systems.
   Google Scholar
• Martin B. Why cathodically protected pipelines fail by corrosion, paper 70. 18th international corrosion Congress 2011; 2011 Nov 10–13; Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn RJ. Cathodic protection of underground pipe lines from soil corrosion. API Proceedings. 1933;14(Section 4):153–167.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn RJ. Galvanic corrosion on cast iron pipes. Ind Eng Chem. 1930;22(4):335–341. doi: 10.1021/ie50244a008
   Google Scholar
• Schwerdtfeger WJ, McDorman ON. Potential and current requirements for the cathodic protection of steel in solids. J Res Natl Bur Stand. 1951;47(2):104–112. doi: 10.6028/jres.047.014
   Google Scholar
• Schwerdtfeger WJ. Current and potential relations for the cathodic protection of steel in salt water. J Res Natl Bur Stand. 1958;60(3):153–159. doi: 10.6028/jres.060.019
   Google Scholar
• Pourbaix M. Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions. National Association of Corrosion Engineers; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Pourbaix M. Significance of protection potential in pitting and intergranular corrosion. Corrosion. 1970;26(10):431–438. doi: 10.5006/0010-9312-26.10.431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackland B, Cherry BW. Stress corrosion cracking in weld metal, heat affected zone and base metal of a line pipe weld. Aust Wel Res J. 1982;11:48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Deltombe E, Pourbaix M. Equilibrium potential-ph diagram for the system Fe-CO2–H2O at 25°C, international committee of electrochemical thermodynamics and kinetics (CITCE). Proceedings of the sixth meeting; 1955; London, Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Leeds JM. (1992). Cathodic-generated film protects pipe surface – part 1. In Pipe line industry 4, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Büchler M. A discussion of the mechanisms Involved in cathodic protection. Proceedings of the Australasian corrosion assosciation conference, CAP-15; 2015 Nov 15–18; Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Kajiyama F, Okamura K. Evaluating cathodic protection reliability on steel pipe in microbially active soils. Corrosion. 1999;55(1):74–80. doi: 10.5006/1.3283968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemical thermodynamics of iron, part 1 (2013) Perrone, J. ed. Data Bank Issy-les-Moulineaux, France OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfson SL, Hartt WH. An initial investigation of calcareous deposits upon cathodic steel surfaces in sea water. Corrosion. 1981;37(2):70–76. doi: 10.5006/1.3593848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angst U, Büchler M, Martin B, et al. Cathodic protection of soil buried steel pipelines – a critical discussion of protection criteria and threshold values. Werkst Korros. 2016;67(11):1135–1142. doi: 10.1002/maco.201608862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchler M. Physical-chemical significance of the IR-free potential and methods for assessing the effectiveness of cathodic protection. 3R Special. 2014;42:60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gummow RA, Segall S, Fingas D. An alternative view of the cathodic protection mechanism on buried pipelines. Mater Perform. 2017;56(3):32–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully JC. The fundamentals of corrosion. Oxford: Permagon Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Angst UM, Buchler M. Impact of IR Drops on the −850 mVCSE cathodic protection criterion for coated steel pipes in soil. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract. 2018;9(1):04017035. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds J. An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson NG, Beavers JA. (1990). The measurement and correction of electrolyte resistance in electrochemical tests, ASTM STP1056, Scribner, L. L. and Taylor, S. R. (eds).
   Google Scholar
• Williams LFG, Taylor RJ. iR correction part I. A computerised interrupt method. J Electroanal Chem. 1980;108:293–303. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(80)80338-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams LFG, Taylor RJ. iR correction part II. Effect on corrosion monitoring. J Electroanal Chem. 1980;108:305–316. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(80)80339-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scribner LL, Taylor SR. The measurement and correction of electrolyte resistance in electrochemical tests. ASTM STP 1056. 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Britz D. iR elimination in electrochemical cells. J Electroanal Chem. 1978;88:309–352. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(78)80122-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes M, Kuhn T, Patefield W. Techniques for the determination of ohmic drop in half-cells and fuel cells. J Power Sources. 1977/78;2:121–136. doi: 10.1016/0378-7753(77)80013-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallen B, Linder B. Ohmic potential drop in cathodic protection of buried structures: evaluation of some measuring methods. Br Corros J. 1973;8:7–14. doi: 10.1179/000705973798322558
   Google Scholar
• Kasahara K, Sato T, Adachi H. Results of polarisation potential and current density surveys on existing buried pipelines. Mater Perform. 1980;19(9):49–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry BW. How instant is off? J Corros Sci Eng. 2004;9(Paper 6):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Husock B. Pipe-to-soil potential limits for protective coatings. National Technical Information Services ESL-TR-80-26 November; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Barlo TJ, Fessler RR. Interpretation of true pipe-to-soil potentials on coated pipelines with holidays. Corrosion. 1983;83:Anaheim, California, NACE.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavi F, Forsyth M, Tan MYJ. Understanding the effects of applied cathodic protection potential and environmental conditions on the rate of cathodic disbondment of coatings by means of local electrochemical measurements on a multi-electrode array. Prog Org Coat. 2017;103:83–92. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidheiser HJ, Wang W. Some substrate and environmental influences on the cathodic delamination of organic coatings. J Coat Technol. 1981;53:77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Leidheiser HJ, Wang W, Igetoft L. the mechanism for the cathodic delamination of organic coatings from a metal surface. Prog Org Coat. 1983;11:19–40. doi: 10.1016/0033-0655(83)80002-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidheiser HJ. De-adhesion at the organic coating/metal interface in aqueous media. Croat Chem Acta. 1980;53(2):197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry BW, Thompson K. Crack tip processes and the adhesive-cohesive transition in the environmental fracture of adhesive joints. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 1980;8:13–24. doi: 10.1080/00914038008077931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackland B, Cherry BW. Cathodic disbonding of pipeline coatings – the effect on stress corrosion cracking. Proceedings of the Australasian corrosion association conference No. 22; 1982 Nov 8–12; Hobart.
   Google Scholar
• Wenk RL. Field investigations of stress corrosion cracking. In: Fifth symposium on line pipe research. Houston (TX): AGA; 1974. p. T-1–T-22.
   Google Scholar
• Fessler RR, Markworth AJ, Parkins RN. Cathodic protection levels under disbonded coatings. Corrosion. 1983;39(1):20–25. doi: 10.5006/1.3580809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 50162 International Organisation for Standardisation. Protection against corrosion by stray current from direct current; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ackland BG. Limitations of the stray current interference criteria. Proceedings of the Australasian corrosion Association Conference and international corrosion Congress, CAP-11, paper 202; 2011 Nov 20–24; Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Hoar TP, Farrer TW. The anodic characteristics of mild steel in dilute aqueous soil electrolytes. Corros Sci. 1961;1:49–61. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(61)90005-1
   Google Scholar
• Martin BA, Huckson JA. New developments in interference testing. Ind Corros. 1986;4(6):26–31.
   Google Scholar
• http://www.esv.vic.gov.au/pdfs/vec-code-of-practice-for-electrolysis-mitigation-and-cathodic-protection/ (2015).
   Google Scholar