Legal and extralegal factors in attorney recommendations of pretrial diversion

References

• Alarid , L.F. and Montemayor , C.D. 2010 . Attorney perspectives and decisions on the presentence investigation report: A research note . Criminal Justice Policy Review , 21 (1) : 119 – 133 .
   Google Scholar
• Albonetti , C.A. 1986 . Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Toward a theory of discretionary decision making in felony case processing . Criminology , 24 : 623 – 644 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albonetti , C.A. 1987 . Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty . Law and Society Review , 21 : 291 – 313 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albonetti , C.A. 1991 . An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion . Social Problems , 38 : 247 – 266 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albonetti , C.A. and Hepburn , J.R. 1996 . Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization: The effects of defendant’s ascribed and achieved status characteristics . Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 12 : 63 – 81 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen , D.M. 2009 . Calling your bluff: How prosecutors and defense attorneys adapt plea bargaining strategies to increased formalization . Justice Quarterly , 26 : 2 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo , E.D. and Alarid , L.F. forthcoming . Factors associated with recidivism among offenders with mental illness . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , doi: DOI: 10.1177/0306624X09359502
   Google Scholar
• Clark , J. and Henry , A.D. 2003 . Pre‐trial services programming at the start of the 21st century: A survey of pre‐trial service programs (NCJ 199773) , Washington, DC : Bureau of Justice Assistance .
   Google Scholar
• Fields , L.L. 1994 . Pretrial diversion: A solution to California’s drunk‐driving problem . Federal Probation , 58 : 20 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Fischer , B. , Wortley , S. , Webster , C. and Kirst , M. 2002 . The socio‐legal dynamics and implications of ‘diversion’: The case study of the Toronto ‘john school’ diversion programme for prostitution offenders . Criminology and Criminal Justice , 2 : 385 – 410 .
   Google Scholar
• Fridell , L.A. 1990 . Decision‐making of the district attorney: Diverting or prosecuting intrafamilial child sexual abuse offenders . Criminal Justice Policy Review , 4 : 249 – 267 .
   Google Scholar
• Giacomazzi , A.L. and Bell , V. 2007 . Drug court program monitoring: Lessons learned about program implementation and research methodology . Criminal Justice Policy Review , 18 (3) : 294 – 312 .
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson , M.R. and Gottfredson , D.M. 1987 . Decision making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion , (2nd ed.) , New York : Plenum Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gottheil , D. and Ghosh , S.A. 1983 . Pretrial intervention: Counseling in adult diversion programs . The Counseling Psychologist , 11 : 17 – 25 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris , R.A. and Springer , J.F. 1984 . Plea bargaining as a game: An empirical analysis of negotiated sentencing decisions . Policy Studies Review , 4 : 245 – 258 .
   Google Scholar
• Hartford , K. , Carey , R. and Mendonca , J. 2007 . Pretrial court diversion of people with mental illness . The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research , 34 : 198 – 205 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartman , J.L. and Belknap , J. 2003 . Beyond the gatekeepers: Court professionals’ self‐reported attitudes about and experiences with misdemeanor domestic violence cases . Criminal Justice and Behavior , 30 : 349 – 373 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey , E. , Shakeshaft , A. , Hetherington , K. , Sannibale , C. and Mattick , R.P. 2007 . The efficacy of diversion and aftercare strategies for adult drug‐involved offenders: A summary and methodological review of the outcome literature . Drug and Alcohol Review , 26 : 379 – 387 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James , D.V. 2006 . Court diversion in perspective . Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry , 40 : 529 – 538 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , B.D. , Ulmer , J.T. and Kramer , J.H. 2008 . The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts . Criminology , 46 : 737 – 783 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy , A.M. , Klein , C. , Gorzalka , B.B. and Yuille , J.C. 2004 . Attitude change following a diversion program for men who solicit sex . Journal of Offender Rehabilitation , 40 : 41 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• Klein , C.M. , Kennedy , A. and Gorzalka , B.B. 2009 . Rape myth acceptance in men who completed the prostitution offender program of British Columbia . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , 53 : 305 – 315 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundman , R.J. 1996 . Extralegal variables and arrest . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , 33 : 349 – 353 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma , Y. 2002 . Prosecutorial discretion and plea bargaining in the United States, France, Germany, and Italy: A comparative perspective . International Criminal Justice Review , 12 : 22 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• McGrath , A. 2008 . The effect of diversion from court: A review of the evidence . Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law , 15 : 317 – 339 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski , C.F. 2007 . Identification for prediction and decision , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe , D.B. , Festinger , D.S. , Arabia , P.L. , Croft , J.R. , Patapis , N.S. and Dugosh , K.L. 2009 . A systematic review of DWI court program evaluations . Drug Court Review , 6 : 1 – 49 .
   Google Scholar
• Misner , R.L. 1996 . Recasting prosecutorial discretion . Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology , 86 : 717 – 777 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty , G.F. 1993 . Pretrial services includes diversion . Federal Probation , 57 : 68 – 75 .
   Google Scholar
• Polk , K. , Adler , C. , Muller , D. and Rechtman , K. Early intervention, diversion and youth conferencing: A national profile and review of current approaches to diverting juveniles from the criminal justice system . Canberra : Attorney‐General Department .
   Google Scholar
• Potter , R.H. and Kakar , S. 2002 . The diversion decision‐making process from the juvenile court practitioners’ perspective: Results of a survey . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice , 18 : 20 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds , D.E. 1988 . The use of pretrial diversion programs in spouse abuse cases: A new solution to an old problem . Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution , 3 : 415 – 436 .
   Google Scholar
• Shafer , M.S. , Arthur , B. and Franczak , M.J. 2004 . An analysis of post‐booking jail diversion programming for person with co‐occurring disorders . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 22 : 771 – 785 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen , J. and Wallace , D.H. 1999 . Prosecutorial discretion in seeking death: An analysis of racial disparity in the pretrial stages of case processing in a Midwestern county . Justice Quarterly , 16 : 559 – 578 .
   Google Scholar
• Steadman , H.J. , Morris , S.M. and Dennis , D.L. 1995 . The diversion of mentally ill persons from jails to community‐based services: A profile of programs . The American Journal of Public Health , 85 : 1630 – 1635 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan , C.J. , Veysey , B.M. , Hamilton , Z.K. and Grillo , M.G. 2007 . Reducing out‐of‐community placement and recidivism: Diversion of delinquent youth with mental health and substance use problems from the justice system . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , 51 : 555 – 577 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung , H. and Belenko , S. 2006 . From diversion experiment to policy movement: A case study of prosecutorial innovation . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice , 22 : 220 – 240 .
   Google Scholar
• Swaminath , R.S. , Mendonca , J.D. , Vidal , C. and Chapman , P. 2002 . Experiments in change: Pretrial diversion of offenders with mental illness . Canadian Journal of Psychiatry , 47 : 450 – 458 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson , M.D. , Reuland , M. and Souweine , D. 2003 . Criminal justice/mental health consensus: Improving responses to people with mental illness . Crime and Delinquency , 49 : 30 – 51 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toborg , M.A. , Yezer , A.M. and Carver , J.A. 1991 . Pretrial urine testing in the District of Columbia: Its usefulness for risk classification and as a ‘signaling device’ for release risk . Journal of Drug Issues , 21 (2) : 369 – 381 .
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer , J.T. , Kurlychek , M.C. and Kramer , J.H. 2007 . Prosecutorial discretion and the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , 44 : 427 – 458 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich , T.E. 2002 . Pretrial diversion in the federal court system . Federal Probation , 66 : 30 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau . 2008 . Population estimates for selected counties in Missouri and Kansas Retrieved December 5, 2009, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/
   Google Scholar
• Vose , B. , Cullen , F.T. and Smith , P. 2008 . The empirical status of the Level of Service Inventory . Federal Probation , 72 : 22 – 29 .
   Google Scholar
• Wahab , S. 2005 . Navigating mixed‐theory programs: Lessons learned from a prostitution diversion project . Affilia , 20 : 203 – 221 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahab , S. 2006 . Evaluating the usefulness of a prostitution diversion project . Qualitative Social Work , 5 : 67 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• Wilmot , K.A. and Spohn , C. 2004 . Prosecutorial discretion and real‐offense sentencing: An analysis of relevant conduct under the federal sentencing guidelines . Criminal Justice Policy Review , 15 : 324 – 343 .
   Google Scholar
• Wright , R.F. and Miller , M.L. 2002 . The screening/bargaining tradeoff . Stanford Law Review , 55 : 29 – 52 .
   Google Scholar