The ‘Short Addiction Program’: experiences from an intervention by the correctional services in Norway

References

• Andvig, E. (2014). Förundran i hermeneutisk forskning – ett exempel från fokusgruppsamtal [Wondering in hermeneutic research: An example from focus group interviews]. In E. Lassenius & E. Severinsson (Eds.), Hermeneutik i vårdpraxis [Hermeneutics in care practice] (pp. 197–209). Malmö: Gleerups Utbildning AB.
   Google Scholar
• Bahr, S. J., Masters, A. L., & Taylor, B. M. (2012). What works in substance abuse treatment programs for offenders? The Prison Journal, 92, 155–174.10.1177/0032885512438836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. (2008). The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 107–118.10.1016/j.avb.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsgard, N. A., & Danielsen, T. (2013). Rehabilitering av rusavhengige i fengsel – nytter det? [Rehabilitation of addicts in prison – does it work?]. Rus & Samfunn, 2, 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Binswanger, I. A., Blatchford, P. J., Mueller, S. R., & Stern, M. F. (2013). Mortality after prison release: Opioid overdose and other causes of death, risk factors, and time trends from 1999 to 2009. Annals of Internal Medicine, 159, 592–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, N. (2007). Sosial kontroll [Social control]. In L. Finstad & C. Høigård (Eds.), Kriminologi [Criminology] (pp. 91–99). Oslo: Pax.10.7326/0003-4819-159-9-201311050-00005
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jacobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2003). Att förklara samhället [Explaining society]. Lund: Studentlitteratur Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M., & Marsden, J. (2008). Acute risk of drug-related death among newly released prisoners in England and Wales. Addiction, 103, 251–255.10.1111/add.2008.103.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., Smith-Merry, J., & Sturdy, S. (2009). WHO, Mental Health, Europe, Orientation 3: Regulation case study (Report to EC Integrated Project 0288848-2). Edinburgh: KNOW and POL.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, C., & Kjelsberg, E. (2009). Drug use and mental health problems among prison inmates—Results from a nation-wide prison population study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 63, 237–245.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, C., & Skog Hansen, I. L. (2004). Levekår blant innsatte [Living conditions among inmates] ( Fafo Report 429). Oslo: Fafo.
   Google Scholar
• Granheim, P. K., Rustad, Å. B., & Rokkan, T. (2010). Evaluation report. National Substance Abuse Programme. Oslo: Kriminalomsorgens utdanningssenter/Correctional Service of Norway Staff Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. V. (2007). Samarbeid uten fellesskap – om individuelle planer i kommunalt psykisk helsearbeid [Collaboration without a feeling of community: Individual plans in local mental health care]. Karlstad University Studies, 2007, 15, 1–240.
   Google Scholar
• Hauge, R. (2001). Behandling som alternativ til straff for rusmiddelbrukere i Norge [Treatment as an alternative to punishment for substance abusers in Norway]. In H. Ólafsdóttir (Ed.), Skyldig eller sjuk?: om valet av påføljd för narkotikabruk [Guilty or sick? The choice of sanctions for drug offenses] (pp. 59–78). Helsinki: NAD Publication 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Heisholt, H. (2013). “Når hovedprosjektet ditt er deg selv”: Muligheter og begrensninger for rusrehabilitering i fengsel [“When your main project is yourself”: Opportunities and constraints for substance abuse rehabilitation in prison] ( Master’s thesis). Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Helgesen, J. H. I. (2013). Godt begynt er halvt fullendt?: Iverksetting av rusmestringsenheter i norsk kriminalomsorg [A good start is half the battle? Implementation of addiction coping units in the Norwegian Correctional Services] ( Master’s thesis). Lillehammer: Lillehammer University College.
   Google Scholar
• King, S. (2013). Transformative agency and desistance from crime. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13, 317–335.10.1177/1748895812452282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, J. A., Humphreys, D. K., Akoensi, T. D., Sánchez de Ribera, O., & Lösel, F. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of European drug treatment programmes on reoffending. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 584–602.10.1080/1068316X.2013.804921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolind, T., Frank, V. A., & Dahl, H. (2010). Drug treatment or alleviating the negative consequences of imprisonment? A critical view of prison-based drug treatment in Denmark. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21, 43–48.10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1997). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju [The qualitative research interview]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Lemire, S. T., Nielsen, S. B., & Dybdal, L. (2012). Making contribution analysis work: A practical framework for handling influencing factors and alternative explanations. Evaluation, 18, 294–309.10.1177/1356389012450654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320.10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A., & Wilson, S. J. (2007). Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2007, 6, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lösel, F., Pugh, G., Markson, L., Souza, K. A., & Lanskey, C. (2012). Risk and protective factors in the resettlement of imprisoned fathers with their families ( Final Report). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M., Williams, J., & Kane, D. (2013). Throughcare for prisoners with problematic drug use: A European perspective. EuroVista, Probation and Community Justice, 2, 144–153.
   Google Scholar
• Mapham, A., & Hefferon, K. (2012). “I Used to Be an Offender – Now I’m a Defender”: Positive psychology approaches in the facilitation of posttraumatic growth in offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51, 389–413.10.1080/10509674.2012.683239
   Google Scholar
• Marsch, L. A. (1998). The efficacy of methadone maintenance interventions in reducing illicit opiate use, HIV risk behavior and criminality: A meta-analysis. Addiction, 93, 515–532.10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9345157.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurran, M. (2009). Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 83–100.10.1348/135532508X278326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, F. (2006). A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 39–62.10.1177/1748895806060666
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., Farrall, S., Lightowler, C., & Maruna, S. (2012). How and why people stop offending: Discovering desistance. Institute for Research and Innovation in Social Services. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nærum, E. J. (2013). Stifinner’n i Oslo fengsel: Et kryss på veien mellom fortid og framtid? [The “Pathfinder” in Oslo Prison: A crossroads on the path between the past and the future?]. Masteroppgave, Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Nordfjærn, T., & Varmdal, T. (2011). Perspektiver på SUKSESSKRITERIER [Perspectives on success criteria]. Rus & Samfunn, 5, 32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T., Holth, P. E. R., & Hassel Kristoffersen, C. (2011). HVA VIRKER: Unge og rusbehandling [What works: Young people and addiction treatment]. Rus & Samfunn, 5, 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Panuccio, E. A., Christian, J., Martinez, D. J., & Sullivan, M. L. (2012). Social support, motivation, and the process of juvenile reentry: An exploratory analysis of desistance. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51, 135–160.10.1080/10509674.2011.618527
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. H., Haas, A. L., & Hunt, W. M. (2001). Treatment “dosage” effects in drug court programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33, 63–72.10.1300/J076v33n04_04
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203413937
   Google Scholar
• Rocque, M., Posick, C., & Paternoster, R. (2016). Identities through time: An exploration of identity change as a cause of desistance. Justice Quarterly, 33, 45–72.10.1080/07418825.2014.894111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronel, N., & Segev, D. (2013). Positive criminology in practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 1389–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundskriv G-8/2006. Samarbeid mellom kommunehelsetjenesten, spesialisthelsetjenesten, kommunenes sosialtjeneste og kriminalomsorgen overfor innsatte og domfelte rusmiddelavhengige [Cooperation between municipal health services, specialist health services, municipal social services and the correctional service for substance abusing inmates and convicted persons]. Oslo: Norwegian Government Circular.
   Google Scholar
• Rundskriv KSF 1/2002. Retningslinjer for kriminalomsorgens arbeid med framtidsplanlegging [Guidelines for future planning in the Norwegian Correctional Service]. Oslo: Norwegian Government Circular.
   Google Scholar
• Rundskriv KSF 2/2002. Retningslinjer for kontaktbetjentarbeidet [Guidelines for the work of the personal contact officer]. Oslo: Norwegian Government Circular.
   Google Scholar
• Skardhamar, T. (2002). Levekår og livssituasjon blant innsatte i norske fengsler [Living conditions and life situation among inmates in Norwegian prisons]. Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• SSB/Statistics Norway. (2013). Straffereaksjoner [Penal sanctions], 2011, http://www.ssb.no/straff, read August 18, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Stortingsmelding/Government White Paper No. 37. (2007–2008). Straff som virker – mindre kriminalitet – tryggere samfunn [Punishment that works – less crime – a safer society, Oslo].
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, B., & McNeill, F. (2011). Some lessons from research for organising and delivering case management work with offenders. The Scottish Centre for Crime & Justice Research. DOMICE, Final Conference, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar