Publication Cover
Criminal Justice Studies
A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society
Volume 31, 2018 - Issue 1
2,804
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The thin blue line meets the big blue sky: perceptions of police legitimacy and public attitudes towards aerial drones

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 18-37 | Received 14 Dec 2016, Accepted 09 Nov 2017, Published online: 28 Nov 2017

References

  • Alpert, G. P., Macdonald, J. M., & Dunham, R. G. (2005). Police suspicion and discretionary decision making during citizen stops. Criminology, 43(2), 407–434. doi:10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00012.x
  • Ariel, B., Farrar, W., & Sutherland, A. (2015). The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(3), 509–535. doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3
  • Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., … Henderson, R. (2017). “Contagious accountability” a global multisite randomized controlled trial on the effect of police body-worn cameras on citizens’ complaints against the police. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(2), 293–316. doi:10.1177/0093854816668218
  • Associated Press. (2016, June 12). Orlando shooting: Witnesses describe how horrific night unfolded. The Times-Picayune Greater New Orleans. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2016/06/orlando_shooting_witnesses_des.html
  • Babwin, D. (2016, July 14). Experts: Use of robot to kill suspect opens door for others. Associated Press. Retrieved from http://bigstory.ap.org/article/732d5152fc5b4a83b254e473e5c2e89c/experts-use-robot-kill-suspect-opens-door-others
  • Baker, W. (2004). The impact of video evidence on modern policing (NIJ grant# 2001-CK-WX-0157). IACP report to National Institute of Justice. Retrieved June 25, 2017, from https://www.bja.gov/bwc/pdfs/IACPIn-CarCameraReport.pdf
  • Beyond the Basics. (2016). Federal aviation administration unmanned aircraft systems. Retrieved July 13, 2016, from http://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/fly_for_work_business/beyond_the_basics/
  • Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.
  • Brown, B., & Benedict, W. (2002). Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and policy implications. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(3), 543–580. doi:10.1108/13639510210437032
  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
  • Carrabine, E. (2005). Prison riots, social order and the problem of legitimacy. British Journal of Criminology, 45(6), 896–913. doi:10.1093/bjc/azi052
  • Clarridge, C. (2013, February 7). Seattle grounds police drone program. Seattle Times. Retrieved from http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/seattle-grounds-police-drone-program/
  • Ericson, R. V., & Haggerty, K. D. (1997). Policing the risk society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Fieldstadt, E. (2015, October 27). Drone carrying package with drugs and blades found in Oklahoma prison yard. NBC News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/drone-carrying-package-drugs-blades-found-oklahoma-prison-yard-n452221
  • Gettinger, D. (2017). Drones at home: Public safety drones (pp. 1–12, Rep.). Annandale-On-Hudson, NY: Center for the Study of Drone. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://dronecenter.bard.edu/drones-at-home-public-safety-drones/
  • Gua, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 255–279. doi:10.1080/074x820902763889
  • Hawdon, J. E., Ryan, J., & Griffin, S. P. (2003). Policing tactics and perceptions of police legitimacy. Police Quarterly, 6(4), 469–491. doi:10.1108/13639510210437032
  • Heen, M. S. J., Lieberman, J. D., & Miethe, T. D. (2014). A comparison of different online sampling approaches for generating national samples ( Research in Brief report). Las Vegas, NV: Center for Crime and Justice Policy.
  • Hinds, L. (2009). Public satisfaction with police: The influence of general attitudes and police–citizen encounters. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 11(1), 54–66. doi:10.1350/ijps.2009.11.1.109
  • Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 27–42. doi:10.1375/acri.40.1.27
  • Ipeirotis, P. (2010). Demographics of Mechanical Turk ( Working Paper). New York: New York University.
  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071. doi:10.1093/bjc/azs032
  • Jackson, D., & Jensen, B. (2015, January 26). Government employee piloted drone that crashed at White House. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/01/26/obama-white-house-device-josh-earnest/22338781/
  • Jennings, W., Lynch, M., & Fridell, L. (2015). Evaluating the impact of police officer body-worn cameras (BWCs) on response-to-resistance and serious external complaints: Evidence from the Orlando police department (OPD) experience utilizing a randomized controlled experiment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 480–486. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.10.003
  • Khan, H. (2015). Keeping LAPD drone-free. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from Bill of Rights Defense Committee: http://bordc.org/news/keeping-lapd-drone-free/
  • Koper, C. S., Lum, C., Willis, J. J., Woods, D. J., & Hibdon, J. (2015). Realizing the potential of technology in policing ( Grant No. 2010-MU-MU-0019). Retrieved from Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy: cebcp.org/wp-content/technology/ImpactTechnologyFinalReport.pdf
  • Lieberman, J. D., Miethe, T. D., Troshynski, E. I., & Heen, M. (2014). Aerial drones, domestic surveillance, and public opinion of adults in the United States ( Research in Brief report). Las Vegas, NV: Center for Crime and Justice Policy.
  • Loosveldt, G., & Sonck, N. (2008). An evaluation of the weighting procedures for an online access panel survey. Survey Research Methods, 2(2), 93–105. doi:10.18148/srm/2008.v2i2.82
  • Lynch, M. (2016). Police technology. In W. Jennings (Ed.), The encyclopedia of crime and punishment (pp. 1–5). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Manzella, M. J., & Favre, G. J. (2015, March). Through the looking glass: Public safety agency drone policies and the Fourth Amendments. Monterey, CA: United States Naval Postgraduate School. Retrieved April 19, 2016, from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:76tkMsJn3SEJ:https://www.chds.us/%3Fserve%26 dl%26f%3D/chds/resources/impact/Public_Safety_-Drone_Policy.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
  • McLean, S. J., Worden, R. E., & Kim, M. (2013). Here’s looking at you: An evaluation of public CCTV cameras and their effects on crime and disorder. Criminal Justice Review, 38(3), 303–334. doi:10.1177/0734016813492415
  • Miethe, T. D., Lieberman, J. D., Sakiyama, M., & Heen, M. S. J. (in press). Public attitudes about UAV usage in police work: A comparative case study of Mesa County residents ( Research in Brief report). Las Vegas, NV: Center for Crime and Justice Policy.
  • Miethe, T. D., Lieberman, J. D., Sakiyama, M., & Troshynski, E. I. (2014). Public attitudes about aerial drone activities: Results of a national survey ( Research in Brief report). Las Vegas, NV: Center for Crime and Justice Policy.
  • Monmouth University. (2013). National: U.S. supports unmanned domestic drones. Monmouth University Poll, August 15. Retrieved April 19, 2016, from https://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/32212254770/32212254991/32212254992/32212254994/32212254995/40802189893/5f0b18a68abf431a8d84bf6d8138c3b2.pdf
  • Myers, L. L. (2013, February 8). Seattle mayor grounds police drone program. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-drones-seattle-idUSBRE91704H20130208
  • Nieto, M., Johnston-Dodds, K., & Simmons, C. W. (2002). Public and private applications of video surveillance and biometric technologies. Sacramento, CA: California State Library, California Research Bureau.
  • Nobles III, W. P. (2015, August 19). Drone hobbyists continue to interfere with wildfire battles in West. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/08/19/drone-hobbyists-continue-to-interfere-with-wildfire-battles-in-west/
  • Norris, C., McCahill, M., & Wood, D. (2002). The growth of CCTV: A global perspective on the international diffusion of video surveillance in publicly accessible space. Surveillance & Society, 2(2/3), 110–135.
  • Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
  • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1626226
  • Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31(1), 163–204. doi:10.2307/3054098
  • Pew Research Center. (2015). American’s internet access: 2002–2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/
  • Police Executive Research Forum. (2014). Legitimacy and procedural justice: A new element of police leadership. Washington, DC: Tom R. Tyler.
  • Posick, C., Rocque, M., & McDevitt, J. (2013). One scale fits all? Assessing racial differences in the measurement of attitudes toward the police. Race and Justice, 3(3), 190–209. doi:10.1177/2153368713494214
  • Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 1005–1028. doi:10.1177/0093854807301275
  • Reisig, M. D., & Correia, M. E. (1997). Public evaluations of police performance: An analysis across three levels of policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 20(2), 311–325. doi:10.1108/13639519710169153
  • Reisig, M. D., & Parks, R. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 607–630. doi:10.1080/07418820000094681
  • Reiss, A. J. (1971). The police and the public (Vol. 39). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Rosenbaum, D., Lawrence, D. S., Hartnett, S. M., McDevitt, J., & Posick, C. (2015). Measuring procedural justice and legitimacy at the local level: The police-community interaction survey. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 335–366. doi:10.1007/s11292-015-9228-9
  • RTI International. (2013). Unmanned aircraft and the human element: Public perceptions and first responder concerns. Retrieved from https://www.rti.org/publications/abstract.cfm?pubid=21155
  • Sakiyama, M., Miethe, T. D., Lieberman, J. D., Heen, M. S. J., & Tuttle, O. (2016). Big hover or big brother? Public attitudes about drone usage in domestic policing activities. Security Journal, 30(4), 1027–1044. doi:10.1057/sj.2016.3
  • Sampson, R. J., & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review, 32(4), 777–804. doi:10.2307/827739
  • Schafer, J. A., Huebner, B. M., & Bynum, T. S. (2003). Citizen perceptions of police services: Race, neighborhood context, and community policing. Police Quarterly, 6(4), 440–468. doi:10.1177/1098611102250459
  • Scott, A. (2015). Americans ok with police drones: Private ownership, not so much. Reuters/Ipsos Online Poll. Retrieved April 19, 2016, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/05/us-usa-drones-poll-idUSKBN0L91EE20150205
  • Skogan, W. G. (2005). Citizen satisfaction with police encounters. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 298–321. doi:10.1177/1098611104271086
  • Skogan, W. G. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing and Society, 16(2), 99–126. doi:10.1080/10439460600662098
  • Skogan, W. G., & Frydl, K. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems. 14 C.F.R. § 107. (2016).
  • Sousa, W. H., Miethe, T. D., & Sakiyama, M. (2015). Body worn cameras on police: Results from a national survey of public attitudes. Las Vegas, NV: University of Nevada Las Vegas: Center for Crime and Justice Policy.
  • Sousa, W. H., Miethe, T. D., & Sakiyama, M. (2017). Inconsistencies in public opinion of body-worn cameras on police: Transparency, trust, and improved police-citizen relationships. Policing: A Journal of policy and Practice, 1–9. doi:10.1093/police/pax015
  • Stephens, B. J., & Sinden, P. G. (2000). Victims voices: Domestic assault victims’ perceptions of police demeanor. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(5), 534–547. doi:10.1177/088626000015005006
  • Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548. doi:10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
  • Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x
  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice – A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 431–505). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99. doi:10.1177/0002716203262627
  • Tyler, T. R. (2005). Policing in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 322–342. doi:10.1177/1098611104271105
  • Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Wakslak, C. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42(2), 253–282. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00520.x
  • Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2005). Determinants of public satisfaction with the police. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 279–297. doi:10.1177/1098611104271106
  • Westphal, L. J. (2004). The in-car camera: Value and impact. Police Chief Magazine, 71(8), 59–67.
  • Wolfe, S. E., Nix, J., Kaminski, R., & Rojek, J. (2016). Is the effect of procedural justice on police legitimacy invariant? Testing the generality of procedural justice and competing antecedents of legitimacy. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 253–282. doi:10.1007/s10940-015-9263-8
  • Xie, M., Pogarsky, G., Lynch, J. P., & McDowall, D. (2006). Prior police contact and subsequent victim reporting: Results from the NCVS. Justice Quarterly, 23(4), 481–501. doi:10.1080/07418820600985339

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.