Variations in community sentiment toward affirmative consent policies

References

• Ackerman, D. (2020). Before face masks, Americans went to war against seat belts. Business Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/when-americans-went-to-war-against-seat-belts-2020-5
   Google Scholar
• Antioch College. (2020). Sexual offense prevention policy (SOPP) & Title IX. Retrieved from https://antiochcollege.edu/campus-life/sexual-offense-prevention-policy-title-ix/
   Google Scholar
• Carle, R. (2014). The trouble with campus rape tribunals. Public Discourse. Retrieved from http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2014/07/13369
   Google Scholar
• Chomos, J.C., & Miller, M.K. (2015). Understanding how individual differences are related to community sentiment toward safe haven laws using a student sample. In M.K. Miller, J.A. Blumenthal, & J. Chamberlain (Eds.), Handbook of community sentiment (pp. 83–97). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, J.N., & Burnett, S. (2017). Affirmative consent: What do college student leaders think about “yes means yes” as the standard for sexual behavior? American Journal of Sexuality Education, 12(3), 201–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J.A. (1998). How big are nonverbal sex differences? The case of smiling and sensitivity to nonverbal cues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-03342-004
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R. (1989). Noncompliance and the limits of coercion: The problematic enforcement of unpopular laws. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 12(4/5), 533–545.
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K.N., Peterson, Z.D., Sanders, S.A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, E.G., Camp, S.D., Clark, A., & Jiang, S. (2011). The impact of information on death penalty support, revisited. Crime and Delinquency, 57(4), 572–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. (2017). University adjudication of sexual assault: How affirmative consent can help close the gap. Southwestern Journal of International Law, 23, 351–373.
   Google Scholar
• McKimmie, B.M., Masser, B.M., & Bongiorno, R. (2014). What counts as rape? The effect of offense prototypes, victim stereotypes, and participant gender on how the complainant and defendant are perceived. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(12), 2273–2303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M.K., & Chamberlain, J. (2015). “There Ought to Be a Law!”: Understanding community sentiment. In M.K. Miller, J.A. Blumenthal, & J. Chamberlain (Eds.), Handbook of community sentiment (pp. 3–28). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M.K., & Thomas, A. (2015). Understanding changes in community sentiment about drug use during pregnancy using a repeated measures design. In M.K. Miller, J.A. Blumenthal, & J. Chamberlain (Eds.), Handbook of community sentiment (pp. 113–128). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M.K. (2020). Judgments about sexual assault vary depending on whether an affirmative consent policy or a “no means no” policy is applied. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 12(3), 163–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M.K., Alvarez, M.J., & Weaver, J. (2018). Empirical evidence for AMBER alert as crime control theater: A comparison of student and community samples. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(2), 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M.K., Wood, S., & Chomos, J.C. (2014). Relationships between support for the death penalty and cognitive processing: A comparison of students and community members. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 731–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert, J., & Miller, M.K. (2017). Social cognitive processes and attitudes toward legal actions: Does receiving information affect community sentiment? Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 13, 70–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (2006). Restorative justice and procedural justice: Dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 307–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of California. (2020). Sexual violence and sexual harassment. Retrieved from https://policy.ucop.edu/doc/4000385/SVSH
   Google Scholar
• White, M.J., Cunningham, L.C., & Titchener, K. (2011). Young drivers’ optimism bias for accident risk and driving skill: Accountability and insight experience manipulations. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(4), 1309–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K.N. (2018). Barriers to the success of affirmative consent initiatives: An application of the social ecological model. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 13, 324–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K., & Allen, A. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 591–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelderman, L.A., Miller, M.K., Forsythe, S., & Sicafuse, L. (2018). Understanding crime control theater: Do sample type, gender, and emotions relate to support for crime control theater policies? Criminal Justice Review, 43(2), 147–173.
   Google Scholar