Affirmative Consent on campus: student understanding, perceptions of effectiveness, and behavioral change

References

• Bennett, J. (2016). Campus Sex … With a Syllabus. The New York Times, 1–10. Accessed 29 April 2021. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/10/fashion/sexual-consent-assault-college-campuses.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Beres, M. (2010). Sexual miscommunication? Untangling assumptions about sexual communication between casual sex partners. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12(1), 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumell, L.E., & Huemmer, J. (2019). Reassessing balance: News coverage of Donald Trump’s Access Hollywood scandal before and during #metoo. Journalism, 1–19. doi:10.1177/1464884918821522
   Google Scholar
• Borges, A.M., Banyard, V.L., & Moynihan, M.M. (2008). Clarifying consent: Prevention of sexual assault on college campus. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 36(1–2), 75–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S.H., Townsend, R., Lee, H., Thomas, G., & Bruce, C. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, J.N., & Burnett, S. (2017). AC: What do college student leaders think About “Yes Means Yes” as the standard for sexual behavior? American Journal of Sexuality Education, 12(3), 201–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardis, C.M., Kraft, K.M., & Gidycz, C.A. (2021). “Miscommunication” and undergraduate women’s conceptualizations of sexual assault: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), 33–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabiano, P.M., Perkins, H.W., Berkowitz, A., Linkenbach, J., & Stark, C. (2003). Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: Evidence for a social norms approach. Journal of American College Health, 52(3), 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner, L. (2017). Sexual consent as a scientific subject: A literature review. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 12(4), 451–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2021). Best practice in consent education. Unpublished notes. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology (QUT).
   Google Scholar
• Flood, M., Fergus, L., & Heenan, M. (2009). Respectful relationships education: Violence prevention and respectful relationships education in Victorian secondary schools. Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, State of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Glace, A.M. (2018). AC endorsement and peer norms supporting sexual violence among vulnerable students on college campuses (Dissertations and theses). Paper 4473. doi:10.15760/etd.6357
   Google Scholar
• Halley, J. (2016). The move to AC. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 42(1), 257–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K.L. (2018). Yes means yes and no means no, but both these mantras need to go: Communication myths in consent education and anti-rape activism. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(2), 155–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, S.E., Muehlenhard, C.L. (1999). “By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36 (3), 258–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J.S., Khan, S.R., Wamboldt, A., & Mellins, C.A. (2019). Social dimensions of sexual consent among cisgender heterosexual college students: Insights from ethnographic research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(1), 26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T.P. (2004). Understanding sexual consent: An empirical investigation of the normative script for young heterosexual adults. In M. Cowling & P. Reynolds (Eds.), Making sense of sexual consent (pp. 209–225). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T.P., & Broussea, M.M. (2010). The consent scale-revised: Development, reliability, preliminary validity. Journal of Sex Research, 47(5), 420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM CORP. (2017). IBM SPSS statistics: Version 25. Armonk, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• It’s On Us. (2018, October). https://www.itsonus.org
   Google Scholar
• Javidi, H., Maheux, A.J., Widman, L., Kamke, K., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Peterson, Z.D. (2020). Understanding adolescents’ attitudes toward AC. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(9), 1100–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A.M., & Hoover, S.M. (2015). The potential of sexual consent interventions on college campuses: A literature review on the barriers to establishing affirmative sexual consent. Pure Insights, 4(1), 5.
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K.N. (2015). “Yes Means Yes”? Sexual consent policy and college students. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(2), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K.N., Manning, J., & Hunt, M. (2018). Sexual consent in and out of the bedroom: Disjunctive views of heterosexual college students. Women’s Studies in Communication, 41(2), 117–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K.N., Marcantonio, T.L., & Hunt, M.E. (2017). College students’ sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: A qualitative investigation. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(4), 237–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K.N., & Peterson, Z.D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K.N., Peterson, Z.D., Sanders, S.A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualization and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantor, L., Levitz, N., & Holstrom, A. (2020). Support for sex education and teenage pregnancy prevention programmes in the USA: Results from a national survey of likely voters. Sex Education, 20(3), 239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilimnik, C.D., & Humphreys, T. (2018). Understanding sexual consent and nonconsensual sexual experiences in undergraduate women: The role of identification and rape myth acceptance. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 27(3), 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimble, M., Neacsiu, A.D., Flack, W.F., Jr., & Horner, J. (2008). Risk of unwanted sex for college women: Evidence for a red zone. Journal of American College Health, 57(3), 331–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klement, K.R., Sagarin, B.J., & Lee, E.M. (2017). Participating in a culture of consent may be associated with lower rape-supportive beliefs. Journal of Sex Research, 54(1), 130–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, C.P., Lindquist, C.H., Warner, T.D., Fisher, B.S., & Martin, S.L. (2007). The campus sexual assault (CSA) study: Final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• LaBore, K. (2018). Yes means yes but does it work?: An empirical investigation on the performance of AC policies on heterosexual sexual assault scenarios (Doctoral dissertation). The University of North Dakota.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. (2017). University adjudication of sexual assault: How AC can help close the gap. Southwestern Journal of International Law, 23, 351–373. http://www.consented.ca/consent/what-is-consent
   Google Scholar
• Martens, M.P., Page, J.C., Mowry, E.S., Damann, K.M., Taylor, K.K., & Cimini, M.D. (2006). Differences between actual and perceived student norms: An examination of alcohol use, drug use, and sexual behavior. Journal of American College Health, 54(5), 295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, S., Wood, L., Cusano, J., & Macri, L.M. (2019). Campus sexual assault: Future directions for research. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 31(3), 270–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M.K. (2020a). Judgments about sexual assault vary depending on whether an AC policy or a “no means no” policy is applied. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 12(3), 163–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M.K. (2020b). Variations in community sentiment toward AC policies. Criminal Justice Studies, 34(2) , 173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C.L., Humphreys, T.P., Jozkowski, K.N., & Peterson, Z.D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 457–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, B., & Becker, P. (2018). Exploring definitions and prevalence of verbal sexual coercion and its relationship to consent to unwanted sex: Implications for AC standards on college campuses. Behavioral Sciences, 8(69), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, T.N., Branch, K.A., Fleury-Steiner, R.E., & Kafonek, K. (2017). A feminist analysis of campus sexual assault policies: Results from a national sample. Family Relations, 66(1), 104–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, K.M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65(11–12), 774–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaluk, J.K., Todd, L.M., Milhausen, R., Lachowsky, N.J., & Undergraduate Research Group in Sexuality (URGiS). (2014). Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: Conceptualization and measurement. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 516–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumlich, E.J., & Fisher, W.A. (2020). An exploration of factors that influence enactment of AC behaviors. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(9), 1108–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, N., & Hovick, S.R. (2018). A schema of denial: The influence of rape myth acceptance on beliefs, attitudes, and processing of AC campaign messages. Journal of Health Communication, 23(6), 505–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trottier, D., Benbouriche, M., & Bonneville, V. (2021). A meta-analysis on the association between rape myth acceptance and sexual coercion perpetration. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(3), 375–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., & Panagopoulos, C. (2019). The O’Reilly factor: An ideological bias in judgments about sexual harassment. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 198–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M.W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K.N. (2018). Barriers to the success of AC initiatives: An application of the social ecological model. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 13(3), 324–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar