References
- American Bar Association (1983). Model rules of professional conduct. Retrieved from January 30, 2024 from https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents/
- American Bar Association (2010). Model code of judicial conduct. Retrieved from January 30, 2024 from https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_code_of_judicial_conduct/
- Armour, M.P. (2002). Experiences of covictims of homicide: Implications for research and practice. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 3(2), 109–124. doi:10.1177/15248380020032002
- Arrigo, B., & Williams, C. (2003). Victim vices, victim voices, and impact statements: On the place of emotion and the role of restorative justice in capital sentencing. Crime & Delinquency, 49(4), 603–626. doi:10.1177/0011128703252408
- Beloof, D.E., & Cassell, P.G. (2005). The crime victim’s right to attend the trial: The reascendent national consensus. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 9, 481–546.
- Berg, B. (2007). An introduction to ontent analysis. In B.L. Berg (Ed.), Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (pp. 238–267). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Boelen, P.A., de Keijser, J., & Smid, G. (2015). Cognitive–behavioral variables mediate the impact of violent loss on post-loss psychopathology. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, & Policy, 7(4), 382–390. doi:10.1037/tra0000018
- Bucy, P.H. (2010). Courtroom conduct by spectators. University of Louisville Law Review, 48, 579–611. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1371765
- Cassell, P.G. (1999). Barbarians at the gates? A reply to the critics of the victims’ rights amendment. Utah Law Review, 1999, 479–544. doi:10.2139/ssrn.174649
- Center for Victim Research (2019). Losing a loved one to homicide: What we know about homicide co-victims from research and practice evidence. Retrieved from https://ncvc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/item/1440/CVR%20Research%20Syntheses_Homicide%20Covictims_Report.pdf?sequence=1
- City of Savannah Annual Report. (2004). Courtroom conduct. Savannah, GA.
- Clarke, C.T. (1991). Missed manners in courtroom decorum. Maryland Law Review, 50, 945–1027.
- Connolly, J., & Gordon, R. (2015). Co-victims of homicide: A systematic review of the literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 16(4), 494–505. doi:10.1177/1524838014557285
- Crime victims’ rights act of 2004, 18 U.S.C. 2004. §. 3771 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title18/pdf/USCODE-2011-title18-partIIchap237-sec3771.pdf
- Dahlberg, L. (2009). Emotional tropes in the courtroom: On representation of affect and emotion in legal court proceedings. Law and Humanities, 3(2), 175–205. doi:10.1080/17521483.2009.11423767
- Dunn, C. (2006, October). Column: Fair trials and courtroom spectator expression. New York Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved on October, 23, 2007, from http://www.nyclu.org/node/761
- Eikenberry, K. (1987). Victims of crime/victims of justice. Wayne Law Review, 34, 29–49.
- Englebrecht, C.M. (2012). Where do I stand?: An exploration of the rules that regulate victim participation in the criminal justice system. Victims & Offenders, 7(2), 161–184. doi:10.1080/15564886.2012.657290
- Englebrecht, C.M., Mason, D.T., & Adams, M.J. (2014). The experiences of homicide victims’ families with the criminal justice system: An exploratory study. Violence & Victims, 29(3), 407–421. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D12-00151
- Final Report of the President’s task force on victims of crime. (1982). Washington, DC: Office for Victims of Crime. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ovc/87299.pdf
- Gardner, N.T. (1986). Cameras in the courtroom: Guidelines for state criminal trials. Michigan Law Review, 84(3), 475–531. doi:10.2307/1289011
- Gekoski, A., Adler, J.R., & Gray, J.M. (2013). Interviewing women bereaved by homicide: Reports of secondary victimization by the criminal justice system. International Review of Victimology, 19(3), 307–329. doi:10.1177/0269758013494136
- Gibbs, J.P. (1982). Social control: Views from the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Goldschmidt, J. (2008). “Order in the court!”: Constitutional issues in the law of courtroom decorum. Hamline Law Review, 31, 1–102.
- Goodrum, S. (2019). After homicide: Victims’ families in the criminal justice system. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
- Goodrum, S.D., & Stafford, M.C. (2001). Homicide, bereavement, and the criminal justice system, final report. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
- Goodrum, S., & Stafford, M.C. (2003). The management of emotions in the criminal justice system. Sociological Focus, 36(3), 179–196. doi:10.1080/00380237.2003.10570723
- Herman, J.L. (2003). The mental health of crime victims: Impact of legal intervention. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(2), 159–166. doi: 10.1023/A:1022847223135
- Hoffman, J. (2003). Revenge or mercy? Some thoughts about survivor opinion evidence in death penalty cases. Cornell Law Review, 88, 530–542.
- Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Kan. Const. art. XV, § 15. 2023.
- Kitner, S. (2008). The need and means to restrict spectators from wearing buttons at criminal trials. Review of Litigation, 27, 733–768.
- Kristensen, P., Weisaeth, L., & Heir, T. (2012). Bereavement and mental health after sudden and violent losses: A review. Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 75(1), 76–97. doi:10.1521/psyc.2012.75.1.76
- Kunst, M., de Groot, G., Meester, J., & van Doorn, J. (2021). The impact of victim impact statements on legal decisions in criminal proceedings: A systematic review of the literature across jurisdictions and decision types. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 56, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2020.101512
- Lind, M.E. (2008). Hearts on their sleeves: Symbolic displays of emotion by spectators in criminal trials. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 98, 1147–1170.
- Mass. Stat. Ch. 258B § 3.v. 2018.
- Miller, L. (2009). Family survivors of homicide: I. Symptoms, syndromes, and reaction patterns. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 37(1), 67–79. doi:10.1080/01926180801960625
- Minnesota Supreme Court. (1996). Rules of decorum. C4-96-2073. Retrieved on October 23, 2007, from http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/archive/supct/9610/96-2073.htm
- Miss. Code Ann. § 99-36-5 (2001).
- National Crime Victim Law Institute. (2022). Victim rights technical assistance. Retrieved on February 29, 2024 from https://ncvli.org/training-and-technical-assistance/
- Neb. Const. art. I, sec. 28, 1996.
- N.J.S.A. § 52:4B-36. 2012.
- Nor. Dak. Stat. § 12.1-34-04 (8). 2020.
- Office for Victims of Crime. February 29, 2024 Training and technical assistance center. https://www.ovcttac.gov.
- Office for Victims of Crime. (2001). The crime victim’s right to be present. Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
- Office for Victims of Crime. (2010). Achieving excellence: Model standards for serving victims & survivors of crime. Retrieved on February 13, 2024 from https://ovc.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh226/files/model-standards/6/index.html.
- Office of Victims of Crime. (2007). The judiciary. Retrieved from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/new/directions/pdftxt/chap4.txt
- Peabody, B. (2007). Constitutional etiquette and the fate of Supreme Court TV. Michigan Law Review, 106, 19–23.
- Randall County. (2007). Honorable Jerry Bigham, justice of the peace. Randall County, Texas. Retrieved from http://www.randallcounty.org/jp/jp1/default.htm
- Reed, M.D. (2022). The administration of death notifications in murder cases: Retelling the secondary victimization experiences of homicide co-victims. Criminal Justice Studies, Advance Online Publication, 35(4), 1–21. doi:10.1080/1478601X.2022.2138985
- Reed, M.D., & Blackwell, B.S. (2006). Secondary victimization among families of homicide victims: The impact of the justice process on co-victims’ psychological adjustment and service utilization. In J.R. Acker & D.R. Karp (Eds.), Wounds that do not bind (pp. 253–271). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
- Reed, M.D., & Caraballo, K. 2021. Voice of the victims: Accounts of secondary victimization with the court system among homicide co-victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–30. advance online publication 10.1177/0886260521989732
- Reed, M.D., Dabney, D.A., Tapp, S., & Ishoy, G.A. (2019). Tense relationships between homicide co-victims and detectives in the wake of murder. Deviant Behavior, 40, 1–19. doi:10.1080/01639625.2019.1574256
- Rheingold, A.A., & Williams, J.L. (2015). Survivors of homicide: Mental health outcomes, social support, and service use among a community-based sample. Violence & Victims, 30(5), 870–883. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00026
- Sarat, A. (2001). When the state kills: Capital punishment and the American condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Spungen, D. (1998). Homicide: The hidden victims. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Stenross, B., & Kleinman, S. (1989). The highs and lows of emotional labor: Detectives’ encounters with criminals and victims. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 17(4), 435–452. doi:10.1177/089124189017004003
- Superior Court of California. (2001). Rule 2.9 General courtroom behavior. Administration of the courts: Courtroom decorum. Retrieved from February 29, 2024 from https://www.mono.courts.ca.gov/system/files/localrules-rule2.pdf.
- Tobolowsky, P.N. (1999). Victim participation in the criminal justice process: Fifteen years after the President’s task force on victims of crime. Criminal and Civil Confinement, 25, 21–105.
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2022). Court decorum. Fed. Cir. R. 28 U.S.C.A.
- U.S. Court of Federal Claims. (January 31, 2024). Courtroom decorum. Retrieved from https://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/courtroom_decorum.
- U.S. Courts. (2019). Code of conduct for United States judges. Retrieved from February 13, 2024 from https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/code_of_conduct_for_united_states_judges_effective_march_12_2019.pdf.
- U.S. Department of Justice. (1998). New directions from the field: Victims’ rights and services for the 21st century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime.
- U.S. Supreme Court. Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S.
- U.S. Supreme Court. Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501.
- U.S. Supreme Court. Holbrook v. Flynn, 475 U.S. 560.
- U.S. Supreme Court. Williams v. Artuz, 237 F.3d 147.
- van Denderen, M., de Keijser, J., Huisman, M., & Boelen, P.A. (2016). Prevalence and correlates of self-rated posttraumatic stress disorder and complicated grief in a community-based sample of homicidally bereaved individuals. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(2), 207–227. doi:10.1177/0886260514555368
- Van Denderen, M., de Keijser, J., Kleen, M., & Boelen, P.A. (2015). Psychopathy among homicidally bereaved individuals: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(1), 70–80. doi:10.1177/1524838013515757
- Woody, T.F. (2018). A client’s guide to courtroom behavior. American Bar Association. Retrieved on January 31, 2024 from https://www.americanbar.org/groups/familylaw/publications/family-advocate/2018/summer/1summer2018-woody/
- Zehr, H. (2001). Transcending: Reflections of crime victims. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.
- Zheng, Y. (2006). On the docket: Buttons and bows to courtroom decorum. Medill News Service, Retrieved on October 23, 2007 from http://docket.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/003704print.php