Practical diagnostic algorithms for Chagas disease: a focus on low resource settings

References

• Pérez-Molina JA, Molina I. Chagas Disease. Lancet. 2018;391:82–94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31612-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAHO Factsheet: Chagas disease in the Americas for public Health workers. [cited 2023 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/en/documents/factsheet-chagas-disease-americas-public-health-workers
   Google Scholar
• Picado A, Cruz I, Redard-Jacot M, et al. The burden of congenital Chagas disease and implementation of molecular diagnostic tools in Latin America. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:1069. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schijman AG, Alonso-Padilla J, Longhi SA, et al. Parasitological, serological and molecular diagnosis of acute and chronic Chagas disease: from Field to laboratory. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2022;117. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760200444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAHO. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chagas Disease; (WA) DC: Pan-American Health Organization. 2019 [cited 2023 Jul 20]. Available from: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/49653/9789275120439_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feilij H, Muller L, Cappa G. Direct micromethod for diagnosis of acute and congenital Chagas’ disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;18:327. doi: 10.1128/JCM.18.2.327-330.1983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Castro AM, Luquetti AO, Rassi A, et al. Detection of parasitemia profiles by blood culture after treatment of human chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Parasitol Res. 2006;99:379–383. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0172-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens L, Dorn PL, Schmidt JO, et al. Kissing bugs. The Vectors of Chagas. Adv Parasitol. 2011;75. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385863-4.00008-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besuschio SA, Llano Murcia M, Benatar AF, et al. Analytical sensitivity and specificity of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) kit prototype for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in human blood samples. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005779. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0005779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal D, Ghosh P, Khan MAA, et al. Mobile suitcase laboratory for Rapid detection of Leishmania donovani using recombinase polymerase amplification assay. Parasites Vectors. 2016;9:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1572-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suescún-Carrero SH, Tadger P, Cuellar CS, et al. Rapid diagnostic tests and ELISA for diagnosing chronic Chagas disease: systematic revision and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16:e0010860. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0010860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egüez KE, Alonso-Padilla J, Terán C, et al. Rapid Diagnostic Tests Duo as Alternative to Conventional Serological Assays for Conclusive Chagas Disease Diagnosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(4):e0005501. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0005501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano D, Rojas L, Méndez S, et al. Use of Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for conclusive diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease – Field implementation in the Bolivian Chaco region. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007877. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0007877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Albizu C, Danesi E, Piorno P, et al. Rapid diagnostic tests for Trypanosoma cruzi infection: field Evaluation of two registered kits in a region of endemicity and a region of nonendemicity in Argentina. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01140-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendicino D, Colussi C, Moretti E. Simultaneous use of two Rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of Chagas disease. Trop Doct. 2019;49(1):23–26. doi: 10.1177/0049475518813792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suescún-Carrero SH, Salamanca-Cardozo LP, Pinazo MJ, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of two Rapid tests for the diagnosis of infection by Trypanosoma cruzi in a Colombian population. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(6):e0009483. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0009483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinazo MJ, Gascon J, Alonso-Padilla J. How effective are Rapid diagnostic tests for Chagas disease?. Exp Rev Anti-Infective Ther. 2021;19(12):1489–1494. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1873130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verani JR, Seitz A, Gilman RH, et al. Geographic variation in the sensitivity of recombinant antigen-based Rapid tests for chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:410–415. doi: 10.4269/AJTMH.2009.80.410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Sesquen YE, Saldaña A, Patino Nava D, et al. Evaluation of 2 lateral flow Rapid tests in the diagnosis of Chagas disease in the Washington Metropolitan Area. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8: doi: 10.1093/OFID/OFAB096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truyens C, Dumonteil E, Alger J, et al. Geographic variations in test reactivity for the serological diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01062-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abras A, Gállego M, Llovet T, et al. Serological diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease: is it time for a change? J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:1566–1572. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00142-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila HA, Pereira JB, Thiemann O, et al. Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in blood specimens of chronic chagasic patients by polymerase chain reaction amplification of kinetoplast minicircle DNA: comparison with serology and Xenodiagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:2421. doi: 10.1128/JCM.31.9.2421-2426.1993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britto C, Cardoso MA, Morel CM, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi: parasite detection and strain discrimination in chronic chagasic patients from northeastern Brazil using PCR amplification of kinetoplast DNA and nonradioactive hybridization. Exp Parasitol. 1995;81:462–471. doi: 10.1006/EXPR.1995.1139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser DR, Kirchhoff LV, Donelson JE. Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi by DNA amplification using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:1477. doi: 10.1128/JCM.27.7.1477-1482.1989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy T, Cura CI, Ramirez JC, et al. Analytical performance of a multiplex real-time PCR assay using TaqMan probes for quantification of Trypanosoma cruzi satellite DNA in blood samples. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(1):e2000 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez JC, Cura CI, Da Cruz Moreira O, et al. Analytical validation of quantitative real-time PCR methods for quantification of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood samples from Chagas disease patients. J Mol Diagn. 2015;17:605–615. doi: 10.1016/J.JMOLDX.2015.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schijman AG, Bisio M, Orellana L, et al. International study to evaluate PCR methods for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood samples from Chagas disease patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(1):e931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porrás AI, Yadon ZE, Altcheh J, et al. Target product profile (TPP) for Chagas disease point-of-care diagnosis and assessment of response to treatment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(6):e0003697. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0003697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cura CI, Ramírez JC, Rodríguez M, et al. Comparative study and analytical verification of PCR methods for the diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease. J Mol Diagn. 2017;19:673–681. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile L, Ciruela P, Requena-Méndez A, et al. Epidemiology of congenital Chagas disease 6 years after implementation of a public Health surveillance System, Catalonia, 2010 to 2015. Eurosurveillance. 2019;24:1. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.26.19-00011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez C, Nolder D, García-Mingo A, et al. Diagnosis and clinical management of Chagas disease: an increasing challenge in non-endemic areas. Res Rep Trop Med. 2022;13:25–40. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S278135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benatar AF, Danesi E, Besuschio SA, et al. Prospective multicenter Evaluation of real time PCR kit prototype for early diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease. EBioMedicine. 2021;69:103450. doi: 10.1016/J.EBIOM.2021.103450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAHO EMTCT Plus. Framework for elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B, and Chagas. Washington DC: Pan American Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-Padilla J, Gallego M, Schijman AG, et al. Molecular diagnostics for Chagas disease: up to date and novel methodologies. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017;17(7):699–710. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1338566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava P, Prasad D. Isothermal nucleic acid amplification and its uses in modern diagnostic technologies. 3 Biotech. 2023;13:200. doi: 10.1007/S13205-023-03628-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jimenez-Coello M, Shelite T, Castellanos-Gonzalez A, et al. Efficacy of recombinase polymerase amplification to diagnose Trypanosoma cruzi infection in dogs with cardiac alterations from an endemic area of Mexico. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018;18:417–423. doi: 10.1089/VBZ.2017.2258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besuschio SA, Picado A, Muñoz-Calderón A, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi loop-mediated isothermal amplification (Trypanosoma cruzi Loopamp) kit for detection of congenital, acute and Chagas disease reactivation. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:1–17. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0008402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisio M, Rivero R, Gonzalez N·, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of two molecular tools for diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease. Mol Diagn Ther. 2021;25:791–801. doi: 10.1007/s40291-021-00553-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Calderón AA, Besuschio SA, Wong S, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA for point-of-care follow-up of anti-parasitic treatment of Chagas disease. Microorganisms. 2022;10(5):909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhi SA, García Casares LJ, Muñoz-Calderón AA, et al. Combination of ultra-Rapid DNA purification (PURE) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for Rapid detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in dried blood spots. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17:e0011290. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0011290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed HA, MacLeod ET, Hide G, et al. The best practice for preparation of samples from FTA®cards for diagnosis of blood borne infections using African trypanosomes as a model System. Parasites Vectors. 2011;4(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oriero EC, Okebe J, Jacobs J, et al. Diagnostic performance of a novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay targeting the apicoplast genome for malaria diagnosis in a field setting in Sub-Saharan Africa. Malar J. 2015;14(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0926-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wehrendt DP, Alonso-Padilla J, Liu B, et al. Development and Evaluation of a three-dimensional printer–based DNA extraction method coupled to loop mediated isothermal amplification for point-of-care diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease in endemic regions. J Mol Diagn. 2021;23:389–398. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peverengo LM, Rodeles LM, Maldonado C, et al. Congenital Chagas disease: development and assessment of a specific IgM capture-based assay for diagnosis of transmission. Acta Trop. 2021;213:105738. doi: 10.1016/J.ACTATROPICA.2020.105738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messenger LA, Gilman RH, Verastegui M, et al. Toward improving early diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease in an endemic setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:268. doi: 10.1093/CID/CIX277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez P, Truyens C, Alonso-Vega C, et al. Dosificación de Anticuerpos IgM e IgA Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi En Sangre de Recién Nacidos de Madres Con Serología Positiva Para Chagas. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2005;2005:62–64.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Anti-Trypanosoma Cruzi Assays: Operational Characteristics, Report 1; Geneva. 2010 [cited 2023 Jul 19]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/75844?locale-attribute=ru&mode=full
   Google Scholar
• Flores-Chávez M, de Fuentes I, Gárate T, et al. Diagnóstico de Laboratorio de La Enfermedad de Chagas Importada. Enferm Infec Microbiol Clin. 2007;25:29–37. doi: 10.1157/13111835
   Google Scholar
• Riera C, Verges M, Iniesta L, et al. Identification of a Western blot pattern for the specific diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in human sera. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:412. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meira WSF, Galvão LMC, Gontijo ED, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi Recombinant Complement Regulatory Protein: A Novel Antigen for Use in an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Diagnosis of Chagas’ Disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:3735. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3735-3740.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caicedo Díaz RA, Forsyth C, Bernal OA, et al. Comparative Evaluation of immunoassays to improve access to diagnosis for Chagas disease in Colombia. Inter J Infect Dis. 2019;87:100–108. doi: 10.1016/J.IJID.2019.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo AB, Berne MEA. Conventional serological performance in diagnosis of Chagas’ disease in Southern Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis. 2013;17:174–178. doi: 10.1016/J.BJID.2012.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos FLN, De Souza WV, Da Silva Barros M, et al. Chronic Chagas disease diagnosis: a Comparative performance of commercial enzyme immunoassay tests. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94:1034. doi: 10.4269/AJTMH.15-0820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiby DA, Wendel S, Takaoka DT, et al. Serologic testing for Trypanosoma cruzi: comparison of radioimmunoprecipitation assay with commercially available indirect immunofluorescence assay, indirect hemagglutination assay, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:639. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.2.639-642.2000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murcia L, Carrilero B, Saura D, et al. Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de La Enfermedad de Chagas. Enferm Infec Microbiol Clin. 2013;31:26–34. doi: 10.1016/S0213-005X(13)70111-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vircell Microbiologists CHAGAS IFA. [cited 2023 Jul 19]. Available form: https://www.vircell.com/producto/chagas-ifa/
   Google Scholar
• Kelly EA, Bulman CA, Gunderson EL, et al. Comparative performance of latest-generation and FDA-Cleared serology tests for the diagnosis of Chagas disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59: doi: 10.1128/JCM.00158-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luquetti AO, Espinoza B, Martínez I, et al. Performance levels of four Latin American laboratories for the serodiagnosis of Chagas disease in Mexican sera samples. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104:797–800. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762009000500023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán-Gómez D, López-Monteon A, De La Soledad Lagunes-Castro M, et al. Highly Discordant Serology against Trypanosoma cruzi in Central Veracruz, Mexico: Role of the Antigen Used for Diagnostic. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8: doi: 10.1186/S13071-015-1072-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinquanta L, Fontana DE, Bizzaro N. Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Technology: What Does It Change in Autoantibody Detection? Auto-Immun Highlights. 2017;8. doi: 10.1007/S13317-017-0097-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pérez-Ayala A, Fradejas I, Rebollo L, et al. Usefulness of the ARCHITECT Chagas® assay as a single test for the diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease. Trop Med Int Health. 2018;23:634–640. doi: 10.1111/TMI.13063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores-Chávez M, Cruz I, Rodríguez M, et al. Comparison of conventional and non-conventional serological tests for the diagnosis of imported Chagas disease in Spain. Enferm Infec Microbiol Clin. 2010;28:284–293. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2009.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores-Chavez M, Cruz I, Nieto J, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of an Operon immunochromatographic test in serum and whole-blood samples for the diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Spain, an area of nonendemicity. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:1353. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00227-12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Navarro M, Perez-Ayala A, Guionnet A, et al. Targeted screening and health education for Chagas disease tailored to at-risk migrants in Spain, 2007 to 2010. Eurosurveillance. 2011;16:19973. doi: 10.2807/ESE.16.38.19973-EN/CITE/PLAINTEXT
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Camargo CL, Albajar-Viñas P, Wilkins PP, et al. Comparative Evaluation of 11 Commercialized Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Detecting Trypanosoma cruzi Antibodies in Serum Banks in Areas of Endemicity and Nonendemicity. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(7):2506–2512. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00144-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah V, Ferrufino L, Gilman RH, et al. Field Evaluation of the InBios Chagas detect plus Rapid test in serum and whole-blood specimens in Bolivia. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21(12):1645–1649. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00609-14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitman JD, Bulman CA, Gunderson EL, et al. Chagas disease serological test performance in U.S. Blood donor specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57: doi: 10.1128/JCM.01217-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIND. Panorama Tecnológico de Los Productos de Diagnóstico Para La Enfermedad de Chagas; 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 18th]. Available from: https://www.finddx.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/20221221_rep_lsc_technical_chagas_FV_ES.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barfield CA, Barney RS, Crudder CH, et al. A highly sensitive Rapid diagnostic test for Chagas disease that utilizes a recombinant Trypanosoma Cruzi Antigen. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58:814. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2087334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappuis F, Mauris A, Holst M, et al. Validation of a Rapid immunochromatographic assay for diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection among Latin-American migrants in Geneva, Switzerland. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2948. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00774-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chippaux JP, Santalla JA, Postigo JR, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of Chagas stat-pak test in Bolivia. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14:732–735. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-3156.2009.02288.X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luquetti AO, Ponce C, Ponce E, et al. Chagas’ disease diagnosis: a multicentric Evaluation of Chagas stat-pak, a Rapid immunochromatographic assay with recombinant proteins of Trypanosoma cruzi. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;46(4):265–271. doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(03)00051-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce C, Ponce E, Vinelli E, et al. Validation of a Rapid and reliable test for diagnosis of Chagas’ disease by detection of Trypanosoma cruzi-specific antibodies in blood of donors and patients in Central America. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5065. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5065-5068.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roddy P, Goiri J, Flevaud L, et al. Field Evaluation of a Rapid immunochromatographic assay for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi infection by use of whole blood. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2022. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02303-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iturra JAD, Leony LM, Medeiros FAC, et al. A multicenter Comparative study of the performance of four Rapid immunochromatographic tests for the detection of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in Brazil. Front Med. 2023;10:1031455. doi: 10.3389/FMED.2023.1031455/FULL
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji MJ, Noh JS, Cho BK, et al. Evaluation of SD BIOLINE Chagas Ab Rapid Kit. Korean J Lab Med. 2009;29:48–52. doi: 10.3343/KJLM.2009.29.1.48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martinez N, Gonzalez Arra M, Delgado D, et al. Evaluation of a Rapid test for serological diagnosis of Chagas disease, in Mendoza, Argentina. J Microbiol Exp. 2021;9:39–40. doi: 10.15406/JMEN.2021.09.00321
   Google Scholar
• Mendicino D, Stafuza M, Colussi C, et al. Diagnostic reliability of an immunochromatographic test for Chagas screening at a primary Health care centre in a rural endemic. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109:984. doi: 10.1590/0074-0276140153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta M Desarrollo y Evaluación de Una Prueba Inmunocromatográfica Para El Diagnóstico de La Infección Con Trypanosoma cruzi/Development and Evaluation of an Immunochromatographic for the Diagnosis of Infection with T. cruzi, Universidad Nacional de Asunción: Asunción. 2013 [cited 2023 Jul 18th]. Ava: https://www.conacyt.gov.py/sites/default/files/TES-BN-012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Velásquez-Ortiz N, Herrera G, Hernández C, et al. Discrete typing units of Trypanosoma Cruzi: geographical and biological distribution in the Americas. Sci Data. 2022;9(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01452-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega-Arroyo A, Flores-Chavez MD, Puente-Alcaraz J. Combined use of two Rapid tests for the conclusive diagnosis of Chagas disease: a systematic scoping review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10):e047825. doi: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-047825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanmugasundram A, Starns D, Böhme U, et al. TriTrypDB: an integrated functional genomics resource for kinetoplastida. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17:e0011058. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0011058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel-Todó L, Reche PA, Bigey P, et al. In silico design of an epitope-based Vaccine ensemble for Chagas disease. Front Immunol. 2019;10: doi: 10.3389/FIMMU.2019.02698/FULL
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingales B, Bartholomeu DC. Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity: impact on transmission cycles and Chagas disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2022;117:e210193. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760210193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci AD, Bracco L, Salas-Sarduy E, et al. The Trypanosoma cruzi antigen and Epitope Atlas: antibody specificities in Chagas disease patients across the Americas. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1–18. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37522-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Padilla J, Cortés-Serra N, Pinazo MJ, et al. Strategies to enhance access to diagnosis and treatment for Chagas disease patients in Latin America. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2019;17:145–157. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1577731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarcón De Noya B, Díaz-Bello Z, Colmenares C, et al. Update on Oral Chagas Disease Outbreaks in Venezuela: Epidemiological, Clinical and Diagnostic Approaches. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro. 2015;110:377–386. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760140285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laynez-Roldán P, Losada-Galván I, Posada E, et al. Characterization of Latin American migrants at risk for Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a non-endemic setting. Insights into initial evaluation of cardiac and digestive involvement infection in a non-endemic setting. Insights into initial evaluation of cardiac and digestive involvement. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17:e0011330. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0011330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Generalitat de Catalunya A Protocol For Screening, Diagnosis And Treatment Of Chagas Disease In Pregnant Latin American Women, Their Newborns And Other Children. 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 19]. Available form: https://scientiasalut.gencat.cat/bitstream/handle/11351/1173/protocol_cribratge_diagnostic_malaltia_chagas_embarassades_2010_ang.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Vilches M, Domínguez-Castellano A, Guerra-Martín M, et al. Cribado de Chagas En Embarazo y Neonato En Andalucía (España). An Sist Sanit Navar. 2019;42:281–290. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.0746
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xunta de Galicia Protocolo de Cribado Da Enfermidade de Chagas En Mulleres Embarazadas. 2014 [cited 2023 Jul 19th]. Available from: https://www.sergas.es/Asistencia-sanitaria/Documents/650/Protocolo%20de%20cribado%20da%20enfermidade%20de%20Chagas%20en%20mulleres%20embarazadas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Basile L, Oliveira I, Ciruela P, et al. The Current screening programme for congenital transmission of Chagas disease in Catalonia, Spain. Eurosurveillance. 2011;16(38). doi: 10.2807/ese.16.38.19972-en
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelman BW, Baral R, Zarlinda I, et al. Costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria reactive case detection using loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to microscopy in the low transmission setting of Aceh Province, Indonesia. Malar J. 2018;17(1):1–12 doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2361-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donkeng-Donfack VF, Tchatchueng-Mbougua JB, Abanda NN, et al. A cost–benefit algorithm for Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance detection during mass screening campaigns. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):1–11 doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07157-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moure Z, Angheben A, Molina I, et al. Serodiscordance in chronic Chagas disease diagnosis: a real problem in non-endemic countries. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:788–792. doi: 10.1016/J.CMI.2016.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reithinger R, Grijalva MJ, Chiriboga RF, et al. Rapid detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in human serum by use of an immunochromatographic dipstick test. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:3003. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02474-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlier Y, Altcheh J, Angheben A, et al. Congenital Chagas disease: updated recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of newborns and siblings, girls, women of childbearing age, and pregnant women. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(10):e0007694. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0007694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land KJ, Boeras DI, Chen XS, et al. REASSURED diagnostics to inform disease control strategies, strengthen health systems and improve patient outcomes. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:46. doi: 10.1038/S41564-018-0295-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes FDSNS, Perez-Molina JA, Angheben A, et al. Critical analysis of Chagas disease treatment in different countries. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2022;117: doi: 10.1590/0074-02760210034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile L, Jansà JM, Carlier Y, et al. Chagas disease in European countries: the challenge of a surveillance System. Eurosurveillance. 2011;16(37). doi: 10.2807/ese.16.37.19968-en
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar