From mystery to mechanism: can proteomics build systems-level understanding of our gut microbes?

References

• Carding S, Verbeke K, Vipond DT, et al. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015;26:26191-26199.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnière J, Raisch J, Veziant J, et al. Gut microbiota imbalance and colorectal cancer. World J Gast Genes Environ. 2016;22:501–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters WA, Xu Z, Knight R. Meta-analyses of human gut microbes associated with obesity and IBD. FEBS Lett. Fed Eur Biochem Societies. 2014;588:4223–4233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consortium T integrative H (iHMP) RN. The integrative human microbiome project: dynamic analysis of microbiome-host omics profiles during periods of human health and disease corresponding author. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;16:276–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensbergen PJ, Klychnikov OI, Bakker D, et al. A novel secreted metalloprotease (CD2830) from Clostridium difficile cleaves specific proline sequences in LPXTG cell surface proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:1231–1244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbaugh PJ, Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, et al. The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice. Sci Transl Med. 2009;1:6ra14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtman JS, Marcobal A, Sonnenburg JL, et al. Host-centric proteomics of stool: a novel strategy focused on intestinal responses to the gut microbiota. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12:3310–3318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verberkmoes NC, Russell AL, Shah M, et al. Shotgun metaproteomics of the human distal gut microbiota. ISME J. 2009;3:179–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, LeBlanc J, Truong A, et al. A metaproteomic approach to study human-microbial ecosystems at the mucosal luminal interface. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(11):e26542.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtman JS, Alsentzer E, Jaffe M, et al. The effect of microbial colonization on the host proteome varies by gastrointestinal location. ISME J. 2015;10:1170-1181.
   Google Scholar
• Chin CD, Laksanasopin T, Cheung YK, et al. Microfluidics-based diagnostics of infectious diseases in the developing world. Nat Med. 2011;17:1015–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson AR, Cantarel BL, Lamendella R, et al. Integrated metagenomics/metaproteomics reveals human host-microbiota signatures of crohn’s disease. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49138.
   Google Scholar
• Cantarel BL, Erickson AR, VerBerkmoes NC, et al. Strategies for metagenomic-guided whole-community proteomics of complex microbial environments. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27173.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Ning Z, Mayne J, et al. MetaPro-IQ: a universal metaproteomic approach to studying human and mouse gut microbiota. Microbiome. 2016;4:31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitski MM, Wilhelm M, Hahne H, et al. Approach for protein false discovery rate estimation in large proteomic data sets. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14:2394–2404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov MV, Levitsky LI, Gorshkov MV. Adaptation of decoy fusion strategy for existing multi-stage search workflows. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2016;27:1579.
   Google Scholar
• Grassl N, Kulak NA, Pichler G, et al. Ultra-deep and quantitative saliva proteome reveals dynamics of the oral microbiome. Genome Med. 2016;8:44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson JK, Baker ES. A multi-omic future for microbiome studies. at Microbiol. 2016;1:16049.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wen Z, Washburn MP, et al. Refinements to label free proteome quantitation: how to deal with peptides shared by multiple proteins. Anal Chem Am Chem Soc. 2010;82:2272–2281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtman JS, Ferreyra JA, Ng KM, et al. Host-microbiota interactions in the pathogenesis of antibiotic-associated diseases. Cell Rep. 2016;14:1049–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekirov I, Tam NM, Jogova M, et al. Antibiotic-induced perturbations of the intestinal microbiota alter host susceptibility to enteric infection. Infect Immun. 2008;76:4726–4736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly CR, Khoruts A, Staley C, et al. Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on recurrence in multiply recurrent clostridium difficile infection: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:609-616.
   Google Scholar
• Li SS, Zhu A, Benes V, et al. Durable coexistence of donor and recipient strains after fecal microbiota transplantation. Science. 2016;352:586–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovel J. Characterization of the gut microbiome using 16S or shotgun metagenomics. Evol Genomic Microbiol. 2016;7:459.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Tian RM, Gao ZM, et al. Optimal eukaryotic 18S and universal 16S/18S ribosomal RNA primers and their application in a study of symbiosis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90053.
   Google Scholar
• Bashiardes S, Zilberman-Schapira G, Elinav E. Use of metatranscriptomics in microbiome research. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2016;10:19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanhausser B, Busse D, Li N, et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature. 2011;473:337–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldbauer JR, Rodrigue S, Coleman ML, et al. Transcriptome and proteome dynamics of a light-dark synchronized bacterial cell cycle. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43432.
   Google Scholar
• Donia MS, Cimermancic P, Schulze CJ, et al. A systematic analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters in the human microbiome reveals a common family of antibiotics. Cell. 2014;158:1402–1414.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel H, Moghaddas Gholami A, Berry D, et al. High-fat diet alters gut microbiota physiology in mice. ISME J. 2014;8:295–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar