Function is what counts: how microbial community complexity affects species, proteome and pathway coverage in metaproteomics

References

• Wilpiszeski RL, Aufrecht JA, Retterer ST, et al. Soil aggregate microbial communities: towards understanding microbiome interactions at biologically relevant scales. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85(14). DOI:10.1128/AEM.00324-19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkowski PG, Fenchel T, Delong EF. The microbial engines that drive Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science. 2008;320(5879):1034–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JM. The presence, nature, and role of gut microflora in aquatic invertebrates: a synthesis. Microb Ecol. 1993;25(3):195–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S. Human colonic microbiota: ecology, physiology and metabolic potential of intestinal bacteria. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1997;222:3–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang X, Figeys D. Perspective and guidelines for metaproteomics in microbiome studies. J Proteome Res. 2019;18(6):2370–2380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar-Zepeda A, Ernestina Gody-Lozano E, Raggi L, et al. Analysis of sequencing strategies and tools for taxonomic annotation: defining standards for progressive metagenomics. Sci Rep. 2018;8. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-30515-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer E, Bushnell B, Coleman-Derr D, et al. High-resolution phylogenetic microbial community profiling. Isme J. 2016;10(8):2020–2032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju SC, Lagström S, Ellonen P, et al. Reproducibility and repeatability of six high-throughput 16S rDNA sequencing protocols for microbiota profiling. J Microbiol Methods. 2018;147:76–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates JR. Proteomics of communities: metaproteomics. J Proteome Res. 2019;18(6):2359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(9):814–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwai S, Weinmaier T, Schmidt BL, et al. Piphillin: improved prediction of metagenomic content by direct inference from human microbiomes. Plos One. 2016;11(11):e0166104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koboldt DC, Steinberg K, Larson D, et al. The next-generation sequencing revolution and its impact on genomics. Cell. 2013;155(1):27–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heather JM, Chain B. The sequence of sequencers: the history of sequencing DNA. Genomics. 2016;107(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siggins A, Gunnigle E, Abram F. Exploring mixed microbial community functioning: recent advances in metaproteomics. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012;80(2):265–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam B, Basit M, Nisar MA, et al. Proteomics: technologies and their applications. J Chromatogr Sci. 2017;55(2):182–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmes P, Bond PL. The application of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and downstream analyses to a mixed community of prokaryotic microorganisms. Environ Microbiol. 2004;6(9):911–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bergen M, Jehmlich N, Taubert M, et al. Insights from quantitative metaproteomics and protein-stable isotope probing into microbial ecology. Isme J. 2013;7(10):1877–1885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga RM, Dourado MN, Araujo WL. Microbial interactions: ecology in a molecular perspective. Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47:86–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao JQ, Tanca A, Jia B, et al. Metagenomic taxonomy-guided database-searching strategy for improving metaproteomic analysis. J Proteome Res. 2018;17(4):1596–1605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner M, Thorson E, Sharp CE, et al. Assessing species biomass contributions in microbial communities via metaproteomics. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettich RL, Pan C, Chourey K, et al. Metaproteomics: harnessing the power of high performance mass spectrometry to identify the suite of proteins that control metabolic activities in microbial communities. Anal Chem. 2013;85(9):4203–4214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer R, Kohrs F, Reichl U, et al. Metaproteomics of complex microbial communities in biogas plants. Microb Biotechnol. 2015;8(5):749–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan F, Lauria M, Scotti M, et al. Diversity of key players in the microbial ecosystems of the human body. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1). DOI:10.1038/srep15920.
   Google Scholar
• Guijas C, Montenegro-Burke JR, Warth B, et al. Metabolomics activity screening for identifying metabolites that modulate phenotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(4):316–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser GA, Larrouy-Maumus G, de Carvalho LPS. Metabolomic strategies for the identification of new enzyme functions and metabolic pathways. EMBO Rep. 2014;15(6):657–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumtaz MW, Hamid AA, Akhtar MT, et al. An overview of recent developments in metabolomics and proteomics - phytotherapic research perspectives. Front Life Sci. 2017;10(1):1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu WY, Su X, Klein MS, et al. Metabolite measurement: pitfalls to avoid and practices to follow. Annu Rev Biochem. 2017;86(1):277–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumann S, Kalkhof S, Hackermüller J, et al. Requirements and perspectives for integrating metabolomics with other omics data. Current Metabol. 2013;1(1):15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Jehmlich N, Vogt C, Lünsmann V, et al. Protein-SIP in environmental studies. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;41:26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert J, Taubert M, Jehmlich N, et al. Protein-based stable isotope probing (protein-SIP) in functional metaproteomics. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2012;31(6):683–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner M, Dong X, Hinzke T, et al. Metaproteomics method to determine carbon sources and assimilation pathways of species in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(24): E5576–E5584. doi:10.1073/pnas.1722325115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner M. Metaproteomics: much more than measuring gene expression in microbial communities. Msystems. 2019;4(3). DOI:10.1128/mSystems.00115-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst FA, Lünsmann V, Kjeldal H, et al. Enhancing metaproteomics–The value of models and defined environmental microbial systems. Proteomics. 2016;16(5):783–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muth T, Benndorf D, Reichl U, et al. Searching for a needle in a stack of needles: challenges in metaproteomics data analysis. Mol Biosyst. 2013;9(4):578–585.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Bergen M, Jehmlich N, Taubert M, et al. Insights from quantitative metaproteomics and protein-stable isotope probing into microbial ecology. Isme J. 2013;7(10):1877–1885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates JR 3rd. Recent technical advances in proteomics. F1000Res. 2019;8(F1000 Faculty Rev):351.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li L, Butcher J, et al. Advancing functional and translational microbiome research using meta-omics approaches. Microbiome. 2019;7(1). DOI:10.1186/s40168-019-0767-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmes P, Heintz-Buschart A, Bond PL. A decade of metaproteomics: where we stand and what the future holds. Proteomics. 2015;15(20):3409–3417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tress ML, Abascal F, Valencia A. Alternative splicing may not be the key to proteome complexity. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42(2):98–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devabhaktuni A, Lin S, Zhang L, et al. TagGraph reveals vast protein modification landscapes from large tandem mass spectrometry datasets. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(4):469–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, et al. A culture-independent approach to unravel uncultured bacteria and functional genes in a complex microbial community. Plos One. 2012;7(10):e47530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro-Quintero A, Ochman H. Assessing the unseen bacterial diversity in microbial communities. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7(12):3416–3425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanca A, Palomba A, Fraumene C, et al. The impact of sequence database choice on metaproteomic results in gut microbiota studies. Microbiome. 2016;4(1):51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geron A, Werner J, Wattiez R, et al. Deciphering the functioning of microbial communities: shedding light on the critical steps in metaproteomics. Front Microbiol. 2019;10. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebenhoefer H, Van Den Bossche T, Fuchs S, et al. Challenges and promise at the interface of metaproteomics and genomics: an overview of recent progress in metaproteogenomic data analysis. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2019;16(5):375–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI, Aebersold R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;4(10):1419–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox J, Mann M. Is proteomics the new genomics? Cell. 2007;130(3):395–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist P, Hummon AB. Proteomic challenges: sample preparation techniques for microgram-quantity protein analysis from biological samples. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(2):3537–3563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer R, Schallert K, Zoun R, et al. Challenges and perspectives of metaproteomic data analysis. J Biotechnol. 2017;261:24–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schape SS, Krause JL, Engelmann B, et al. The simplified human intestinal microbiota (SIHUMIx) shows high structural and functional resistance against changing transit times in in vitro bioreactors. Microorganisms. 2019;7(12):641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker N, Kunath J, Loh G, et al. Human intestinal microbiota: characterization of a simplified and stable gnotobiotic rat model. Gut Microbes. 2011;2(1):25–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krause JL, Schape SS, Engelmann B, et al. Changes in pH can modify the ability of a simplified human intestinal microbiota to stimulate MAIT cells. Eur J Immunol. 2019;49:39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald JAK, Fuentes S, Schroeter K, et al. Simulating distal gut mucosal and luminal communities using packed-column biofilm reactors and an in vitro chemostat model. J Microbiol Methods. 2015;108:36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke R, Müller M, Gaspar M, et al. Candidate Brocadiales dominates C, N and S cycling in anoxic groundwater of a pristine limestone-fracture aquifer. J Proteomics. 2017;152:153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinke C, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A, et al. Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature. 2013;499(7459):431–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling G, Wilsey B. Empirical relationships between species richness, evenness, and proportional diversity. Am Nat. 2001;158(3):286–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis SC, Yadav JS, Barrow SD, et al. Gut microbiome diversity influenced more by the Westernized dietary regime than the body mass index as assessed using effect size statistic. Microbiologyopen. 2017;6(4):e00476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macarthur RH. Patterns of species diversity. Biol Rev. 1965;40(4):510-+.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27(3):379–423.
   Google Scholar
• Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett. 2001;4(4):379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes JB, Hellmann JJ. The application of rarefaction techniques to molecular inventories of microbial diversity. Methods Enzymol. 2005;397:292–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jousset A, Bienhold C, Chatzinotas A, et al. Where less may be more: how the rare biosphere pulls ecosystems strings. Isme J. 2017;11(4):853–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpinets TV, Gopalakrishnan V, Wargo J, et al. Linking associations of rare low-abundance species to their environments by association networks. Front Microbiol. 2018;9. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas A, Hale L, Voordeckers JW, et al. Microbial functional diversity: from concepts to applications. Ecol Evol. 2019;9(20):12000–12016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haange SB, Jehmlich N. Proteomic interrogation of the gut microbiota: potential clinical impact. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2016;13(6):535–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiblinger KM, Fuchs S, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, et al. Soil and leaf litter metaproteomics-a brief guideline from sampling to understanding. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92(11):fiw180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, et al. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D286–D293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galperin MY, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, et al. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(D1):D261–D269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol. 2016;428(4):726–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge JD, Scott C, Tang Y, et al. Escherichia coli transcriptome dynamics during the transition from anaerobic to aerobic conditions. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(38):27806–27815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Angulo MT, Friedman J, et al. Mapping the ecological networks of microbial communities. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):2042.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang M, Herrmann CJ, Simonovic M, et al. Version 4.0 of PaxDb: protein abundance data, integrated across model organisms, tissues, and cell-lines. Proteomics. 2015;15(18):3163–3168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong WL, Abraham PE, Li Z, et al. Microbial metaproteomics for characterizing the range of metabolic functions and activities of human gut microbiota. Proteomics. 2015;15(20):3424–3438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rechenberger J, Samaras P, Jarzab A, et al. Challenges in clinical metaproteomics highlighted by the analysis of acute leukemia patients with gut colonization by multidrug-resistant enterobacteriaceae. Proteomes. 2019;7(1):E2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutleben J, Chaib De Mares M, van Elsas JD, et al. The multi-omics promise in context: from sequence to microbial isolate. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2018;44(2):212–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI. Proteogenomics: concepts, applications and computational strategies. Nat Methods. 2014;11(11):1114–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taubert M, Vogt C, Wubet T, et al. Protein-SIP enables time-resolved analysis of the carbon flux in a sulfate-reducing, benzene-degrading microbial consortium. Isme J. 2012;6(12):2291–2301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberbach A, Haange S-B, Schlichting N, et al. Metabolic in vivo labeling highlights differences of metabolically active microbes from the mucosal gastrointestinal microbiome between high-fat and normal chow diet. J Proteome Res. 2017;16(4):1593–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumert C, Kalkhof S, Brocke-Heidrich K, et al. Analysis of the STAT3 interactome using in-situ biotinylation and SILAC. J Proteomics. 2013;94:370–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haange S-B, Oberbach A, Schlichting N, et al. Metaproteome analysis and molecular genetics of rat intestinal microbiota reveals section and localization resolved species distribution and enzymatic functionalities. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(11):5406–5417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar