Chilean psychologists as expert witnesses: The challenges of a new criminal justice system

References

• Ackerman , M. J. and Ackerman , M. C. 1997 . Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited) . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 28 : 137 – 145 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boletín Estadístico Ministerio Público . 2005 . Santiago de Chile: Publicación Ministerio Público Fiscalía Nacional
   Google Scholar
• Borum , R. and Grisso , T. 1996 . Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: An empirical analysis . Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law , 24 : 297 – 317 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeClue , G. 2005 . Interrogations and disputed confessions: A manual for forensic psychological practice , Sarasota, FL : Professional Resource Press .
   Google Scholar
• Grisso , T. 1986 . Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments , New York : Plenum Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson , G. H. 1996 . Psychological evidence in court: Results from the 1995 survey . The Psychologist , 5 : 213 – 217 .
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson , G. H. 2003 . The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook , Chichester, , UK : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson , G. H. and Haward , L. R.H. 1998 . Forensic psychology: A guide to practice , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Kapardis , A. 2003 . Psychology and law: A critical introduction , 2nd ed. , Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lally , S. J. 2003 . What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 34 : 491 – 498 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie , O. , Young , S. , Valentine , T. and Gudjonsson , G. 2007 . Criminal barristers' opinions and perceptions of mental health experts . Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology , 18 : 394 – 410 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod , D. and Roberts , A. 2006 . “ The admissibility of expert evidence ” . In Witness testimony: Psychological, investigative and evidential perspectives , Edited by: Heaton-Armstrong , A. , Shepherd , E. , Gudjonsson , G. H. and Wolchover , D. 401 – 423 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson , J. F. and Gudjonsson , G. H. 2004 . Forensic psychology in Iceland: A survey of members of the Icelandic Psychological Society . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology , 45 : 325 – 329 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrij , A. 2005 . Criteria-based content analysis: A quantitative review of the first 37 studies . Psychology, Public Policy and Law , 11 : 3 – 41 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar