The role of intelligence on performance on the Inventory of Legal Knowledge (ILK)

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Belfi, B., Klaver, J., Tussey, C., & Green, D. (2012, March 14). Validation of the Test of Competency Evaluation Effort (TO-CEE) within a sample of pretrial defendants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APLS Conference, Caribe Hilton, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p546488_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell, J., Heilbrun, K., & Friedman, F. (1992). Predicting who will regain trial competency: Initial promise unfulfilled. Forensic Reports, 5, 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Colwell, L., Perry, A., Wasieleski, D., & Billings, T. (2008). The Test of Malingered Incompetence (TOMI): A forced-choice instrument for assessing cognitive malingering in competence to stand trial evaluations. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 26, 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, A., Victor, T., Boone, K., & Arnold, G. (2008). The relationship of IQ to effort test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 705–722. doi:10.1080/1385404070144049310.1080/13854040701440493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusky v. United States. (1960). 362 U.S. 402.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, R. (2000). Mixed group validation: A method to address the limitations of criterion group validation in research on malingering detection. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 693–718. doi:10.1002/bsl.43210.1002/(ISSN)1099-0798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10871-000
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, C., & Otto, R. (2010). Identifying persons feigning limitations in their competence to proceed in the legal process. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 603–613. doi:10.1002/bsl.95610.1002/bsl.956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., Hale, D., & Gouvier, W. (1997). Do tests predict malingering in defendants with mental retardation? The Journal of Psychology, 131, 575–576. doi:10.1080/0022398970960354910.1080/00223989709603549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., Hale, D., & Gouvier, W. (1998). Malingering detection in a mentally retarded forensic population. Applied Neuropsychology, 5, 33–36. doi:10.1207/s15324826an0501_410.1207/s15324826an0501_4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hurley, K., & Deal, W. (2006). Assessment instruments measuring malingering used with individuals who have mental retardation: Potential problems and issues. Mental Retardation, 44, 112–119. doi:10.1352/0047-676510.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[112:AIMMUW]2.0.CO;2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lesser, F. (1990). Formulating a prediction model for regaining competency to stand trial (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International (1991-51161-001).
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, P., & Happe, M. (2007). The performance of individuals with mental retardation on cognitive tests assessing effort and motivation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 826–840. doi:10.1080/1385404060080100110.1080/13854040600801001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. (2001). Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E., & Condit, D. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exeggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section A), 24, 1094–1102. doi:10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.837910.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. (1949). The uses and usefulness of binomial probability paper. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, 174–212. doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.1048330010.1080/01621459.1949.10483300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musick, J., & Otto, R. (2010). The inventory of legal knowledge. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, R., Musick, J., & Sherrod, C. (2010). Inventory of legal knowledge professional manual. Lutz, FL: PAR.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, R., Musick, J., & Sherrod, C. (2011). Convergent validity of a screening measure designed to identify defendants feigning knowledge deficits related to competence to stand trial. Assessment, 18, 60–62. doi:10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.837910.1177/1073191110377162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelfrey, W. (2004). The relationship between malingerers’ intelligence and MMPI-2 knowledge and their ability to avoid detection. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 649–663. doi:10.1177/0306624X0426508510.1177/0306624X04265085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2000). Doing justice? Criminal offenders with developmental disabilities. Detailed research findings. Berkeley: California Policy Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (Ed.). (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shipley, W., Gruber, C., Martin, T., & Klein, M. (2009). Shipley-2 professional manual. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). New York, NY: Multi Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, B., Krupp, B., & Guilmette, T. (2003). Restoration of competency to stand trial: A training program for persons with mental retardation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 32, 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R., Rosenfeld, B., & Farkas, M. (2011). The utility of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in a sample of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Assessment, 18, 284–290. doi:10.1177/107319111140823010.1177/1073191111408230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar