The role of neurological and psychological explanations in legal judgments of psychopathic wrongdoers

References

• Anderson, N. E., & Kiehl, K. A. (2012). The psychopath magnetized: Insights from brain imaging. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 52–60.10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, L. G., Brown, T. R., & Tabery, J. (2012). The double-edged sword: Does biomechanism increase or decrease judges’ sentencing of psychopaths? Science, 337, 846–849.10.1126/science.1219569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskin, J. H., Edersheim, J. G., & Price, B. H. (2007). Is a picture worth a thousand words-neuroimaging in the courtroom. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 33, 239–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J. M., Smith, S. F., Watts, A. L., Ammirati, R., Green, S. E., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2013). Misconceptions regarding psychopathic personality: Implications for clinical practice and research. Neuropsychiatry, 3, 63–74.10.2217/npy.12.69
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2009). Descartes’ baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S. (2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science, 316, 996–997.10.1126/science.1133398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckholtz, J. W., & Faigman, D. L. (2014). Promises, promises for neuroscience and law. Current Biology, 24, R861–R867.10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, P., Lin, C. H., & Mausam, D. S. (2013). POMDP-based control of workflows for crowdsourcing. Artificial Intelligence, 202, 52–85.10.1016/j.artint.2013.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 659–683.10.1023/A:1005552203727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. (1993). 509 U.S. 579.
   Google Scholar
• Demertzi, A., Liew, C., Ledoux, D., Bruno, M. A., Sharpe, M., Laureys, S., & Zeman, A. (2009). Dualism persists in the science of mind. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1157, 1–9.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04117.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denno, D. W. (2015). Myth of the double-edged sword: An empirical study of neuroscience evidence in criminal cases. The Boston College Law Review, 56, 493–551.
   Google Scholar
• Denno, D. W. (2016). The place for neuroscience in criminal law. In D. Patterson & M. S. Pardo (Eds.), Philosophical foundations of law and neuroscience (pp. 69–83). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faigman, D. L., Monahan, J., & Slobogin, C. (2014). Group to individual (G2i) inference in scientific expert testimony. The University of Chicago Law Review, 81, 417–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., & Hook, C. J. (2013). The Seductive Allure of “Seductive Allure”. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 88–90.10.1177/1745691612469035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahany, N. A. (2016). Neuroscience and behavioral genetics in US criminal law: An empirical analysis. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2, 485–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forstmann, M., Burgmer, P., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). “The Mind Is Willing, but the Flesh Is Weak”. Psychological Science, 23, 1239–1245.10.1177/0956797612442392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Daoud, Y., & Swami, V. (2009). How to spot a psychopath. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 44, 464–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, E., & Cahill, B. S. (2012). Effects of Neuroimaging Evidence on Mock Juror Decision Making. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 280–296.10.1002/bsl.v30.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, D., & Dickerson, J. A. (2012). Persuasive images in popular science: Testing judgments of scientific reasoning and credibility. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 938–948.10.1177/0963662512454072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurley, J. R., & Marcus, D. K. (2008). The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26, 85–97.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D. (1991/2003). Manual for the psychopathy checklist-revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, N., & Kvaale, E. P. (2015). Biogenetic explanations of mental disorder. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 399–404.10.1177/0963721415588082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook, C. J., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Look again: Effects of brain images and mind–brain dualism on lay evaluations of research. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1397–1405.10.1162/jocn_a_00407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda, K., Kitagami, S., Takahashi, T., Hattori, Y., & Ito, Y. (2013). Neuroscientific information bias in metacomprehension: The effect of brain images on metacomprehension judgment of neuroscience research. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1357–1363.10.3758/s13423-013-0457-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebowitz, M. S., & Ahn, W. K. (2014). Effects of biological explanations for mental disorders on clinicians’ empathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 17786–17790.10.1073/pnas.1414058111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist, 67, 111–129.10.1037/a0023963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107, 343–352.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, R. B., Newman, E. J., Vuorre, M., Cumming, G., & Garry, M. (2013). On the (non)persuasive power of a brain image. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 720–725.10.3758/s13423-013-0391-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, S. J. (2005). Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: A diagnostic note. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 3, 397–412.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, G. D., & Munro, C. A. (2014). “Soft” versus “Hard” psychological science: Biased evaluations of scientific evidence that threatens or supports a strongly held political identity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 533–543.10.1080/01973533.2014.960080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2013). How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A review of the evidence. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 254–268.10.1177/0963662513476812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskies, A. L., Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2013). Neuroimages in court: Less biasing than feared. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 99–101.10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks, M. J., Schweitzer, N. J., Aharoni, E., & Kiehl, K. A. (2014). The impact of neuroimages in the sentencing phase of capital trials. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11, 105–131.10.1111/jels.2014.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satel, S., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2013). Brainwashed: The seductive appeal of mindless neuroscience. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, T. W., & Otten, S. (2002). Overlap of self, ingroup, and outgroup: Pictorial measures of self-categorization. Self and Identity, 1, 353–376.10.1080/152988602760328012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, N. J., Baker, D. A., & Risko, E. F. (2013). Fooled by the brain: Re-examining the influence of neuroimages. Cognition, 129, 501–511.10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2011). Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 592–607.10.1002/bsl.995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, N. J., Saks, M. J., Murphy, E. R., Roskies, A. L., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Gaudet, L. M. (2011). Neuroimages as evidence in a mens rea defense: No impact. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 357–393.10.1037/a0023581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scurich, N., & Shniderman, A. (2014). The selective allure of neuroscientific explanations. PLoS ONE, 9, e107529.10.1371/journal.pone.0107529
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1989). Implicit philosophies of mind: The dualism scale and its relation to religiosity and belief in extrasensory perception. The Journal of Psychology, 123, 5–23.10.1080/00223980.1989.10542958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Weber, R. (1982). Support for the death penalty; instrumental response to crime, or symbolic attitude? Law and Society Review, 17, 21–45.10.2307/3053531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, R. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2015). Demons are everywhere: The effects of belief in pure evil, demonization, and retribution on punishing criminal perpetrators. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 72–77.10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470–477.10.1162/jocn.2008.20040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar