Towards new learning partnerships in bilingual educational contexts – raising learner awareness and creating conditions for reciprocity and pedagogic attention

References

• Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2012). Making schools effective for all: Rethinking the task. School Leadership & Management, 32(3), 197–213.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, P. (2002). School students’ views on school councils and daily life at school. Children and Society, 14, 121–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2000.tb00160.x
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. (2008). Metacognition and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 99–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship amongst pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyse and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, R. (2003). Changing power relations in education: Kaupapa Maori messages for mainstream education in Aotearoa New Zealand. Comparative Education, 39(2), 221–238. doi:10.1080/03050060302555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnet, A. (2012). Towards and evidence base for CLIL: How to integrate qualitative and quantitative as well as process, product and participant perspectives in CLIL research. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 66–78. Retrieved from http://www.icrj.eu/14/article7.html
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W. (2005). For education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (2001). Teaching learning strategies in immersion classrooms. The ACIE Newsletter, 5(1), 1–8. (Bridge insert). Retrieved from http://www.nclrc.org/eils
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning Strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (2007). Instruction and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), The good language learner: Lessons from research (pp. 71–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (2014, August). Integrating learning strategies into the CLIL classroom. Paper presented at the Think CLIL Conference, Venice.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. (2007). Learning to learn: The impact of strategy training. ELT Journal, 61(1), 20–29. doi:10.1093/elt/ccl041
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. J., Emanuelsson, J., Jablonka, E., & Mok, I. A. C. (2006). The learners’ perspective study and international comparisons of classroom practice (Chapter 1). In D. J. Clarke, J. Emanuelsson, E. Jablonka, & I. A. Mok (Eds.), Making connections, comparing mathematics around the world (pp. 1–22). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research knowledge. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language (1st ed.). Essex: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.). Essex: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Change based on what students say: Preparing teachers for a more paradoxical model of leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9, 345–358. doi: 10.1080/13603120600895437
   Google Scholar
• Coonan, C. M. (2007). Insider view of the CLIL class through teacher self-observation-introspection. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 625–646. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/beb463.0
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2010). Language pedagogies revisited: Alternative approaches for integrating language learning, language using and intercultural understanding. In J. Miller, A. Kostogriz, & M. Gearon (Eds.), Culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: New dilemmas for teachers (pp. 172–195). Ontario: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2011a). Post-method pedagogies: Using a second or other language as a learning tool in CLIL settings. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, & F. Gallardo del Puerto (Eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts (pp. 75–101). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2011b). ITALIC – investigating student gains: Content and language integrated learning. University of Aberdeen. Retrieved from http://www.abdn.ac.uk/italic/documents/ITALIC_Report__Complete_Version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2013). Listening to learners: An investigation into ‘successful learning’ across CLIL contexts. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 244–266. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2014). Motivating learners and teachers as researchers. In D. Lasagabaster, A. Doiz, & J. M. Sierra (Eds.), Motivation and foreign language learning: From theory to practice (pp. 51–69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2005). Using information technology to create a zone of proximal development for academic language learning. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Information technology and innovation in language education (pp. 105–126). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). Content and language-integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46(4), 545–559. doi:10.1017/S0261444813000256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. D. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–299. doi: 10.17763/haer.58.3.c43481778r528qw4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erler, L. (2002). Reading in a foreign language: Near-beginner adolescents’ experiences of French in English secondary schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). Learning languages and something else. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/languages/news/20100809-learning-languages-and-something-else_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Council regulation (EU) No 390/2014 of 14 April 2014 establishing the ‘Europe for Citizens’ programme for the period 2014–2020 ‘Europe for Citizens’ programme 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 European Commission (2004) Promoting language learning and language diversity. An action plan 2004–2006. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/citizenship/europe-for-citizens-programme/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice investigating the involvement of learners in research in their own learning. Theoretical underpinnings and recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 259–311. doi: 10.1080/0141192042000195236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2013). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Langworthy, A. (2014). Rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. (2006). Conceptualising goodies and baddies through narratives of Jesus and superman. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(2), 97–108. doi: 10.2304/ciec.2006.7.2.97
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, C. (2003). Language learning strategy use and proficiency: The relationship between patterns of reported language learning strategy use (LLS) by speakers of other languages (SOL) and proficiency with implications for the teaching/learning situation (PhD thesis). New Zealand: University of Auckland. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2292/9
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, C., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, 43, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, P. Y., Hu, G., & Zhang, L. J. (2005). Investigating language learner strategies among lower primary school pupils in Singapore. Language and Education, 19(4), 281–303. doi:10.1080/09500780508668682
   Google Scholar
• Gunning, B., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). Children's learning strategy use and the effects of strategy instruction on success in learning ESL in Canada. System, 43, 82–100. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K. D. (2013). Forward. In K. Hall, T. Cremin, B. Comber, & L. Moll (Eds.), International handbook on research on children's literacy, learning and culture (pp. xxix–xxxvii). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hallet, W. (2012). Semiotic translation and literacy learning in CLIL. In D. Marsh & O. Meyer (Eds.), Quality interfaces: Examining evidence & exploring solutions in CLIL (pp. 175–190). Eichstaett: Eichstaett Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holdsworth, R., & Thomson, P. (2002). Options within the regulation and containment of ‘student voice’. Student Voice Symposium, American Education Research Association, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73–85. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00051-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. (2011). Collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) for teachers in Scotland: Aspirations, opportunities and barriers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 25–41. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2010.534980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2011). Classroom observation: Desirable conditions established by teacher. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 449–463. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2011.587113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learning Futures. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.innovationunit.org/sites/default/files/Learning%20_Futures_Engaging_Schools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. R. (2007). Strategy awareness-raising for success: Reading strategy instruction in the EFL context (PhD thesis). College Park, MD: University of Maryland. Retrieved from http://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/6859.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154. doi:10.1177/0022487108330245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A., & Porter, J. (2007). Research and pupil voice. In L. Florian (Ed.), Handbook of special education (pp. 22–232). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (1999). Developing learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: A social-interactive view of learning and three fundamental pedagogical principles. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 38, 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W., & Horn, I. S. (2007). Normalizing problems of practice. In L. Stoll & K. S. Lewis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depths and dilemmas (pp. 179–172). London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2010). The roles of languages in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in second and foreign language classrooms. Continuum: London.
   Google Scholar
• Macaro, E., & Erler, L. (2008). Raising the achievement of young-beginner readers of French through strategy instruction. Applied Linguistics, 29, 90–119. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, K. (1994). Inspection, verbal reports and second language learning strategy research. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(2), 363–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 357–382. doi: 10.1080/03057640500319065
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, O. (2010). Towards quality CLIL. Pulso: Revista de Educación, 33, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, A. (2007). Using video-stimulated recall to understands young children's perceptions of learning in the classroom settings. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(2), 213–226. doi: 10.1080/13502930701320933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Wells: Open Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 76–91. doi:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., & de Royston, M. M. (2013). Power identity and mathematical practices outside and inside school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 264–287. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naughton, D. (2006). Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 169–184. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. (2003). Diary writing as a process: Simple, useful, powerful. Guidelines, 25(2), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddock, J., & Flutter, J. (2000). Pupil participation and the pupil perspective: ‘Carving a new order of experience’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89. doi:10.1080/03057640050005780
   Google Scholar
• Ruddock, J., & McIntyre, D. (2007). Improving learning through consulting pupils. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Lasagabaster, D. (2010). CLIL in a bilingual community: The Basque autonomous community. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 12–19). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Zenotz, V. (2014). Strategic instruction in primary education: A pathway to successful learning in content-based contexts. In R. Breeze, C. Llamas, C. Martínez, & C. Tabernero (Eds.), Integration of theory and practice of CLIL (pp. 37–54). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Zenotz, V. (in press). Reading strategies and CLIL: The effect of training in formal instruction. Language Learning Journal, 43(3).
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Tough, P. (2012). How children success: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2015, January). The second UNESCO Forum on global citizenship education: Building peaceful and sustainable societies, Paris, UNESCO. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. Applied Linguistics and Language Study Series. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2003). From prediction through reflection: Guiding students through the process of L2 listening. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(3), 425–440. doi:10.3138/cmlr.59.3.425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer, H. J. (2008). Constructing tasks for content and language integrated learning and assessment. In J. Eckerth & S. Siekmann (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching. Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 227–290). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Walshaw, M. (2011). Identity as the cornerstone of quality and equitable mathematical experiences. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 91–104). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2009). The meaning makers: Learning to talk and talking to learn. Ontario: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesemes, R. (2007). Developing an expanded methodology for CLIL classroom research: CLIL classroom case studies. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts converging goals CLIL in Europe (pp. 145–152). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why? Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1311–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, D. (2011). CLIL and learner autonomy: Relating two educational concepts. Education et Sociétés Plurilingues, 30, 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Zenotz, V. (2012). Awareness development for online reading. Language Awareness, 21, 85–100. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2011.639893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar