Cross-linguistic influences, language proficiency and metalinguistic knowledge in L3 Italian subject placement

References

• Angelovska, T. (2017). (When) do L3 English learners transfer from L2 German? Evidence from spoken and written data by L1 Russian speakers. In T. Angelovska & A. Hahn (Eds.), L3 syntactic transfer: Models, new developments and implications (pp. 195–222). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Angelovska, T. (2018). Cross-linguistic awareness of adult L3 learners of English: A focus on metalinguistic reflections and proficiency. Language Awareness, 27(1–2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1431243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelovska, T., & Hahn, A. (2017). L3 syntactic transfer: Models, new developments and implications. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307080557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). The L2 status factor and the declarative/procedural distinction. In J. C. Amaro, S. Flynn, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 61–78). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bardel, C., & Sánchez, L. (2017). The L2 status factor hypothesis revisited: The role of metalinguistic knowledge, working memory, attention and noticing in third language learning. In T. Angelovska & A. Hahn (Eds.), L3 syntactic transfer: Models, new developments and implications (pp. 85–102). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J. (2001). The effect of linguistic distance, L2 status and age on cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 8–20). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, V., & Wei, L. (2016). The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., & Scott, R. (2005). Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung, 69(5–6), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0208-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, Y., Lindqvist, C., & Bardel, C. (2015). The role of L1 explicit metalinguistic knowledge in L3 oral production at the initial state. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festman, J. (2018). The psycholinguistics of multilingualism. In D. Singleton, & L. Aronin (Eds.), Twelve lectures on multilingualism (pp. 233–267). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710408668175
   Google Scholar
• Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., Park, J.-H., Gass, S., & Ellis, R. (2015). Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 423–449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hermas, A. (2010). Language acquisition as computational resetting: Verb movement in L3 initial state. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(4), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2010.487941
   Google Scholar
• Hermas, A. (2014). Multilingual transfer: L1 morphosyntax in L3 English. International Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Imaz Agirre, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2017). Transfer effects in the acquisition of double object constructions in English as an L3. In T. Angelovska & A. Hahn (Eds.), L3 syntactic transfer: Models, new developments and implications (pp. 143–172). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S., & Odlin, T. (2000). Morphological type, spatial reference, and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004034
   Google Scholar
• Jessner, U. (2008). Teaching third languages: Findings, trends and challenges. Language Teaching, 41(1), 15–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004739.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, F. (2009). Third language acquisition of Norwegian objects: Interlanguage transfer or L1 influence? In Y-K. I. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and universal grammar (pp. 144–161). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Kobosko, W., & Otwinowska, A. (2017). Metalinguistic awareness and cross-linguistic differences in learning L3: what eliminates transfer? Presentation at ISB11, June 2016, University of Limerick, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bice, K., & Perrotti, L. (2015). Bilingualism, mind, and brain. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., Stafford, C. A., & Sanz, C. (2014). A fine-grained analysis of the effects of negative evidence with and without metalinguistic information in language development. Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813510382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, Y-K. I. (2005). L2 vs. L3 initial state: A comparative study of the acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese monolinguals and Cantonese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904002044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages (1st ed.). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008
   Google Scholar
• Polinsky, M., & Scontras, G. (2020). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63(3), 595–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehr-Brackin, K. (2018). Metalinguistic awareness and second language acquisition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (2009). Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 951–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310386439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300059X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research, 26(2), 189–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309349410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, L., & Bardel, C. (2017). Transfer from an L2 in third language learning. In T. Angelovska & A. Hahn (Eds.), L3 syntactic transfer: Models, new developments and implications (pp. 223–252). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sharwood Smith, M. (2007). Morphological and syntactic awareness in foreign/second language learning. In J. Cenoz, & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 179–192). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Slabakova, R. (2017). The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916655413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slabakova, R., & García Mayo, M P. (2017). Testing the current models of third language acquisition. In T. Angelovska & A. Hahn (Eds.), L3 syntactic transfer: Models, new developments and implications (pp. 63–84). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Società Dante Alighieri. (2018). PLIDA, Test di ingresso. Certificazione di competenza della lingua italiana livello B1.
   Google Scholar
• Sorace, A. (2016). Referring expressions and executive functions in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(5), 669–684. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15055.sor.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachisnke, I. (2017). Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 59–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhove, J. (2019). Metalinguistic knowledge about the native language and language transfer in gender assignment. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 397–419. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.2.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The linguistic proximity model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916648859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar